Q.Prove that the greatest integer function defined by f(x)=[x], 0<x<3, is not differentiable at x=1 and x=2.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Greatest Integer Continuity
Continuity of the Greatest Integer Function
The greatest integer function f(x)=⌊x⌋ returns the largest integer not exceeding x: ⌊2.3⌋=2, ⌊−1.2⌋=−2, ⌊4⌋=4. Its graph is a staircase — flat segments that jump up by 1 at every integer.
The intuition
Walk along the graph from left to right. Near a non-integer such as x=1.5 the function is flat at 1; nudge x a little either way and the value does not change, so nothing is broken there. But as you approach an integer like x=2 from the left the value is stuck at 1, and the instant you reach x=2 it leaps to 2. That sudden leap is a break.
⌊x⌋ is continuous at every non-integer and discontinuous at every integer.
Why integers fail
At an integer n the one-sided limits disagree:
limx→n−⌊x⌋=n−1,limx→n+⌊x⌋=n,⌊n⌋=n.
Since the left- and right-hand limits differ, limx→n⌊x⌋ does not exist, so continuity fails. This is a jump discontinuity, and the jump is always exactly 1. At a non-integer c there is a whole small interval on which f is constant equal to ⌊c⌋, so the limit exists and matches f(c) — the function is continuous.
How to test it …
A function that is not continuous at a point cannot be differentiable there. The greatest integer function f(x)=[x] jumps at each integer.
At x=1: limx→1−[x]=0 but limx→1+[x]=1, so the limit does not exist and f is discontinuous — hence not differentiable. Checking derivatives with f(1)=1: the right-hand derivative limh→0+h[1+h]−1=limh→0+h0=0, while the left-hand derivative limh→0−h[1+h]−1=limh→0−h−1→+∞; the …
[x] has a jump at each integer, so it is discontinuous — and therefore not differentiable — at x=1 and x=2; the one-sided derivatives there also disagree.
On 0<x<3 the greatest integer function is a staircase: [x]=0 on (0,1), [x]=1 on [1,2), [x]=2 on [2,3). Differentiability requires continuity first, and where the graph jumps it cannot be continuous.
Discontinuity forces non-differentiability at x=1
Left: for x just below 1, [x]=0, so limx→1−[x]=0.
Right: for x just above 1, [x]=1, so limx→1+[x]=1.
The one-sided limits differ, so limx→1[x] does not exist — f is discontinuous, hence not differentiable at x=1.
Confirm with the derivative definition at x=1
Using f(1)=[1]=1:
f+′(1)=limh→0+h[1+h]−1=limh→0+h1−1=0,
f−′(1)=limh→0−h[1+h]−1=limh→0−h0−1=limh→0−h−1→+∞.
The right-hand derivative is 0 and the left-hand derivative diverges, so they are unequal — f′(1) does not exist. …
Method: Showing Non-Differentiability at a Jump Discontinuity
Use this method for functions like the greatest integer (floor) function that jump abruptly at certain points — this route is shorter than the corner-point method above because differentiability can be ruled out immediately once a jump is shown.
Steps
Step 1: Recall that differentiability requires continuity first
If a function is not even continuous at a point, it cannot be differentiable there — there is no need to compute a derivative limit at all. This shortcut saves work whenever a jump can be shown directly.
Step 2: Compute the left-hand and right-hand limits of the function itself (not yet the derivative) at the point in question
For the greatest integer function [x] at an integer n, evaluate [x] for x slightly less than n and slightly greater than n separately.
Step 3: Compare the two one-sided limits to the function's actual value
If limx→n−f(x)=limx→n+f(x), the two-sided limit does not exist, so f is discontinuous at n — and, by Step 1's logic, therefore automatically not differentiable there. …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Trying to prove non-differentiability directly from the derivative limit without first checking continuity
Why it's wrong: it's more work, and easy to make sign errors, to jump straight into computing limh→0h[n+h]−n from both sides without first noticing the simpler fact that [x] isn't even continuous at n. Correct approach: always check continuity first at a suspected trouble point — if it fails, non-differentiability follows immediately and no derivative computation is required.
Mistake 2: Evaluating [1+h] or [2+h] incorrectly for negative h
Why it's wrong: for h a small negative number, 1+h is just below 1 (e.g. 0.99), so [1+h]=0, not 1 — students sometimes assume the floor value doesn't change until h crosses a whole unit. Correct approach: pick a concrete small value (like h=−0.01) and evaluate [1+h] numerically before generalizing. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-FN1 markMCQQ.[x] represent greatest integer function. The difference of the maximum and minimum values of the function f(x)=sin2[x]π+cos2[x]π is (A) 0 (B) 1 (C) 2 (D) 4
›Reveal solutionSolution
Writing n=[x] reduces the function to sin(nπ/2)+1 for integer n; since sin(nπ/2) only ever takes the values −1,0,1, the function's range is {0,1,2}, giving a max−min difference of 2.
Concept and Intuition
Since [x] (the greatest integer function) only ever outputs integers, we can replace [x] by an integer variable n and analyze the resulting discrete-valued function directly, rather than treating x as continuous.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let n=[x]∈Z. Then f(x)=sin(2nπ)+cos(2nπ).
- Since n is an integer, 2nπ is an integer multiple of 2π, so cos(2nπ)=1 always.
- So f=sin(2nπ)+1.
- Evaluate sin(nπ/2) for consecutive integers (period 4): n=0⇒0; n=1⇒1; n=2⇒0; n=3⇒−1; then it repeats.
- So sin(nπ/2)∈{−1,0,1} for all integers n, hence f=sin(nπ/2)+1∈{0,1,2}. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-AN1 markMCQQ.[x] denotes integral part of x. For n∈N, if f(x)=⎩⎨⎧[∣x∣[∣x∣1]],0,for ∣x∣=n1for ∣x∣=n1, then for ∣x∣=n1, f(x)= (A) 0 (B) 1 (C) n1 (D) n
›Reveal solutionSolution
For any x with ∣x∣=1/n, the quantity [∣x∣[1/∣x∣]] always simplifies to 0 — a classic floor-function identity. Answer: (A) 0.
Concept and Intuition
This is testing the identity [t[1/t]]=0 for all t>0 not of the form 1/n. The intuition: [1/t] is the largest integer n with n≤1/t (loosely), so nt≤1, and as long as t isn't exactly 1/n, the product nt stays strictly below 1 — never reaching the next integer — so its floor is always 0.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let t=∣x∣>0, and suppose t=1/n for every positive integer n.
- Case t≥1: Then 0<1/t≤1. Since t=1 (which would be 1/n with n=1), we actually have 1/t<1, so [1/t]=0. Hence t⋅[1/t]=0 and [t[1/t]]=0.
- Case 0<t<1: Then 1/t>1. Let n=[1/t], an integer ≥1. By definition of floor, n≤1/t<n+1. Since t=1/n, the equality n=1/t cannot hold, so strictly n<1/t<n+1.
- Multiplying through by t>0: nt<1<(n+1)t. In particular 0<nt<1 (since nt>0 trivially and nt<1 from the left inequality). …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-FN1 markMCQQ.If n→5−lim(2[n])3−(24[n]3)=k, then n→k+lim(2[n])3−(24[n]3)= (here [n] denotes the greatest integer function) (A) k+1 (B) k−1 (C) k+2 (D) k
›Reveal solutionSolution
Both one-sided limits land on integer values where [n]=4 throughout the punctured neighbourhood, so both expressions evaluate to the same number 4; the second limit equals k.
Concept and Intuition
The greatest-integer function [n] is constant on any half-open interval that avoids an integer boundary. As n→5−, for n slightly less than 5 (e.g. 4.9), [n]=4 throughout that neighbourhood, so the limit is just the function evaluated at [n]=4. Similarly for n→4+ (e.g. 4.1), [n]=4 throughout.
Step-by-Step Solution
- As n→5−: for n in (4,5), [n]=4. So
limn→5−(2[n])3−24[n]3=(24)3−1643=8−4=4.
So k=4.
2. Now find n→k+lim(2[n])3−24[n]3=n→4+lim(⋯). …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-FN1 markMCQQ.Let [y] represent the greatest integer less than or equal to y. Then set of all x at which f(x)=Cos−1[4x+3] is differentiable is (A) R (B) [−1,1] (C) [−1,−41)−{−43,−21} (D) (−43,∞)
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests domain + continuity of a composition with the greatest-integer function.
The domain of cos−1 forces [4x+3]∈{−1,0,1}, giving x∈[−1,−1/4); the
function is differentiable there except at the two points where the floor jumps.
Concept and Intuition
[y] denotes the greatest integer ≤y (the floor function) — it is an integer-valued
step function, constant on each interval [n,n+1) and jumping by 1 at every integer.
cos−1(t) needs t∈[−1,1]. So for f(x)=cos−1[4x+3] to even be defined,
the integer [4x+3] must lie in {−1,0,1} (the only integers in [−1,1]).
Differentiability requires first continuity — and a step function composed with a
continuous one is continuous only where the step itself doesn't jump.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Domain from [4x+3]=−1: −1≤4x+3<0⇒−4≤4x<−3⇒x∈[−1,−3/4).
- Domain from [4x+3]=0: 0≤4x+3<1⇒−3≤4x<−2⇒x∈[−3/4,−1/2).
- Domain from [4x+3]=1: 1≤4x+3<2⇒−2≤4x<−1⇒x∈[−1/2,−1/4).
- Union of all three: x∈[−1,−1/4) — this is the full domain of f.
- On [−1,−3/4), f(x)=cos−1(−1)=π (constant); on [−3/4,−1/2), f(x)=cos−1(0)=π/2 (constant); on [−1/2,−1/4), f(x)=cos−1(1)=0 (constant).
- At x=−3/4: f jumps from π to π/2 — discontinuous, so not differentiable. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-14-AN1 markMCQQ.The number of points of discontinuity of the function f(x)=[x]+∣x−2∣, −3<x<3 is (A) 5 (B) 3 (C) 4 (D) 2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Only the floor function contributes discontinuities (the absolute-value term is continuous everywhere); counting the integers strictly inside (−3,3) gives 5 points.
Concept and Intuition
A sum of functions is discontinuous exactly where at least one summand is discontinuous, unless the jumps happen to cancel exactly. Here ∣x−2∣ is continuous for all real x (it has a corner at x=2, but no jump), while [x] (the greatest integer / floor function) jumps by exactly 1 at every integer. Since ∣x−2∣ contributes no jump anywhere, none of the floor function's jumps can be cancelled, so the discontinuities of f are precisely the integers in the domain.
Step-by-Step Solution
- ∣x−2∣ is continuous for every real x (piecewise linear, no jump, only a kink at x=2).
- [x] (floor) is discontinuous at every integer n: as x→n−, [x]→n−1, but [n]=n — a jump of size 1.
- Since f(x)=[x]+∣x−2∣ and the second term never jumps, f is discontinuous at exactly the same points as [x], i.e. at every integer in the domain.
- List the integers strictly between −3 and 3: −2,−1,0,1,2 — that's 5 integers. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-22-AN1 markMCQQ.[x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x. If {x}=x−[x] and x→0−lim2−{x}Sin−1(x+[x])=θ, then sinθ+cosθ= (A) -1 (B) 0 (C) 1 (D) 2
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests reading the floor and fractional-part functions correctly on the left of 0. Evaluating the limit gives θ=−2π, so sinθ+cosθ=−1.
Concept and Intuition
For x approaching 0 from the left, x stays in (−1,0), so the greatest integer function [x] is constant at −1 throughout this approach (it does not vary continuously — it only "jumps" at integers). Similarly {x}=x−[x]=x+1 tends to 1 as x→0−. Substituting these constants turns the seemingly complicated limit into a simple evaluation.
Step-by-Step Solution
- For x∈(−1,0) (which covers x→0−): [x]=−1.
- So x+[x]=x−1. As x→0−, x−1→−1.
- Also {x}=x−[x]=x+1. As x→0−, {x}→1.
- Substitute into the limit: θ=limx→0−2−{x}sin−1(x+[x])=2−1sin−1(−1)=1−π/2=−2π …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-22-AN1 markMCQQ.Let f:R→R be defined by f(x)=⎩⎨⎧a−x−1sin[x−1]1b−[([x−1])3sin[x−1]−[x−1]]if x>1if x=1if x<1 where [t] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to t. If f is continuous at x=1, then a+b= (A) 0 (B) 1 (C) 2 (D) 3
›Reveal solutionSolution
Evaluating the two one-sided limits (each becomes a constant, thanks to the floor function freezing [x−1] near x=1) and matching them to f(1)=1 gives a=1, b=0, so a+b=1.
Concept and Intuition
The trick with [x−1] (greatest integer of x−1) is that for x in a punctured neighbourhood of 1 (excluding 1 itself), x−1 never actually reaches an integer boundary except right at x=1 — so [x−1] is genuinely constant just to the right of 1 (equal to 0, since 0<x−1<1) and constant just to the left of 1 (equal to −1, since −1<x−1<0). This turns each piece of f into an ordinary constant near x=1, and continuity just becomes matching these constants (and the outer floor bracket) to f(1)=1.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Right-hand limit (x→1+): for x slightly greater than 1, x−1∈(0,1), so [x−1]=0.
f(x)=a−x−1sin[x−1]=a−x−1sin0=a−0=a
So x→1+limf(x)=a.
- Left-hand limit (x→1−): for x slightly less than 1, x−1∈(−1,0), so [x−1]=−1 throughout this range.
sin[x−1]−[x−1]=sin(−1)−(−1)=1−sin1
([x−1])3=(−1)3=−1
([x−1])3sin[x−1]−[x−1]=−11−sin1=sin1−1
Since sin1≈0.8415, this equals ≈−0.1585, a constant strictly between −1 and 0, so its greatest integer (the outer [ ⋅ ]) is −1:
f(x)=b−[sin1−1]=b−(−1)=b+1 …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-23-AN1 markMCQQ.[ t ] denotes the greatest integer function and [t−m]=[t]−m when m∈Z. If k=2[2x−1]−1 and 3[2x−2]+1=2[2x−1]−1 then the range of f(x)=[k+5x] is (A) {7,8,9} (B) {4,5,6} (C) {5,6,7} (D) {6,7,8}
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests the property [t−m]=[t]−m for integer m, used to pin down x from a floor-function equation, then reading off the range of another floor function over that interval. The answer is {6,7,8}.
Concept and Intuition
The greatest integer function [t] only changes as t crosses an integer. When you subtract an integer m from t, the floor just shifts by that integer: [t−m]=[t]−m. This lets every floor expression in the problem be rewritten in terms of a single unknown integer, n=[2x], turning a floor equation into an ordinary integer equation.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let n=[2x]. Using [t−m]=[t]−m with t=2x: [2x−1]=[2x]−1=n−1, and [2x−2]=[2x]−2=n−2.
- Substitute into 3[2x−2]+1=2[2x−1]−1:
3(n−2)+1=2(n−1)−1⟹3n−5=2n−3⟹n=2.
- So [2x]=2, i.e. 2≤2x<3, i.e. x∈[1,1.5).
- Compute k=2[2x−1]−1=2(n−1)−1=2(1)−1=1.
- Now f(x)=[k+5x]=[1+5x] for x∈[1,1.5). As x increases continuously from 1 to just under 1.5, 1+5x increases continuously from 6 to just under 8.5. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-24-FN1 markMCQQ.[x] represents the greatest integer function. If x→0+limx2cos[x]−cos(kx−[x])=5 then k= (A) 10 (B) 11 (C) 3 (D) 9
›Reveal solutionSolution
Tests the greatest-integer function combined with a standard 1−cos small-angle limit; the answer is k=10.
Concept and Intuition
The greatest integer function [x] is locally constant near any non-integer point. As x→0+ (approaching 0 from the right, through small positive values less than 1), [x]=0 throughout — this is the key simplification that turns an odd-looking limit into a familiar one. Once [x] is replaced by 0, the limit is just the classical limθ→0θ21−cosθ=21 in disguise.
Step-by-Step Solution
- For 0<x<1, [x]=0. So cos[x]=cos0=1, and cos(kx−[x])=cos(kx−0)=cos(kx).
- The limit becomes x→0+limx21−cos(kx).
- Use the standard expansion 1−cosθ=2sin2(θ/2)≈2θ2 for small θ, with θ=kx: x21−cos(kx)→x2k2x2/2=2k2. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-26-AN1 markMCQQ.If a real valued function f(x)=⎩⎨⎧log(1+[x]),sin−1[x],k([x]+∣x∣),x≥0−1≤x<0x<−1 is continuous at x=−1, then k= (A) −π/2 (B) −π (C) π (D) π/2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Match the left-hand limit (from the x<−1 piece) to the function's actual value at x=−1 (from the −1≤x<0 piece). Answer: k=π/2.
Concept and Intuition
x=−1 belongs to the domain "−1≤x<0" of the function's definition, so f(−1) is computed from that piece. Continuity at x=−1 then requires the limit from the left (using the "x<−1" piece, which is the only piece active for x just below −1) to equal this value f(−1).
Step-by-Step Solution
- f(−1)=sin−1([−1])=sin−1(−1)=−2π (using the −1≤x<0 branch, since −1 satisfies −1≤−1<0).
- For x→−1− (i.e. x slightly less than −1, so x<−1), use the third branch k([x]+∣x∣).
- For such x (e.g. x=−1−ϵ, small ϵ>0): [x]=⌊−1−ϵ⌋=−2, and ∣x∣=1+ϵ→1.
- So x→−1−limk([x]+∣x∣)=k(−2+1)=−k. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-26-FN1 markMCQQ.If a real valued function f(x)=⎩⎨⎧ex−[x]sina(x−[x]),b+1,x−1∣x2+x−2∣,if x<1if x=1if x>1 is continuous at x=1, then bsina= ([x] denotes the greatest integer function) (A) 6 (B) 4 (C) loge9 (D) loge2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Tests continuity of a piecewise function using the greatest-integer function; matching the three one-sided values at x=1 gives bsina=loge9.
Concept and Intuition
Continuity at a point where a function is defined piecewise means the left-hand limit, the right-hand limit, and the value at the point must all agree. Since [x] (the greatest integer function) only changes value at integers, for x just below 1 (i.e. 0<x<1) we have [x]=0, so the messy exponent simplifies a lot.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Left-hand limit (x→1−): for x slightly less than 1, [x]=0, so x−[x]=x. Thus
limx→1−ex−[x]sin(a(x−[x]))=limx→1−exsin(ax)=esina.
- Value at x=1: f(1)=b+1.
- Right-hand limit (x→1+): x2+x−2=(x−1)(x+2). For x>1, x−1>0 and x+2>0, so ∣x2+x−2∣=(x−1)(x+2), giving
f(x)=x−1(x−1)(x+2)=x+2⇒limx→1+f(x)=3.
- Match all three: esina=b+1=3. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-27-FN1 markMCQQ.Let [x] denote the greatest integer less than or equal to x. Then x→2+lim(3[x]3−[3x]3)= (A) 0 (B) 38 (C) 2764 (D) 31
›Reveal solutionSolution
Evaluate the two floor functions just to the right of x=2: [x]=2 and [x/3]=0. Answer: 38.
Concept and Intuition
The greatest-integer function [x] is constant on each interval [n,n+1), so a one-sided limit "at" an integer just means evaluating [x] on the corresponding half-open interval immediately next to that integer, not at the integer's own possibly-different value on the other side.
Step-by-Step Solution
- As x→2+, x ranges just above 2, i.e. x∈(2,2+ε)⊂[2,3), so [x]=2.
- For this same range, 3x∈(32,32+ε), which lies inside [0,1) since 32+ε<1 for small ε. So [3x]=0.
- Substitute: 3[x]3−[3x]3=323−03=38−0=38.
- Since this value is constant for all x in a right-neighbourhood of 2, the limit equals 38.
Common Mistakes …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.