Q.Find dxdy in the following: ex,x>0
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Chain Rule
The Chain Rule: Why It Makes Sense
Imagine you're assembling a toy. First you put part A into part B, then you put that combined piece into part C. The final toy's position depends on how you moved A, which then affected B, which then affected C. That's exactly what the chain rule captures — how a change in the first variable ripples through a sequence of functions to affect the final output.
Let's make this concrete. Suppose you have a function f that depends on g, and g itself depends on x:
y=f(g(x))
You want to know: if x changes by a tiny amount, how much does y change? The answer isn't just f′(g(x)) — because g(x) itself changes when x changes. You have to multiply the two rates:
- How fast does g change with respect to x? That's g′(x).
- How fast does f change with respect to its input g? That's f′(g(x)).
The total effect is the product:
dxdy=f′(g(x))⋅g′(x)
In Leibniz notation, this looks even more natural: dxdy=dudy⋅dxdu, where u=g(x). The du's "cancel" like fractions — though this is just a helpful memory aid, not a rigorous proof.
The Precise Statement
Chain Rule (single variable): If g is differentiable at x and f is differentiable at g(x), then the composite function h(x)=f(g(x)) is differentiable at x, and
h′(x)=f′(g(x))⋅g′(x)
That's it. One multiplication. But the power is enormous — it lets you differentiate almost any nested function.
A Simple Example
Differentiate h(x)=sin(3x2).
Here f(u)=sinu and g(x)=3x2. Then:
- f′(u)=cosu, so f′(g(x))=cos(3x2)
- g′(x)=6x
Multiply: h′(x)=cos(3x2)⋅6x=6xcos(3x2)
The most common mistake is forgetting to multiply by the inner derivative. Students often write dxdsin(3x2)=cos(3x2) and stop — that's wrong. The chain rule demands you also multiply by 6x.
Why It's Called a "Chain"
Think of a chain of links: x→g→f. Each link has its own rate of change. To find the total rate from x to f, you multiply the rates of each link. If you had three functions — say h(x)=f(g(k(x))) — you'd multiply three derivatives: …
We are differentiating y=ex. First, rewrite the square root as a power:
y=(ex)1/2=e21x
Now apply the chain rule. The outermost function is eu with u=21x.
Step 1: Differentiate the outer exponential: dudy=e21x.
Step 2: Differentiate u=21x1/2: dxdu=21⋅21x−1/2=4x1. …
Use the Chain Rule repeatedly on the nested functions: differentiate the outer square root, then the exponential, then the inner square root. The derivative is 4xex/2.
We have y=ex. This is a composition of three functions: an outer square root, a middle exponential, and an inner square root. The Chain Rule says: differentiate from the outside in, multiplying by the derivative of each inner function.
Let’s rewrite the expression to make the nesting clear:
y=(ex1/2)1/2=e21x1/2
But it’s safer to keep the original form and apply the chain rule stepwise.
-
Outer function: square root
Write y=u where u=ex.
The derivative of u with respect to u is 2u1.
So dudy=2u1=2ex1.
-
Middle function: exponential
Now u=ev where v=x.
The derivative of ev with respect to v is ev=ex.
So dvdu=ex.
-
Inner function: square root
Finally v=x=x1/2.
Its derivative with respect to x is dxdv=2x1.
-
Multiply the chain
By the Chain Rule:
dxdy=dudy⋅dvdu⋅dxdv
Substitute each piece:
dxdy=2ex1⋅ex⋅2x1
- Simplify Combine the constants: 21⋅21=41. The exponential part: exex=ex−21x=e21x. So we get: …
Method: Rewrite Nested Radicals/Exponentials as a Single Exponent Before Differentiating
Use this whenever a function stacks a radical on top of an exponential on top of another radical (or similar nested roots/powers) — rewriting in exponent form usually collapses several layers into one.
Steps
Step 1: Rewrite every radical as a fractional power
ex=(ex)1/2=e21x=e21x1/2
Combining the outer 21 power with the exponential's exponent is the key simplification — it turns a three-layer nested function into a single exponential with a two-layer exponent.
Step 2: Differentiate the now-single exponential using the chain rule
For y=ef(x), dxdy=ef(x)⋅f′(x), where here f(x)=21x1/2.
Step 3: Differentiate the exponent f(x) itself using the power rule …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Differentiating each nested layer separately instead of combining exponents first
Why it's wrong: it's not mathematically incorrect to chain through square-root, then exponential, then square-root again, but it triples the chances of an algebra slip compared to combining the exponents first. Correct approach: always rewrite nested radicals/exponentials as a single power/exponent before differentiating, when possible.
Mistake 2: Forgetting the extra 21 factor from the outer square root …
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-23-AN1 markMCQQ.If y=coshx+coshx, then dxdy= (A) 4y(y2+coshx)sinhx(2y2+2coshx+1) (B) 4y(y2−coshx)sinhx(2y2−2coshx−1) (C) 4ycoshxsinhx(1−2coshx) (D) 4ycoshxsinhx(1+2coshx)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Square both sides to remove the outer root, differentiate implicitly, then
tidy the resulting fraction — the answer comes out directly in terms of y
and coshx, matching option (D).
Concept and Intuition
When y is defined as a nested square root, it's usually easier to square first
(y2= the inside) and differentiate implicitly rather than applying the chain
rule twice directly to the nested radical — this avoids stacking two
2⋅1 factors and keeps the algebra manageable.
Step-by-Step Solution
- y=coshx+coshx ⇒ y2=coshx+coshx.
- Differentiate both sides w.r.t. x: 2ydxdy=sinhx+2coshx1⋅sinhx=sinhx(1+2coshx1).
- Combine the bracket over a common denominator: 1+2coshx1=2coshx2coshx+1.
- So 2yy′=2coshxsinhx(2coshx+1). …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-23-AN1 markMCQQ.If y=Tan−1x2−1+Sinh−1x2−1, x>1, then dxdy= (A) xx2−11 (B) xx2−1x+1 (C) x2x2−1x+1 (D) x2−1x
›Reveal solutionSolution
Both inverse-function derivatives share the same inner derivative
u′=x/x2−1; the 1+u2 under Tan−1 and 1+u2 under
Sinh−1 both simplify beautifully because u2=x2−1, so 1+u2=x2.
Concept and Intuition
Both Tan−1 and Sinh−1 have derivative formulas built around
1+u2 (as 1+u21 and 1+u21 respectively). Here
u=x2−1 makes 1+u2=x2 exactly, a clean perfect square — this is why
the two inverse functions are paired together in the problem, since they
combine so tidily.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let u=x2−1. Then u′=x2−1x and 1+u2=1+(x2−1)=x2.
- dxdTan−1u=1+u2u′=x2x/x2−1=xx2−11.
- dxdSinh−1u=1+u2u′=x2x/x2−1=xx/x2−1=x2−11 (since x>1 means x2=x, not ∣x∣ ambiguity). …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-14-FN1 markMCQQ.If f(x)=22xlog(3x−2), then f′(2)= (A) log44log2log4+3 (B) 2log48(log2)2+3 (C) 2log48(log4)2+3 (D) 2log48log2log4+3
›Reveal solutionSolution
Differentiate f(x)=22xlog(3x−2) using the chain rule on the square root and the product rule inside; at x=2 this evaluates to 2log48log2log4+3.
Concept and Intuition
Whenever a function is a square root of a product, write f=L so f′=2LL′ (chain rule), then find L′ using the product rule since L(x)=22x⋅log(3x−2) is a product of an exponential and a log term. This two-layer differentiation is the key technique.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let L(x)=22xlog(3x−2), so f(x)=L(x) and f′(x)=2L(x)L′(x).
- Evaluate L(2): 22(2)=24=16; log(3(2)−2)=log4. So L(2)=16log4, and L(2)=16log4=4log4.
- Find L′(x) by the product rule: L′(x)=dxd[22x]log(3x−2)+22x⋅dxd[log(3x−2)].
- dxd22x=22x⋅ln2⋅2=2⋅22xlog2 (using log as natural log consistently), i.e. 22x+1log2.
- dxdlog(3x−2)=3x−23.
- So L′(x)=22x+1log2⋅log(3x−2)+22x⋅3x−23. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-27-FN1 markMCQQ.If x=2cosec−1t and y=2sec−1t, ∣t∣≥1 then dxdy= (A) yx (B) xy (C) −xy (D) −yx
›Reveal solutionSolution
The identity cosec−1t+sec−1t=π/2 lets both x and y be written as exponentials of a single parameter u, so dy/dx follows from parametric differentiation. Answer: −xy.
Concept and Intuition
When x and y are both given as functions of a common (possibly hidden) parameter — here through the complementary inverse trig identity — the cleanest path is to introduce that parameter explicitly and use dxdy=dx/dudy/du, rather than trying to eliminate t directly.
Step-by-Step Solution
- For ∣t∣≥1, the standard identity cosec−1t+sec−1t=2π holds.
- Let u=cosec−1t. Then sec−1t=2π−u.
- x=2u=2u/2, and y=2π/2−u=2(π/2−u)/2=2π/4−u/2.
- Differentiate w.r.t. u: dudx=2u/2ln2⋅21=2xln2.
- dudy=2π/4−u/2ln2⋅(−21)=−2yln2. …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-24-FN1 markMCQQ.Find the value of 'k' if dxd⎩⎨⎧2+2+2+2cos(4x)2⎭⎬⎫=ksec(2x)tan(2x) (A) 21 (B) 2 (C) 1 (D) 81
›Reveal solutionSolution
Repeatedly apply the half-angle identity 2+2cosϕ=4cos2(ϕ/2) to peel away the nested square roots, collapsing the whole expression to a simple sec(x/2).
Concept and Intuition
The identity 1+cosϕ=2cos2(ϕ/2) (i.e. 2+2cosϕ=4cos2(ϕ/2)) is exactly designed to simplify nested square-root expressions of this kind — applying it repeatedly, from the innermost root outward, collapses the whole tower.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Innermost: 2+2cos4x=4cos2(2x) (using 2+2cosϕ=4cos2(ϕ/2) with ϕ=4x). So 2+2cos4x=2cos2x (taking cos2x>0).
- Next level: 2+2+2cos4x=2+2cos2x=4cos2x. So 2+2+2cos4x=2cosx.
- Next level: 2+2+2+2cos4x=2+2cosx=4cos2(x/2). So 2+2+2+2cos4x=2cos(x/2).
- So the whole expression is 2cos(x/2)2=sec(x/2).
- Differentiate: dxdsec(x/2)=sec(x/2)tan(x/2)⋅21. …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-24-FN1 markMCQQ.If f′(x)=2x2−1 and y=f(x3), then find the value of dxdy at x=1. (A) -1 (B) 3 (C) 0 (D) -3
›Reveal solutionSolution
Direct chain-rule application: y=f(x3) gives y′=3x2f′(x3), evaluated using the given formula for f′.
Concept and Intuition
When y is a composition f(g(x)), the chain rule multiplies the outer derivative (evaluated at the inner function) by the inner function's derivative.
Step-by-Step Solution
- y=f(x3), so dxdy=f′(x3)⋅dxd(x3)=f′(x3)⋅3x2.
- At x=1: inner value is x3=1, so we need f′(1)=2(1)2−1=1=1.
- Then dxdyx=1=1⋅3(1)2=3.
Common Mistakes …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-14-FN1 markMCQQ.If y=Sec−1(2x1+x2) and x>1, then dxdy= (A) 1+x21 (B) 1+x22 (C) −1+x21 (D) −1+x22
›Reveal solutionSolution
Differentiating the inverse secant of a rational expression using the chain rule and careful algebraic simplification gives dxdy=1+x22.
Concept and Intuition
For y=Sec−1(u), the derivative formula is dxdy=∣u∣u2−11⋅dxdu. Here u=2x1+x2 is positive for x>1, so we can drop the absolute value and just carefully simplify the algebra — the key insight is recognizing that u2−1 factors as a perfect square-like expression involving (x2−1)2, which simplifies the square root beautifully.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let u=2x1+x2. Compute dxdu using the quotient rule: u′=(2x)22x(2x)−(1+x2)(2)=4x24x2−2−2x2=4x22x2−2=2x2x2−1.
- Compute u2−1: u2−1=4x2(1+x2)2−4x2=4x2(1+x2−2x)(1+x2+2x)=4x2(x−1)2(x+1)2.
- So u2−1=2∣x∣∣x−1∣∣x+1∣=2∣x∣∣x2−1∣. For x>1: x2−1>0 and x>0, so u2−1=2xx2−1.
- For x>1, u=2x1+x2>0, so ∣u∣=u=2x1+x2. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-21-AN1 markMCQQ.If y=tanh−11+x1−x, then dxdy= (A) −21−x21 (B) −2x1−x21 (C) 1+x22 (D) 2x1+x21
›Reveal solutionSolution
Differentiating tanh−1u via the chain rule and simplifying u(1+x)=1−x2 gives dy/dx=−2x1−x21.
Concept and Intuition
tanh−1z=21log1−z1+z has derivative 1−z21, exactly like a standard log-based inverse function. Here z=u(x) is itself a composite square-root expression, so the chain rule applies twice; the algebra simplifies nicely because u2 is a simple rational function of x.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let u=1+x1−x, so y=tanh−1u and dudy=1−u21.
- u2=1+x1−x⇒1−u2=1−1+x1−x=1+x(1+x)−(1−x)=1+x2x.
- Differentiate u2=1+x1−x w.r.t. x: 2udxdu=(1+x)2−(1+x)−(1−x)=(1+x)2−2⇒dxdu=u(1+x)2−1.
- By the chain rule: dxdy=dudy⋅dxdu=2x1+x⋅(u(1+x)2−1)=2xu(1+x)−1. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-18-AN1 markMCQQ.If y=Sech−1(9x2+109), then dxdy= (A) (9x2+10)2+81−18x (B) (9x2+10)2−81−18x (C) (9x2+19)(9x2+1)18x (D) (9x2+19)(9x2+1)18x(9x2+10)
›Reveal solutionSolution
A chain-rule differentiation of an inverse hyperbolic function, where (9x2+10)2−81 factors as a difference of squares into (9x2+1)(9x2+19).
Concept and Intuition
For y=sech−1u, the standard derivative is dudy=u1−u2−1 (for 0<u<1). The chain rule then just needs du/dx, and the algebra simplifies neatly because (9x2+10)2−92 is a difference of squares.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let u=9x2+109. Then dxdu=9⋅(9x2+10)2−18x=(9x2+10)2−162x.
- 1−u2=1−(9x2+10)281=(9x2+10)2(9x2+10)2−81.
- Factor as a difference of squares: (9x2+10)2−92=(9x2+10−9)(9x2+10+9)=(9x2+1)(9x2+19).
- So 1−u2=9x2+10(9x2+1)(9x2+19).
- u1−u2=9x2+109⋅9x2+10(9x2+1)(9x2+19)=(9x2+10)29(9x2+1)(9x2+19). …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-06-FN1 markMCQQ.If dxd(Alog(1−x3+11−x3+B))=x1−x31, then AB= (A) 31 (B) 3−1 (C) 3−2 (D) 32
›Reveal solutionSolution
Matching the derivative of a log-quotient expression to 1/(x1−x3) pins down A=1/3, B=−1, so AB=−1/3.
Concept and Intuition
This is a "guess the antiderivative form, then solve for constants" problem. Differentiate the given log expression symbolically in terms of u=1−x3, and choose B so the resulting denominator simplifies nicely (ideally to a pure power of x), then fix A by matching coefficients.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let u=1−x3, so u′=21−x3−3x2=2u−3x2.
- dxd[Alog(u+1u+B)]=A[u+Bu′−u+1u′]=(u+B)(u+1)Au′(1−B).
- Try B=−1: then (u+B)(u+1)=(u−1)(u+1)=u2−1=(1−x3)−1=−x3.
- With B=−1, 1−B=2, so the expression becomes −x32Au′=x3−2A⋅2u−3x2=xu3A. …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-22-FN1 markMCQQ.If f(0)=0, f′(0)=3, then the derivative of y=f(f(f(f(f(x))))) at x=0 is (A) 16 (B) 32 (C) 81 (D) 243
›Reveal solutionSolution
Because 0 is a fixed point of f (f(0)=0), differentiating a repeated composition at x=0 just multiplies f′(0) by itself once per composition — five times here.
Concept and Intuition
By the chain rule, dxdf(g(x))=f′(g(x))g′(x). For a chain of five compositions, the derivative at a point is a product of five factors of f′, each evaluated at the running value of the inner composition at that point. Since f(0)=0, the running value stays 0 throughout, so every factor is just f′(0).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let y=f(f(f(f(f(x))))) (five nested f's).
- By repeated chain rule: y′(x)=f′(f(f(f(f(x)))))⋅f′(f(f(f(x))))⋅f′(f(f(x)))⋅f′(f(x))⋅f′(x).
- At x=0: since f(0)=0, we get f(x)=0, then f(f(x))=f(0)=0, and so on — every nested value at x=0 is 0. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-FN1 markMCQQ.If x=Sinh−1t+log(t2+1) and y=Tan−1t+log∣t∣, then dxdy= (A) 2t+t4+t2t2+t+1 (B) 2t+t2+1t2+t+1 (C) 2t2+t4+t2t2+t+1 (D) 2+1+t2t2+t+1
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests parametric differentiation (dxdy=dx/dtdy/dt) with inverse-hyperbolic and inverse-trig terms; the answer is option (C).
Concept and Intuition
When both x and y are given in terms of a parameter t, we find dy/dx as the ratio of the two derivatives with respect to t, using dtdSinh−1t=1+t21 and dtdTan−1t=1+t21.
Step-by-Step Solution
- dtdx=1+t21+t2+12t (since dtdlog(t2+1)=t2+12t).
- dtdy=1+t21+t1=t(1+t2)t+(1+t2)=t(1+t2)t2+t+1.
- Write dtdx over common denominator 1+t2: dtdx=1+t21+t2+2t. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.