Q.If u,v and w are functions of x, then show that dxd(u⋅v⋅w)=dxdu⋅v⋅w+u⋅dxdv⋅w+u⋅v⋅dxdw in two ways - first by repeated application of product rule, second by logarithmic differentiation.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Chain Rule
The Chain Rule: Why It Makes Sense
Imagine you're assembling a toy. First you put part A into part B, then you put that combined piece into part C. The final toy's position depends on how you moved A, which then affected B, which then affected C. That's exactly what the chain rule captures — how a change in the first variable ripples through a sequence of functions to affect the final output.
Let's make this concrete. Suppose you have a function f that depends on g, and g itself depends on x:
y=f(g(x))
You want to know: if x changes by a tiny amount, how much does y change? The answer isn't just f′(g(x)) — because g(x) itself changes when x changes. You have to multiply the two rates:
- How fast does g change with respect to x? That's g′(x).
- How fast does f change with respect to its input g? That's f′(g(x)).
The total effect is the product:
dxdy=f′(g(x))⋅g′(x)
In Leibniz notation, this looks even more natural: dxdy=dudy⋅dxdu, where u=g(x). The du's "cancel" like fractions — though this is just a helpful memory aid, not a rigorous proof.
The Precise Statement
Chain Rule (single variable): If g is differentiable at x and f is differentiable at g(x), then the composite function h(x)=f(g(x)) is differentiable at x, and
h′(x)=f′(g(x))⋅g′(x)
That's it. One multiplication. But the power is enormous — it lets you differentiate almost any nested function.
A Simple Example
Differentiate h(x)=sin(3x2).
Here f(u)=sinu and g(x)=3x2. Then:
- f′(u)=cosu, so f′(g(x))=cos(3x2)
- g′(x)=6x
Multiply: h′(x)=cos(3x2)⋅6x=6xcos(3x2)
The most common mistake is forgetting to multiply by the inner derivative. Students often write dxdsin(3x2)=cos(3x2) and stop — that's wrong. The chain rule demands you also multiply by 6x.
Why It's Called a "Chain"
Think of a chain of links: x→g→f. Each link has its own rate of change. To find the total rate from x to f, you multiply the rates of each link. If you had three functions — say h(x)=f(g(k(x))) — you'd multiply three derivatives: …
Concept: Chain Rule & Product Rule
Method 1 — Repeated Product Rule
Treat u⋅v⋅w as (u⋅v)⋅w.
First apply product rule to u⋅v:
dxd(uv)=u′v+uv′.
Now differentiate the product with w:
dxd[(uv)w]=(u′v+uv′)w+(uv)w′
=u′vw+uv′w+uvw′.
Method 2 — Logarithmic Differentiation
Let y=uvw. Take log on both sides:
logy=logu+logv+logw.
Differentiate with respect to x:
y1dxdy=uu′+vv′+ww′. …
The derivative of a product of three functions is the sum of three terms, each differentiating one function while keeping the other two unchanged. This is proved by applying the product rule twice, or by taking logs, differentiating, and multiplying through.
Why this works — the Chain Rule in disguise
The product rule for two functions says:
dxd(uv)=u′v+uv′.
For three functions, we are really just applying that rule twice. Think of u⋅v⋅w as (u⋅v)⋅w — a product of two "functions", where the first factor is itself a product. The Chain Rule never appears directly here (no composition), but the idea of "differentiate one factor at a time" is the same pattern that extends to any number of factors.
Logarithmic differentiation gives an alternative view: it turns multiplication into addition, so the derivative becomes a sum of individual logarithmic derivatives — which is exactly the same result.
Method 1: Repeated application of the product rule
Step 1. Treat u⋅v⋅w as (uv)⋅w.
Let p=uv. Then we have dxd(p⋅w).
Step 2. Apply the product rule to p⋅w:
dxd(p⋅w)=dxdp⋅w+p⋅dxdw.
Step 3. Now dxdp=dxd(uv). Apply the product rule again:
dxdp=dxdu⋅v+u⋅dxdv.
Step 4. Substitute back:
dxd(uvw)=(dxdu⋅v+u⋅dxdv)⋅w+(uv)⋅dxdw.
Step 5. Expand:
dxd(uvw)=dxdu⋅v⋅w+u⋅dxdv⋅w+u⋅v⋅dxdw.
That's the result.
This pattern generalises: for n functions, the derivative is the sum of n terms, each differentiating exactly one factor. No need to memorise — just apply the product rule repeatedly.
Method 2: Logarithmic differentiation
Step 1. Assume u,v,w>0 (so logs are defined). Take the natural log of both sides:
log(uvw)=logu+logv+logw.
Step 2. Differentiate both sides with respect to x. On the left, by the Chain Rule:
dxdlog(uvw)=uvw1⋅dxd(uvw).
On the right, differentiate term by term: …
Method: Extending a Two-Factor Rule to Three Factors
When you're asked to derive a formula for three (or more) functions multiplied together, the general strategy is to reduce it to a rule you already know, applied more than once — never derive it from scratch with limits.
Steps
Step 1 (Method A — repeated product rule): Group two factors together first
Treat u⋅v⋅w as (u⋅v)⋅w — a product of two things, where the first "thing" happens to itself be a product. This lets you apply the ordinary two-factor product rule you already know, twice.
Step 2: Apply the product rule to the outer grouping
dxd[(uv)⋅w]=dxd(uv)⋅w+(uv)⋅dxdw
Step 3: Apply the product rule again to expand dxd(uv), then substitute back
dxd(uv)=dxduv+udxdv
Substituting gives the three-term result — each term differentiates exactly one of u,v,w while leaving the other two unchanged.
Step 4 (Method B — logarithmic differentiation): an independent cross-check …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Writing only two terms instead of three when generalising the product rule
Why it's wrong: a very common error when extending the two-factor product rule to three factors is to write dxd(uvw)=u′vw+uvw′ (skipping the middle term uv′w) — an easy slip because the two-factor rule only has two terms to pattern-match against. Correct approach: apply the two-factor rule twice, in stages (first to (uv)⋅w, then to u⋅v inside), so no term gets silently dropped.
Mistake 2: Using logarithmic differentiation without noting the positivity requirement …
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-14-FN1 markMCQQ.If f(x)=22xlog(3x−2), then f′(2)= (A) log44log2log4+3 (B) 2log48(log2)2+3 (C) 2log48(log4)2+3 (D) 2log48log2log4+3
›Reveal solutionSolution
Differentiate f(x)=22xlog(3x−2) using the chain rule on the square root and the product rule inside; at x=2 this evaluates to 2log48log2log4+3.
Concept and Intuition
Whenever a function is a square root of a product, write f=L so f′=2LL′ (chain rule), then find L′ using the product rule since L(x)=22x⋅log(3x−2) is a product of an exponential and a log term. This two-layer differentiation is the key technique.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let L(x)=22xlog(3x−2), so f(x)=L(x) and f′(x)=2L(x)L′(x).
- Evaluate L(2): 22(2)=24=16; log(3(2)−2)=log4. So L(2)=16log4, and L(2)=16log4=4log4.
- Find L′(x) by the product rule: L′(x)=dxd[22x]log(3x−2)+22x⋅dxd[log(3x−2)].
- dxd22x=22x⋅ln2⋅2=2⋅22xlog2 (using log as natural log consistently), i.e. 22x+1log2.
- dxdlog(3x−2)=3x−23.
- So L′(x)=22x+1log2⋅log(3x−2)+22x⋅3x−23. …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-06-FN1 markMCQQ.If dxd(Alog(1−x3+11−x3+B))=x1−x31, then AB= (A) 31 (B) 3−1 (C) 3−2 (D) 32
›Reveal solutionSolution
Matching the derivative of a log-quotient expression to 1/(x1−x3) pins down A=1/3, B=−1, so AB=−1/3.
Concept and Intuition
This is a "guess the antiderivative form, then solve for constants" problem. Differentiate the given log expression symbolically in terms of u=1−x3, and choose B so the resulting denominator simplifies nicely (ideally to a pure power of x), then fix A by matching coefficients.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let u=1−x3, so u′=21−x3−3x2=2u−3x2.
- dxd[Alog(u+1u+B)]=A[u+Bu′−u+1u′]=(u+B)(u+1)Au′(1−B).
- Try B=−1: then (u+B)(u+1)=(u−1)(u+1)=u2−1=(1−x3)−1=−x3.
- With B=−1, 1−B=2, so the expression becomes −x32Au′=x3−2A⋅2u−3x2=xu3A. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-23-AN1 markMCQQ.If y=coshx+coshx, then dxdy= (A) 4y(y2+coshx)sinhx(2y2+2coshx+1) (B) 4y(y2−coshx)sinhx(2y2−2coshx−1) (C) 4ycoshxsinhx(1−2coshx) (D) 4ycoshxsinhx(1+2coshx)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Square both sides to remove the outer root, differentiate implicitly, then
tidy the resulting fraction — the answer comes out directly in terms of y
and coshx, matching option (D).
Concept and Intuition
When y is defined as a nested square root, it's usually easier to square first
(y2= the inside) and differentiate implicitly rather than applying the chain
rule twice directly to the nested radical — this avoids stacking two
2⋅1 factors and keeps the algebra manageable.
Step-by-Step Solution
- y=coshx+coshx ⇒ y2=coshx+coshx.
- Differentiate both sides w.r.t. x: 2ydxdy=sinhx+2coshx1⋅sinhx=sinhx(1+2coshx1).
- Combine the bracket over a common denominator: 1+2coshx1=2coshx2coshx+1.
- So 2yy′=2coshxsinhx(2coshx+1). …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-22-FN1 markMCQQ.If f(0)=0, f′(0)=3, then the derivative of y=f(f(f(f(f(x))))) at x=0 is (A) 16 (B) 32 (C) 81 (D) 243
›Reveal solutionSolution
Because 0 is a fixed point of f (f(0)=0), differentiating a repeated composition at x=0 just multiplies f′(0) by itself once per composition — five times here.
Concept and Intuition
By the chain rule, dxdf(g(x))=f′(g(x))g′(x). For a chain of five compositions, the derivative at a point is a product of five factors of f′, each evaluated at the running value of the inner composition at that point. Since f(0)=0, the running value stays 0 throughout, so every factor is just f′(0).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let y=f(f(f(f(f(x))))) (five nested f's).
- By repeated chain rule: y′(x)=f′(f(f(f(f(x)))))⋅f′(f(f(f(x))))⋅f′(f(f(x)))⋅f′(f(x))⋅f′(x).
- At x=0: since f(0)=0, we get f(x)=0, then f(f(x))=f(0)=0, and so on — every nested value at x=0 is 0. …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-18-FN1 markMCQQ.If x=3[sint−log(cot2t)] and y=6[cost+log(tan2t)] then dxdy= (A) 1+sintcost2sin2t (B) 1+sin2t2cos2t (C) 1+sintcost2cos2t (D) 1+sin2t1+cos2t
›Reveal solutionSolution
A parametric-differentiation problem built around the classic identity dtdlogtan(t/2)=csct; the final simplified slope is 1+sintcost2cos2t.
Concept and Intuition
When x and y are given as functions of a parameter t, dxdy=dx/dtdy/dt. The log-tangent-half-angle term is a recurring building block whose derivative simplifies neatly to csct, which is worth memorizing to avoid a messy chain-rule expansion each time.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Recall dtdlogtan(t/2)=2tan(t/2)sec2(t/2)=2sin(t/2)cos(t/2)1=sint1=csct. Hence dtdlogcot(t/2)=−csct.
- x=3[sint−logcot(t/2)]⇒dtdx=3[cost−(−csct)]=3(cost+csct).
- y=6[cost+logtan(t/2)]⇒dtdy=6[−sint+csct].
- dxdy=3(cost+csct)6(csct−sint)=cost+csct2(csct−sint). …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-FN1 markMCQQ.If x=Sinh−1t+log(t2+1) and y=Tan−1t+log∣t∣, then dxdy= (A) 2t+t4+t2t2+t+1 (B) 2t+t2+1t2+t+1 (C) 2t2+t4+t2t2+t+1 (D) 2+1+t2t2+t+1
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests parametric differentiation (dxdy=dx/dtdy/dt) with inverse-hyperbolic and inverse-trig terms; the answer is option (C).
Concept and Intuition
When both x and y are given in terms of a parameter t, we find dy/dx as the ratio of the two derivatives with respect to t, using dtdSinh−1t=1+t21 and dtdTan−1t=1+t21.
Step-by-Step Solution
- dtdx=1+t21+t2+12t (since dtdlog(t2+1)=t2+12t).
- dtdy=1+t21+t1=t(1+t2)t+(1+t2)=t(1+t2)t2+t+1.
- Write dtdx over common denominator 1+t2: dtdx=1+t21+t2+2t. …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-16-AN1 markMCQQ.If u=sin(yx), x=et and y=t2, then t6(dtdu)2÷e2t(t−2)2= (A) 2u (B) u2 (C) 1−u2 (D) cosu
›Reveal solutionSolution
Differentiating u=sin(x/y) with x=et,y=t2 and simplifying the given combination leaves exactly cos2(x/y)=1−u2.
Concept and Intuition
Compute du/dt via the chain rule, then see how the algebraic combination in the question is designed to cancel everything except cos2(x/y).
Step-by-Step Solution
- yx=t2et. dtd(t2et)=t4ett2−et⋅2t=t3et(t−2).
- dtdu=cos(yx)⋅t3et(t−2).
- (dtdu)2=cos2(yx)⋅t6e2t(t−2)2. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-23-AN1 markMCQQ.If y=Tan−1x2−1+Sinh−1x2−1, x>1, then dxdy= (A) xx2−11 (B) xx2−1x+1 (C) x2x2−1x+1 (D) x2−1x
›Reveal solutionSolution
Both inverse-function derivatives share the same inner derivative
u′=x/x2−1; the 1+u2 under Tan−1 and 1+u2 under
Sinh−1 both simplify beautifully because u2=x2−1, so 1+u2=x2.
Concept and Intuition
Both Tan−1 and Sinh−1 have derivative formulas built around
1+u2 (as 1+u21 and 1+u21 respectively). Here
u=x2−1 makes 1+u2=x2 exactly, a clean perfect square — this is why
the two inverse functions are paired together in the problem, since they
combine so tidily.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let u=x2−1. Then u′=x2−1x and 1+u2=1+(x2−1)=x2.
- dxdTan−1u=1+u2u′=x2x/x2−1=xx2−11.
- dxdSinh−1u=1+u2u′=x2x/x2−1=xx/x2−1=x2−11 (since x>1 means x2=x, not ∣x∣ ambiguity). …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-27-FN1 markMCQQ.If x=2cosec−1t and y=2sec−1t, ∣t∣≥1 then dxdy= (A) yx (B) xy (C) −xy (D) −yx
›Reveal solutionSolution
The identity cosec−1t+sec−1t=π/2 lets both x and y be written as exponentials of a single parameter u, so dy/dx follows from parametric differentiation. Answer: −xy.
Concept and Intuition
When x and y are both given as functions of a common (possibly hidden) parameter — here through the complementary inverse trig identity — the cleanest path is to introduce that parameter explicitly and use dxdy=dx/dudy/du, rather than trying to eliminate t directly.
Step-by-Step Solution
- For ∣t∣≥1, the standard identity cosec−1t+sec−1t=2π holds.
- Let u=cosec−1t. Then sec−1t=2π−u.
- x=2u=2u/2, and y=2π/2−u=2(π/2−u)/2=2π/4−u/2.
- Differentiate w.r.t. u: dudx=2u/2ln2⋅21=2xln2.
- dudy=2π/4−u/2ln2⋅(−21)=−2yln2. …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-24-FN1 markMCQQ.If f′(x)=2x2−1 and y=f(x3), then find the value of dxdy at x=1. (A) -1 (B) 3 (C) 0 (D) -3
›Reveal solutionSolution
Direct chain-rule application: y=f(x3) gives y′=3x2f′(x3), evaluated using the given formula for f′.
Concept and Intuition
When y is a composition f(g(x)), the chain rule multiplies the outer derivative (evaluated at the inner function) by the inner function's derivative.
Step-by-Step Solution
- y=f(x3), so dxdy=f′(x3)⋅dxd(x3)=f′(x3)⋅3x2.
- At x=1: inner value is x3=1, so we need f′(1)=2(1)2−1=1=1.
- Then dxdyx=1=1⋅3(1)2=3.
Common Mistakes …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-07-FN1 markMCQQ.If ∫f(x)dx=F(x)+C, then dtdg(t)∫h(t)f(x)dx= (A) f(h(t))−f(g(t)) (B) F(h(t))−F(g(t)) (C) F(h(t))h′(t)−F(g(t))g′(t) (D) f(h(t))h′(t)−f(g(t))g′(t)
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is the Leibniz differentiation rule for integrals with variable limits.
Concept and Intuition
∫g(t)h(t)f(x)dx=F(h(t))−F(g(t)) where F′=f. Differentiating with respect to t needs the chain rule on both limits.
Step-by-Step Solution
- ∫g(t)h(t)f(x)dx=F(h(t))−F(g(t)), where F(x)=∫f(x)dx.
- Differentiate w.r.t. t: dtd[F(h(t))−F(g(t))]=F′(h(t))h′(t)−F′(g(t))g′(t).
- Since F′=f: this equals f(h(t))h′(t)−f(g(t))g′(t).
Common Mistakes …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-22-FN1 markMCQQ.If x=2cos3θ and y=3sin2θ, then dxdy= (A) −secθ (B) cosθ (C) −cosecθ (D) sinθ
›Reveal solutionSolution
Differentiate x and y separately with respect to the parameter θ, then take the ratio. Answer: −secθ.
Concept and Intuition
For a parametric curve x=x(θ), y=y(θ), the derivative is found via the chain rule as dxdy=dx/dθdy/dθ, avoiding the need to eliminate θ and differentiate implicitly.
Step-by-Step Solution
- x=2cos3θ. Differentiate: dθdx=2⋅3cos2θ⋅(−sinθ)=−6cos2θsinθ.
- y=3sin2θ. Differentiate: dθdy=3⋅2sinθcosθ=6sinθcosθ.
- dxdy=dx/dθdy/dθ=−6cos2θsinθ6sinθcosθ. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.