Q.A couple has two children,
Concept understanding — Conditional Probability
Conditional Probability
Roll a die and ask "what is the chance of an even number?" — that is 3/6. But suppose someone tells you the result is greater than 3. Now you are no longer looking at all six faces, only at {4,5,6}, and two of those (4 and 6) are even, so the probability becomes 2/3. That change — from the probability of A to the probability of A given that B has already occurred — is conditional probability.
The Idea: Shrink the Sample Space
Conditioning on B throws away every outcome where B is false and treats B as the new "whole world." You measure A only against what is still possible.
Think of filtering a table of data: unconditional probability uses every row; conditional probability keeps only the rows where the condition is true.
The Definition
For events A and B with P(B)>0,
P(A∣B)=P(B)P(A∩B).
We divide by P(B) to rescale so that B itself has probability 1; the surviving part of A is the overlap A∩B. Checking the die: P(A∩B)=P({4,6})=62 and P(B)=63, so P(A∣B)=3/62/6=32, matching the intuition.
Rearranging gives the multiplication rule P(A∩B)=P(A∣B)P(B), which is usually the easier way to compute a joint probability when a problem says "given that."
Two Cautions
- P(A∣B) and P(B∣A) are generally not equal; swapping them is the classic mistake. They are linked by Bayes' theorem, P(A∣B)=P(B)P(B∣A)P(A).
- If P(A∣B)=P(A), then knowing B tells you nothing about A — the events are independent. That is a special case, not the general rule.
Conditional probability is the foundation of the multiplication theorem, independence, and Bayes' theorem — every "given that" question in this chapter rests on it.
Conditional Probability opens the CBSE Class 12 Probability chapter and is foundational for everything that follows in that unit, including Bayes' theorem and the multiplication rule — making "conditional probability formula class 12 with examples" one of the most searched topics in Class 12 Mathematics. It is equally important for JEE Main and CUET, where conditional probability questions are set almost every year.
Concept: Conditional Probability — we restrict the sample space based on the given condition.
(i) Sample space for two children: {MM,MF,FM,FF}.
Given at least one male, the reduced space is {MM,MF,FM}.
Only MM satisfies "both males".
So P=31.
(ii) Given the elder child is female, the reduced space is {FM,FF}.
Only FF satisfies "both females".
So P=21.
- The probability is 31;
- The probability is 21.
Conditional probability reduces the sample space to only outcomes satisfying the given condition. For (i), the probability that both are males given at least one male is 31. For (ii), the probability that both are females given the elder is female is 21.
Concept and Intuition
When we say "given that" something is true, we are no longer looking at all possible outcomes — we restrict our attention to only those outcomes where the condition holds. This is the heart of conditional probability: P(A∣B)=P(B)P(A∩B), where B is the condition.
For a family with two children, the natural sample space (assuming equal probability for male and female, and independence) is:
{MM,MF,FM,FF}
Each outcome has probability 41. The order matters here — first child then second — so MF and FM are distinct.
The classic mistake is to treat "at least one male" as if it only eliminates FF, but then to forget that the remaining three outcomes are not equally likely under the condition? Actually, they are equally likely because each original outcome had equal probability, and we are simply discarding one. So the conditional probability is just counting: number of favorable outcomes in the reduced space divided by total outcomes in the reduced space.
Let's work each part carefully.
(i) Both males, given at least one male
-
Define events.
Let A = "both children are males" = {MM}.
Let B = "at least one child is male" = {MM,MF,FM}.
-
Find the reduced sample space.
The condition B removes only {FF}. So the new sample space has 3 equally likely outcomes: MM, MF, FM.
-
Count favorable outcomes.
Only MM satisfies A. So exactly 1 outcome.
-
Compute probability.
P(A∣B)=∣B∣∣A∩B∣=31.
A common error is to think that "at least one male" means the first child is male, or to list the reduced space as {MM, MF} — forgetting that FM (first female, second male) is also valid. Always list all ordered pairs.
(ii) Both females, given elder child is female
-
Define events.
Let C = "both children are females" = {FF}.
Let D = "the elder child is female" = {FF,FM}.
-
Find the reduced sample space.
Condition D keeps only outcomes where the first child (elder) is female: FF and FM. These are equally likely.
-
Count favorable outcomes.
Only FF satisfies C. So 1 outcome.
-
Compute probability.
P(C∣D)=∣D∣∣C∩D∣=21.
Notice the difference: "at least one male" is a symmetric condition that keeps three outcomes, while "elder is female" is an asymmetric condition that keeps only two. That's why the answers differ — the condition itself determines how much the sample space shrinks.
- The probability that both are males given at least one male is 31.
- The probability that both are females given the elder is female is 21.
Method: Conditional probability by reducing the sample space
For "given that … , find the probability that …" problems with a small set of equally likely outcomes, you can skip the fraction formula and just shrink the world of possibilities.
Steps
Step 1: Write the full, ordered, equally likely sample space.
List every outcome once, keeping order where it matters (elder child first, then younger): {MM,MF,FM,FF}, each equally likely.
Step 2: Keep only the outcomes that satisfy the given condition.
The condition becomes your new, smaller sample space. "At least one male" keeps {MM,MF,FM}; "elder is female" keeps {FF,FM}. Discard everything the condition rules out.
Step 3: Count the favourable outcomes inside the reduced space.
P(target∣condition)=total outcomes in the reduced spacefavourable outcomes in the reduced space.
The whole answer turns on listing the reduced space completely — order-sensitive outcomes like FM versus MF are the ones most often missed.
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Reducing "at least one male" to {MM,MF} and getting 21.
Why it's wrong: it drops FM (elder female, younger male), which also has at least one male. Correct approach: the reduced space is {MM,MF,FM}, so the answer is 31.
Mistake 2: Treating "at least one male" as "the elder child is male".
Why it's wrong: those are different conditions that shrink the sample space by different amounts. Correct approach: keep every outcome with a male anywhere, not just elder-male ones.
Mistake 3: In part (ii), forgetting that "elder is female" fixes only the first child.
Why it's wrong: the reduced space is {FF,FM}, not a single outcome. Correct approach: count FF among these two, giving 21.
Showing the 12 most recent of 69 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-AN1 markMCQQ.If it is known that a woman has two children and she has at least one girl child, the probability that the woman has both girl children is (A) 41 (B) 31 (C) 32 (D) 21
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a classic conditional-probability trap: conditioning on "at least one girl" (not "the elder/first child is a girl") leaves 3 equally likely outcomes, of which 1 is both-girls, giving 31.
Concept and Intuition
With two children, birth order matters for counting equally likely outcomes: BB,BG,GB,GG, each with probability 1/4. The event "at least one girl" is a set of outcomes, not a statement about a specific (e.g. first) child, so it correctly removes only BB and keeps three outcomes, not two. This distinguishes it from the simpler (and different) question "given the elder child is a girl," which would leave only {GB,GG} and give probability 1/2.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Sample space (ordered by birth, say elder-younger): {BB,BG,GB,GG}, each with probability 41.
- Event E = "at least one girl" = {BG,GB,GG}, so P(E)=43.
- Event F = "both girls" = {GG}, and F⊂E, so P(F∩E)=P(F)=41.
- P(F∣E)=P(E)P(F∩E)=3/41/4=31.
Common Mistakes
- Confusing "at least one girl" with "a specific (e.g. the first) child is a girl," which would wrongly give 21.
- Forgetting that BG and GB are distinct outcomes (birth order matters), undercounting the conditioning event.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) 31.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-22-AN1 markMCQQ.There are three families F1,F2,F3. F1 has 2 boys and 1 girl; F2 has 1 boy and 2 girls; F3 has 1 boy and 1 girl. A family is randomly chosen and a child is chosen from that family randomly. If it is known that the child thus selected is a girl, then the probability that she is from F2 is (A) 94 (B) 92 (C) 73 (D) 75
›Reveal solutionSolution
Applying Bayes' theorem across the three equally-likely families gives P(F2∣girl)=94.
Concept and Intuition
This is a textbook application of Bayes' theorem: we're given the reverse conditional probabilities (family → probability of picking a girl) and asked for the forward one (girl picked → probability she's from a specific family).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Prior: P(F1)=P(F2)=P(F3)=31.
- P(girl∣F1)=31 (1 girl out of 3 children), P(girl∣F2)=32, P(girl∣F3)=21.
- Total probability: P(girl)=31⋅31+31⋅32+31⋅21=31(31+32+21)=31⋅62+4+3=31⋅69=21
- P(F2∩girl)=31⋅32=92.
- Bayes: P(F2∣girl)=P(girl)P(F2∩girl)=1/22/9=94.
Common Mistakes
- Treating the child-selection probability as uniform over all 9 children (2+1+1+2+1+1=9, wrong weighting) instead of first picking a family uniformly, then a child within it — the families have unequal sizes so this changes the answer.
- Arithmetic slip adding 31+32+21 without a common denominator.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 94.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-26-AN1 markMCQQ.A family consists of 8 persons. If 4 persons are chosen at random and they are found to be 2 men and 2 women, then the probability that there are equal number of men and women in that family is (A) 51 (B) 73 (C) 52 (D) 72
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a Bayes'-theorem problem: given the observed sample (2 men, 2 women out of 4 drawn), find the posterior probability that the family itself is evenly split (4 men, 4 women), by weighting each possible family composition's likelihood of producing that sample.
Concept and Intuition
Before drawing, we don't know how many of the 8 family members are men — call it k (k can range from 0 to 8, but only k=2,3,4,5,6 can possibly yield a sample of 2 men and 2 women out of 4 drawn, since we need at least 2 men and at least 2 women in the family). Treating each feasible value of k as equally likely a priori, Bayes' theorem says: P(k=4∣observed 2M,2W)=∑kP(observed∣k)P(observed∣k=4), since the priors cancel when they're equal.
Step-by-Step Solution
- For a family with k men and 8−k women, the probability of drawing exactly 2 men and 2 women in a sample of 4 (hypergeometric) is proportional to (2k)(28−k) (the (48) denominator is common to all k and cancels in the ratio).
- Only k=2,3,4,5,6 give a nonzero value (need k≥2 and 8−k≥2).
- Compute L(k)=(2k)(28−k) for each:
- k=2: (22)(26)=1×15=15
- k=3: (23)(25)=3×10=30
- k=4: (24)(24)=6×6=36
- k=5: (25)(23)=10×3=30
- k=6: (26)(22)=15×1=15
- Sum of likelihoods =15+30+36+30+15=126.
- With equal priors on each feasible k, the posterior probability of k=4 (equal numbers of men and women in the family) is ∑L(k)L(4)=12636=72.
Common Mistakes
- Confusing this with a simple hypergeometric probability calculation for a KNOWN family composition, rather than recognising it needs Bayesian updating over the UNKNOWN composition.
- Weighting the prior by (k8) (as if each person's gender were an independent fair coin flip) instead of treating each feasible composition as equally likely — the latter is what reproduces one of the given options exactly.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — 72.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-16-AN1 markMCQQ.Two dice are rolled. If A denote the event that the same number shows on each die and B denote the event that the sum of the numbers on both dice is greater than 7, then P(A∣B) and P(B∣A) respectively are (A) 52,41 (B) 51,21 (C) 51,41 (D) 21,53
›Reveal solutionSolution
Counting the 36 equally likely dice outcomes directly gives P(A∣B)=51 and P(B∣A)=21.
Concept and Intuition
With two fair dice there are 36 equally likely outcomes, so every probability here reduces to simple counting: enumerate the outcomes in A, in B, and in A∩B, then apply the conditional probability formula P(X∣Y)=P(Y)P(X∩Y) directly as a ratio of counts.
Step-by-Step Solution
- A = "same number on each die": outcomes (1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(4,4),(5,5),(6,6) — 6 outcomes, so P(A)=366.
- B = "sum >7", i.e. sum ∈{8,9,10,11,12}. Counting pairs per sum: sum 8 has 5 pairs, 9 has 4, 10 has 3, 11 has 2, 12 has 1 — total 5+4+3+2+1=15 outcomes, so P(B)=3615.
- A∩B: doubles with sum >7 — check each double: (4,4) sum 8 ✓, (5,5) sum 10 ✓, (6,6) sum 12 ✓; (1,1),(2,2),(3,3) have sums 2,4,6, all ≤7 — excluded. So A∩B has 3 outcomes, P(A∩B)=363.
- P(A∣B)=P(B)P(A∩B)=15/363/36=153=51.
- P(B∣A)=P(A)P(A∩B)=6/363/36=63=21.
Common Mistakes
- Miscounting the number of outcomes with sum >7 (forgetting sum =8 is included since >7 means ≥8).
- Swapping P(A∣B) and P(B∣A) in the final answer.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 51,21.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-06-FN1 markMCQQ.Two persons P and Q are considering to apply for a job. The probability that P applies for the job is 1/4, the probability that P applies for the job given that Q applies for the job is 1/2, and the probability that Q applies for the job given that P applies for the job is 1/3. Then the probability that P does not apply for the job given that Q does not apply for the job is (A) 4/5 (B) 5/6 (C) 7/8 (D) 11/12
›Reveal solutionSolution
Chain the given conditional probabilities to find P(Q) and P(P∩Q), then use the complement rule — the answer is (A) 4/5.
Concept and Intuition
Conditional probability definitions let us cross-multiply to recover the joint probability P(P∩Q) from either conditional. Once P(P),P(Q),P(P∩Q) are all known, De Morgan's law converts "neither event" into the complement of the union.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Given: P(P)=41, P(P∣Q)=21, P(Q∣P)=31.
- P(P∩Q)=P(Q∣P)⋅P(P)=31×41=121.
- Also P(P∩Q)=P(P∣Q)⋅P(Q)⇒121=21⋅P(Q)⇒P(Q)=61.
- P(P∪Q)=P(P)+P(Q)−P(P∩Q)=41+61−121=123+122−121=124=31.
- By De Morgan's law, "neither P nor Q applies" is the complement of P∪Q: P(P∩Q)=1−31=32.
- P(Q)=1−P(Q)=1−61=65.
- P(P∣Q)=P(Q)P(P∩Q)=5/62/3=32×56=1512=54.
Common Mistakes
- Mixing up which conditional probability to use for computing the joint probability first (must use P(Q∣P)P(P), not P(P∣Q)P(P), to directly match given data).
- Forgetting to convert to complements at the final step (computing P(P∣Q)-type instead of P(P∣Q)).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 4/5.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-FN1 markMCQQ.In a college, the heights of 4% of male and 1% of female students are more than 1.8 meters. If 60% of the total students are female and a student selected at random has height more than 1.8 meters, then the probability that this student is a female, is (A) 118 (B) 116 (C) 115 (D) 113
›Reveal solutionSolution
A direct application of Bayes' theorem: given the height is above 1.8m, find the probability the student is female.
Concept and Intuition
This is the classic "reverse conditional probability" setup — we know P(tall∣gender) for each gender and the gender proportions, and want P(gender∣tall). Bayes' theorem converts one direction of conditioning into the other by weighting each gender's tall-probability by its population share and normalizing.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let M = male, F = female, H = height >1.8m. Given: P(F)=0.6, P(M)=0.4, P(H∣M)=0.04, P(H∣F)=0.01.
- Total probability of height >1.8m: P(H)=P(M)P(H∣M)+P(F)P(H∣F)=0.4(0.04)+0.6(0.01)=0.016+0.006=0.022.
- By Bayes' theorem: P(F∣H)=P(H)P(F)P(H∣F)=0.0220.6×0.01=0.0220.006.
- Simplify: 0.0220.006=226=113.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to weight each conditional probability by the corresponding gender's population share before summing for P(H).
- Accidentally computing P(M∣H) instead of P(F∣H).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — 113.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-06-AN1 markMCQQ.An unbiased coin is tossed 3 times. If the third toss gets head, then the probability of getting at least one more head is (A) 3/4 (B) 1/4 (C) 1/2 (D) 1/3
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests recognizing conditional independence: given the third toss's outcome, the first two tosses remain independent unbiased flips, so their probability is unaffected by the condition. Answer: 3/4.
Concept and Intuition
Since coin tosses are independent events, knowing the outcome of the third toss (head) gives us no information about the first two tosses. So the question really just asks: what's the probability of getting at least one head in two independent fair coin tosses? This is most easily computed via the complement (no heads at all in two tosses).
Step-by-Step Solution
- The condition 'the third toss gets head' is independent of the outcomes of the first two tosses (each coin toss is independent of the others).
- So conditioning on the third toss being heads doesn't change the probabilities for the first two tosses — they remain two independent fair coin flips.
- We want P(at least one head among the first two tosses).
- Use the complement: P(no heads in first two tosses)=P(both tails)=21×21=41.
- So P(at least one head)=1−41=43.
Common Mistakes
- Overcomplicating this by trying to build a full conditional probability tree over all three tosses, when the key insight (independence removes any real conditioning effect) simplifies it immediately.
- Misreading 'at least one MORE head' as requiring at least one head among ALL three tosses (which would be different, and trivially true anyway since the third is already head) — the question specifically asks about the first two, i.e., 'one more' beyond the given third-toss head.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 3/4.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-FN1 markMCQQ.For a biased die, the probabilities for different faces to turn up are given belowThe die is tossed and you are told that either face 1 or 2 has turned up. Then the probability that it is face 1 is (A) 3310 (B) 215 (C) 218 (D) 421
Face 1 2 3 4 5 6 Probability 0.1 0.32 0.21 0.15 0.05 0.17 ›Reveal solutionSolution
Conditioning on "face 1 or face 2" just means renormalizing the two individual probabilities so they add to 1.
Concept and Intuition
P(face 1∣face 1 or 2)=P(face 1)+P(face 2)P(face 1), since these two events are mutually exclusive and their union is the conditioning event.
Step-by-Step Solution
- P(1)=0.1, P(2)=0.32.
- P(1 or 2)=0.1+0.32=0.42.
- P(1∣1 or 2)=0.420.1=4210=215.
Common Mistakes
- Dividing by the total probability 1 instead of the restricted event's probability 0.42.
- Arithmetic slip simplifying 10/42 (should reduce to 5/21).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 215.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-23-AN1 markMCQQ.2 aero planes I and II bond a target in succession. The probabilities of I and II scoring a hit correctly is 0.3 and 0.2 respectively. The second plane will bomb only if first misses the target. The probability that the target is hit by the 2nd plane is (A) 0.06 (B) 0.14 (C) 0.32 (D) 0.7
›Reveal solutionSolution
The 2nd plane gets a chance only after the 1st fails, so P=0.7×0.2=0.14. Answer: (B).
Concept and Intuition
This is a sequential (conditional) experiment: the second trial happens only when the first fails. The event 'the target is hit by the 2nd plane' is therefore a compound event —
{I misses}∩{II hits}
and because the two planes' performances are independent, the probability of the intersection is the product of the probabilities.
A useful picture is a probability tree:
┌── I hits (0.3) ────────────────► target hit by plane I (0.3) Start ───┤ └── I misses (0.7) ─┬── II hits (0.2) ──► hit by plane II (0.7 × 0.2 = 0.14) └── II misses (0.8) ► target not hit (0.7 × 0.8 = 0.56)The three leaves sum to 0.3+0.14+0.56=1 ✓ — a good check that the model is complete.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let H1 = plane I hits, with P(H1)=0.3, so P(H1)=1−0.3=0.7.
- Let H2 = plane II hits (given it bombs), with P(H2)=0.2.
- Plane II bombs only if plane I missed. Hence
P(target hit by 2nd plane)=P(H1∩H2)=P(H1)P(H2)
- Substitute:
=0.7×0.2=0.14
- ⇒ option (B).
Common Mistakes
- Answering 0.2 — that is the conditional probability P(H2∣H1), i.e. the chance the 2nd plane hits given it actually bombs, not the unconditional probability asked for.
- Answering 0.3×0.2=0.06 (distractor A) — that would be 'both hit', but plane II never bombs if plane I has already hit.
- Answering 0.3+0.2−0.06=0.44 or the 'at least one hit' value — the question asks specifically for a hit by the second plane.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 0.14.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-18-FN1 markMCQQ.Two balls are drawn at random from a box containing 4 white, 6 black balls one after the other without replacement. If it is known that second ball drawn is black, then the probability that the first ball drawn is also black is (A) 115 (B) 95 (C) 125 (D) 135
›Reveal solutionSolution
Conditional probability with sampling without replacement, solved with Bayes' theorem; answer is 95.
Concept and Intuition
When balls are drawn one after another without replacement, the marginal probability that any particular draw (say the 2nd) is black equals the overall proportion of black balls, 106 — position doesn't matter for the marginal event by symmetry. To find the conditional probability of the first draw given information about the second, we use Bayes' theorem: we need the joint probability of both events and divide by the marginal probability of the conditioning event.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Total balls: 4 white (W) + 6 black (B) = 10.
- P(2nd is black)=P(1st B, 2nd B)+P(1st W, 2nd B) =106⋅95+104⋅96=9030+9024=9054=53.
- P(1st black and 2nd black)=106⋅95=9030=31.
- By Bayes' theorem: P(1st black∣2nd black)=P(2nd B)P(1st B, 2nd B)=3/51/3=95.
Common Mistakes
- Assuming P(2nd black)=95 (the conditional probability given 1st was black) instead of computing the correct marginal 53.
- Forgetting to include both cases (1st W/2nd B and 1st B/2nd B) when finding the joint denominator event.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 95.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-24-AN1 markMCQQ.A box contains n coins, m of which are fair and the rest are biased. When a biased coin is tossed, the probability of getting a head is twice as likely as tail. A coin is drawn from the box at random and is tossed twice. It is found that first time it shows head and the second time it shows tail. Then the probability that the coin drawn is fair is (A) 8n+m7m (B) 8n+m9m (C) 8m+n7m (D) 8m+n9m
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a Bayes'-theorem problem; computing the likelihoods for fair vs. biased coins and combining with the prior m/n gives 8n+m9m.
Concept and Intuition
Bayes' theorem updates our belief about which "type" of coin was drawn, given the observed outcome (head then tail), by weighing each type's prior probability by how likely it was to produce that exact outcome.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Fair coin: P(H)=P(T)=21, so P(HT∣fair)=21⋅21=41.
- Biased coin: head is twice as likely as tail, so P(H)=32,P(T)=31; P(HT∣biased)=32⋅31=92.
- Priors: P(fair)=nm, P(biased)=nn−m.
- Bayes: P(fair∣HT)=nm⋅41+nn−m⋅92nm⋅41.
- Multiply numerator and denominator by 36n: numerator =9m; denominator =9m+8(n−m)=m+8n.
- So P(fair∣HT)=8n+m9m.
Common Mistakes
- Using P(H)=P(T)=21 for the biased coin too, or mixing up which outcome (HT vs. TH) is asked.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 8n+m9m.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-24-FN1 markMCQQ.In a school there are 3 sections A, B and C. Section A contains 20 girls and 30 boys, section B contains 40 girls and 20 boys and section C contains 10 girls and 30 boys. The probabilities of selecting the section A, B and C are 0.2, 0.3 and 0.5 respectively. If a student selected at random from the school is a girl, then the probability that she belongs to section A is (A) 200121 (B) 12116 (C) 8114 (D) 8116
›Reveal solutionSolution
A three-section Bayes'-theorem problem; the answer is 8116, option (D).
Concept and Intuition
Given a randomly selected student is a girl, we want to reverse-condition on which section she came from. This requires the total probability of "selecting a girl" (summed over all three sections weighted by section-selection probability), then applying Bayes' theorem to isolate section A's contribution.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Conditional probabilities of picking a girl within each section: P(girl∣A)=5020=52; P(girl∣B)=6040=32; P(girl∣C)=4010=41.
- Section-selection probabilities: P(A)=51, P(B)=103, P(C)=21.
- Joint terms: P(A)P(girl∣A)=51⋅52=252; P(B)P(girl∣B)=103⋅32=51; P(C)P(girl∣C)=21⋅41=81.
- Common denominator 200: 252=20016, 51=20040, 81=20025. Sum =20081=P(girl).
- Bayes: P(A∣girl)=81/20016/200=8116.
Common Mistakes
- Using the section sizes directly as weights instead of the given selection probabilities 0.2,0.3,0.5.
- Arithmetic slips when combining fractions with different denominators — using a common denominator (200) avoids this.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — 8116.
ANSWER: D
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.