Q.A short bar magnet of magnetic moment m=0.32 J T−1 is placed in a uniform magnetic field of 0.15 T. If the bar is free to rotate in the plane of the field, which orientation would correspond to its
Concept understanding — Magnetic Poles
Magnetic Poles: The Intuition First
Imagine you have a bar magnet — the kind you might have stuck on your refrigerator. If you bring two of them close, something interesting happens. Sometimes they snap together with a satisfying click. Other times, they push each other away, refusing to touch no matter how hard you try.
That's not random. Every magnet has two special regions, one at each end, where the magnetic force is strongest. These are its magnetic poles.
The word "pole" comes from the Greek polos, meaning "pivot" or "axis" — the Earth itself has a North Pole and a South Pole, and it behaves like a giant magnet.
The Two Types of Poles
Every magnet has exactly two poles: a north pole and a south pole. You cannot have a magnet with only one pole — cut a bar magnet in half, and each half immediately becomes a complete magnet with its own north and south poles.
The rule of interaction is simple and memorable:
- Unlike poles attract: north pulls south, south pulls north.
- Like poles repel: north pushes north away; south pushes south away.
This is the fundamental behaviour. No exceptions.
The Precise Statement
Magnetic poles are the regions of a magnet where the external magnetic field is strongest. Every magnet has exactly two poles — a north pole and a south pole — that cannot be isolated. Like poles repel; unlike poles attract.
The key points to remember for exams:
- Poles always come in pairs — there is no magnetic monopole (a single isolated pole) in nature, despite decades of searching.
- The north pole is defined as the pole that points toward Earth's geographic north when the magnet is freely suspended.
- The south pole points toward Earth's geographic south.
A Common Confusion (Watch Out)
Earth's geographic North Pole is actually a magnetic south pole. Why? Because the north pole of a compass needle (which is a magnetic north pole) is attracted to it. And unlike poles attract. So the Earth's north pole behaves like a magnetic south pole. This often trips students up in exams.
Why This Matters
Magnetic poles are the starting point for understanding everything from simple compasses to electric motors, generators, and MRI machines. The idea that "opposites attract" in magnetism is the same principle that makes electric charges behave the way they do — but with one crucial difference: you can have a single positive or negative electric charge, but you can never have a single magnetic pole.
That asymmetry is one of the deepest facts about magnetism.
The behaviour of magnetic poles — always in pairs, with like poles repelling and unlike poles attracting — is covered in the NCERT Class 12 Physics chapter on magnetism and matter, a frequent source of short-answer CBSE board questions. Searches for "magnetic poles and Earth's magnetism class 12 physics" will find this north-south pole explanation, including the Earth's-north-pole-is-a-magnetic-south-pole detail, matches the NCERT textbook's own framing.
Why this formula?
Magnetic Poles: Why the Key Formulas Hold
Let's build this from first principles — understanding why a magnetic pole behaves the way it does, not just memorizing the result.
1. What Is a Magnetic Pole?
A magnetic pole is a conceptual point where the magnetic field appears to originate or terminate. In reality, magnetic poles always come in north-south pairs (no isolated monopoles exist in nature), but we treat them as idealized sources for calculations.
- North pole: source of magnetic field lines (outward)
- South pole: sink of magnetic field lines (inward)
2. The Key Formula: Force Between Two Magnetic Poles
The force between two magnetic poles of strengths m1 and m2, separated by distance r, is:
F=4πμ0⋅r2m1m2
Why this form?
This is a Coulomb's law analog — and that's not a coincidence. Here's the reasoning:
-
Experimental observation: Magnetic poles attract/repel with a force that:
- Varies as 1/r2 (inverse square law)
- Is proportional to the product of pole strengths
- Depends on the medium (via μ0, the permeability of free space)
-
Mathematical analogy: The magnetic field B at distance r from a single pole m is:
B=4πμ0⋅r2m
This comes from Gauss's law for magnetism applied to a point source.
- Force derivation: The force on pole m2 in the field of pole m1 is:
F=m2⋅B1=m2⋅(4πμ0⋅r2m1)
Hence:
F=4πμ0⋅r2m1m2
Key insight: The 1/r2 dependence is not arbitrary — it follows from the geometry of 3D space (flux spreads over a sphere of area 4πr2).
3. The Magnetic Field of a Bar Magnet (Two Poles)
For a bar magnet of length 2l with poles +m and −m, the field at a point on the axis at distance x from the center is:
B=4πμ0⋅(x2−l2)22ml
Why this form?
-
Superposition principle: The total field is the vector sum of fields from the north pole (+m) and south pole (−m).
-
Field from north pole at distance (x−l):
BN=4πμ0⋅(x−l)2m(away from north)
- Field from south pole at distance (x+l):
BS=4πμ0⋅(x+l)2m(toward south)
- Net field (both along same direction on axis):
B=BN−BS=4πμ0m[(x−l)21−(x+l)21]
- Simplify using algebra:
(x−l)21−(x+l)21=(x2−l2)24xl
Therefore:
B=4πμ0⋅(x2−l2)24mxl
But for a bar magnet, the magnetic moment is M=m⋅(2l) (pole strength × separation). So 2ml=M, giving:
B=4πμ0⋅(x2−l2)22Mx
Key insight: The field is not simply 1/r2 because we have two poles — the net effect is a dipole field, which falls off as 1/r3 at large distances.
4. The Far-Field Approximation (Dipole Formula)
For x≫l (far from the magnet), x2−l2≈x2, so:
B≈4πμ0⋅x32M
Why 1/x3?
- A single pole gives 1/r2
- Two opposite poles separated by distance d give a dipole — the fields nearly cancel at large distances, leaving a weaker 1/r3 dependence
- This is a universal property of dipoles (electric or magnetic)
5. Torque on a Magnetic Dipole in a Uniform Field
τ=MBsinθ
Why this form?
-
Force on each pole: In uniform field B, north pole feels F=mB along field, south pole feels F=mB opposite field.
-
Torque calculation: These equal and opposite forces form a couple:
- Lever arm = 2lsinθ (perpendicular distance between forces)
- Torque = force × lever arm = (mB)×(2lsinθ)
-
Using magnetic moment M=m⋅2l:
τ=MBsinθ
Key insight: The torque tries to align the magnet with the field — this is why a compass needle points north.
Summary Table: Why Each Formula Has Its Form
| Formula | Key Reason |
|---|---|
| F∝1/r2 | Flux spreads over sphere area 4πr2 |
| F∝m1m2 | Force is proportional to source strength (linear response) |
| B∝1/x3 (dipole) | Two opposite poles nearly cancel; residual is dipole field |
| τ=MBsinθ | Lever arm depends on sinθ in a couple |
Remember: Every formula in magnetism is either a Coulomb analog (for poles) or a superposition of such analogs. The 1/r2 law is the foundation — everything else builds on it.
Concept: Magnetic Poles — A magnetic dipole in a uniform field experiences a torque that tries to align it with the field. Stable equilibrium occurs when the dipole is parallel to the field (lowest potential energy), and unstable equilibrium when it is antiparallel (highest potential energy).
Reasoning:
- Potential energy of a magnetic dipole in a uniform field: U=−mBcosθ, where θ is the angle between m and B.
- For stable equilibrium, U is minimum → cosθ=+1 → θ=0∘ (parallel).
- For unstable equilibrium, U is maximum → cosθ=−1 → θ=180∘ (antiparallel).
- Compute U: m=0.32 J T−1, B=0.15 T → mB=0.048 J.
- Stable equilibrium at θ=0∘ with U=−0.048 J;
- unstable equilibrium at θ=180∘ with U=+0.048 J.
A magnetic dipole in a uniform field has minimum potential energy (stable equilibrium) when aligned parallel to the field, and maximum potential energy (unstable equilibrium) when anti-parallel. For the given magnet, stable orientation gives U=−0.048 J, unstable gives U=+0.048 J.
The key idea is that a magnetic dipole — like a bar magnet — in a uniform external field experiences a torque that tries to align it with the field. But the real story is about energy. The potential energy of a magnetic dipole in a uniform field is given by U=−m⋅B=−mBcosθ, where θ is the angle between the magnetic moment vector m and the field B.
Why does this matter for equilibrium? Because nature always seeks the lowest energy state. When the magnet is aligned with the field (θ=0∘), cosθ=1, so U=−mB — the most negative, hence lowest, energy. That’s stable equilibrium: if you nudge it, it will return. When it’s anti-aligned (θ=180∘), cosθ=−1, so U=+mB — the highest energy. That’s unstable: the slightest push sends it spinning toward the stable orientation.
Let’s work through the numbers.
-
Identify the given data
Magnetic moment, m=0.32 J T−1
Magnetic field strength, B=0.15 T
The magnet is free to rotate in the plane of the field, so θ can vary from 0∘ to 180∘.
-
Write the potential energy formula
U=−mBcosθ
- Stable equilibrium This occurs at the minimum of U. Since cosθ is maximum at θ=0∘, we have:
Ustable=−mBcos0∘=−mB
Substitute:
Ustable=−(0.32)(0.15)=−0.048 J
The orientation: the magnet’s north pole points in the direction of the external field.
- Unstable equilibrium This occurs at the maximum of U, at θ=180∘:
Uunstable=−mBcos180∘=−mB(−1)=+mB
So:
Uunstable=+0.048 J
The orientation: the magnet’s north pole points opposite to the external field.
A common mistake is to think that stable equilibrium corresponds to the lowest potential energy magnitude — but energy is signed. −0.048 J is lower than +0.048 J, so the negative value is indeed the minimum. Don’t drop the sign!
You can remember this as: “Like poles repel, opposite poles attract.” In stable equilibrium, the magnet’s south pole is closer to the external field’s north pole (attraction), so the system has lower energy. In unstable, like poles face each other (repulsion), giving higher energy.
The stable equilibrium orientation is parallel to the field with potential energy −0.048 J, and the unstable equilibrium orientation is anti-parallel with potential energy +0.048 J.
Method: Potential Energy Analysis for a Magnetic Dipole in a Uniform Field
This problem uses the potential energy method for a magnetic dipole in a uniform external field. The key idea: a system is in stable equilibrium when its potential energy is minimum, and in unstable equilibrium when its potential energy is maximum.
Step-by-step solution
Step 1: Recall the potential energy formula
For a magnetic dipole (bar magnet) of magnetic moment m placed in a uniform magnetic field B, the potential energy is:
U=−m⋅B=−mBcosθ
where θ is the angle between m and B.
Step 2: Identify the equilibrium conditions
-
Stable equilibrium: U is minimum → cosθ is maximum → cosθ=+1 → θ=0∘
(magnetic moment aligned parallel to the field)
-
Unstable equilibrium: U is maximum → cosθ is minimum → cosθ=−1 → θ=180∘
(magnetic moment anti-parallel to the field)
Step 3: Calculate the potential energies
Given:
m=0.32 J T−1
B=0.15 T
- Stable equilibrium (θ=0∘, cosθ=1):
Ustable=−mBcos0∘=−mB=−(0.32)(0.15)
Ustable=−0.048 J
- Unstable equilibrium (θ=180∘, cosθ=−1):
Uunstable=−mBcos180∘=−mB(−1)=+mB=(0.32)(0.15)
Uunstable=+0.048 J
Final Answer Summary
| Equilibrium type | Orientation (θ) | Potential energy |
|---|---|---|
| Stable | 0∘ (parallel) | −0.048 J |
| Unstable | 180∘ (anti-parallel) | +0.048 J |
Key insight: The negative sign in U=−mBcosθ is crucial — it makes the aligned orientation energetically favourable (lower energy), which is why a freely rotating magnet always settles parallel to the field.
Here are the common mistakes students make on this magnetic poles / torque & potential energy question, and how to avoid each.
Mistake 1: Confusing stable and unstable equilibrium orientations
The error:
Students often think the magnet aligns perpendicular to the field for stable equilibrium, or they swap the two orientations.
Why it happens:
They memorise “stable = minimum energy” but forget the actual angular dependence.
How to avoid:
- Stable equilibrium → magnetic moment m is parallel to B (angle θ=0∘).
- Unstable equilibrium → m is antiparallel to B (θ=180∘).
Think of a compass needle: it points along the field (stable). Flipping it 180° is unstable — the slightest nudge makes it swing back.
Mistake 2: Using the wrong formula for potential energy
The error:
Using U=−mBcosθ but forgetting the negative sign, or using U=+mBcosθ.
Why it happens:
Misremembering the sign convention.
How to avoid:
The potential energy of a magnetic dipole in a uniform field is:
U=−m⋅B=−mBcosθ
- At θ=0∘: cos0=1 → U=−mB (minimum → stable)
- At θ=180∘: cos180=−1 → U=+mB (maximum → unstable)
Check: Minimum energy = stable; maximum energy = unstable.
Mistake 3: Forgetting to include units or misreading given data
The error:
Writing U=−0.32×0.15=−0.048 but omitting the unit (Joules), or misreading m as 0.32 J T−1 and B as 0.15 T.
How to avoid:
Always write the full calculation with units:
Ustable=−mB=−(0.32 J T−1)(0.15 T)=−0.048 J
Uunstable=+mB=+0.048 J
Pro tip: In exams, box your final answer with the correct unit.
Mistake 4: Thinking torque is zero only in stable equilibrium
The error:
Stating that torque is zero only for θ=0∘, forgetting θ=180∘ also gives zero torque.
Why it happens:
Torque τ=mBsinθ — students see sin0=0 but forget sin180=0 too.
How to avoid:
Torque is zero at both θ=0∘ and θ=180∘. The difference is:
- θ=0∘ → stable (restoring torque if displaced)
- θ=180∘ → unstable (torque away from equilibrium if displaced)
Quick Summary Table
| Equilibrium | Orientation | Angle θ | Potential Energy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stable | m∥B | 0∘ | U=−mB=−0.048 J |
| Unstable | m∥−B | 180∘ | U=+mB=+0.048 J |
Final tip: Draw a quick diagram — arrow for m and arrow for B — before writing the answer. It prevents orientation errors every time.
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-22-FN1 markMCQQ.A short bar magnet has a magnetic moment of 0.48 JT−1. The magnitude of magnetic field at a point at 10 cm distance from the centre of the magnet on its axis is (A) 0.96 gauss (B) 0.48 gauss (C) 1.92 gauss (D) 1.44 gauss
›Reveal solutionSolution
The axial field of a short bar magnet falls off as 1/d3; substituting the given moment and distance gives 9.6×10−5 T, i.e. 0.96 gauss.
Concept and Intuition
A bar magnet behaves, at points far from it compared to its own length (the "short magnet" or point-dipole approximation), like a magnetic dipole. On its axis, the field is Baxial=4πμ0d32m — twice as strong as on the equatorial line at the same distance, and falling off rapidly (∝1/d3) because it is a dipole field, not a monopole field. This rapid fall-off is why bar-magnet fields become negligible just a short distance away.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Axial field formula: B=4πμ0⋅d32m, with 4πμ0=10−7 Tm/A.
- Substitute m=0.48 JT−1, d=0.1 m: d3=0.001 m3.
- B=10−7×0.0012×0.48=10−7×960=9.6×10−5 T.
- Convert to gauss (1 T =104 gauss): 9.6×10−5 T=0.96 gauss.
Common Mistakes
- Using the equatorial-field formula (B=4πμ0d3m, without the factor of 2) instead of the axial one — the question specifically asks for the field on the magnet's axis.
- Forgetting to convert tesla to gauss (a factor of 104), which would give an answer 10,000 times too small.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 0.96 gauss.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2024Set ap-2024-05-17-FN1 markMCQQ.Two bar magnets A and B are identical and arranged as shown. Their lengths are negligible when compared to the separation between them. A magnetic needle placed between the magnets at point P gets deflected through an angle 'θ' under their influence. The ratio of distances d1 and d2 is [FIGURE] (bar magnet A with poles S–N lies horizontally on the left; bar magnet B stands vertically on the right with poles S (top) and N (bottom); at point P between them the field B1 from magnet A points along the horizontal axis toward B, and the field B2 from magnet B points vertically; the resultant magnetic needle direction makes angle θ with the horizontal; d1 is the horizontal distance from magnet A to the vertical line through P, and d2 is the horizontal distance from that vertical line to magnet B) (A) (2cotθ)1/3 (B) (2cotθ)1/2 (C) (2tanθ)1/3 (D) (2tanθ)1/2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Setting tanθ=B2/B1 with axial and equatorial dipole fields gives d1/d2=(2tanθ)1/3.
Concept and Intuition
Point P is end-on (axial) to magnet A, whose horizontal field is B1=4πμ0d132M. P is broadside (equatorial) to the perpendicular magnet B, whose field is B2=4πμ0d23M and points vertically. The needle aligns with the resultant, tilted at θ from the horizontal B1 direction.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Axial field of A at P: B1=4πμ0d132M (horizontal).
- Equatorial field of B at P: B2=4πμ0d23M (vertical).
- The deflection satisfies tanθ=B1B2=2M/d13M/d23=2d23d13.
- Rearrange: d23d13=2tanθ⇒d2d1=(2tanθ)1/3.
Common Mistakes
- Using M/d3 for A (it is axial, so the factor is 2M/d3) or 2M/d3 for B (it is equatorial, factor M/d3).
- Writing tanθ=B1/B2 and getting the inverse, (2cotθ)1/3.
- Forgetting to take the cube root, leaving 2tanθ.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — (2tanθ)1/3.
ANSWER: C
NoteThis solution was worked out by our team and cross-checked by a second independent solve. The official answer key for this question could not be confirmed, so please cross-verify with the official paper where possible.
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-17-FN1 markMCQQ.Curl the palm of your right hand around the circular wire with the fingers pointing in the direction of current and the thumb gives the direction of the magnetic field. In this case the upper side of the loop may be thought of as (A) direction of current (B) direction of electric field (C) south pole (D) north pole
›Reveal solutionSolution
The right-hand rule identifies the face of a current loop from which the magnetic field lines emerge as its effective north pole.
Concept and Intuition
A current loop behaves like a magnetic dipole, with field lines emerging from one face (like a bar magnet's north pole) and entering the opposite face (like the south pole). The right-hand rule — curl the fingers in the direction of current flow, and the thumb points in the direction of the magnetic field along the axis — identifies which face is the "north" face: the field lines point out of that face, exactly the way they emerge from a bar magnet's north pole.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Curl the right-hand fingers along the direction of the current in the loop.
- The thumb then points along the axis of the loop, in the direction of the magnetic field inside/through the loop.
- The face from which the field lines emerge (the thumb's side) is, by analogy to a bar magnet, the north pole of this equivalent magnetic dipole.
- So "the upper side of the loop" (the thumb-pointing side, as per the described hand orientation) is the north pole.
Common Mistakes
- Confusing this with the direction of current itself (option A) or electric field (option B), which are unrelated quantities here.
- Getting the curl direction backwards (left-hand vs right-hand), which would flip north and south.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — north pole.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-18-AN1 markMCQQ.Which of the following do not exist? (A) Electric dipoles (B) Electric monopoles (C) Magnetic monopoles (D) Magnetic dipoles
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests a foundational distinction between electricity and magnetism: isolated electric charges exist, but isolated magnetic poles do not. Magnetic monopoles do not exist.
Concept and Intuition
In electrostatics, a single point charge (an "electric monopole") is the most basic and commonly observed object — charges of a single sign exist freely (e.g., an electron or proton). Electric dipoles (pairs of equal and opposite charges) also exist as composite structures. In magnetism, however, every magnet observed in nature has both a north and a south pole together; cutting a bar magnet in half only produces two smaller magnets, each with its own north-south pair, never an isolated pole. This experimental fact is formalized as Gauss's law for magnetism (∮B⋅dA=0), which states magnetic field lines have no beginning or end — unlike electric field lines, which start and end on individual (monopole) charges.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Electric dipoles: composite systems of equal and opposite charges — these exist (e.g. polar molecules).
- Electric monopoles: single isolated charges — these definitely exist (e.g. a free electron or proton).
- Magnetic dipoles: bar magnets, current loops — these exist and are the most basic magnetic sources found.
- Magnetic monopoles: an isolated north or south pole alone — despite theoretical predictions in some particle-physics models, none has ever been experimentally observed; every known magnetic source is a dipole (or higher multipole) at minimum.
- Hence the only entity in the list that does not exist is the magnetic monopole.
Common Mistakes
- Confusing "electric monopole" (which is just a normal single charge, and does exist) with "magnetic monopole" (an isolated magnetic pole, which does not exist) — the terms sound parallel but their physical status is opposite.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — Magnetic monopoles.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-18-FN1 markMCQQ.If B is magnetic field and q is the charge then the following represents the Gauss's law of magnetism (A) ∫B⋅ds=0 (B) ∫B⋅ds=q (C) ∫B⋅ds=4π (D) ∫B⋅ds=μoq
›Reveal solutionSolution
Gauss's law for magnetism asserts zero net magnetic flux through any closed surface, reflecting the absence of magnetic monopoles.
Concept and Intuition
Unlike electric field lines, which begin and end on charges (giving nonzero net flux, per Gauss's law of electrostatics), magnetic field lines always form closed loops with no beginning or end — there are no isolated magnetic "charges" (monopoles). Hence the net flux out of any closed surface for B is always exactly zero, regardless of what currents or magnets are inside or outside.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Compare with Gauss's law for electricity: ∫E⋅ds=q/ε0 (nonzero when charge is enclosed).
- For magnetism, the analogous "magnetic charge" is always zero (no monopoles observed), so ∫B⋅ds=0 always, independent of currents present.
- This matches option (A) exactly; the other options wrongly introduce a dependence on q or constants.
Common Mistakes
- Confusing this with Ampere's law (∮B⋅dl=μ0I, a line integral, not a surface flux integral).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — ∫B⋅ds=0.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-08-AN1 markMCQQ.If a bar magnet is cut along the dotted line as shown in the figure and the two pieces are held separated by a small distance as they are, then [FIGURE] (a rectangular bar magnet with pole N labelled at the left end and pole S labelled at the right end; a vertical dotted line cuts through the bar approximately at its midpoint, perpendicular to its length) (A) They repel each other. (B) They attract each other. (C) They do not experience any force on each other. (D) Will repel or attract depending on the location of cut.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Cutting a bar magnet creates two new poles at the cut faces; in the original alignment these new faces are opposite (S facing N), so the pieces attract.
Concept and Intuition
A bar magnet's poles arise from an unbroken chain of aligned atomic dipoles running along its length, N at one end and S at the other. Cutting it does not erase this alignment — each half is simply a shorter version of the same chain, so each half becomes a complete magnet on its own, with a north and a south pole. The end that was already a pole (say N) stays N. The newly exposed face at the cut must become the other pole (S), because inside a magnet field lines run from S to N — the cut face, which used to be the interior mid-point where the field pointed toward the N end, becomes the new S pole for the left piece. By the same logic the right piece's cut face becomes a new N pole.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Original magnet: N (left end) ——— S (right end), dotted cut line at the midpoint.
- After cutting, left piece: retains N at its left end; develops a new S pole at its cut (right) face.
- Right piece: retains S at its right end; develops a new N pole at its cut (left) face.
- The two pieces are held apart "as they are" — i.e., in their original relative alignment, so the left piece's cut face (S) is nearest the right piece's cut face (N).
- Opposite poles (S and N) facing each other means the two pieces attract — in fact, this is exactly why they would snap back together into the original single magnet if released.
Common Mistakes
- Assuming both cut faces become the same type of pole (e.g., both N) — this would violate the idea that each half is now a full magnet with one N and one S pole.
- Forgetting that "held separated ... as they are" means the original alignment is preserved (not flipped), which is what makes the facing poles opposite.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — They attract each other.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-08-FN1 markMCQQ.A bar magnet of length 16 cm is placed in the magnetic meridian with the N-pole pointing towards geographical north. Two neutral points separated by 12 cm are obtained on the equatorial line of the magnet. If the horizontal component of earth's magnetic field = 3.2×10−5 T, then the pole strength of magnet is (A) 0.25 Am (B) 0.5 Am (C) 1 Am (D) 2 Am
›Reveal solutionSolution
Uses the equatorial-field neutral-point condition of a bar magnet to solve for pole strength, giving 2 Am.
Concept and Intuition
"Neutral points" on the equatorial line of a bar magnet are where the magnet's own (equatorial) field exactly cancels the Earth's horizontal field, so their location pins down the magnet's moment. The equatorial field of a short bar magnet at distance d from its centre is Beq=4πμ0(d2+l2)3/2m, where m=qm×2l is the magnetic moment and l is the half-length.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Half-length: l=16/2=8cm=0.08m.
- Neutral points are symmetric about the centre, separated by 12cm, so each is at d=6cm=0.06m from the centre.
- At a neutral point: Beq=H⇒4πμ0⋅(d2+l2)3/2qm(2l)=H.
- Compute d2+l2=0.0036+0.0064=0.01m2, so (d2+l2)3/2=(0.01)1.5=0.001m3.
- Substitute μ0/4π=10−7: 10−7×0.001qm(0.16)=3.2×10−5.
- Simplify: 1.6×10−5qm=3.2×10−5⇒qm=2Am.
Common Mistakes
- Using the full magnet length (16 cm) as l instead of the half-length (8 cm).
- Using the full neutral-point separation (12 cm) as d instead of half of it (6 cm).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — 2 Am.
ANSWER: D
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.