The molar conductivity of KCl solutions at different concentrations at 298 K are given below:
| c / mol L−1 | Λm / S cm2 mol−1 |
|---|---|
| 0.000198 | 148.61 |
| 0.000309 | 148.29 |
| 0.000521 | 147.81 |
| 0.000989 | 147.09 |
Show that a plot between Λm and c1/2 is a straight line. Determine the values of Λm0 and A for KCl.
Concept understanding — Molar Conductivity
From Resistance to Conductance: Flipping the Idea
You already know resistance (R) — it tells you how much a material opposes the flow of current. A high resistance means the wire fights the current; a low resistance means it lets current through easily.
Now flip that thought. Instead of asking "how much does it resist?", ask "how easily does it let current flow?" That's exactly what conductance measures.
Conductance (G) is the reciprocal of resistance:
G=R1
Unit: siemens (S) — named after Werner von Siemens. 1 S = 1 A/V (ampere per volt).
If a wire has R=10 Ω, its conductance is G=0.1 S. If R=0.5 Ω, G=2 S — it conducts twice as well.
Ohm's Law in Conductance Form
You know V=IR. Rearranging:
I=RV=GV
So current = conductance × voltage. A high-conductance material draws a large current for the same voltage — it's a "good conductor."
Now, Conductivity: The Material's Intrinsic Property
Resistance depends on two things: the material itself (its "resistivity" ρ) and the geometry (length L, cross-sectional area A):
R=ρAL
Conductance also depends on geometry. A thicker wire (larger A) or a shorter wire (smaller L) has higher conductance. To isolate the material's inherent ability to conduct, we define conductivity (σ):
σ=ρ1
And for a uniform wire:
G=σLA
Conductivity is the reciprocal of resistivity. It tells you how well the material itself conducts, independent of shape and size.
- Unit: siemens per metre (S/m).
- High σ → good conductor (copper: ≈5.8×107 S/m).
- Low σ → poor conductor / insulator (glass: ≈10−12 S/m).
Don't confuse conductance (property of a specific object, depends on geometry) with conductivity (property of the material, independent of geometry). A short thick copper wire has high conductance; a long thin copper wire has lower conductance — but both have the same conductivity.
The Big Picture in One Table
| Quantity | Symbol | Definition | Depends on | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resistance | R | V/I | Material + geometry | Ω |
| Resistivity | ρ | RA/L | Material only | Ω⋅m |
| Conductance | G | 1/R | Material + geometry | S |
| Conductivity | σ | 1/ρ | Material only | S/m |
Intuitive Analogy
Think of a water pipe:
- Resistance = how hard it is to push water through (narrow, long pipe).
- Conductance = how easily water flows (wide, short pipe).
- Resistivity = the "roughness" of the pipe's inner surface (material property).
- Conductivity = the "smoothness" of the pipe's inner surface (material property).
A copper pipe is smooth (high conductivity). A rubber hose is rough (low conductivity). But a short, fat rubber hose might still have decent conductance — because geometry can compensate for poor material.
Key Takeaway for Exams
- G=R1 and σ=ρ1.
- G=σLA for a uniform conductor.
- Conductivity is an intrinsic material property; conductance is an extrinsic property of a specific object.
- In circuits, you'll often use conductance when dealing with parallel resistors (total conductance = sum of individual conductances).
You now have the complete picture: from resistance to conductance, from resistivity to conductivity — and the clean relationship between them.
Molar conductivity is a quantitative cornerstone of the NCERT/CBSE Class 12 Chemistry Electrochemistry chapter, and ‘molar conductivity formula’ or ‘molar conductivity vs concentration’ are recurring important-question types in board exams as well as JEE Main and NEET chemistry. This concept also sets up Kohlrausch's law, a common follow-on topic in the same unit.
Why this formula?
Conductance and Conductivity: Why the Formulas Hold
Let's build this from first principles — understanding the why before the what.
1. The Core Idea: How Easily Does Current Flow?
Think of a conductor (like a copper wire). When you apply a voltage across it, electrons drift through the material. Two questions arise:
- How much current flows for a given voltage? → This is conductance (G).
- How well does the material itself allow current? → This is conductivity (σ).
The key distinction: Conductance depends on the size and shape of the object. Conductivity is an intrinsic property of the material.
2. Ohm's Law in Terms of Conductance
You know Ohm's law:
V=IR
But we can rewrite it as:
I=RV
Define conductance G as the reciprocal of resistance:
G=R1
So:
I=GV
Why this makes sense:
- A larger G means more current for the same voltage — the conductor "conducts" better.
- G has units of siemens (S) = A/V.
3. From Resistance to Conductivity: The Geometry Factor
Resistance of a uniform conductor depends on:
- Length L (longer → more resistance)
- Cross-sectional area A (thicker → less resistance)
- Material property ρ (resistivity)
The formula:
R=ρAL
Now, conductivity σ is the reciprocal of resistivity:
σ=ρ1
So:
R=σ1⋅AL
Why this form?
- If you double the length, electrons have to travel twice as far, colliding more → resistance doubles.
- If you double the area, there's twice as many "lanes" for electrons → resistance halves.
4. The Key Formula: Conductance in Terms of Conductivity
Since G=1/R, we get:
G=σLA
This is the central relationship. Let's see why it holds:
- σ tells you how well the material conducts (intrinsic).
- A/L tells you how the geometry amplifies or reduces that.
Intuition:
- A fat, short wire (A large, L small) has high conductance.
- A thin, long wire (A small, L large) has low conductance.
- A material with high σ (like copper) gives higher G than one with low σ (like iron), for the same shape.
5. Microscopic Derivation (Why σ Exists)
At the microscopic level, conductivity arises from electron motion:
σ=neμ
Where:
- n = number of free electrons per unit volume
- e = electron charge
- μ = electron mobility (how fast they drift per unit electric field)
Why this works:
- More free electrons (n large) → more charge carriers → higher conductivity.
- Higher mobility (μ large) → electrons move faster for the same push → higher conductivity.
This explains why metals (high n) are good conductors, and why heating reduces σ (more collisions → lower μ).
6. Summary: The Logical Chain
| Step | Concept | Formula | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ohm's law | V=IR | Voltage drives current against resistance |
| 2 | Conductance | G=1/R | Measures ease of flow |
| 3 | Resistivity | R=ρL/A | Geometry + material |
| 4 | Conductivity | σ=1/ρ | Material's intrinsic ability |
| 5 | Key result | G=σLA | Combines material + geometry |
Final takeaway:
Conductance G is not just a number — it's the product of how good the material is (σ) and how the shape helps (A/L). This is why a thick copper wire conducts far better than a thin iron wire of the same length.
Concept: Molar Conductivity — For strong electrolytes, Kohlrausch's law states Λm=Λm0−Ac, so a plot of Λm vs c should be linear.
Step 1: Compute c for each concentration
| c (mol L⁻¹) | c (mol¹/² L⁻¹/²) | Λm (S cm² mol⁻¹) |
|---|---|---|
| 0.000198 | 0.01407 | 148.61 |
| 0.000309 | 0.01758 | 148.29 |
| 0.000521 | 0.02283 | 147.81 |
| 0.000989 | 0.03145 | 147.09 |
Step 2: Check linearity — Λm decreases uniformly as c increases, confirming a straight-line relationship (as c rises, Λm falls; equivalently Λm increases on dilution).
Step 3: Determine A (slope) and Λm0 (intercept)
Slope =−A=0.03145−0.01407147.09−148.61=0.01738−1.52≈−87.46
So A=87.46 S cm2mol−1/(mol L−1)1/2.
Extending the straight line to c=0, the graphical intercept read from the plot is Λm0=150.0 S cm2mol−1.
The plot of Λm vs c is a straight line; from it, Λm0=150.0 S cm2mol−1 and A=87.46 S cm2mol−1/(mol L−1)1/2 for KCl at 298 K.
NCERT reads Λm0=150.0 from its graphical extrapolation. A full least-squares fit of the four data points gives Λm0≈149.8 S cm2mol−1 and A≈87.5 — essentially identical; the small difference is only graphical rounding of the intercept.
For strong electrolytes like KCl, molar conductivity varies linearly with the square root of concentration (Kohlrausch's law). Plotting Λm vs c1/2 gives a straight line; the book reads its intercept as Λm0=150.0 S cm2 mol−1 and its slope gives A=87.46 S cm2 mol−1 (mol L−1)−1/2.
The key idea here is Kohlrausch's law of independent migration of ions. For strong electrolytes, as you dilute the solution, ions move more freely because interionic attractions weaken. The molar conductivity Λm therefore increases on dilution — and, plotted against the square root of concentration, it decreases linearly as c rises. This linear relationship is the hallmark of a strong electrolyte.
Why c? Because the Debye–Hückel theory shows that the ionic atmosphere dragging on a moving ion has a radius proportional to 1/c. So the retarding effect scales with c, and conductivity rises as c falls.
The equation is:
Λm=Λm0−Ac
where Λm0 is the limiting molar conductivity (at infinite dilution) and A is a constant for the electrolyte.
Let's test this with the given data.
-
Convert the data to c values.
c (mol L⁻¹) c (mol L⁻¹)1/2 Λm (S cm² mol⁻¹) 0.000198 0.01407 148.61 0.000309 0.01758 148.29 0.000521 0.02283 147.81 0.000989 0.03145 147.09 -
Plot Λm against c.
The points fall on a straight line: as c increases, Λm decreases linearly. This confirms Kohlrausch's law for KCl.
-
Find A (slope magnitude).
The slope of the line is −A:
slope=0.03145−0.01407147.09−148.61=0.01738−1.52=−87.46 S cm2 mol−1 (mol L−1)−1/2
So A=87.46 S cm2 mol−1 (mol L−1)−1/2.
- Find Λm0 (the intercept). Extending the straight line to c=0 (infinite dilution), NCERT reads the intercept from the graph as:
Λm0=150.0 S cm2 mol−1
You don't need to draw the graph perfectly in an exam — just show that the points satisfy a linear relation by computing the slope between successive pairs. If the slopes are nearly constant, the plot is a straight line.
A common mistake is to plot Λm against c instead of c. That curve is not linear — it bends. Always use c for strong electrolytes.
NCERT reads Λm0=150.0 from its graphical extrapolation. If you instead fit the four points algebraically (least squares, or point-slope from the first point: 148.61+87.46×0.01407=149.84), you get Λm0≈149.8 S cm2 mol−1 and A≈87.5 — essentially identical to the printed values; the difference is only graphical rounding of the intercept.
The plot of Λm vs c1/2 is a straight line, giving Λm0=150.0 S cm2 mol−1 and A=87.46 S cm2 mol−1 (mol L−1)−1/2 for KCl at 298 K.
Method: Kohlrausch's Law (Empirical Debye–Hückel–Onsager Plot)
Kohlrausch observed that for strong electrolytes, molar conductivity varies linearly with the square root of concentration at low concentrations:
Λm=Λm0−Ac
Here:
- Λm0 = limiting molar conductivity (intercept)
- A = Kohlrausch constant (magnitude of the slope; the slope of the line is −A)
Steps
Step 1: Compute c for each concentration
| c (mol L⁻¹) | c (mol L⁻¹)^(1/2) | Λm (S cm² mol⁻¹) |
|---|---|---|
| 0.000198 | 0.01407 | 148.61 |
| 0.000309 | 0.01758 | 148.29 |
| 0.000521 | 0.02283 | 147.81 |
| 0.000989 | 0.03145 | 147.09 |
Step 2: Plot Λm vs c
Put c on the x-axis and Λm on the y-axis. The points fall on a straight line with negative slope.
Step 3: Determine A (slope)
Take two well-separated points:
- Point 1: (0.01407, 148.61)
- Point 2: (0.03145, 147.09)
slope=0.03145−0.01407147.09−148.61=0.01738−1.52≈−87.46
Since Λm=Λm0−Ac, the constant is:
A=87.46 S cm2mol−1(mol L−1)−1/2
Step 4: Determine Λm0 (intercept)
Extend the line to c=0. NCERT reads the intercept from the graph as:
Λm0=150.0 S cm2mol−1
Final Result
- Method: Kohlrausch's empirical law (linear Λm vs c plot)
- Λm0 = 150.0 S cm² mol⁻¹
- A = 87.46 S cm² mol⁻¹ (mol L⁻¹)^(−1/2)
The straight-line nature confirms KCl behaves as a strong electrolyte at these dilutions.
NCERT reads Λm0=150.0 graphically. A least-squares fit of the four points gives Λm0≈149.8 and A≈87.5 — essentially the same; the difference is only graphical rounding of the intercept.
1. ✗ Mistake: Forgetting to convert concentration units
Students often take c directly in mol L−1 and then compute c1/2 without realising that the Kohlrausch law uses c in mol L−1 — but the square root is fine as given.
The real trap: they forget that Λm is already in S cm2 mol−1 and try to convert it unnecessarily.
✓ How to avoid:
- Check units at the start. Here, both c and Λm are given in standard units.
- Only convert if the problem explicitly asks for SI units (e.g., S m2 mol−1). For this problem, use as given.
2. ✗ Mistake: Plotting Λm vs c instead of Λm vs c1/2
This is the most common error. The Kohlrausch law is:
Λm=Λm0−Ac
So the x-axis must be c, not c.
✓ How to avoid:
- Always write the law first before plotting.
- Compute a new column: c for each concentration.
- Plot Λm on y-axis, c on x-axis.
3. ✗ Mistake: Errors in calculating c
Students sometimes:
- Take square root of the number without the unit.
- Miscalculate powers of 10 (e.g., 0.000198=0.01407, not 0.1407).
✓ How to avoid:
- Use scientific notation: 0.000198=1.98×10−4 Then c=1.98×10−2≈1.407×10−2
- Double-check each value with a calculator.
4. ✗ Mistake: Drawing a rough freehand graph and guessing intercept/slope
Students often sketch a line by eye and read Λm0 from the y-intercept inaccurately.
✓ How to avoid:
- Use graph paper or plotting software.
- Draw the best-fit straight line (not just connecting dots).
- Read Λm0 as the y-intercept (where c=0).
- Read slope =−A from two far-apart points on the line.
5. ✗ Mistake: Confusing A with the slope directly
The Kohlrausch law is:
Λm=Λm0−Ac
So the slope of the line = −A. Students often take slope = A and get sign wrong.
✓ How to avoid:
- Write the equation in y = mx + c form:
- y=Λm
- x=c
- m=−A
- c=Λm0
- So if slope =−50, then A=50.
6. ✗ Mistake: Forgetting units for Λm0 and A
Students report Λm0=150 without units, or give A in wrong units.
✓ How to avoid:
- Λm0 has same units as Λm: S cm2 mol−1
- A has units: S cm2 mol−1⋅(mol L−1)−1/2 (Often written as S cm2 mol−1⋅L1/2 mol−1/2)
7. ✗ Mistake: Not checking linearity properly
Students assume the plot is a straight line without verifying.
✓ How to avoid:
- After plotting, check if points lie close to a straight line.
- For strong electrolytes like KCl, it should be linear at low concentrations.
- If one point deviates, recheck calculation of c for that point.
Quick Summary Table
| Mistake | How to Avoid |
|---|---|
| Plotting Λm vs c | Always plot vs c |
| Wrong c values | Use scientific notation, double-check |
| Freehand inaccurate graph | Use graph paper / software, best-fit line |
| Slope = A (wrong sign) | Slope = −A |
| No units for Λm0, A | Always attach correct units |
| Not checking linearity | Verify points lie on a line |
Final tip: Before you start, write the Kohlrausch law clearly. Then compute c, plot, find intercept (Λm0) and slope (−A). This structured approach eliminates most errors.
- AHSEC Higher Secondary (HS) Final Examination 2026Set ANNUAL2 marksQ.State the variation of conductivity and molar conductivity of acetic acid with dilution.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Diluting acetic acid lowers its conductivity but raises its molar conductivity (increasing dissociation).
Conductivity (κ) measures the conductance of ions present in unit volume of solution. On dilution the number of ions per unit volume decreases, so conductivity always decreases with dilution.
Molar conductivity (Λ_m = κ × 1000 / c) measures the conducting power of all the ions produced by one mole of electrolyte. On dilution the volume containing one mole increases, and for a weak electrolyte like acetic acid the degree of dissociation (α) rises steeply, releasing many more ions. Therefore molar conductivity increases with dilution, and the increase is very sharp near infinite dilution (where α → 1). Because acetic acid is weak, Λ_m does not reach a limiting value by simple extrapolation and Λ°_m is instead found using Kohlrausch's law.
✓Final answerConductivity of acetic acid decreases on dilution; molar conductivity increases (sharply) on dilution due to increasing dissociation.
- AHSEC Higher Secondary (HS) Final Examination 2024Set ANNUAL2 marksQ.Define conductivity and molar conductivity for the solution of an electrolyte. Discuss their variation with concentration.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Conductivity falls as a solution is diluted (fewer ions per unit volume), while molar conductivity rises on dilution (each mole's ions become more independent / more of a weak electrolyte dissociates).
Conductivity (κ, specific conductance):
Conductivity is defined as the conductance of a solution of unit length (1 cm) and unit cross-sectional area (1 cm²) — i.e. it is the reciprocal of resistivity (ρ):
κ = 1/ρ
Its SI unit is S m⁻¹ (commonly expressed as S cm⁻¹). It measures how well the solution as a whole (per unit volume) conducts electricity.
Molar conductivity (Λm):
Molar conductivity is the conducting power of all the ions produced by dissolving 1 mole of an electrolyte in solution, and is related to conductivity by:
Λm = κ × 1000 / C (C = molar concentration in mol L⁻¹, κ in S cm⁻¹)
Its unit is S cm² mol⁻¹.
Variation with concentration:
-
Conductivity (κ) always decreases as the solution is diluted, because the number of ions per unit volume of solution decreases with dilution, even though the degree of dissociation (for weak electrolytes) increases.
-
Molar conductivity (Λm) always increases as concentration decreases (i.e. on dilution), because it is normalised per mole of electrolyte:
• For strong electrolytes: Λm increases slowly with dilution (ionic interactions/inter-ionic attractions decrease), following the Debye-Hückel-Onsager relation Λm = Λm° − A√C, so Λm° (limiting molar conductivity) can be found by extrapolating a Λm vs √C plot to C → 0.
• For weak electrolytes: Λm increases very sharply near infinite dilution because the degree of dissociation increases markedly as concentration falls (more of the electrolyte ionises), and Λm° cannot be obtained by extrapolation — it must be calculated using Kohlrausch's law of independent migration of ions.
✓Final answerκ (conductance of 1 cm of solution, unit S/cm) decreases on dilution; Λm (= 1000κ/C, conducting power per mole, unit S cm² mol⁻¹) increases on dilution — slowly for strong electrolytes, sharply for weak electrolytes near infinite dilution.
-
- AHSEC Higher Secondary (HS) Final Examination 2023Set ANNUAL2 marksQ.The following limiting molar conductivities are given as: lambda-m-zero(H2SO4) = x S cm^2 mol^-1, lambda-m-zero(K2SO4) = y S cm^2 mol^-1, lambda-m-zero(CH3COOK) = z S cm^2 mol^-1. Calculate limiting molar conductivity of acetic acid. OR The cell potential for the following cell is 0.576V at 298K. Calculate the pH of the solution: Pt | H2(g) | H+(aq) || Cu2+(0.01M) | Cu(s). Given, E-zero(Cu2+/Cu) = 0.34V.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Option 1 combines the three given conductivities via Kohlrausch's law to cancel out K⁺ and SO₄²⁻; Option 2 uses the Nernst equation for the H₂|H⁺ vs Cu²⁺|Cu cell to back-calculate [H⁺].
Option 1 — Limiting molar conductivity of acetic acid via Kohlrausch's law:
By Kohlrausch's law of independent migration of ions, each limiting molar conductivity splits into ionic contributions:
2λ0(H+)+λ0(SO42−)=x...(i), from H2SO4
2λ0(K+)+λ0(SO42−)=y...(ii), from K2SO4
λ0(CH3COO−)+λ0(K+)=z...(iii), from CH3COOK
Subtracting (ii) from (i): 2λ0(H+)−2λ0(K+)=x−y⇒λ0(H+)=λ0(K+)+2x−y
We want λm0(CH3COOH)=λ0(CH3COO−)+λ0(H+). From (iii), λ0(CH3COO−)=z−λ0(K+), so:
λm0(CH3COOH)=[z−λ0(K+)]+[λ0(K+)+2x−y]=z+2x−y
(Equivalently, λm0(CH3COOH)=λm0(CH3COOK)+λm0(21H2SO4)−λm0(21K2SO4).)
Option 2 — pH from cell potential:
Cell: Pt∣H2(g)∣H+(aq) ∣∣ Cu2+(0.01M)∣Cu(s), with anode = H₂/H⁺ (oxidation, E0=0V) and cathode = Cu²⁺/Cu (reduction, E0=0.34V).
Ecell0=Ecathode0−Eanode0=0.34−0=0.34 V
Overall reaction: H2(g)+Cu2+(aq)→2H+(aq)+Cu(s), n=2.
Nernst equation (taking PH2=1 atm):
Ecell=Ecell0−n0.0591log[Cu2+][H+]2
0.576=0.34−20.0591log0.01[H+]2
0.236=−0.02955log0.01[H+]2⟹log0.01[H+]2=−7.99
[H+]2=0.01×10−7.99=10−9.99⟹[H+]=10−4.99 M
pH=−log[H+]≈5.0
✓Final answerOption 1: λm0(CH3COOH)=z+2x−y. Option 2: pH ≈ 5.0.
- AHSEC Higher Secondary (HS) Final Examination 2020Set ANNUAL2 marksQ.Define molar conductivity of a solution. Explain how molar conductivity changes with change in concentration of solution for a weak and a strong electrolyte. (1+1=2)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Molar conductivity is conductivity per mole of dissolved electrolyte; it rises on dilution for both strong and weak electrolytes, but far more steeply for weak electrolytes because dilution increases their degree of dissociation.
Definition of molar conductivity
Molar conductivity (Λm) is the conducting power of all the ions produced by dissolving one mole of an electrolyte in solution. It is related to the specific conductivity (κ) and molar concentration (C) by:
Λm = κ × 1000 / C (with κ in S cm⁻¹ and C in mol L⁻¹, giving Λm in S cm² mol⁻¹)
Variation with concentration — strong electrolytes
For strong electrolytes (fully ionised at all concentrations, e.g. NaCl, KCl), Λm increases only slowly as concentration decreases (i.e. on dilution). This is because, even though the number of ions per unit volume stays proportional to concentration (the electrolyte is always ~100% ionised), interionic attractive forces between the oppositely charged ions reduce their mobility at higher concentrations; diluting the solution weakens these interionic forces, allowing ions to move a little more freely, so Λm rises gradually. Λm for a strong electrolyte varies linearly with √C (Debye-Hückel-Onsager equation), so Λm° (the limiting molar conductivity at infinite dilution) can be found by extrapolating the Λm vs √C plot to C = 0.
Variation with concentration — weak electrolytes
For weak electrolytes (only partially ionised, e.g. CH3COOH), Λm increases sharply as the solution is diluted. This is mainly because dilution shifts the ionisation equilibrium further towards dissociation (by Le Chatelier's principle / the dissociation constant expression), so the degree of dissociation (α) increases significantly with dilution, producing many more ions per mole of electrolyte at low concentration than at high concentration. Because of this steep, non-linear rise near C = 0, the Λm vs √C curve for a weak electrolyte cannot be extrapolated to obtain Λm° — instead Λm° must be calculated indirectly using Kohlrausch's law of independent migration of ions.
✓Final answerMolar conductivity, Λm = κ×1000/C, is the conducting power of all ions from one mole of electrolyte. On dilution, Λm increases gradually for strong electrolytes (weakening interionic attraction) but increases sharply for weak electrolytes (because their degree of dissociation rises with dilution).
- AHSEC Higher Secondary (HS) Final Examination 2020Set ANNUAL2 marksQ.(a) Following reactions occur at cathode during the electrolysis of aqueous silver chloride: Ag+(aq) + e- -> Ag(s), E° = +0.80V; H+(aq) + e- -> 1/2 H2(g), E° = 0.00V. On the basis of their standard reduction electrode potential (E°) values, which reaction is feasible at the cathode and why?(1)(b) State Kohlrausch law of independent migration of ions. Write an expression for the molar conductivity of acetic acid at infinite dilution according to Kohlrausch law. (1/2+1/2=1)
›Reveal solutionSolution
(a) The half-reaction with the more positive standard reduction potential occurs preferentially at the cathode. (b) Kohlrausch's law lets us calculate the limiting molar conductivity of any electrolyte, including weak ones like acetic acid, by summing the independent ionic contributions.
(a) Which reaction occurs at the cathode?
Given: Ag+(aq) + e- → Ag(s), E° = +0.80 V and H+(aq) + e- → ½H2(g), E° = 0.00 V
At the cathode, reduction occurs, and between two competing reduction half-reactions, the one with the higher (more positive) standard reduction potential is thermodynamically more favourable and occurs preferentially, since it has the greater tendency to be reduced (to gain electrons). Since E°(Ag+/Ag) = +0.80 V is more positive than E°(H+/H2) = 0.00 V, silver ions are reduced in preference to hydrogen ions at the cathode:
Ag+(aq) + e- → Ag(s)
(b) Kohlrausch's law of independent migration of ions
At infinite dilution, when dissociation of an electrolyte is complete and interionic interactions vanish, each ion migrates independently of the other ion with which it is associated, and each ion makes its own definite contribution to the total molar conductivity of the electrolyte, regardless of the nature of the other ion present. Mathematically, for an electrolyte that dissociates into ν+ cations and ν- anions:
Λm° = ν+ λ°+ + ν- λ°-
where λ°+ and λ°- are the limiting (infinite-dilution) molar conductivities of the cation and anion respectively.
Molar conductivity of acetic acid at infinite dilution
Acetic acid, CH3COOH, dissociates into one H+ and one CH3COO- ion, so:
Λm°(CH3COOH) = λ°(H+) + λ°(CH3COO-)
(This is especially useful because acetic acid is a weak electrolyte whose Λm° cannot be found by direct extrapolation; it is instead obtained via Kohlrausch's law using the known λ° values of H+ and CH3COO-, e.g. combining data from strong electrolytes: Λm°(CH3COOH) = Λm°(CH3COONa) + Λm°(HCl) − Λm°(NaCl).)
✓Final answer- Ag+ + e- → Ag is feasible at the cathode (E°(Ag+/Ag) = +0.80 V > E°(H+/H2) = 0.00 V, so Ag+ is reduced preferentially).
- Kohlrausch's law: at infinite dilution each ion contributes independently to Λm°; Λm°(CH3COOH) = λ°(H+) + λ°(CH3COO-).
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.