Q.Calculate Λm0 for CaCl2 and MgSO4 from the data given in Table 3.4.
(The relevant limiting molar conductivities are: λ0(Ca2+)=119.0, λ0(Cl−)=76.3, λ0(Mg2+)=106.0 and λ0(SO42−)=160.0 S cm2 mol−1.)
Concept understanding — Molar Conductivity
From Resistance to Conductance: Flipping the Idea
You already know resistance (R) — it tells you how much a material opposes the flow of current. A high resistance means the wire fights the current; a low resistance means it lets current through easily.
Now flip that thought. Instead of asking "how much does it resist?", ask "how easily does it let current flow?" That's exactly what conductance measures.
Conductance (G) is the reciprocal of resistance:
G=R1
Unit: siemens (S) — named after Werner von Siemens. 1 S = 1 A/V (ampere per volt).
If a wire has R=10 Ω, its conductance is G=0.1 S. If R=0.5 Ω, G=2 S — it conducts twice as well.
Ohm's Law in Conductance Form
You know V=IR. Rearranging:
I=RV=GV
So current = conductance × voltage. A high-conductance material draws a large current for the same voltage — it's a "good conductor."
Now, Conductivity: The Material's Intrinsic Property
Resistance depends on two things: the material itself (its "resistivity" ρ) and the geometry (length L, cross-sectional area A):
R=ρAL
Conductance also depends on geometry. A thicker wire (larger A) or a shorter wire (smaller L) has higher conductance. To isolate the material's inherent ability to conduct, we define conductivity (σ):
σ=ρ1
And for a uniform wire:
G=σLA
Conductivity is the reciprocal of resistivity. It tells you how well the material itself conducts, independent of shape and size.
- Unit: siemens per metre (S/m).
- High σ → good conductor (copper: ≈5.8×107 S/m).
- Low σ → poor conductor / insulator (glass: ≈10−12 S/m).
Don't confuse conductance (property of a specific object, depends on geometry) with conductivity (property of the material, independent of geometry). A short thick copper wire has high conductance; a long thin copper wire has lower conductance — but both have the same conductivity.
The Big Picture in One Table
| Quantity | Symbol | Definition | Depends on | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resistance | R | V/I | Material + geometry | Ω |
| Resistivity | ρ | RA/L | Material only | Ω⋅m |
| Conductance | G | 1/R | Material + geometry | S |
| Conductivity | σ | 1/ρ | Material only | S/m |
Intuitive Analogy
Think of a water pipe:
- Resistance = how hard it is to push water through (narrow, long pipe).
- Conductance = how easily water flows (wide, short pipe).
- Resistivity = the "roughness" of the pipe's inner surface (material property).
- Conductivity = the "smoothness" of the pipe's inner surface (material property).
A copper pipe is smooth (high conductivity). A rubber hose is rough (low conductivity). But a short, fat rubber hose might still have decent conductance — because geometry can compensate for poor material.
Key Takeaway for Exams
- G=R1 and σ=ρ1.
- G=σLA for a uniform conductor.
- Conductivity is an intrinsic material property; conductance is an extrinsic property of a specific object.
- In circuits, you'll often use conductance when dealing with parallel resistors (total conductance = sum of individual conductances).
You now have the complete picture: from resistance to conductance, from resistivity to conductivity — and the clean relationship between them.
Molar conductivity is a quantitative cornerstone of the NCERT/CBSE Class 12 Chemistry Electrochemistry chapter, and ‘molar conductivity formula’ or ‘molar conductivity vs concentration’ are recurring important-question types in board exams as well as JEE Main and NEET chemistry. This concept also sets up Kohlrausch's law, a common follow-on topic in the same unit.
Why this formula?
Conductance and Conductivity: Why the Formulas Hold
Let's build this from first principles — understanding the why before the what.
1. The Core Idea: How Easily Does Current Flow?
Think of a conductor (like a copper wire). When you apply a voltage across it, electrons drift through the material. Two questions arise:
- How much current flows for a given voltage? → This is conductance (G).
- How well does the material itself allow current? → This is conductivity (σ).
The key distinction: Conductance depends on the size and shape of the object. Conductivity is an intrinsic property of the material.
2. Ohm's Law in Terms of Conductance
You know Ohm's law:
V=IR
But we can rewrite it as:
I=RV
Define conductance G as the reciprocal of resistance:
G=R1
So:
I=GV
Why this makes sense:
- A larger G means more current for the same voltage — the conductor "conducts" better.
- G has units of siemens (S) = A/V.
3. From Resistance to Conductivity: The Geometry Factor
Resistance of a uniform conductor depends on:
- Length L (longer → more resistance)
- Cross-sectional area A (thicker → less resistance)
- Material property ρ (resistivity)
The formula:
R=ρAL
Now, conductivity σ is the reciprocal of resistivity:
σ=ρ1
So:
R=σ1⋅AL
Why this form?
- If you double the length, electrons have to travel twice as far, colliding more → resistance doubles.
- If you double the area, there's twice as many "lanes" for electrons → resistance halves.
4. The Key Formula: Conductance in Terms of Conductivity
Since G=1/R, we get:
G=σLA
This is the central relationship. Let's see why it holds:
- σ tells you how well the material conducts (intrinsic).
- A/L tells you how the geometry amplifies or reduces that.
Intuition:
- A fat, short wire (A large, L small) has high conductance.
- A thin, long wire (A small, L large) has low conductance.
- A material with high σ (like copper) gives higher G than one with low σ (like iron), for the same shape.
5. Microscopic Derivation (Why σ Exists)
At the microscopic level, conductivity arises from electron motion:
σ=neμ
Where:
- n = number of free electrons per unit volume
- e = electron charge
- μ = electron mobility (how fast they drift per unit electric field)
Why this works:
- More free electrons (n large) → more charge carriers → higher conductivity.
- Higher mobility (μ large) → electrons move faster for the same push → higher conductivity.
This explains why metals (high n) are good conductors, and why heating reduces σ (more collisions → lower μ).
6. Summary: The Logical Chain
| Step | Concept | Formula | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ohm's law | V=IR | Voltage drives current against resistance |
| 2 | Conductance | G=1/R | Measures ease of flow |
| 3 | Resistivity | R=ρL/A | Geometry + material |
| 4 | Conductivity | σ=1/ρ | Material's intrinsic ability |
| 5 | Key result | G=σLA | Combines material + geometry |
Final takeaway:
Conductance G is not just a number — it's the product of how good the material is (σ) and how the shape helps (A/L). This is why a thick copper wire conducts far better than a thin iron wire of the same length.
Concept: Molar Conductivity — Kohlrausch’s law of independent migration of ions states that the limiting molar conductivity of an electrolyte is the sum of the limiting molar conductivities of its constituent ions, each multiplied by its stoichiometric coefficient.
Step 1: For CaCl2
CaCl2 dissociates as Ca2++2Cl−.
Using Kohlrausch’s law:
Λm0(CaCl2)=λ0(Ca2+)+2λ0(Cl−)
Step 2: Substitute values
Λm0(CaCl2)=119.0+2(76.3)=119.0+152.6=271.6 S cm2 mol−1
Step 3: For MgSO4
MgSO4 dissociates as Mg2++SO42−.
Λm0(MgSO4)=λ0(Mg2+)+λ0(SO42−)=106.0+160.0=266.0 S cm2 mol−1
The limiting molar conductivity is 271.6 S cm2 mol−1 for CaCl2 and 266.0 S cm2 mol−1 for MgSO4.
Kohlrausch's law of independent migration of ions lets us add the limiting molar conductivities of the individual ions, weighted by their stoichiometric coefficients, to get the limiting molar conductivity of the whole salt. For CaCl2: Λm0=119.0+2(76.3)=271.6 S cm2 mol−1. For MgSO4: Λm0=106.0+160.0=266.0 S cm2 mol−1.
The printed question cites "Table 3.4" — a leftover from NCERT's pre-rationalization numbering, when Electrochemistry was Unit 3; it refers to the same ionic limiting molar conductivities as today's Table 2.4 in the current textbook, which the values below are taken from.
The key idea is that at infinite dilution, ions behave completely independently — they don't interact with each other. So the total conductivity of a salt solution is simply the sum of the contributions from each type of ion, each multiplied by how many of that ion appear in the formula unit.
This is Kohlrausch's law of independent migration. It's a powerful shortcut: you don't need to measure every salt directly. Once you know the limiting molar conductivity of a few key ions, you can predict Λm0 for any salt made from them.
Let's apply it.
- For CaCl2 One formula unit gives one Ca2+ ion and two Cl− ions. So:
Λm0(CaCl2)=λ0(Ca2+)+2⋅λ0(Cl−)
Plug in the numbers:
Λm0=119.0+2(76.3)=119.0+152.6=271.6 S cm2 mol−1
- For MgSO4 One formula unit gives one Mg2+ and one SO42− ion. So:
Λm0(MgSO4)=λ0(Mg2+)+λ0(SO42−)
Substituting:
Λm0=106.0+160.0=266.0 S cm2 mol−1
A common mistake is to forget the stoichiometric coefficient. For CaCl2, students sometimes add only one Cl− contribution. Always check the formula: CaCl2 means two chlorides per calcium.
Notice that MgSO4 has a lower Λm0 than CaCl2 even though SO42− has a much higher λ0 than Cl−. Why? Because CaCl2 has three ions per formula unit, while MgSO4 has only two. The number of charge carriers matters.
The limiting molar conductivities are Λm0(CaCl2)=271.6 S cm2 mol−1 and Λm0(MgSO4)=266.0 S cm2 mol−1.
Method: Kohlrausch’s Law of Independent Migration of Ions
This law states that at infinite dilution, each ion contributes a fixed amount to the total molar conductivity of an electrolyte, independent of the other ion present.
Steps
- Recall the formula For any electrolyte AxBy:
Λm0=x⋅λ0(Ay+)+y⋅λ0(Bx−)
where x and y are the number of cations and anions per formula unit.
- For CaCl2
- CaCl2 dissociates as: Ca2++2Cl−
- So x=1, y=2
- Using given values:
Λm0(CaCl2)=1×λ0(Ca2+)+2×λ0(Cl−)
=1(119.0)+2(76.3)
=119.0+152.6
271.6 S cm2 mol−1
- For MgSO4
- MgSO4 dissociates as: Mg2++SO42−
- So x=1, y=1
- Using given values:
Λm0(MgSO4)=1×λ0(Mg2+)+1×λ0(SO42−)
=106.0+160.0
266.0 S cm2 mol−1
Key Concept Check
- Why does this work? At infinite dilution, ions are so far apart that they don’t interact — each ion’s conductivity is purely its own property.
- Units note: All values are in S cm2 mol−1 — always include units in your final answer for exams.
Common Mistakes Students Make with Molar Conductivity (and How to Avoid Them)
Mistake 1: Forgetting to Multiply by Stoichiometric Coefficients
The error:
Students often directly add the given ionic conductivities without considering the number of ions in the formula unit. For example, for CaCl2, they write:
Λm0=λ0(Ca2+)+λ0(Cl−)
This is wrong because CaCl2 has two chloride ions.
How to avoid:
Always write the dissociation equation first:
CaCl2→Ca2++2Cl−
Then apply Kohlrausch’s law correctly:
Λm0=ν+λ+0+ν−λ−0
where ν is the number of ions of each type.
Correct calculation:
Λm0(CaCl2)=1×119.0+2×76.3=119.0+152.6=271.6 S cm2 mol−1
Mistake 2: Confusing the Formula for 1:1 vs 2:2 Electrolytes
The error:
For MgSO4, students sometimes incorrectly multiply both ions by 2, thinking "both are divalent so double everything."
How to avoid:
Remember: stoichiometry matters, not just charge. MgSO4 dissociates as:
MgSO4→Mg2++SO42−
There is one magnesium ion and one sulfate ion. So:
Λm0(MgSO4)=1×106.0+1×160.0=266.0 S cm2 mol−1
Key insight: Charge tells you the mobility (given in the table), but the count of ions tells you the multiplier.
Mistake 3: Mixing Up Units or Omitting Them
The error:
Students write numbers without units, or confuse S cm2 mol−1 with S m2 mol−1.
How to avoid:
- Always attach units to your final answer.
- In NCERT/board exams, the standard unit is S cm2 mol−1.
- If conversion is needed: 1 S cm2 mol−1=10−4 S m2 mol−1.
Correct final answers with units:
- Λm0(CaCl2)=271.6 S cm2 mol−1
- Λm0(MgSO4)=266.0 S cm2 mol−1
Mistake 4: Using the Wrong Table Values
The error:
Students accidentally swap values (e.g., using λ0(Mg2+) for Ca2+) or misread the table.
How to avoid:
- Label each value as you copy it from the table.
- Double-check: Ca2+=119.0, Cl−=76.3, Mg2+=106.0, SO42−=160.0.
- Cross-check with periodic trends: Ca2+ has higher conductivity than Mg2+ (larger ion, less hydration), so 119>106 makes sense.
Quick Checklist to Avoid All Mistakes
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| 1 | Write the dissociation equation |
| 2 | Count the number of each ion (ν+ and ν−) |
| 3 | Apply: Λm0=ν+λ+0+ν−λ−0 |
| 4 | Use correct values from the table |
| 5 | Attach units: S cm2 mol−1 |
Final correct answers for reference:
Λm0(CaCl2)=271.6 S cm2 mol−1
Λm0(MgSO4)=266.0 S cm2 mol−1
- AHSEC Higher Secondary (HS) Final Examination 2026Set ANNUAL2 marksQ.State the variation of conductivity and molar conductivity of acetic acid with dilution.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Diluting acetic acid lowers its conductivity but raises its molar conductivity (increasing dissociation).
Conductivity (κ) measures the conductance of ions present in unit volume of solution. On dilution the number of ions per unit volume decreases, so conductivity always decreases with dilution.
Molar conductivity (Λ_m = κ × 1000 / c) measures the conducting power of all the ions produced by one mole of electrolyte. On dilution the volume containing one mole increases, and for a weak electrolyte like acetic acid the degree of dissociation (α) rises steeply, releasing many more ions. Therefore molar conductivity increases with dilution, and the increase is very sharp near infinite dilution (where α → 1). Because acetic acid is weak, Λ_m does not reach a limiting value by simple extrapolation and Λ°_m is instead found using Kohlrausch's law.
✓Final answerConductivity of acetic acid decreases on dilution; molar conductivity increases (sharply) on dilution due to increasing dissociation.
- AHSEC Higher Secondary (HS) Final Examination 2024Set ANNUAL2 marksQ.Define conductivity and molar conductivity for the solution of an electrolyte. Discuss their variation with concentration.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Conductivity falls as a solution is diluted (fewer ions per unit volume), while molar conductivity rises on dilution (each mole's ions become more independent / more of a weak electrolyte dissociates).
Conductivity (κ, specific conductance):
Conductivity is defined as the conductance of a solution of unit length (1 cm) and unit cross-sectional area (1 cm²) — i.e. it is the reciprocal of resistivity (ρ):
κ = 1/ρ
Its SI unit is S m⁻¹ (commonly expressed as S cm⁻¹). It measures how well the solution as a whole (per unit volume) conducts electricity.
Molar conductivity (Λm):
Molar conductivity is the conducting power of all the ions produced by dissolving 1 mole of an electrolyte in solution, and is related to conductivity by:
Λm = κ × 1000 / C (C = molar concentration in mol L⁻¹, κ in S cm⁻¹)
Its unit is S cm² mol⁻¹.
Variation with concentration:
-
Conductivity (κ) always decreases as the solution is diluted, because the number of ions per unit volume of solution decreases with dilution, even though the degree of dissociation (for weak electrolytes) increases.
-
Molar conductivity (Λm) always increases as concentration decreases (i.e. on dilution), because it is normalised per mole of electrolyte:
• For strong electrolytes: Λm increases slowly with dilution (ionic interactions/inter-ionic attractions decrease), following the Debye-Hückel-Onsager relation Λm = Λm° − A√C, so Λm° (limiting molar conductivity) can be found by extrapolating a Λm vs √C plot to C → 0.
• For weak electrolytes: Λm increases very sharply near infinite dilution because the degree of dissociation increases markedly as concentration falls (more of the electrolyte ionises), and Λm° cannot be obtained by extrapolation — it must be calculated using Kohlrausch's law of independent migration of ions.
✓Final answerκ (conductance of 1 cm of solution, unit S/cm) decreases on dilution; Λm (= 1000κ/C, conducting power per mole, unit S cm² mol⁻¹) increases on dilution — slowly for strong electrolytes, sharply for weak electrolytes near infinite dilution.
-
- AHSEC Higher Secondary (HS) Final Examination 2023Set ANNUAL2 marksQ.The following limiting molar conductivities are given as: lambda-m-zero(H2SO4) = x S cm^2 mol^-1, lambda-m-zero(K2SO4) = y S cm^2 mol^-1, lambda-m-zero(CH3COOK) = z S cm^2 mol^-1. Calculate limiting molar conductivity of acetic acid. OR The cell potential for the following cell is 0.576V at 298K. Calculate the pH of the solution: Pt | H2(g) | H+(aq) || Cu2+(0.01M) | Cu(s). Given, E-zero(Cu2+/Cu) = 0.34V.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Option 1 combines the three given conductivities via Kohlrausch's law to cancel out K⁺ and SO₄²⁻; Option 2 uses the Nernst equation for the H₂|H⁺ vs Cu²⁺|Cu cell to back-calculate [H⁺].
Option 1 — Limiting molar conductivity of acetic acid via Kohlrausch's law:
By Kohlrausch's law of independent migration of ions, each limiting molar conductivity splits into ionic contributions:
2λ0(H+)+λ0(SO42−)=x...(i), from H2SO4
2λ0(K+)+λ0(SO42−)=y...(ii), from K2SO4
λ0(CH3COO−)+λ0(K+)=z...(iii), from CH3COOK
Subtracting (ii) from (i): 2λ0(H+)−2λ0(K+)=x−y⇒λ0(H+)=λ0(K+)+2x−y
We want λm0(CH3COOH)=λ0(CH3COO−)+λ0(H+). From (iii), λ0(CH3COO−)=z−λ0(K+), so:
λm0(CH3COOH)=[z−λ0(K+)]+[λ0(K+)+2x−y]=z+2x−y
(Equivalently, λm0(CH3COOH)=λm0(CH3COOK)+λm0(21H2SO4)−λm0(21K2SO4).)
Option 2 — pH from cell potential:
Cell: Pt∣H2(g)∣H+(aq) ∣∣ Cu2+(0.01M)∣Cu(s), with anode = H₂/H⁺ (oxidation, E0=0V) and cathode = Cu²⁺/Cu (reduction, E0=0.34V).
Ecell0=Ecathode0−Eanode0=0.34−0=0.34 V
Overall reaction: H2(g)+Cu2+(aq)→2H+(aq)+Cu(s), n=2.
Nernst equation (taking PH2=1 atm):
Ecell=Ecell0−n0.0591log[Cu2+][H+]2
0.576=0.34−20.0591log0.01[H+]2
0.236=−0.02955log0.01[H+]2⟹log0.01[H+]2=−7.99
[H+]2=0.01×10−7.99=10−9.99⟹[H+]=10−4.99 M
pH=−log[H+]≈5.0
✓Final answerOption 1: λm0(CH3COOH)=z+2x−y. Option 2: pH ≈ 5.0.
- AHSEC Higher Secondary (HS) Final Examination 2020Set ANNUAL2 marksQ.Define molar conductivity of a solution. Explain how molar conductivity changes with change in concentration of solution for a weak and a strong electrolyte. (1+1=2)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Molar conductivity is conductivity per mole of dissolved electrolyte; it rises on dilution for both strong and weak electrolytes, but far more steeply for weak electrolytes because dilution increases their degree of dissociation.
Definition of molar conductivity
Molar conductivity (Λm) is the conducting power of all the ions produced by dissolving one mole of an electrolyte in solution. It is related to the specific conductivity (κ) and molar concentration (C) by:
Λm = κ × 1000 / C (with κ in S cm⁻¹ and C in mol L⁻¹, giving Λm in S cm² mol⁻¹)
Variation with concentration — strong electrolytes
For strong electrolytes (fully ionised at all concentrations, e.g. NaCl, KCl), Λm increases only slowly as concentration decreases (i.e. on dilution). This is because, even though the number of ions per unit volume stays proportional to concentration (the electrolyte is always ~100% ionised), interionic attractive forces between the oppositely charged ions reduce their mobility at higher concentrations; diluting the solution weakens these interionic forces, allowing ions to move a little more freely, so Λm rises gradually. Λm for a strong electrolyte varies linearly with √C (Debye-Hückel-Onsager equation), so Λm° (the limiting molar conductivity at infinite dilution) can be found by extrapolating the Λm vs √C plot to C = 0.
Variation with concentration — weak electrolytes
For weak electrolytes (only partially ionised, e.g. CH3COOH), Λm increases sharply as the solution is diluted. This is mainly because dilution shifts the ionisation equilibrium further towards dissociation (by Le Chatelier's principle / the dissociation constant expression), so the degree of dissociation (α) increases significantly with dilution, producing many more ions per mole of electrolyte at low concentration than at high concentration. Because of this steep, non-linear rise near C = 0, the Λm vs √C curve for a weak electrolyte cannot be extrapolated to obtain Λm° — instead Λm° must be calculated indirectly using Kohlrausch's law of independent migration of ions.
✓Final answerMolar conductivity, Λm = κ×1000/C, is the conducting power of all ions from one mole of electrolyte. On dilution, Λm increases gradually for strong electrolytes (weakening interionic attraction) but increases sharply for weak electrolytes (because their degree of dissociation rises with dilution).
- AHSEC Higher Secondary (HS) Final Examination 2020Set ANNUAL2 marksQ.(a) Following reactions occur at cathode during the electrolysis of aqueous silver chloride: Ag+(aq) + e- -> Ag(s), E° = +0.80V; H+(aq) + e- -> 1/2 H2(g), E° = 0.00V. On the basis of their standard reduction electrode potential (E°) values, which reaction is feasible at the cathode and why?(1)(b) State Kohlrausch law of independent migration of ions. Write an expression for the molar conductivity of acetic acid at infinite dilution according to Kohlrausch law. (1/2+1/2=1)
›Reveal solutionSolution
(a) The half-reaction with the more positive standard reduction potential occurs preferentially at the cathode. (b) Kohlrausch's law lets us calculate the limiting molar conductivity of any electrolyte, including weak ones like acetic acid, by summing the independent ionic contributions.
(a) Which reaction occurs at the cathode?
Given: Ag+(aq) + e- → Ag(s), E° = +0.80 V and H+(aq) + e- → ½H2(g), E° = 0.00 V
At the cathode, reduction occurs, and between two competing reduction half-reactions, the one with the higher (more positive) standard reduction potential is thermodynamically more favourable and occurs preferentially, since it has the greater tendency to be reduced (to gain electrons). Since E°(Ag+/Ag) = +0.80 V is more positive than E°(H+/H2) = 0.00 V, silver ions are reduced in preference to hydrogen ions at the cathode:
Ag+(aq) + e- → Ag(s)
(b) Kohlrausch's law of independent migration of ions
At infinite dilution, when dissociation of an electrolyte is complete and interionic interactions vanish, each ion migrates independently of the other ion with which it is associated, and each ion makes its own definite contribution to the total molar conductivity of the electrolyte, regardless of the nature of the other ion present. Mathematically, for an electrolyte that dissociates into ν+ cations and ν- anions:
Λm° = ν+ λ°+ + ν- λ°-
where λ°+ and λ°- are the limiting (infinite-dilution) molar conductivities of the cation and anion respectively.
Molar conductivity of acetic acid at infinite dilution
Acetic acid, CH3COOH, dissociates into one H+ and one CH3COO- ion, so:
Λm°(CH3COOH) = λ°(H+) + λ°(CH3COO-)
(This is especially useful because acetic acid is a weak electrolyte whose Λm° cannot be found by direct extrapolation; it is instead obtained via Kohlrausch's law using the known λ° values of H+ and CH3COO-, e.g. combining data from strong electrolytes: Λm°(CH3COOH) = Λm°(CH3COONa) + Λm°(HCl) − Λm°(NaCl).)
✓Final answer- Ag+ + e- → Ag is feasible at the cathode (E°(Ag+/Ag) = +0.80 V > E°(H+/H2) = 0.00 V, so Ag+ is reduced preferentially).
- Kohlrausch's law: at infinite dilution each ion contributes independently to Λm°; Λm°(CH3COOH) = λ°(H+) + λ°(CH3COO-).
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.