Match the items of Column I and Column II. Column I: (i) kappa (ii) Lambdam (iii) α (iv) Q Column II: (a) I ×

NCERT Exemplar · Q56

Q. Match the items of Column I and Column II. Column I:

(i)

\kappa

(ii)

\Lambda_m

(iii)

\alpha

(iv)

Q

Column II:

(a)

I \times t

(b)

\Lambda_m / \Lambda^0_m

(c)

\frac{\kappa}{c}

(d)

\frac{G^*}{R}

Assam AhsecShort· 2mImportance★★★★★

86% · 99/115 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Molar Conductivity

From Resistance to Conductance: Flipping the Idea

You already know resistance ( $R$ ) — it tells you how much a material opposes the flow of current. A high resistance means the wire fights the current; a low resistance means it lets current through easily.

Now flip that thought. Instead of asking "how much does it resist?", ask "how easily does it let current flow?" That's exactly what conductance measures.

Note

Conductance ( $G$ ) is the reciprocal of resistance:

$G = \frac{1}{R}$

Unit: siemens (S) — named after Werner von Siemens. 1 S = 1 A/V (ampere per volt).

If a wire has $R = 10\ \Omega$ , its conductance is $G = 0.1\ \text{S}$ . If $R = 0.5\ \Omega$ , $G = 2\ \text{S}$ — it conducts twice as well.

Ohm's Law in Conductance Form

You know $V = IR$ . Rearranging:

I = \frac{V}{R} = G V

So current = conductance × voltage. A high-conductance material draws a large current for the same voltage — it's a "good conductor."

Now, Conductivity: The Material's Intrinsic Property

Resistance depends on two things: the material itself (its "resistivity" $\rho$ ) and the geometry (length $L$ , cross-sectional area $A$ ):

R = \rho \frac{L}{A}

Conductance also depends on geometry. A thicker wire (larger $A$ ) or a shorter wire (smaller $L$ ) has higher conductance. To isolate the material's inherent ability to conduct, we define conductivity ( $\sigma$ ):

\sigma = \frac{1}{\rho}

Conductivity is the reciprocal of resistivity. It tells you how well the material itself conducts, independent of shape and size.

Unit: siemens per metre (S/m).
High $\sigma$ → good conductor (copper: $\approx 5.8 \times 10^7\ \text{S/m}$ ).
Low $\sigma$ → poor conductor / insulator (glass: $\approx 10^{-12}\ \text{S/m}$ ).

Watch out

Don't confuse conductance (property of a specific object, depends on geometry) with conductivity (property of the material, independent of geometry). A short thick copper wire has high conductance; a long thin copper wire has lower conductance — but both have the same conductivity.

The Big Picture in One Table

Quantity	Symbol	Definition	Depends on	Unit
Resistance	$R$	$V/I$	Material + geometry	$\Omega$
Resistivity	$\rho$	$R A / L$	Material only	$\Omega \cdot \text{m}$
Conductance	$G$	$1/R$	Material + geometry	S
Conductivity	$\sigma$	$1/\rho$	Material only	S/m

Intuitive Analogy

Think of a water pipe:

Resistance = how hard it is to push water through (narrow, long pipe).
Conductance = how easily water flows (wide, short pipe). …

Why this formula?

Conductance and Conductivity: Why the Formulas Hold

Let's build this from first principles — understanding the why before the what.

1. The Core Idea: How Easily Does Current Flow?

Think of a conductor (like a copper wire). When you apply a voltage across it, electrons drift through the material. Two questions arise:

How much current flows for a given voltage? → This is conductance ( $G$ ).
How well does the material itself allow current? → This is conductivity ( $\sigma$ ).

The key distinction: Conductance depends on the size and shape of the object. Conductivity is an intrinsic property of the material.

2. Ohm's Law in Terms of Conductance

You know Ohm's law:

V = IR

But we can rewrite it as:

I = \frac{V}{R}

Define conductance $G$ as the reciprocal of resistance:

G = \frac{1}{R}

So:

I = G V

Why this makes sense:

A larger $G$ means more current for the same voltage — the conductor "conducts" better.
$G$ has units of siemens (S) = $\text{A/V}$ .

3. From Resistance to Conductivity: The Geometry Factor

Resistance of a uniform conductor depends on:

Length $L$ (longer → more resistance)
Cross-sectional area $A$ (thicker → less resistance)
Material property $\rho$ (resistivity)

The formula:

R = \rho \frac{L}{A}

Now, conductivity $\sigma$ is the reciprocal of resistivity:

\sigma = \frac{1}{\rho}

So:

R = \frac{1}{\sigma} \cdot \frac{L}{A}

Why this form?

If you double the length, electrons have to travel twice as far, colliding more → resistance doubles.
If you double the area, there's twice as many "lanes" for electrons → resistance halves.

4. The Key Formula: Conductance in Terms of Conductivity

Since $G = 1/R$ , we get:

G = \sigma \frac{A}{L}

This is the central relationship. Let's see why it holds:

$\sigma$ tells you how well the material conducts (intrinsic).
$A/L$ tells you how the geometry amplifies or reduces that.

Intuition:

A fat, short wire ( $A$ large, $L$ small) has high conductance.
A thin, long wire ( $A$ small, $L$ large) has low conductance.
A material with high $\sigma$ (like copper) gives higher $G$ than one with low $\sigma$ (like iron), for the same shape.

5. Microscopic Derivation (Why $\sigma$ Exists)

At the microscopic level, conductivity arises from electron motion:

\sigma = n e \mu

Where:

$n$ = number of free electrons per unit volume
$e$ = electron charge …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

This problem matches physical quantities from electrochemistry (Column I) with their defining formulas (Column II). The key is to recall the exact definitions: $\kappa$ is conductivity ( $G^*/R$ ), $\Lambda_m$ is molar conductivity ( $\kappa/c$ ), $\alpha$ is degree of dissociation ( $\Lambda_m/\Lambda_m^0$ ), and $Q$ is charge ( $I \times t$ ). The correct matches are (i)→(d), (ii)→(c), (iii)→(b), (iv)→(a).

Before we jump into matching, let’s build the intuition. Electrochemistry is full of quantities that look similar but measure very different things. Conductivity ( $\kappa$ ) tells you how well a solution conducts electricity — it’s a property of the solution itself, independent of how much you have. Molar conductivity ( $\Lambda_m$ ) normalises that by concentration, so you can compare different electrolytes fairly. The degree of dissociation ( $\alpha$ ) tells you what fraction of the electrolyte has actually split into ions — it’s a ratio of actual conductivity to the theoretical maximum. And charge ( $Q$ ) is simply how much electricity has flowed, which is current times time.

The trap here is mixing up $\kappa$ and $\Lambda_m$ — they are related but not the same. Let’s work through each match carefully.

$\kappa$ (conductivity)

Conductivity is the reciprocal of resistivity. In a conductivity cell, you measure resistance $R$ of the solution. The cell constant $G^*$ (which depends on electrode area and separation) relates them: $\kappa = \frac{G^*}{R}$ . So $\kappa$ matches with (d) $\frac{G^*}{R}$ .
$\Lambda_m$ (molar conductivity)

Molar conductivity is defined as the conductivity of the solution divided by the molar concentration: $\Lambda_m = \frac{\kappa}{c}$ . This lets you compare how well one mole of electrolyte conducts. So $\Lambda_m$ matches with (c) $\frac{\kappa}{c}$ .
$\alpha$ (degree of dissociation) …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept: Conductivity, Molar Conductivity, Degree of Dissociation, and Charge in Electrochemistry

Method: Direct Definition Matching

This method uses the exact definitions of each symbol from Column I and matches them with the correct formula/expression in Column II.

Steps:

Step 1: Recall the definition of each symbol in Column I

Symbol	Meaning
$\kappa$	Conductivity (specific conductance) of a solution
$\Lambda_m$	Molar conductivity of a solution
$\alpha$	Degree of dissociation of an electrolyte
$Q$	Electric charge passed through a circuit

Step 2: Recall the formula for each

Conductivity $\kappa$ is related to cell constant $G^*$ and resistance $R$ :

$\kappa = \frac{G^*}{R}$

→ matches with (d)
Molar conductivity $\Lambda_m$ is defined as:

$\Lambda_m = \frac{\kappa}{c}$

→ matches with (c)
Degree of dissociation $\alpha$ is the ratio:

$\alpha = \frac{\Lambda_m}{\Lambda_m^0}$ …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Common Mistakes in Matching Electrochemistry Quantities

This question tests your understanding of conductivity ( $\kappa$ ), molar conductivity ( $\Lambda_m$ ), degree of dissociation ( $\alpha$ ), and quantity of electricity ( $Q$ ) — and their interrelationships.

Here are the most frequent errors students make, with how to avoid each:

1. Confusing $\kappa$ (conductivity) with $\Lambda_m$ (molar conductivity)

Mistake: Matching $\kappa$ with $\frac{\kappa}{c}$ or $\frac{G^*}{R}$ .

Why it happens: Both involve $\kappa$ , so students rush to match without checking the formula.

How to avoid:

Remember: $\kappa$ is conductivity — it depends on the cell constant $G^*$ and resistance $R$ :

\kappa = \frac{G^*}{R}

So $\kappa$ matches with (d) $\frac{G^*}{R}$ .

$\Lambda_m$ is molar conductivity — it is conductivity per unit concentration:

\Lambda_m = \frac{\kappa}{c}

So $\Lambda_m$ matches with (c) $\frac{\kappa}{c}$ .

Key trick: Think of $\Lambda_m$ as "conductivity divided by concentration" — the $c$ in denominator is the clue.

2. Mixing up $\alpha$ (degree of dissociation) with $\Lambda_m$

Mistake: Matching $\alpha$ with $\frac{\kappa}{c}$ or $\frac{G^*}{R}$ .

Why it happens: Students forget the definition of $\alpha$ in terms of molar conductivities.

How to avoid:

$\alpha$ is defined as:

\alpha = \frac{\Lambda_m}{\Lambda_m^0}

where $\Lambda_m^0$ is limiting molar conductivity.

So $\alpha$ matches with (b) $\Lambda_m / \Lambda_m^0$ .

Key trick: $\alpha$ is a ratio of two molar conductivities — look for the fraction with $\Lambda_m$ in numerator and $\Lambda_m^0$ in denominator.

3. Forgetting the formula for quantity of electricity ( $Q$ )

Mistake: Matching $Q$ with $\frac{G^*}{R}$ or $\frac{\kappa}{c}$ .

Why it happens: Students confuse $Q$ (charge) with conductivity-related terms.

How to avoid:

$Q$ is charge passed through a circuit:

Q = I \times t

where $I$ is current and $t$ is time.

So $Q$ matches with (a) $I \times t$ .

Key trick: $Q$ is the only quantity here that involves time — look for $t$ in the column.

4. Rushing without checking units/dimensions

Mistake: Matching based on superficial similarity (e.g., both have $\kappa$ in them). …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Same / Similar Concept — real previous-year questions on the same or a closely similar concept, not this exact question.

AHSEC Higher Secondary (HS) Final Examination 2026Set ANNUAL2 marks
$Q. State the variation of conductivity and molar conductivity of acetic acid with dilution.$
›Reveal solutionSolution

Diluting acetic acid lowers its conductivity but raises its molar conductivity (increasing dissociation).

Conductivity (κ) measures the conductance of ions present in unit volume of solution. On dilution the number of ions per unit volume decreases, so conductivity always decreases with dilution.

Molar conductivity (Λ_m = κ × 1000 / c) measures the conducting power of all the ions produced by one mole of electrolyte. On dilution the volume containing one mole increases, and for a weak electrolyte like acetic acid the degree of dissociation (α) rises steeply, releasing many more ions. Therefore molar conductivity increases with dilution, and the increase is very sharp near infini …

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
AHSEC Higher Secondary (HS) Final Examination 2024Set ANNUAL2 marks
$Q. Define conductivity and molar conductivity for the solution of an electrolyte. Discuss their variation with concentration.$
›Reveal solutionSolution
Conductivity falls as a solution is diluted (fewer ions per unit volume), while molar conductivity rises on dilution (each mole's ions become more independent / more of a weak electrolyte dissociates).

Conductivity (κ, specific conductance):

Conductivity is defined as the conductance of a solution of unit length (1 cm) and unit cross-sectional area (1 cm²) — i.e. it is the reciprocal of resistivity (ρ):

κ = 1/ρ

Its SI unit is S m⁻¹ (commonly expressed as S cm⁻¹). It measures how well the solution as a whole (per unit volume) conducts electricity.

Molar conductivity (Λm):

Molar conductivity is the conducting power of all the ions produced by dissolving 1 mole of an electrolyte in solution, and is related to conductivity by:

Λm = κ × 1000 / C (C = molar concentration in mol L⁻¹, κ in S cm⁻¹)

Its unit is S cm² mol⁻¹.

Variation with concentration:

Conductivity (κ) always decreases as the solution is diluted, because the number of ions per unit volume of solution decreases with dilution, even though the degree of dissociation (for weak electrolytes) increases.

Molar conductivity (Λm) always increases as concentration decreases (i.e. on dilution), because it is normalised per mole of electrolyte: …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
AHSEC Higher Secondary (HS) Final Examination 2023Set ANNUAL2 marks
$Q. The following limiting molar conductivities are given as: lambda-m-zero(H2SO4) = x S cm^2 mol^-1, lambda-m-zero(K2SO4) = y S cm^2 mol^-1, lambda-m-zero(CH3COOK) = z S cm^2 mol^-1. Calculate limiting molar conductivity of acetic acid. OR The cell potential for the following cell is 0.576V at 298K. Calculate the pH of the solution: Pt | H2(g) | H+(aq) || Cu2+(0.01M) | Cu(s). Given, E-zero(Cu2+/Cu) = 0.34V.$
›Reveal solutionSolution

Option 1 combines the three given conductivities via Kohlrausch's law to cancel out K⁺ and SO₄²⁻; Option 2 uses the Nernst equation for the H₂|H⁺ vs Cu²⁺|Cu cell to back-calculate [H⁺].

Option 1 — Limiting molar conductivity of acetic acid via Kohlrausch's law:

By Kohlrausch's law of independent migration of ions, each limiting molar conductivity splits into ionic contributions:

$2\lambda^0(H^+) + \lambda^0(SO_4^{2-}) = x \quad \text{...(i), from } H_2SO_4$

$2\lambda^0(K^+) + \lambda^0(SO_4^{2-}) = y \quad \text{...(ii), from } K_2SO_4$

$\lambda^0(CH_3COO^-) + \lambda^0(K^+) = z \quad \text{...(iii), from } CH_3COOK$

Subtracting (ii) from (i): $2\lambda^0(H^+) - 2\lambda^0(K^+) = x - y \Rightarrow \lambda^0(H^+) = \lambda^0(K^+) + \dfrac{x-y}{2}$

We want $\lambda_m^0(CH_3COOH) = \lambda^0(CH_3COO^-) + \lambda^0(H^+)$ . From (iii), $\lambda^0(CH_3COO^-) = z - \lambda^0(K^+)$ , so:

$\lambda_m^0(CH_3COOH) = \left[z - \lambda^0(K^+)\right] + \left[\lambda^0(K^+) + \frac{x-y}{2}\right] = z + \frac{x-y}{2}$

(Equivalently, $\lambda_m^0(CH_3COOH) = \lambda_m^0(CH_3COOK) + \lambda_m^0(\tfrac12H_2SO_4) - \lambda_m^0(\tfrac12K_2SO_4)$ .)

Option 2 — pH from cell potential:

Cell: $Pt|H_2(g)|H^+(aq)\ ||\ Cu^{2+}(0.01M)|Cu(s)$ , with anode = H₂/H⁺ (oxidation, $E^0=0V$ ) and cathode = Cu²⁺/Cu (reduction, $E^0=0.34V$ ).

…

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
AHSEC Higher Secondary (HS) Final Examination 2020Set ANNUAL2 marks
$Q. Define molar conductivity of a solution. Explain how molar conductivity changes with change in concentration of solution for a weak and a strong electrolyte. (1+1=2)$
›Reveal solutionSolution

Molar conductivity is conductivity per mole of dissolved electrolyte; it rises on dilution for both strong and weak electrolytes, but far more steeply for weak electrolytes because dilution increases their degree of dissociation.

Definition of molar conductivity

Molar conductivity (Λm) is the conducting power of all the ions produced by dissolving one mole of an electrolyte in solution. It is related to the specific conductivity (κ) and molar concentration (C) by:

Λm = κ × 1000 / C (with κ in S cm⁻¹ and C in mol L⁻¹, giving Λm in S cm² mol⁻¹)

Variation with concentration — strong electrolytes

For strong electrolytes (fully ionised at all concentrations, e.g. NaCl, KCl), Λm increases only slowly as concentration decreases (i.e. on dilution). This is because, even though the number of ions per unit volume stays proportional to concentration (the electrolyte is always ~100% ionised), interionic attractive forces between the oppositely charged ions reduce their mobility at higher concentrations; diluting the solution weakens these interionic forces, allowing ions to move a little more freely, so Λm rises gradually. Λm for a strong electrolyte varies linearly with √C (Debye-Hückel-Onsager equation), so Λm° (the limiting molar conductivity at infinite dilution) can be found by extrapolating the Λm vs √C plot to C = 0.

Variation with concentration — weak electrolytes …

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
AHSEC Higher Secondary (HS) Final Examination 2020Set ANNUAL2 marks
$Q. (a) Following reactions occur at cathode during the electrolysis of aqueous silver chloride: Ag+(aq) + e- -> Ag(s), E° = +0.80V; H+(aq) + e- -> 1/2 H2(g), E° = 0.00V. On the basis of their standard reduction electrode potential (E°) values, which reaction is feasible at the cathode and why?$
(1)
(b) State Kohlrausch law of independent migration of ions. Write an expression for the molar conductivity of acetic acid at infinite dilution according to Kohlrausch law. (1/2+1/2=1)
›Reveal solutionSolution

(a) The half-reaction with the more positive standard reduction potential occurs preferentially at the cathode. (b) Kohlrausch's law lets us calculate the limiting molar conductivity of any electrolyte, including weak ones like acetic acid, by summing the independent ionic contributions.

(a) Which reaction occurs at the cathode?

Given: Ag+(aq) + e- → Ag(s), E° = +0.80 V and H+(aq) + e- → ½H2(g), E° = 0.00 V

At the cathode, reduction occurs, and between two competing reduction half-reactions, the one with the higher (more positive) standard reduction potential is thermodynamically more favourable and occurs preferentially, since it has the greater tendency to be reduced (to gain electrons). Since E°(Ag+/Ag) = +0.80 V is more positive than E°(H+/H2) = 0.00 V, silver ions are reduced in preference to hydrogen ions at the cathode:

Ag+(aq) + e- → Ag(s)

(b) Kohlrausch's law of independent migration of ions

At infinite dilution, when dissociation of an electrolyte is complete and interionic interactions vanish, each ion migrates independently of the other ion with which it is associated, and each ion makes its own definite contribution to the total molar conductivity of the electrolyte, regardless of the nature of the other ion present. Mathematically, for an electrolyte that dissociates into ν+ cations and ν- anions:

Λm° = ν+ λ°+ + ν- λ°-

where λ°+ and λ°- are the limiting (infinite-dilution) molar conductivities of the cation and anion respectively.

Molar conductivity of acetic acid at infinite dilution …

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →

←Previous questionQ55 — Match the items of Column I and Column II. Column I: (i) Lead storage …→Next questionQ57 — Match the items of Column I and Column II. Column I: (i) Lechlanche ce…

Q.Match the items of Column I and Column II. Column I:

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Q.Match the items of Column I and Column II.
Column I:

Unlock everything free for 14 days