The molar conductivity of KCl solutions at different concentrations at 298 K are given below:
| c / mol L−1 | Λm / S cm2 mol−1 |
|---|---|
| 0.000198 | 148.61 |
| 0.000309 | 148.29 |
| 0.000521 | 147.81 |
| 0.000989 | 147.09 |
Show that a plot between Λm and c1/2 is a straight line. Determine the values of Λm0 and A for KCl.
Concept understanding — Molar Conductivity
From Resistance to Conductance: Flipping the Idea
You already know resistance (R) — it tells you how much a material opposes the flow of current. A high resistance means the wire fights the current; a low resistance means it lets current through easily.
Now flip that thought. Instead of asking "how much does it resist?", ask "how easily does it let current flow?" That's exactly what conductance measures.
Conductance (G) is the reciprocal of resistance:
G=R1
Unit: siemens (S) — named after Werner von Siemens. 1 S = 1 A/V (ampere per volt).
If a wire has R=10 Ω, its conductance is G=0.1 S. If R=0.5 Ω, G=2 S — it conducts twice as well.
Ohm's Law in Conductance Form
You know V=IR. Rearranging:
I=RV=GV
So current = conductance × voltage. A high-conductance material draws a large current for the same voltage — it's a "good conductor."
Now, Conductivity: The Material's Intrinsic Property
Resistance depends on two things: the material itself (its "resistivity" ρ) and the geometry (length L, cross-sectional area A):
R=ρAL
Conductance also depends on geometry. A thicker wire (larger A) or a shorter wire (smaller L) has higher conductance. To isolate the material's inherent ability to conduct, we define conductivity (σ):
σ=ρ1
And for a uniform wire:
G=σLA
Conductivity is the reciprocal of resistivity. It tells you how well the material itself conducts, independent of shape and size.
- Unit: siemens per metre (S/m).
- High σ → good conductor (copper: ≈5.8×107 S/m).
- Low σ → poor conductor / insulator (glass: ≈10−12 S/m).
Don't confuse conductance (property of a specific object, depends on geometry) with conductivity (property of the material, independent of geometry). A short thick copper wire has high conductance; a long thin copper wire has lower conductance — but both have the same conductivity.
The Big Picture in One Table
| Quantity | Symbol | Definition | Depends on | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resistance | R | V/I | Material + geometry | Ω |
| Resistivity | ρ | RA/L | Material only | Ω⋅m |
| Conductance | G | 1/R | Material + geometry | S |
| Conductivity | σ | 1/ρ | Material only | S/m |
Intuitive Analogy
Think of a water pipe:
- Resistance = how hard it is to push water through (narrow, long pipe).
- Conductance = how easily water flows (wide, short pipe).
- Resistivity = the "roughness" of the pipe's inner surface (material property).
- Conductivity = the "smoothness" of the pipe's inner surface (material property).
A copper pipe is smooth (high conductivity). A rubber hose is rough (low conductivity). But a short, fat rubber hose might still have decent conductance — because geometry can compensate for poor material.
Key Takeaway for Exams
- G=R1 and σ=ρ1.
- G=σLA for a uniform conductor.
- Conductivity is an intrinsic material property; conductance is an extrinsic property of a specific object.
- In circuits, you'll often use conductance when dealing with parallel resistors (total conductance = sum of individual conductances).
You now have the complete picture: from resistance to conductance, from resistivity to conductivity — and the clean relationship between them.
Molar conductivity is a quantitative cornerstone of the NCERT/CBSE Class 12 Chemistry Electrochemistry chapter, and ‘molar conductivity formula’ or ‘molar conductivity vs concentration’ are recurring important-question types in board exams as well as JEE Main and NEET chemistry. This concept also sets up Kohlrausch's law, a common follow-on topic in the same unit.
Why this formula?
Conductance and Conductivity: Why the Formulas Hold
Let's build this from first principles — understanding the why before the what.
1. The Core Idea: How Easily Does Current Flow?
Think of a conductor (like a copper wire). When you apply a voltage across it, electrons drift through the material. Two questions arise:
- How much current flows for a given voltage? → This is conductance (G).
- How well does the material itself allow current? → This is conductivity (σ).
The key distinction: Conductance depends on the size and shape of the object. Conductivity is an intrinsic property of the material.
2. Ohm's Law in Terms of Conductance
You know Ohm's law:
V=IR
But we can rewrite it as:
I=RV
Define conductance G as the reciprocal of resistance:
G=R1
So:
I=GV
Why this makes sense:
- A larger G means more current for the same voltage — the conductor "conducts" better.
- G has units of siemens (S) = A/V.
3. From Resistance to Conductivity: The Geometry Factor
Resistance of a uniform conductor depends on:
- Length L (longer → more resistance)
- Cross-sectional area A (thicker → less resistance)
- Material property ρ (resistivity)
The formula:
R=ρAL
Now, conductivity σ is the reciprocal of resistivity:
σ=ρ1
So:
R=σ1⋅AL
Why this form?
- If you double the length, electrons have to travel twice as far, colliding more → resistance doubles.
- If you double the area, there's twice as many "lanes" for electrons → resistance halves.
4. The Key Formula: Conductance in Terms of Conductivity
Since G=1/R, we get:
G=σLA
This is the central relationship. Let's see why it holds:
- σ tells you how well the material conducts (intrinsic).
- A/L tells you how the geometry amplifies or reduces that.
Intuition:
- A fat, short wire (A large, L small) has high conductance.
- A thin, long wire (A small, L large) has low conductance.
- A material with high σ (like copper) gives higher G than one with low σ (like iron), for the same shape.
5. Microscopic Derivation (Why σ Exists)
At the microscopic level, conductivity arises from electron motion:
σ=neμ
Where:
- n = number of free electrons per unit volume
- e = electron charge
- μ = electron mobility (how fast they drift per unit electric field)
Why this works:
- More free electrons (n large) → more charge carriers → higher conductivity.
- Higher mobility (μ large) → electrons move faster for the same push → higher conductivity.
This explains why metals (high n) are good conductors, and why heating reduces σ (more collisions → lower μ).
6. Summary: The Logical Chain
| Step | Concept | Formula | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ohm's law | V=IR | Voltage drives current against resistance |
| 2 | Conductance | G=1/R | Measures ease of flow |
| 3 | Resistivity | R=ρL/A | Geometry + material |
| 4 | Conductivity | σ=1/ρ | Material's intrinsic ability |
| 5 | Key result | G=σLA | Combines material + geometry |
Final takeaway:
Conductance G is not just a number — it's the product of how good the material is (σ) and how the shape helps (A/L). This is why a thick copper wire conducts far better than a thin iron wire of the same length.
Concept: Molar Conductivity — For strong electrolytes, Kohlrausch's law states Λm=Λm0−Ac, so a plot of Λm vs c should be linear.
Step 1: Compute c for each concentration
| c (mol L⁻¹) | c (mol¹/² L⁻¹/²) | Λm (S cm² mol⁻¹) |
|---|---|---|
| 0.000198 | 0.01407 | 148.61 |
| 0.000309 | 0.01758 | 148.29 |
| 0.000521 | 0.02283 | 147.81 |
| 0.000989 | 0.03145 | 147.09 |
Step 2: Check linearity — Λm decreases uniformly as c increases, confirming a straight-line relationship (as c rises, Λm falls; equivalently Λm increases on dilution).
Step 3: Determine A (slope) and Λm0 (intercept)
Slope =−A=0.03145−0.01407147.09−148.61=0.01738−1.52≈−87.46
So A=87.46 S cm2mol−1/(mol L−1)1/2.
Extending the straight line to c=0, the graphical intercept read from the plot is Λm0=150.0 S cm2mol−1.
The plot of Λm vs c is a straight line; from it, Λm0=150.0 S cm2mol−1 and A=87.46 S cm2mol−1/(mol L−1)1/2 for KCl at 298 K.
NCERT reads Λm0=150.0 from its graphical extrapolation. A full least-squares fit of the four data points gives Λm0≈149.8 S cm2mol−1 and A≈87.5 — essentially identical; the small difference is only graphical rounding of the intercept.
For strong electrolytes like KCl, molar conductivity varies linearly with the square root of concentration (Kohlrausch's law). Plotting Λm vs c1/2 gives a straight line; the book reads its intercept as Λm0=150.0 S cm2 mol−1 and its slope gives A=87.46 S cm2 mol−1 (mol L−1)−1/2.
The key idea here is Kohlrausch's law of independent migration of ions. For strong electrolytes, as you dilute the solution, ions move more freely because interionic attractions weaken. The molar conductivity Λm therefore increases on dilution — and, plotted against the square root of concentration, it decreases linearly as c rises. This linear relationship is the hallmark of a strong electrolyte.
Why c? Because the Debye–Hückel theory shows that the ionic atmosphere dragging on a moving ion has a radius proportional to 1/c. So the retarding effect scales with c, and conductivity rises as c falls.
The equation is:
Λm=Λm0−Ac
where Λm0 is the limiting molar conductivity (at infinite dilution) and A is a constant for the electrolyte.
Let's test this with the given data.
-
Convert the data to c values.
c (mol L⁻¹) c (mol L⁻¹)1/2 Λm (S cm² mol⁻¹) 0.000198 0.01407 148.61 0.000309 0.01758 148.29 0.000521 0.02283 147.81 0.000989 0.03145 147.09 -
Plot Λm against c.
The points fall on a straight line: as c increases, Λm decreases linearly. This confirms Kohlrausch's law for KCl.
-
Find A (slope magnitude).
The slope of the line is −A:
slope=0.03145−0.01407147.09−148.61=0.01738−1.52=−87.46 S cm2 mol−1 (mol L−1)−1/2
So A=87.46 S cm2 mol−1 (mol L−1)−1/2.
- Find Λm0 (the intercept). Extending the straight line to c=0 (infinite dilution), NCERT reads the intercept from the graph as:
Λm0=150.0 S cm2 mol−1
You don't need to draw the graph perfectly in an exam — just show that the points satisfy a linear relation by computing the slope between successive pairs. If the slopes are nearly constant, the plot is a straight line.
A common mistake is to plot Λm against c instead of c. That curve is not linear — it bends. Always use c for strong electrolytes.
NCERT reads Λm0=150.0 from its graphical extrapolation. If you instead fit the four points algebraically (least squares, or point-slope from the first point: 148.61+87.46×0.01407=149.84), you get Λm0≈149.8 S cm2 mol−1 and A≈87.5 — essentially identical to the printed values; the difference is only graphical rounding of the intercept.
The plot of Λm vs c1/2 is a straight line, giving Λm0=150.0 S cm2 mol−1 and A=87.46 S cm2 mol−1 (mol L−1)−1/2 for KCl at 298 K.
Method: Kohlrausch's Law (Empirical Debye–Hückel–Onsager Plot)
Kohlrausch observed that for strong electrolytes, molar conductivity varies linearly with the square root of concentration at low concentrations:
Λm=Λm0−Ac
Here:
- Λm0 = limiting molar conductivity (intercept)
- A = Kohlrausch constant (magnitude of the slope; the slope of the line is −A)
Steps
Step 1: Compute c for each concentration
| c (mol L⁻¹) | c (mol L⁻¹)^(1/2) | Λm (S cm² mol⁻¹) |
|---|---|---|
| 0.000198 | 0.01407 | 148.61 |
| 0.000309 | 0.01758 | 148.29 |
| 0.000521 | 0.02283 | 147.81 |
| 0.000989 | 0.03145 | 147.09 |
Step 2: Plot Λm vs c
Put c on the x-axis and Λm on the y-axis. The points fall on a straight line with negative slope.
Step 3: Determine A (slope)
Take two well-separated points:
- Point 1: (0.01407, 148.61)
- Point 2: (0.03145, 147.09)
slope=0.03145−0.01407147.09−148.61=0.01738−1.52≈−87.46
Since Λm=Λm0−Ac, the constant is:
A=87.46 S cm2mol−1(mol L−1)−1/2
Step 4: Determine Λm0 (intercept)
Extend the line to c=0. NCERT reads the intercept from the graph as:
Λm0=150.0 S cm2mol−1
Final Result
- Method: Kohlrausch's empirical law (linear Λm vs c plot)
- Λm0 = 150.0 S cm² mol⁻¹
- A = 87.46 S cm² mol⁻¹ (mol L⁻¹)^(−1/2)
The straight-line nature confirms KCl behaves as a strong electrolyte at these dilutions.
NCERT reads Λm0=150.0 graphically. A least-squares fit of the four points gives Λm0≈149.8 and A≈87.5 — essentially the same; the difference is only graphical rounding of the intercept.
1. ✗ Mistake: Forgetting to convert concentration units
Students often take c directly in mol L−1 and then compute c1/2 without realising that the Kohlrausch law uses c in mol L−1 — but the square root is fine as given.
The real trap: they forget that Λm is already in S cm2 mol−1 and try to convert it unnecessarily.
✓ How to avoid:
- Check units at the start. Here, both c and Λm are given in standard units.
- Only convert if the problem explicitly asks for SI units (e.g., S m2 mol−1). For this problem, use as given.
2. ✗ Mistake: Plotting Λm vs c instead of Λm vs c1/2
This is the most common error. The Kohlrausch law is:
Λm=Λm0−Ac
So the x-axis must be c, not c.
✓ How to avoid:
- Always write the law first before plotting.
- Compute a new column: c for each concentration.
- Plot Λm on y-axis, c on x-axis.
3. ✗ Mistake: Errors in calculating c
Students sometimes:
- Take square root of the number without the unit.
- Miscalculate powers of 10 (e.g., 0.000198=0.01407, not 0.1407).
✓ How to avoid:
- Use scientific notation: 0.000198=1.98×10−4 Then c=1.98×10−2≈1.407×10−2
- Double-check each value with a calculator.
4. ✗ Mistake: Drawing a rough freehand graph and guessing intercept/slope
Students often sketch a line by eye and read Λm0 from the y-intercept inaccurately.
✓ How to avoid:
- Use graph paper or plotting software.
- Draw the best-fit straight line (not just connecting dots).
- Read Λm0 as the y-intercept (where c=0).
- Read slope =−A from two far-apart points on the line.
5. ✗ Mistake: Confusing A with the slope directly
The Kohlrausch law is:
Λm=Λm0−Ac
So the slope of the line = −A. Students often take slope = A and get sign wrong.
✓ How to avoid:
- Write the equation in y = mx + c form:
- y=Λm
- x=c
- m=−A
- c=Λm0
- So if slope =−50, then A=50.
6. ✗ Mistake: Forgetting units for Λm0 and A
Students report Λm0=150 without units, or give A in wrong units.
✓ How to avoid:
- Λm0 has same units as Λm: S cm2 mol−1
- A has units: S cm2 mol−1⋅(mol L−1)−1/2 (Often written as S cm2 mol−1⋅L1/2 mol−1/2)
7. ✗ Mistake: Not checking linearity properly
Students assume the plot is a straight line without verifying.
✓ How to avoid:
- After plotting, check if points lie close to a straight line.
- For strong electrolytes like KCl, it should be linear at low concentrations.
- If one point deviates, recheck calculation of c for that point.
Quick Summary Table
| Mistake | How to Avoid |
|---|---|
| Plotting Λm vs c | Always plot vs c |
| Wrong c values | Use scientific notation, double-check |
| Freehand inaccurate graph | Use graph paper / software, best-fit line |
| Slope = A (wrong sign) | Slope = −A |
| No units for Λm0, A | Always attach correct units |
| Not checking linearity | Verify points lie on a line |
Final tip: Before you start, write the Kohlrausch law clearly. Then compute c, plot, find intercept (Λm0) and slope (−A). This structured approach eliminates most errors.
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 on this concept.
- CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 markQ.What is the SI unit of molar conductivity?
›Reveal solutionSolution
Molar conductivity's SI unit is S m² mol⁻¹.
Molar conductivity Λm=Cκ, where κ (conductivity) has SI unit Sm−1 and concentration C has SI unit molm−3.
Λm=molm−3Sm−1=Sm2mol−1
(In practice, chemists often quote it in Scm2mol−1, but the SI unit is Sm2mol−1.)
✓Final answerS m² mol⁻¹
- CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 markQ.Define the following — Limiting molar conductivity
›Reveal solutionSolution
Limiting molar conductivity is molar conductivity extrapolated to zero concentration.
Limiting molar conductivity (Λm0 or Λm∞) is the molar conductivity of an electrolyte solution when the concentration approaches zero (i.e. at infinite dilution). At infinite dilution, dissociation of the electrolyte is essentially complete and inter-ionic attractions vanish, so each ion conducts independently and to its maximum extent. For strong electrolytes, Λm0 is obtained by extrapolating the Λm vs C plot to C→0 (Kohlrausch's law); for weak electrolytes it is obtained using Kohlrausch's law of independent migration of ions.
✓Final answerΛm° = molar conductivity of an electrolyte at infinite dilution (C → 0)
- CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.Equivalent conductances of sodium acetate, sodium chloride and hydrochloric acid at infinite dilution are 224, 38.2, 203 ohm^-1 cm^2 eqv^-1 respectively at 298K. So the (lambda)0 CH3COOH is:(a) 288.5 ohm^-1 cm^2 eqv.^-1(b) 288.8 ohm^-1 cm^2 eqv.^-1(c) 388.8 ohm^-1 cm^2 eqv.^-1(d) 59.2 ohm^-1 cm^2 eqv.^-1
›Reveal solutionSolution
λ0(CH3COOH) = λ0(CH3COONa) + λ0(HCl) − λ0(NaCl) = 224 + 203 − 38.2 = 388.8 ohm^-1 cm^2 eqv^-1.
CH3COOH is a weak electrolyte, so its limiting equivalent conductance cannot be found by direct extrapolation. Instead, Kohlrausch's law of independent migration of ions lets us combine the limiting conductances of related strong electrolytes.
We want λ0(CH3COO-) + λ0(H+). Note that:
λ0(CH3COONa) = λ0(CH3COO-) + λ0(Na+) = 224
λ0(HCl) = λ0(H+) + λ0(Cl-) = 203
λ0(NaCl) = λ0(Na+) + λ0(Cl-) = 38.2
Adding the first two and subtracting the third cancels Na+ and Cl-, leaving exactly what we want:
λ0(CH3COOH) = λ0(CH3COONa) + λ0(HCl) − λ0(NaCl)
= 224 + 203 − 38.2 = 388.8 ohm^-1 cm^2 eqv^-1.
✓Final answer(c) 388.8 ohm^-1 cm^2 eqv^-1.
- CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 markQ.Fill in the blank: Molar conductivity ________ with decrease in concentration.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Molar conductivity increases as concentration decreases (i.e., on dilution), reaching a maximum limiting value at infinite dilution.
Molar conductivity is given by:
Λm = κ x 1000 / M
As a solution is diluted (concentration M decreases):
- For weak electrolytes: the degree of dissociation increases sharply with dilution, so more ions are produced per mole, increasing Λm markedly.
- For strong electrolytes: dissociation is already essentially complete, but the interionic (electrostatic) attractions between oppositely charged ions decrease on dilution, allowing ions to move more freely and conduct better, so Λm increases (though only slightly compared to weak electrolytes).
In both cases Λm increases with decreasing concentration, approaching a limiting molar conductivity Λm° at infinite dilution.
✓Final answerincreases (with decrease in concentration / on dilution).
- CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.The unit of molar conductivity is(a) S cm^-2 mol^-1(b) S cm^2 mol^-1(c) S^-1 cm^2 mol^-1(d) S cm^2 mol
›Reveal solutionSolution
Molar conductivity relates conductivity (S/cm) to concentration (mol/cm^3), giving the composite unit S cm^2 mol^-1.
Molar conductivity is defined as:
Λm=Cκ×1000
where κ (specific conductivity) has units S cm^-1 and C (concentration) has units mol L^-1 (mol per 1000 cm^3).
Working out the units: 1S cm−1×cm3mol−1=S cm2mol−1
✓Final answer(b) S cm^2 mol^-1.
- CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.The molar conductivity of a 0.1mol L−1 solution of KCl with electrolytic conductivity 0.0129 S cm−1 at 298 K is –(a) 12.9 S cm2 mol−1(b) 1.29 S cm2 mol−1(c) 0.0129 S cm2 mol−1(d) 129 S cm2 mol−1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Converting conductivity (per cm) into molar conductivity requires dividing by the molar concentration expressed per cm³, giving a factor of 1000 in the standard formula.
Molar conductivity is related to the specific conductivity (electrolytic conductivity, κ) and molar concentration C (in molL−1) by:
Λm=Cκ×1000
(The factor of 1000 converts the concentration from molL−1 to molcm−3, since κ is expressed per cm.)
Substituting κ=0.0129 Scm−1 and C=0.1 molL−1:
Λm=0.10.0129×1000=0.112.9=129 Scm2mol−1
✓Final answer(d) 129 S cm² mol⁻¹.
- CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.The formula used to calculate molar conductivity of an electrolyte is _____.(a) Λ=k1000c(b) c=k1000Λ(c) Λ=c1000k(d) k=Λc1000
›Reveal solutionSolution
Λm=c1000κ.
Molar conductivity (Λm) relates to specific conductivity (κ) and molar concentration c (in moldm−3) by:
Λm=cκ×1000
(the factor 1000 converts κ, usually in Scm−1, to a per-litre basis consistent with c in moldm−3=molL−1).
✓Final answer(c) Λ=c1000k
- CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 markQ.What is the SI unit of molar conductivity? OR Write the relation between specific conductivity and molar conductivity.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Molar conductivity's SI unit follows from Λm=κ/C: siemens metre-squared per mole.
Molar conductivity is defined as Λm=Cκ, where κ (specific/electrical conductivity) has SI unit Sm−1 and C (molar concentration) has SI unit molm−3. Dividing, the SI unit of Λm works out to
molm−3Sm−1=Sm2mol−1.
(In practical lab work, where κ is often expressed in Scm−1 and C in molL−1, the commonly used relation is Λm=C1000κ, giving the c.g.s.-style unit Scm2mol−1.)
OR (relation between specific and molar conductivity): Molar conductivity relates to specific conductivity by dividing by molar concentration: Λm=κ/C (SI, C in molm−3), or equivalently Λm=C1000κ when κ is in Scm−1 and C is in molL−1.
✓Final answerSI unit: Sm2mol−1; relation: Λm=κ/C.
- CBSE 2024Set A11 markMCQQ.When the concentration of electrolytic solution approaches zero, the resulting molar conductivity is known as ;(a) specific conductance(b) resistivity(c) conductivity(d) limiting molar conductivity
›Reveal solutionSolution
Molar conductivity at zero concentration (infinite dilution) is called the limiting molar conductivity — option (d).
Molar conductivity Λm increases as an electrolytic solution is diluted, because more of the electrolyte is present as free, effectively conducting ions. As the concentration approaches zero (infinite dilution), Λm reaches a limiting maximum value denoted Λm∘, the limiting molar conductivity. Specific conductance/conductivity (κ) and resistivity (ρ) are different quantities, so (a), (b) and (c) are incorrect.
✓Final answer(d) limiting molar conductivity
- CBSE 2024Set B1 markQ.Answer in one word/sentence: Write the unit of Equivalence conductivity.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Equivalent conductivity is conductivity per gram-equivalent of electrolyte per unit volume, giving units of S cm^2 eq^-1.
Equivalent conductivity, Λeq, is defined as Λeq=κ×V, where κ (specific conductivity) has units of S cm^-1 (ohm^-1 cm^-1) and V is the volume in cm^3 containing one gram-equivalent of the electrolyte, so the overall unit works out to S cm^2 eq^-1 (equivalently, ohm^-1 cm^2 g-equiv^-1).
✓Final answerS cm^2 eq^-1 (ohm^-1 cm^2 equiv^-1).
- CBSE 2024Set ANNUAL1 markQ.The molar conductivity of 2.5×10−2 M of methanoic acid is 46.1 S cm2 mol−1. Calculate the degree of dissociation. (Molar conductivity of H+ and HCOO− at infinite dilutions are λ°H+=349.6 S cm2 mol−1 and λ°HCOO−=54.6 S cm2 mol−1).
›Reveal solutionSolution
Adding the limiting ionic molar conductivities gives Λm°, and dividing the measured Λm by it gives the degree of dissociation.
For a weak electrolyte, the degree of dissociation is given by:
α=Λm°Λm
Limiting molar conductivity of methanoic acid (using Kohlrausch's law of independent migration of ions):
Λm°=λ°H++λ°HCOO−=349.6+54.6=404.2 Scm2mol−1
Degree of dissociation:
α=Λm°Λm=404.246.1=0.1140
✓Final answerα=404.246.1≈0.114 (11.4% dissociated).
- CBSE 2024Set ANNUAL1 markQ.Write SI unit of molar conductivity.
›Reveal solutionSolution
SI unit of molar conductivity is Sm2mol−1.
Molar conductivity Λm is defined as the conducting power of all the ions produced by dissolving one mole of an electrolyte, measured between electrodes 1 m apart.
Its SI unit is derived from conductivity (Sm−1) divided by molar concentration (molm−3): Λm=Cκ, giving units molm−3Sm−1=Sm2mol−1.
✓Final answerSm2mol−1 (siemens metre² per mole).
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.