Q.Verify: ∫2x+32x−1dx=x−log∣(2x+3)2∣+C
Concept understanding — Verification of Solution
Verifying a Solution of a Differential Equation
A function y=ϕ(x) is called a solution of a differential equation if, when you substitute it and its derivatives into the equation, the two sides become equal for every x in the domain. Verification is the act of carrying out that substitution and checking that it holds as an identity.
The useful point: you do not have to solve the equation to verify a candidate. You are only checking a function that is already handed to you — which is exactly how many exam questions are phrased: "Show that … is a solution of …."
The steps
- From the given y=ϕ(x), compute exactly the derivatives that appear in the equation.
- Substitute y and those derivatives into the left-hand side.
- Simplify and check that it equals the right-hand side for all x (an identity, not just at one point).
Example 1
Verify that y=e−3x is a solution of dx2d2y+dxdy−6y=0.
Here y′=−3e−3x and y′′=9e−3x. Substituting:
9e−3x+(−3e−3x)−6e−3x=(9−3−6)e−3x=0.
The left side is 0 for every x, so y=e−3x is a solution.
Example 2 (a solution with constants)
Verify that y=acosx+bsinx satisfies dx2d2y+y=0 for any constants a,b.
Since y′′=−acosx−bsinx=−y, we get y′′+y=0. It holds for all a,b, so this two-constant family is a solution.
Verification links your answer back to the definition of a solution: a function is a solution not because of how you found it, but because it makes the differential equation true. If the substitution does not reduce to an identity, the function is simply not a solution.
Verifying that a given function solves a differential equation is explicitly listed as an exercise type in the NCERT Class 12 Mathematics textbook's Differential Equations chapter, and "verify the solution of differential equation examples" is a common CBSE and JEE Main search. This is often the easiest full-mark question in the chapter once the substitution steps are practiced a few times.
To verify an antiderivative, differentiate the right side and check it returns the integrand.
Let F(x)=x−log∣(2x+3)2∣+C. Using log∣(2x+3)2∣=2log∣2x+3∣,
F′(x)=1−2⋅2x+31⋅2=1−2x+34=2x+3(2x+3)−4=2x+32x−1.
This is exactly the integrand, so the statement is verified.
True. dxd[x−log∣(2x+3)2∣]=2x+32x−1, so the given result is correct.
True. Differentiating x−log∣(2x+3)2∣+C gives 2x+32x−1, so the stated antiderivative is correct.
The fastest way to verify a claimed integral is to differentiate the proposed answer: if you recover the integrand, the statement holds. No integration is needed.
Differentiate the right-hand side
Let F(x)=x−log∣(2x+3)2∣+C. First simplify the logarithm with the power rule log∣a2∣=2log∣a∣:
F(x)=x−2log∣2x+3∣+C.
Now differentiate term by term:
- dxd(x)=1,
- dxd(−2log∣2x+3∣)=−2⋅2x+31⋅2=−2x+34.
So
F′(x)=1−2x+34=2x+3(2x+3)−4=2x+32x−1.
Compare with the integrand
This matches 2x+32x−1 exactly, and the domains agree (x=−23). Hence F is a valid antiderivative and the identity is correct.
Writing the constant as log∣(2x+3)2∣ instead of 2log∣2x+3∣ is just a stylistic choice — the two are equal, so both forms verify identically.
True. dxd[x−log∣(2x+3)2∣]=2x+32x−1, confirming ∫2x+32x−1dx=x−log∣(2x+3)2∣+C.
Method: Verifying a claimed antiderivative by differentiation
Use this whenever a question says "Verify ∫f(x)dx=F(x)+C". You never integrate — you differentiate the proposed F(x) and check it returns the integrand.
Steps
Step 1: Simplify F(x) using log/algebra rules first.
Constants and log powers simplify differentiation, e.g. log∣(2x+3)2∣=2log∣2x+3∣. Doing this before differentiating avoids messy chain rules.
Step 2: Differentiate F(x) term by term.
Apply standard derivatives, including dxdlog∣u∣=uu′ with the chain rule for the inner linear factor.
Step 3: Combine over a common denominator.
Collect the terms into a single fraction so it can be compared directly with the given integrand.
Step 4: Compare with the integrand and state the verdict.
If F′(x) equals f(x) (and the domains match), the identity is verified as True. The logic: differentiation and integration are inverses, so recovering f confirms F is a valid antiderivative.
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Forgetting the chain-rule factor inside the log.
Why it's wrong: dxdlog∣2x+3∣=2x+32, not 2x+31 — dropping the inner 2 gives 1−2x+32 and a false "mismatch". Correct approach: differentiate log∣u∣ as u′/u with u′=2.
Mistake 2: Ignoring the power inside the log.
Why it's wrong: log∣(2x+3)2∣=2log∣2x+3∣ carries a factor 2; treating it as log∣2x+3∣ halves the derivative. Correct approach: apply loga2=2loga before differentiating.
Mistake 3: Trying to integrate instead of differentiate.
Why it's wrong: verification only needs the reverse check; re-integrating 2x+32x−1 wastes time and invites errors. Correct approach: differentiate the given F(x) and match it to the integrand.
- AHSEC Higher Secondary (HS) Final Examination 2024Set ANNUAL4 marksQ.Write the order and degree (if defined) of the differential equation (dx2d2y)5+(dxdy)2+cos(dxdy)+1=0. Verify that y=1+x2 is a solution of the differential equation dxdy=1+x2xy. [1+1+2=4] OR Find a particular solution of the following differential equation satisfying the given condition: x(x2−1)dxdy=1; y=0 when x=2.
›Reveal solutionSolution
The ODE has order 2 but no defined degree (it isn't a polynomial in derivatives); y=1+x2 checks out as a genuine solution of the given first-order ODE. The OR part solves a separable ODE with an initial condition.
Order and degree: In (dx2d2y)5+(dxdy)2+cos(dxdy)+1=0, the highest-order derivative is d2y/dx2, so the order is 2. Degree is defined only when the equation is a polynomial in the derivatives; here cos(dy/dx) is a transcendental function of dy/dx, not a polynomial term, so the degree is not defined.
Verification: y=1+x2⇒dxdy=1+x2x. The RHS of the given equation is
1+x2xy=1+x2x1+x2=1+x2x=dxdy.
Since LHS = RHS, y=1+x2 is indeed a solution.
OR: x(x2−1)dxdy=1⇒dy=x(x−1)(x+1)dx. Partial fractions:
x(x−1)(x+1)1=xA+x−1B+x+1C,
giving (by substitution) A=−1, B=21, C=21. So
y=−ln∣x∣+21ln∣x−1∣+21ln∣x+1∣+K=−ln∣x∣+21ln∣x2−1∣+K.
Using y=0 at x=2: 0=−ln2+21ln3+K⇒K=ln2−21ln3. So the particular solution is
y=−lnx+21ln(x2−1)+ln2−21ln3=lnx2+21ln3x2−1(x>2 region).
✓Final answerOrder =2; degree not defined. y=1+x2 verified as a solution. OR: y=lnx2+21ln3x2−1.
- AHSEC Higher Secondary (HS) Final Examination 2019Set ANNUAL4 marksQ.If y=3cos(logx)+4sin(logx), show that x2dx2d2y+xdxdy+y=0.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Differentiate twice using the chain rule, multiply by x and x2 appropriately, and the terms cancel to give 0.
y=3cos(logx)+4sin(logx).
First derivative (chain rule, dxdlogx=1/x):
y′=−3sin(logx)⋅x1+4cos(logx)⋅x1=x1[4cos(logx)−3sin(logx)].
So xy′=4cos(logx)−3sin(logx).
Differentiate xy′ again with respect to x (product rule on the LHS, chain rule on the RHS):
y′+xy′′=−4sin(logx)⋅x1−3cos(logx)⋅x1=−x1[3cos(logx)+4sin(logx)]=−xy.
Multiply both sides by x:
xy′+x2y′′=−y.
Rearranging:
x2dx2d2y+xdxdy+y=0.
This is exactly the required relation, so it is proved.
✓Final answerShown: x2y′′+xy′+y=0 for y=3cos(logx)+4sin(logx).
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.