Q.Verify: ∫x2+3x2x+3dx=log∣x2+3x∣+C
Concept understanding — Verification of Solution
Verifying a Solution of a Differential Equation
A function y=ϕ(x) is called a solution of a differential equation if, when you substitute it and its derivatives into the equation, the two sides become equal for every x in the domain. Verification is the act of carrying out that substitution and checking that it holds as an identity.
The useful point: you do not have to solve the equation to verify a candidate. You are only checking a function that is already handed to you — which is exactly how many exam questions are phrased: "Show that … is a solution of …."
The steps
- From the given y=ϕ(x), compute exactly the derivatives that appear in the equation.
- Substitute y and those derivatives into the left-hand side.
- Simplify and check that it equals the right-hand side for all x (an identity, not just at one point).
Example 1
Verify that y=e−3x is a solution of dx2d2y+dxdy−6y=0.
Here y′=−3e−3x and y′′=9e−3x. Substituting:
9e−3x+(−3e−3x)−6e−3x=(9−3−6)e−3x=0.
The left side is 0 for every x, so y=e−3x is a solution.
Example 2 (a solution with constants)
Verify that y=acosx+bsinx satisfies dx2d2y+y=0 for any constants a,b.
Since y′′=−acosx−bsinx=−y, we get y′′+y=0. It holds for all a,b, so this two-constant family is a solution.
Verification links your answer back to the definition of a solution: a function is a solution not because of how you found it, but because it makes the differential equation true. If the substitution does not reduce to an identity, the function is simply not a solution.
Verifying that a given function solves a differential equation is explicitly listed as an exercise type in the NCERT Class 12 Mathematics textbook's Differential Equations chapter, and "verify the solution of differential equation examples" is a common CBSE and JEE Main search. This is often the easiest full-mark question in the chapter once the substitution steps are practiced a few times.
Verify by differentiating the right side and checking it equals the integrand.
Let F(x)=log∣x2+3x∣+C. With u=x2+3x and u′=2x+3,
F′(x)=x2+3x1⋅(2x+3)=x2+3x2x+3.
This is exactly the integrand — note the numerator 2x+3 is precisely the derivative of the denominator x2+3x, the hallmark of a ∫uu′dx=log∣u∣ form.
True. dxdlog∣x2+3x∣=x2+3x2x+3, so the given result is correct.
True. The numerator is the derivative of the denominator, so ∫x2+3x2x+3dx=log∣x2+3x∣+C; differentiating the right side confirms it.
Whenever an integrand has the shape u(x)u′(x), its antiderivative is log∣u(x)∣. Verifying is even simpler: differentiate the claimed answer and check you land back on the integrand.
Spot the pattern
Here u=x2+3x, and u′=2x+3 — which is exactly the numerator. So the integrand is uu′, and the natural antiderivative is log∣u∣=log∣x2+3x∣.
Differentiate to confirm
Let F(x)=log∣x2+3x∣+C. By the chain rule,
F′(x)=x2+3x1⋅dxd(x2+3x)=x2+3x2x+3.
This is the original integrand, and both are defined for x=0,−3, so the domains match.
In calculus log denotes the natural logarithm log; the derivative of log∣u∣ is u′/u, which is what makes the check work.
True. dxdlog∣x2+3x∣=x2+3x2x+3, confirming ∫x2+3x2x+3dx=log∣x2+3x∣+C.
Method: Verifying ∫f(x)f′(x)dx=log∣f(x)∣+C by differentiation
Use this for "Verify" questions where the proposed answer is a logarithm — and, more generally, to recognise integrands that are a derivative-over-function.
Steps
Step 1: Differentiate the claimed log∣f(x)∣.
dxdlog∣f(x)∣=f(x)f′(x).
This standard result is the whole engine of the check.
Step 2: Compute f′(x) for the specific f.
Identify f(x) (here f=x2+3x) and differentiate it (f′=2x+3).
Step 3: Form the ratio and compare with the integrand.
Write f(x)f′(x) and check it matches the given fraction exactly.
Step 4: State the verdict.
If they agree, the antiderivative is verified. The transferable insight: whenever an integrand's numerator is the derivative of its denominator, the integral is log of the denominator — spotting this pattern is faster than partial fractions or substitution.
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Not checking that the numerator is exactly f′(x).
Why it's wrong: the log∣f∣ rule applies only when the top is precisely the derivative of the bottom; here dxd(x2+3x)=2x+3 matches, but a different numerator would need adjusting. Correct approach: differentiate the denominator and confirm it equals the numerator.
Mistake 2: Forgetting the absolute value in log∣f(x)∣.
Why it's wrong: f(x)=x2+3x can be negative, so log(x2+3x) is undefined there; the modulus keeps the antiderivative valid on the whole domain. Correct approach: always write log∣x2+3x∣.
Mistake 3: Over-complicating with partial fractions.
Why it's wrong: splitting x2+3x2x+3 is unnecessary work when the numerator already equals the denominator's derivative. Correct approach: recognise the f′/f pattern and verify by differentiation directly.
- AHSEC Higher Secondary (HS) Final Examination 2024Set ANNUAL4 marksQ.Write the order and degree (if defined) of the differential equation (dx2d2y)5+(dxdy)2+cos(dxdy)+1=0. Verify that y=1+x2 is a solution of the differential equation dxdy=1+x2xy. [1+1+2=4] OR Find a particular solution of the following differential equation satisfying the given condition: x(x2−1)dxdy=1; y=0 when x=2.
›Reveal solutionSolution
The ODE has order 2 but no defined degree (it isn't a polynomial in derivatives); y=1+x2 checks out as a genuine solution of the given first-order ODE. The OR part solves a separable ODE with an initial condition.
Order and degree: In (dx2d2y)5+(dxdy)2+cos(dxdy)+1=0, the highest-order derivative is d2y/dx2, so the order is 2. Degree is defined only when the equation is a polynomial in the derivatives; here cos(dy/dx) is a transcendental function of dy/dx, not a polynomial term, so the degree is not defined.
Verification: y=1+x2⇒dxdy=1+x2x. The RHS of the given equation is
1+x2xy=1+x2x1+x2=1+x2x=dxdy.
Since LHS = RHS, y=1+x2 is indeed a solution.
OR: x(x2−1)dxdy=1⇒dy=x(x−1)(x+1)dx. Partial fractions:
x(x−1)(x+1)1=xA+x−1B+x+1C,
giving (by substitution) A=−1, B=21, C=21. So
y=−ln∣x∣+21ln∣x−1∣+21ln∣x+1∣+K=−ln∣x∣+21ln∣x2−1∣+K.
Using y=0 at x=2: 0=−ln2+21ln3+K⇒K=ln2−21ln3. So the particular solution is
y=−lnx+21ln(x2−1)+ln2−21ln3=lnx2+21ln3x2−1(x>2 region).
✓Final answerOrder =2; degree not defined. y=1+x2 verified as a solution. OR: y=lnx2+21ln3x2−1.
- AHSEC Higher Secondary (HS) Final Examination 2019Set ANNUAL4 marksQ.If y=3cos(logx)+4sin(logx), show that x2dx2d2y+xdxdy+y=0.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Differentiate twice using the chain rule, multiply by x and x2 appropriately, and the terms cancel to give 0.
y=3cos(logx)+4sin(logx).
First derivative (chain rule, dxdlogx=1/x):
y′=−3sin(logx)⋅x1+4cos(logx)⋅x1=x1[4cos(logx)−3sin(logx)].
So xy′=4cos(logx)−3sin(logx).
Differentiate xy′ again with respect to x (product rule on the LHS, chain rule on the RHS):
y′+xy′′=−4sin(logx)⋅x1−3cos(logx)⋅x1=−x1[3cos(logx)+4sin(logx)]=−xy.
Multiply both sides by x:
xy′+x2y′′=−y.
Rearranging:
x2dx2d2y+xdxdy+y=0.
This is exactly the required relation, so it is proved.
✓Final answerShown: x2y′′+xy′+y=0 for y=3cos(logx)+4sin(logx).
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.