Skip to content
NCERT Exemplar · Q51

Q.In the presence of peroxide addition of HBr to propene takes place according to anti Markovnikov's rule but peroxide effect is not seen in the case of HCl and HI. Explain.

Bihar BsebLong· 3mImportance★★★★★est
100% · 90/90 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The peroxide effect (anti-Markovnikov addition) works only for HBr because the reaction proceeds through a free-radical mechanism that requires energetically favourable steps. For HCl the H–Cl bond is too strong to break, while for HI the iodine radical is too unreactive to add efficiently to the alkene.


When an alkene reacts with a hydrogen halide, the usual outcome follows Markovnikov's rule: the hydrogen attaches to the carbon with more hydrogens, and the halogen goes to the more substituted carbon. This happens through a carbocation intermediate, where the more stable (more substituted) carbocation forms preferentially.

But in the presence of peroxides, HBr behaves differently. The reaction switches to a free-radical mechanism, and the product flips to anti-Markovnikov orientation. The question is: why does this peroxide effect work for HBr but not for HCl or HI?

The answer lies in the energetics of each step in the radical chain mechanism.


The Free-Radical Mechanism

When peroxides are present, they decompose to generate radicals that initiate a chain reaction:

  1. Initiation: Peroxide breaks homolytically to form radicals, which then abstract a hydrogen from HBr to produce a bromine radical Br⋅\text{Br}^\cdot.

  2. Propagation Step 1: The bromine radical adds to the alkene. Radicals, unlike carbocations, are more stable when they have more alkyl groups around them. So Br⋅\text{Br}^\cdot adds to the less substituted carbon of propene, forming the more stable secondary radical on the middle carbon:

CH3–CH=CH2+Br⋅⟶CH3–C⋅H–CH2Br\text{CH}_3\text{–CH=CH}_2 + \text{Br}^\cdot \longrightarrow \text{CH}_3\text{–}\overset{\cdot}{\text{C}}\text{H}\text{–CH}_2\text{Br}

  1. Propagation Step 2: This carbon radical abstracts a hydrogen from another HBr molecule, regenerating Br⋅\text{Br}^\cdot and giving the anti-Markovnikov product:

CH3–C⋅H–CH2Br+H–Br⟶CH3–CH2–CH2Br+Br⋅\text{CH}_3\text{–}\overset{\cdot}{\text{C}}\text{H}\text{–CH}_2\text{Br} + \text{H–Br} \longrightarrow \text{CH}_3\text{–CH}_2\text{–CH}_2\text{Br} + \text{Br}^\cdot

For this chain to be efficient, both propagation steps must be exothermic (or at least not too endothermic). If either step requires too much energy, the chain breaks down and the radical mechanism cannot compete with the ionic pathway.


Why HCl Fails

The H–Cl bond is very strong (bond dissociation energy ≈431 kJ/mol\approx 431 \, \text{kJ/mol}).

In the second propagation step, the carbon radical would need to abstract hydrogen from HCl:

R⋅+H–Cl⟶R–H+Cl⋅\text{R}^\cdot + \text{H–Cl} \longrightarrow \text{R–H} + \text{Cl}^\cdot

This step is highly endothermic because breaking the H–Cl bond costs far more energy than is released by forming the new C–H bond. The reaction simply doesn't proceed at a useful rate, so the radical chain never gets going.

Watch out

A common mistake is to think the peroxide effect fails for HCl because the chlorine radical is unstable. In fact, the problem is that the H–Cl bond is too stable to break in the hydrogen-abstraction step.


Why HI Fails

The H–I bond is weak (bond dissociation energy ≈297 kJ/mol\approx 297 \, \text{kJ/mol}), so hydrogen abstraction from HI is easy and exothermic. The problem is in the first propagation step. …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.