Q.Do you think that a good/convincing argument can compel others to listen to you?
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Largely yes, in the domain of ideas -- a genuinely reasoned argument compels agreement because it exposes an inconsistency the listener cannot honestly deny -- but agreement in argument does not always translate into changed real-world behaviour.
Socrates' cross-examination of Polemarchus in Plato's Republic is a good test case. Polemarchus starts out believing justice means doing good to friends and harming enemies. Socrates does not simply assert that this is wrong; he builds an argument step by step -- using the analogy of horses and dogs, and then of a musician and a horseman -- until Polemarchus is forced to admit that harming anyone can never actually be the act of a just person. Polemarchus is not persuaded by Socrates' authority or status; he is persuaded because the logic itself leaves him no honest way to keep holding his original view. In this sense, yes, a good, convincing argument can genuinely compel a listener to accept a conclusion, because refusing to accept it would mean holding openly contradictory beliefs. …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.