Skip to content
Activity Questions · Q2

Q.In the conservation experiment with two transparent glasses (Activity 3.2), why might a Class II child and a Class V child give different answers when asked which glass has more water after it is poured into a tall thin glass in front of them?

CBSENCERTSubjectiveImportance★★★★★est
21% · 5/24 Questions
✓ Free question

This activity is a direct, hands-on version of Piaget's classic conservation task, and the expected difference in responses between a Class II child and a Class V child illustrates the shift from preoperational to concrete operational thought described in the chapter.

A Class II child is typically around 7 years old, an age at which many children are either still in, or only just transitioning out of, Piaget's preoperational stage (roughly 2-7 years). Preoperational thought is marked by centration — the tendency to focus on just one salient feature of a situation while ignoring others. When water is poured from one of the original identical glasses into a taller, thinner glass, a preoperational child is likely to centrate on the greater height of the water column in the new glass, and conclude that it now contains 'more' water — even though nothing was actually added or removed. This is because such a child cannot yet mentally reverse the pouring action to recognise that the increased height is exactly compensated by the decreased width, and their thinking about the situation is not yet flexible enough to consider both dimensions (height and width) together.

A Class V child is typically around 10 or 11 years old, an age by which most children have entered Piaget's concrete operational stage (roughly 7-11 years). Concrete operational thought is built around reversible mental operations — the ability to mentally 'undo' a transformation. A concrete operational child can mentally reverse the pouring of water back into the original glass, recognising that the amount of water has not changed despite its different appearance in the new container; they are also able to attend to both the height and the width of the water column simultaneously, rather than centrating on just one dimension. As a result, a Class V child is expected to correctly say that both glasses (the original, and the new tall thin one) contain the same amount of water — demonstrating conservation of quantity.

This experiment, and the different responses expected from Class II and Class V children, thus offers a very direct, observable illustration of Piaget's broader point that cognitive development involves qualitative shifts in the way children think, not merely quantitative increases in what they happen to know.

✓Final answer

A Class II child, still preoperational, centrates on the taller water column's height and concludes there is more water, while a Class V child, having entered the concrete operational stage, can mentally reverse the pouring and attend to both height and width together, correctly recognising the quantity is unchanged — a direct demonstration of the shift from preoperational to concrete operational thought.

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.