Skip to content
Talking about the Text · Q1

Q.Discuss the following in groups of two pairs, each pair in a group taking opposite points of view.
Scientific intervention is necessary to unearth buried mysteries.

CBSENCERTSubjective· 4mImportance★★★★★est
10% · 3/29 Questions
✓ Free question

Science can reveal the past without destroying it, but it can also intrude on the dead — a balanced view favours respectful, non-invasive methods.

For the motion: Scientific intervention is often the only way to unearth buried mysteries. The CT scan of Tut, and the earlier X-ray, answered questions that centuries of speculation could not, and did so without tearing the mummy apart. Such knowledge deepens our understanding of ancient life, medicine and history, and preserves discoveries for future generations.

Against the motion: Intervention, however careful, disturbs the dead and can damage what it studies — Carter's crude methods left Tut's mummy in bad condition. Some argue that traditions and funerary practices deserve respect, and that not every mystery needs to be forcibly 'solved.'

A balanced view: The essay itself models the answer. Modern, non-invasive science — imaging that leaves the body intact and treats it with dignity — can unearth mysteries responsibly, unlike the destructive treasure-hunting of the past. Scientific intervention is valuable when it is respectful and does no harm.

✓Final answer

Science is often the only way to reveal buried truths, as Tut's non-destructive CT scan showed; but reckless intervention (like Carter's) damages remains and disturbs the dead. Respectful, non-invasive scientific study is therefore justified, while crude or intrusive methods are not.

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.