History · Ch 12 — Framing the Constitution — The Beginning of a New Era
The Vision of the Constitution
The Vision of the Constitution
The Constitution of India was not merely a legal document; it was a vision for a new society. The framers, especially Jawaharlal Nehru, saw the Constitution as an instrument of social revolution. This vision shaped the very structure of the Union government and the powers it would hold.
The Union Powers Committee, chaired by Jawaharlal Nehru, was tasked with defining the relationship between the central government and the provinces. The committee’s report, presented to the Constituent Assembly, laid out a clear preference for a strong central authority. This was not an arbitrary choice — it was a direct response to the trauma of Partition and the need to hold a diverse, newly independent nation together.
Nehru argued that only a powerful centre could ensure national unity, coordinate economic planning, and defend the country against external threats. The committee therefore recommended that the Union government be given control over the most important subjects: defence, foreign affairs, currency, communications, and economic coordination. The provinces would retain autonomy over local matters like agriculture, public health, and education, but the centre would have overriding powers in times of emergency. …
Source 1 — "We are not going just to copy". From Jawaharlal Nehru's speech of 13 December 1946, moving the Objectives Resolution (CAD, Vol. I):
My mind goes back to the various Constituent Assemblies that have gone before … the making of the great American nation when the fathers of that nation met and fashioned out a Constitution which has stood the test of so many years … My mind goes back to that mighty revolution which took place also over 150 years ago and to that Constituent Assembly that met in that gracious and lovely city of Paris … they betook themselves to an open tennis court and met there and took the oath, which is called the Oath of the Tennis Court …
We say that it is our firm and solemn resolve to have an independent sovereign republic … some friends have raised the question: "Why have you not put in the word 'democratic' here?" … it is obvious that the word "republic" contains that word … We are not going just to copy, I hope, a certain democratic procedure or an institution of a so-called democratic country. We may improve upon it. In any event whatever system of government we may establish here must fit in with the temper of our people and be acceptable to them. …