Skip to content
Question

Q.Read the given source carefully and answer the questions that follow : A warning for Europe Bernier warned that if European kings followed the Mughal model : Their kingdoms would be very far from being well cultivated and peopled, so well built, so rich, so polite and flourishing as we see them. Our kings are otherwise rich and powerful; and we must avow that they are much better and more royally served. They would soon be kings of deserts and solitudes, of beggars and barbarians, such as those are whom I have been representing (the Mughals). ... We should find the great Cities and the great Burroughs (boroughs) rendered uninhabitable because of ill air, and to fall to ruine (ruin) without any bodies (anybody) taking care of repairing them; the hillocks abandon'd, and the fields overspread with bushes, or fill'd with pestilential marishes (marshes), as hath been already intimated. (32.1) Why did Bernier warn their European kings against following Mughal model of kingship ?

(1) (32.2) Mention any one difference between Mughal & European land-ownership.
(1) (32.3) How did Bernier's description influence the western theorists from 18th century onwards ? Explain. (2)
CBSECBSE Class XII Board 2026Subjective· 4mImportance★★★★★
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Bernier warned European kings against the Mughal model of kingship, primarily due to its system of land ownership, which he believed led to economic decline and despotism, a view that later influenced Western theories about Asian societies.

François Bernier, a French physician and philosopher, traveled extensively in the Mughal Empire during the mid-17th century. His observations, meticulously recorded in his "Travels in the Mughal Empire," offered a critical perspective on Indian society, often comparing it unfavorably with European conditions. Bernier's writings were not merely travelogues; they were deeply analytical, reflecting his European intellectual background and his desire to draw lessons for his own continent. His central critique revolved around the perceived lack of private land ownership in the Mughal Empire, which he believed had profound consequences for its prosperity and governance.

(32.1) Why did Bernier warn their European kings against following Mughal model of kingship?

Bernier warned European kings against adopting the Mughal model of kingship primarily because he believed it led to economic ruin, depopulation, and a general state of decay. As the source indicates, he feared that if European kingdoms followed this model, they would become "kings of deserts and solitudes, of beggars and barbarians."

His reasoning stemmed from the idea that the Mughal emperor owned all land. In Bernier's view, this system meant that landholders, who were essentially temporary jagirdars or officials, had no long-term stake in the land they administered. They would extract as much revenue as possible during their tenure, neglecting investment in land improvement, irrigation, or the welfare of the peasantry. This short-sighted approach, he argued, led to:

  • Agricultural decline: Fields would become "overspread with bushes, or fill'd with pestilential marishes," indicating a lack of cultivation and maintenance.
  • Urban decay: "Great Cities and the great Burroughs (boroughs) rendered uninhabitable because of ill air, and to fall to ruine (ruin) without any bodies (anybody) taking care of repairing them."
  • Poverty and depopulation: The lack of incentive for improvement would impoverish the populace, leading to a decline in population and a general state of "beggars and barbarians."

Bernier contrasted this with the European system, where private land ownership provided an incentive for individuals to invest in and care for their property, leading to prosperity and well-maintained kingdoms.

(32.2) Mention any one difference between Mughal & European land-ownership.

The primary difference Bernier highlighted was that in the Mughal Empire, the emperor was considered the owner of all land, whereas in Europe, private individuals held ownership of land.

Note

Bernier's assertion that the Mughal emperor owned all land was a significant point of contention and has been debated by historians. While the emperor did control vast territories and had ultimate authority, various forms of land rights and tenures existed, including those held by zamindars and peasants, which were not strictly "private property" in the European sense but did grant hereditary rights and control. However, Bernier interpreted the system through his European lens, emphasizing the absence of absolute private ownership as he understood it.

(32.3) How did Bernier's description influence the western theorists from 18th century onwards? Explain. …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.