Skip to content
Question 22 of 26

Q.Sameer is a wholesaler, who deals in cricket equipment. He collects cricket equipment like bats, balls, helmets, gloves, stumps, etc. from different manufacturers and assembles them in a kit for the convenience of customers. He sets a standard target to assemble 100 kits a day. During the first week of the month the workers assembled 92 – 96 kits a day, which was lower than the set standard. On investigation, it was found that the variation in assembly of kits was due to an irregular supply of helmets. Workers had to wait for helmets to assemble the kits.

(i) State the function of management discussed in the above case.
(ii) State the steps of the function identified in
(i) above, which are discussed in the above paragraph.
CBSECBSE Class XII Board 2025Subjective· 3mImportance★★★★★
85% · 22/26 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The function is Controlling — comparing actual performance (92–96 kits) against the standard (100 kits), identifying the deviation, and investigating its cause (irregular helmet supply). The steps discussed are: (a) setting standards, (b) measuring actual performance, (c) comparing actual with standard, and (d) analyzing causes of deviation.


Management is not a one-time act but a continuous cycle of planning, organizing, staffing, directing, and controlling. When Sameer sets a target of 100 kits per day and then discovers that only 92–96 are being assembled, he is exercising a specific managerial function that closes the loop: Controlling.

Controlling is the process of ensuring that actual activities conform to planned activities. It involves monitoring performance, comparing it against predetermined standards, identifying deviations, and taking corrective action. Without controlling, plans remain wishful thinking — there is no feedback mechanism to tell you whether you are on track or veering off course.

In Sameer's case, the standard (100 kits/day) acts as a benchmark. The moment actual output falls short, the controlling function kicks in: measure the gap, investigate why it happened, and decide what to do next. This is not about blame; it is about diagnosis and correction.


(i) The Function of Management

The function of management discussed in the case is Controlling.

Sameer has set a standard target (100 kits per day), observed that actual performance (92–96 kits) deviates from this standard, and investigated the cause (irregular helmet supply). All of these actions — setting benchmarks, measuring outcomes, comparing, and analyzing — are hallmarks of the controlling function.

Note

Controlling is often confused with "control" in the sense of authority or command. Here it means monitoring and correcting — a feedback mechanism that keeps the organization aligned with its goals.


(ii) Steps of the Controlling Function Identified in the Paragraph

The controlling process is systematic. While textbooks list it in various ways, the core steps are universally recognized. Let us identify which of these steps appear in the given scenario.

1. Setting Performance Standards

Sameer sets a standard target of assembling 100 kits per day. A standard is a criterion against which actual performance can be measured — it could be quantitative (units, time, cost) or qualitative (customer satisfaction, quality grade). Here the standard is clear and quantitative: 100 kits/day.

This is the foundation of controlling. Without a standard, there is no reference point to judge whether performance is acceptable.

2. Measuring Actual Performance

During the first week, Sameer (or his team) observes and records that workers are assembling 92–96 kits per day. Measurement can be done through reports, observation, sampling, or automated systems. In this case, daily output is being tracked.

Measurement must be accurate and timely. If you measure too late or incorrectly, the entire controlling process collapses.

3. Comparing Actual Performance with Standards

The paragraph explicitly states that the actual output (92–96 kits) is lower than the set standard (100 kits). This comparison reveals a negative deviation — a shortfall of 4–8 kits per day.

Comparison can reveal three outcomes:

  • Actual = Standard → No corrective action needed.
  • Actual > Standard → Favorable variance; investigate if sustainable or due to one-time factors.
  • Actual < Standard → Unfavorable variance; investigate and correct.

Here we have an unfavorable variance.

4. Analyzing Causes of Deviation

On investigation, Sameer discovers that the variation is due to irregular supply of helmets, causing workers to wait. This step goes beyond merely noting the gap — it digs into why the gap exists.

Root-cause analysis is critical. If Sameer had assumed workers were lazy or unskilled, he might have taken the wrong corrective action (training, warnings). Instead, he identifies the real bottleneck: supply chain disruption. …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.