Q.Ashita and Lakshita are employees working in Dazzling enterprises dealing in costume jewellery. The firm secured an urgent order for 1,000 bracelets that were to be delivered within 4 days. They were assigned the responsibility of producing 500 bracelets each at a cost of Rs 100 per bracelet. Ashita was able to produce the required number within the stipulated time at the cost of Rs 55,000 whereas, Lakshita was able to produce only 450 units at a cost of Rs 90 per unit. State whether Ashita and Lakshita are efficient and effective. Give reasons to justify your answer.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Efficiency And Effectiveness
Efficiency and Effectiveness: Doing Things Right vs. Doing the Right Things
Imagine you are studying for an exam. You sit at your desk for six hours straight, reading every line of the textbook, underlining sentences, and making neat notes. You have worked hard, covered a lot of ground, and wasted no time. That is efficiency — you used your time and energy well.
But if those six hours were spent on a chapter that is not in your syllabus, all that efficient work leads nowhere. You were efficient, but you were not effective. Effectiveness is about whether you achieved what you actually needed to achieve — in this case, learning the right chapter.
This simple distinction is the foundation of the concept.
The Precise Meaning
In management and business studies, these two terms have clear, distinct definitions:
- Efficiency means "doing things right." It focuses on the process — using minimum resources (time, money, effort) to get a given output. An efficient operation wastes little.
- Effectiveness means "doing the right things." It focuses on the outcome — whether the goal itself was achieved, regardless of how many resources were used.
A business can be efficient but not effective, or effective but not efficient. The ideal is to be both, but that is not always possible.
Efficiency is about means (how you do it). Effectiveness is about ends (what you achieve). The NCERT textbook states this clearly: efficiency is concerned with 'doing things right', while effectiveness is concerned with 'doing the right things'.
Why This Distinction Matters
Consider a factory that produces 1,000 toys per day using very little raw material and few workers. That is efficient — low cost per toy. But if those toys are of poor quality and nobody buys them, the factory has failed. It was efficient but not effective.
Now consider a different factory that makes 200 high-quality toys that sell out immediately. It uses more resources per toy, so it is less efficient. But it achieves its goal — satisfied customers and profit. It is effective, though not perfectly efficient.
In real life, managers constantly balance the two. A hospital that treats patients quickly (efficient) but misdiagnoses them (ineffective) is useless. A hospital that diagnoses correctly (effective) but keeps patients waiting for hours (inefficient) frustrates everyone.
- Efficiency is measured by input-output ratio — less input for same output means higher efficiency.
- Effectiveness is measured by goal achievement — did you reach the target, yes or no? …
Why this formula?
Efficiency and Effectiveness: Why the Formulas Hold
Let's build this from first principles — understanding the why before the what.
1. The Core Distinction
Before formulas, grasp the conceptual difference:
- Effectiveness = Are we doing the right things? (Outcome-focused)
- Efficiency = Are we doing things right? (Resource-focused)
This distinction is not just academic — it drives how we measure performance in exams, business, and engineering.
2. Effectiveness Formula
The Formula
Effectiveness=Expected OutputActual Output×100%
Why This Holds
Reasoning:
- Effectiveness measures goal achievement — how much of what we planned to achieve did we actually achieve?
- The denominator is the target (expected output), not the input.
- The numerator is the real result (actual output).
Example intuition:
If a factory planned to produce 1000 units but made only 800, effectiveness = 800/1000=80%. The formula captures "we fell short by 20% of our goal."
Key exam point: Effectiveness can exceed 100% if actual output exceeds target — this means you over-achieved the goal.
3. Efficiency Formula
The Formula
Efficiency=Actual InputActual Output×100%
Why This Holds
Reasoning:
- Efficiency measures resource utilization — how much output did we get per unit of input?
- The denominator is resources consumed (time, money, materials, energy).
- The numerator is output produced with those resources.
Example intuition:
If a factory used 500 labour-hours to produce 800 units, efficiency = 800/500=1.6 units per labour-hour. This tells us "productivity per resource unit."
Key exam point: Efficiency is a ratio of output to input — higher is better, but it doesn't tell you if you met your goal (that's effectiveness).
4. The Critical Relationship: Why Both Matter
The Combined Insight
Effectiveness×Efficiency=Overall Performance
Why? Because they measure different dimensions:
| Scenario | Effectiveness | Efficiency | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 100% | 50% | Met goal but wasted resources |
| B | 50% | 100% | Used resources perfectly but missed goal |
| C | 100% | 100% | Ideal — both right things done right |
Derivation logic:
- Effectiveness = Expected OutputActual Output
- Efficiency = Actual InputActual Output
- Their product = Expected Output×Actual Input(Actual Output)2 — this has no direct physical meaning in standard management theory.
Exam tip: Never multiply them blindly. Instead, evaluate each separately.
5. Why These Formulas Are Not Arbitrary …
Let’s break this down by the two management concepts: effectiveness means completing the task — achieving the goal — and efficiency means doing so at the lowest possible cost (minimising resource use).
- Ashita produced all 500 bracelets within the 4-day deadline. That makes her effective. Her actual cost was Rs 55,000, whereas the standard cost for 500 units at Rs 100 each would be Rs 50,000. Since she spent Rs 5,000 more than planned, she is not efficient. …
Efficiency is about doing things right (minimising cost/resource use), while effectiveness is about doing the right things (achieving the target). Ashita was both efficient and effective; Lakshita was efficient but not effective.
In management, two words that often travel together but mean very different things are efficiency and effectiveness. Think of efficiency as the means — how well you use your resources (time, money, materials) to get the job done. Effectiveness, on the other hand, is the end — whether you actually achieved the goal you set out to accomplish. A manager or employee can be good at one but poor at the other, and the best performers excel at both.
Let’s apply this to the case of Ashita and Lakshita at Dazzling Enterprises. The firm had an urgent order for 1,000 bracelets to be delivered in 4 days. Each employee was assigned 500 bracelets, with a target cost of Rs 100 per bracelet. That means the expected total cost for each was 500 × Rs 100 = Rs 50,000. The goal was clear: produce 500 units within 4 days, at or below Rs 50,000.
Now look at Ashita. She produced exactly 500 bracelets — the full target — within the 4-day deadline. That makes her effective: she achieved the desired result. Her actual cost was Rs 55,000, which is Rs 5,000 more than the planned Rs 50,000. But here’s the key: the cost per bracelet she incurred was Rs 55,000 ÷ 500 = Rs 110. That is higher than the target of Rs 100 per bracelet. So was she efficient? Efficiency means minimising resource usage — in this case, cost. Since she spent more than planned per unit, she was not efficient. She got the job done, but at a higher cost.
Some students confuse "efficiency" with simply completing work quickly. Efficiency is about the ratio of output to input — here, cost per unit. If you spend more than the standard, you are inefficient, even if you meet the deadline. …
Method: Efficiency vs. Effectiveness Analysis
Method Name: The 2×2 Performance Matrix (Efficiency × Effectiveness)
Steps to Solve
Step 1: Define the two concepts clearly
- Effectiveness = Doing the right things (achieving the goal/target)
- Efficiency = Doing things right (achieving the goal at minimum cost)
Step 2: Identify the given targets
| Parameter | Target |
|---|---|
| Quantity per person | 500 bracelets |
| Time limit | 4 days |
| Standard cost per bracelet | ₹100 |
| Standard total cost per person | 500 × ₹100 = ₹50,000 |
Step 3: Analyse Ashita’s performance
-
Effectiveness check:
Produced 500 units within 4 days → Target achieved ✓
→ Ashita is effective.
-
Efficiency check:
Actual cost = ₹55,000
Standard cost = ₹50,000
Cost overrun = ₹5,000 (more than standard)
→ Ashita is NOT efficient (she spent more than the standard cost).
Step 4: Analyse Lakshita’s performance
-
Effectiveness check:
Produced only 450 units (target was 500) → Target NOT achieved ✗
→ Lakshita is NOT effective.
-
Efficiency check:
Actual cost per unit = ₹90 (less than ₹100 standard)
Total actual cost = 450 × ₹90 = ₹40,500
Standard cost for 450 units = 450 × ₹100 = ₹45,000
→ Saved ₹4,500 compared to standard …
Here are the most common mistakes students make when analyzing this case study on Efficiency and Effectiveness, along with how to avoid each.
Mistake 1: Confusing the Definitions of Efficiency and Effectiveness
The Error:
Students often swap the two terms. They might say Ashita is effective because she saved money, or that Lakshita is efficient because she worked cheaply.
The Correct Understanding:
- Effectiveness is about doing the right things — achieving the goal (target output and deadline).
- Efficiency is about doing things right — achieving the goal with the minimum cost or resources.
How to Avoid:
Always ask two separate questions:
- Did they achieve the target? (Effectiveness)
- Did they do it at or below the planned cost? (Efficiency)
Mistake 2: Miscalculating the "Planned Cost" for Efficiency
The Error:
Students compare Ashita’s actual cost (Rs 55,000) directly to Lakshita’s actual cost (Rs 90/unit) without first calculating the standard or planned cost for each person.
The Correct Calculation:
The firm planned a cost of Rs 100 per bracelet. For 500 units, the planned cost for each was:
500 units × Rs 100 = Rs 50,000
How to Avoid:
Always compute the budgeted/standard cost first. Then compare:
- Ashita: Actual cost = Rs 55,000. Planned cost = Rs 50,000. Since 55,000 > 50,000, she is not efficient (she overspent).
- Lakshita: Actual cost = Rs 90 per unit. Planned cost = Rs 100 per unit. Since 90 < 100, she is efficient (she saved money per unit).
Mistake 3: Ignoring the "Quantity" Dimension in Effectiveness
The Error:
Students see that Lakshita produced at a lower cost and assume she was effective. They forget that effectiveness requires meeting the full target quantity.
The Correct Analysis:
- Ashita: Produced 500 units (target met) within 4 days (deadline met). She is effective.
- Lakshita: Produced only 450 units (target of 500 not met). She is not effective, regardless of cost savings.
How to Avoid:
Check the output quantity and deadline before checking cost. If the target is missed, the person is ineffective by definition.
Mistake 4: Giving a "Partial" or "Mixed" Answer Without Clear Reasoning
The Error:
Students write "Ashita is effective but not efficient" without explaining why using the numbers from the case.
The Correct Answer Format (for exams):
Ashita:
- Effective: Yes. Reason: She produced 500 units (target) within 4 days (deadline). …
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 on this concept.
- CBSE 2026Set 66/1/11 markMCQQ.‘CARO Tech Solutions’ aimed at development of a software system for the company’s growing operations. The project was to be completed within six months with a budget of ₹ 12,00,000. The software development team successfully completed its project on time by outsourcing a part of the project, leading to an additional expense of ₹ 2,00,000. From the following, identify whether the software development team is : (A) Efficient and Effective (B) Efficient but not effective (C) Effective but not efficient (D) Neither efficient nor effective
›Reveal solutionSolution
The team completed the project on time (effective) but exceeded the budget (inefficient), so they are effective but not efficient.
To understand this question, you first need to grasp the two distinct ideas that management uses to judge performance: effectiveness and efficiency. These are not the same thing, and a team or organisation can be good at one without being good at the other.
Effectiveness is about doing the right things — it means achieving the stated goal or objective. In this case, the goal was to complete the software system within six months. The team did exactly that. They delivered the project on time. So, from the standpoint of effectiveness, they succeeded. They got the job done.
Efficiency, on the other hand, is about doing things right — it means achieving the goal with the least possible cost or waste of resources. Here, the budget was set at ₹12,00,000. But the team outsourced a part of the project, which added an extra ₹2,00,000. That means the actual cost was ₹14,00,000. They spent more than planned. So, from the standpoint of efficiency, they failed. They did not use their resources optimally.
NoteOutsourcing itself is not a problem — it is a common business practice. The issue is that it led to an unplanned additional expense. If the budget had been revised and approved, the situation might be different. But as per the given facts, the team went over budget.
Now, look at the options:
- (A) Efficient and Effective — This would require both on-time completion and staying within budget. The team failed on budget, so this is wrong. …
- CBSE 2026Set MARCH1 markMCQQ.Which of the following refers to doing the task correctly and with minimum cost?(a) Effectiveness(b) Co-ordination(c) Process(d) Efficiency
›Reveal solutionSolution
The correct option is (d) Efficiency. Efficiency is about the cost-benefit relationship — finishing the work correctly with the lowest possible use of resources.
…
- CBSE 2026Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.A manager achieves the target given to him but the production cost is high, this shows that management is A) Effective and efficient B) Effective but not efficient C) Efficient but not effective D) Neither efficient nor effective
›Reveal solutionSolution
Achieving the target shows effectiveness, but high cost shows a lack of efficiency, so the answer is B) Effective but not efficient.
This MCQ tests the core distinction in the nature of management:
- Effectiveness means completing the task / achieving the end result or target on time.
- Efficiency means doing the task with minimum cost and least wastage of resources (a favourable input-output ratio). …
- CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.Which of the following shows the importance of management?(a) Management is barrier in development of society(b) Objectives are not achieved through management(c) Management increases efficiency(d) None of these(a) Management is barrier in development of society(b) Objectives are not achieved through management(c) Management increases efficiency(d) None of these
›Reveal solutionSolution
Management increases efficiency — that is the real-world importance of management, not the other three options.
Management is important because it helps an organisation achieve group goals, increases efficiency, creates a dynamic organisation, helps achieve personal objectives of employees, and helps in the development of society. "Barrier in development of society" and "objectives are not achieved through management" are both the opposite of what management actually does, so they are wrong. Management ensures optimum utilisation of resources — by assigning the right work to the right people, reducing wastage, and improving productivity — and this is what increases effici …
- CBSE 2024Set 66/1/11 markMCQQ._____________ refers to doing the task correctly and with minimum cost. (A) Effectiveness (B) Coordination (C) Process (D) Efficiency
›Reveal solutionSolution
The term that refers to doing a task correctly and with minimum cost is Efficiency.
In management and economics, understanding the distinction between efficiency and effectiveness is crucial. While both are desirable, they describe different aspects of performance. This question specifically probes the concept related to resource optimization and correct execution.
Let's break down the core ideas:
- Efficiency focuses on how a task is performed. It's about getting the most output from the least input. Think of it as "doing things right." When you perform a task efficiently, you minimize waste of resources like time, money, materials, and effort.
- Effectiveness focuses on what task is performed and whether it achieves the desired outcome. It's about "doing the right things." An effective action leads to the successful accomplishment of a goal, regardless of the resources consumed.
Consider an example: A company might produce a product very efficiently (low cost, minimal waste), but if that product is not what customers want, the company is not being effective. Conversely, a company might produce a highly desired product (effective), but if it uses excessive resources to do so, it's not efficient. The ideal scenario is to be both efficient and effective.
Now, let's evaluate the given options based on this understanding.
-
Analyze the question's keywords: The phrase "doing the task correctly and with minimum cost" contains two key components:
- "Doing the task correctly": This implies following the optimal method, avoiding errors, and ensuring quality of execution.
- "With minimum cost": This directly points to resource optimization – using the least amount of money, time, or other inputs.
-
Evaluate Option (A) Effectiveness: Effectiveness is about achieving goals or producing the desired result. While doing a task correctly can contribute to effectiveness, the "minimum cost" aspect is not central to the definition of effectiveness itself. An effective task might still be very costly if resources are not managed well.
-
Evaluate Option (B) Coordination: Coordination refers to the process of organizing different activities or people to work together smoothly and achieve a common goal. It's about synchronization and integration, not directly about the cost or correctness of a single task's execution. …
- CBSE 2024Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.How does a manager achieve his objectives? (A) Through efficiency (B) Through effectiveness (C) Through efficiency and effectiveness (D) None of these
›Reveal solutionSolution
Objectives are achieved by being effective (finishing the right task) and efficient (using resources economically), so both are needed.
Effectiveness means completing the task and achieving the goal within the given time. Efficiency means doing the work at the least possible cost, with minimum wastage of resources. A manager who is effective but not efficient wastes resources, while one who is efficient but not effective saves resources but fails to reach the goal. Good management bal …
- CBSE 2024Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.When a worker achieves target production of 1000 units at a higher cost, he is(a) efficient(b) effective(c) Both(i) and(ii)(d) None of the above
›Reveal solutionSolution
Achieving the target output but at a higher cost makes the worker EFFECTIVE (the goal was reached) but NOT efficient (resources were not used optimally) — effectiveness is about "doing the right task and completing it," while efficiency is about "doing it with the least possible cost/resources."
Management aims for both effectiveness (completing the task/achieving the targeted goal) and efficiency (achieving that goal with minimum cost and optimum utilisation of resources). The two do not automatically go together: a worker can be effective without being efficient (hitting the target but wasting resources or spending more money than necessary to get there, as in this question), and in principle could even be efficient at a task that turns out not to matter (minimising cost while missing the actual larger goal — though that is less common in this exact kind of question). Because the worker here DID reach the 1000-unit target, he cannot b …
- CBSE 2023Set 66/2/11 markMCQQ.Akash works as a production manager in 'Elite Enterprises' manufacturing LED lights. Due to festive season, there is lot of demand for their lights. Akash was given the task of producing 100 units of LED lights @ ₹ 200 per unit within 5 days for an urgent order. Akash was able to achieve the target of 100 units of LED lights within 5 days @ ₹ 220 per unit. Identify from the following whether Akash is : (A) Efficient only (B) Effective only (C) Both efficient and effective (D) Neither efficient nor effective
›Reveal solutionSolution
Akash met the target (effective) but exceeded the cost (inefficient), so he is effective only.
To understand this question, you first need to grasp the two distinct yardsticks by which a manager’s performance is measured: efficiency and effectiveness. These are not the same thing, and a manager can be good at one without being good at the other.
Effectiveness is about doing the right things — it means achieving the stated objective or target. In Akash’s case, the target was clear: produce 100 units of LED lights within 5 days. He did exactly that. The order was urgent, the deadline was met, and the quantity was correct. So, by the measure of effectiveness, Akash has succeeded. He delivered what was asked, when it was asked.
Efficiency, on the other hand, is about doing things right — it means achieving the target with the minimum possible cost or waste of resources. Here, the cost target was ₹200 per unit. Akash produced each unit at ₹220, which is ₹20 more per unit than planned. That means he used more resources (money) than necessary to get the job done. He was not efficient, because he overshot the cost constraint.
NoteIn management, efficiency is often expressed as the ratio of output to input. Here, the input (cost) was higher than planned, so the ratio is lower than desired — a clear sign of inefficiency.
Now, look at the options given:
- (A) Efficient only — This would require meeting the cost target, which he did not. So this is wrong.
- (B) Effective only — This fits perfectly. He achieved the goal (effective) but at a higher cost (inefficient).
- (C) Both efficient and effective — This would require meeting both the quantity/deadline and the cost target. He missed the cost target, so this is incorrect. …
- CBSE 2023Set MARCH1 markMCQQ.Achievement of goals with minimum resources is called :(a) Efficiency(b) Effectiveness(c) Goal setting(d) All of these
›Reveal solutionSolution
Correct option: (a) Efficiency. Efficiency = achieving goals with minimum resources (best input-output ratio); effectiveness = achieving goals on time, regardless of cost.
This is a core one-mark concept in the Kerala Plus Two (DHSE) Commerce syllabus, chapter 'Nature and Significance of Management'. Management aims to be BOTH efficient and effective:
- Efficiency means doing the task correctly and with minimum cost. It looks at the relationship between inputs (resources — money, material, labour, time) and outputs. Higher output from the same input, or the same output from lower input, means higher efficiency.
- Effectiveness means completing the task and achieving the end goal within the given time, whether or not resources were economised. …
- CBSE 2022Set MARCH1 markMCQQ.Doing and completing tasks with minimum cost is denoted by the term ______.(a) efficiency(b) effectiveness(c) co-ordination(d) None of these
›Reveal solutionSolution
The correct answer is (a) efficiency, because completing tasks at minimum cost means making the best use of resources.
Management aims at both efficiency and effectiveness:
- Efficiency means doing the task correctly with minimum cost, that is, getting maximum output from minimum input and avoiding waste of resources.
- Effectiveness means completing the task on time and achieving the end result or goal, regardless of cost. …
- CBSE 2022Set ANNUAL1 markQ.What is meant by ‘effectiveness’ in management?
›Reveal solutionSolution
Effectiveness means achieving the task/goal that was set — it focuses on the end result.
Effectiveness is goal-focused — it measures whether the intended objective was actually accomplished (e.g. 'did we produce the 200 units that were targeted?'). Efficiency, by contrast, is a means-focused concept — it measures how economically the resources (time, money, materials, effort) were used in accomplishing the task (e.g. 'did we produce those units at the lowest possible cost?'). A manager can be effective without being efficient (hitting the target but wasting resources to …
- CBSE 2021Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.Danny works as a production manager and he was given the task of manufacturing 100 table fans at a cost of ₹2,000 per fan within 7 days. He will be an effective manager if he ensures that(a) the cost of production is less than ₹2,000 but time taken is 10 days(b) the cost of production is ₹2,100 but work completed in 7 days(c) 80 table fans manufactured at cost of ₹2,000 within 7 days(d) None of the above
›Reveal solutionSolution
Effectiveness means achieving the given goal/deadline, while efficiency means doing so at minimum cost of resources — Danny is effective (the fans were finished on time) in option (b), even though spending 2100 instead of 2000 per fan makes him less efficient.
Management aims at being both efficient (doing the task correctly, with minimum cost and wastage of resources) and effective (doing the right task, i.e. achieving the stated goal within the given time). These two are not always achieved together — a manager can complete a task on time (effective) while overshooting the cost budget (inefficient), or keep costs low while missing the deadline or the full quantity (efficient but not effective). In the scenario, the target was 100 fans, at 2000 per fan, within 7 days. Option (a) misses both the time (10 days) and arguably the cost angle too. Option (c) misses the quantity target (only 80 fans). Option (b) de …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.