Skip to content
Question of 17
Q.

On the basis of the given data, comment on trends of output growth in different sectors (1980 – 2018), between India and Pakistan.

Country1980 – 90 : AgricultureIndustryServices2014 – 18 : AgricultureIndustryServices
India3·17·46·93·16·97·6
Pakistan47·76·81·74·85·0
CBSECBSE Class XII Board 2026Subjective· 4mImportance★★★★★
0% · 0/17 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The data shows India’s services sector accelerated while agriculture stagnated; Pakistan saw a broad-based slowdown across all three sectors from 1980–90 to 2014–18.

This question asks you to compare sectoral growth trends between India and Pakistan over two time periods: 1980–90 and 2014–18. The key is to look at each sector separately and then form an overall picture. Don’t just list numbers — interpret what they mean for the structure of the economy.

Let’s start with India. In 1980–90, agriculture grew at 3.1% per year, industry at 7.4%, and services at 6.9%. By 2014–18, agriculture remained exactly at 3.1% — no acceleration, no deceleration. Industry actually slowed from 7.4% to 6.9%. Services, however, rose from 6.9% to 7.6%. So India’s growth story is one of services-led expansion, with industry losing a bit of steam and agriculture stuck at a modest pace. This matches what we know: India’s post-1991 reforms boosted IT and financial services, while manufacturing faced infrastructure and policy bottlenecks.

Now Pakistan. In 1980–90, agriculture grew at 4%, industry at 7.7%, and services at 6.8%. By 2014–18, every sector had slowed: agriculture dropped sharply to 1.7%, industry fell to 4.8%, and services declined to 5.0%. This is a broad-based deceleration. The agricultural slowdown is particularly severe — from 4% to 1.7% — which is worrying for a country where a large share of the population depends on farming. Industry and services also lost momentum, suggesting structural problems like energy shortages, political instability, or weak investment.

Watch out

Don’t confuse growth rate with size. A sector growing at 7% could still be smaller than one growing at 3% if its base is much smaller. The data here are growth rates, not shares of GDP. …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.