Q.Transition metals have incomplete d-subshell either in neutral atom or in their ions. The presence of partly filled d-orbitals in their atoms makes transition elements different from that of the non-transition elements. With partly filled d-orbitals, these elements exhibit certain characteristic properties such as display of a variety of oxidation states, formation of coloured ions and entering into complex formation with a variety of ligands. The transition metals and their compounds also exhibit catalytic properties and paramagnetic behaviour. The transition metals are very hard and have low volatility. An examination of the E(M2+/M)∘ values shows the varying trends : E(M2+/M)∘/V : V −1⋅18, Cr −0⋅91, Mn −1⋅18, Fe −0⋅44, Co −0⋅28, Ni −0⋅25, Cu +0⋅34, Zn −0⋅76 Answer the following questions :
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Part (a)Concept understanding — Standard Electrode Potentials
Standard Electrode Potentials: A Number for "How Badly It Wants Electrons"
Dip a zinc rod into a zinc-salt solution and a tiny tug-of-war begins at the surface:
metal atoms tend to dissolve as ions (leaving electrons behind on the rod) while ions
from the solution tend to deposit as metal (consuming electrons). The rod ends up with
a characteristic electrical potential relative to the solution — the electrode potential. It is a direct measure of the tendency of that redox couple to gain or
lose electrons.
The Core Idea
Different couples pull electrons with very different strengths. Copper's ion grabs
them readily; zinc's barely wants them. Put a number on each couple and you can
predict, before mixing anything, who will oxidise whom.
Two conventions make the numbers comparable:
- Standard conditions. Every species at unit concentration (1 M), any gas at 1 atm, temperature 298 K. The potential measured then is the standard electrode potential, written E⊖.
- A common zero. Potentials can only be measured as differences, so one electrode is defined as the reference: the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE), 2H++2e−→H2, is fixed at exactly 0.00 V. Every E⊖ is the voltage of a couple measured against it.
By convention the values are tabulated for the reduction direction:
Oxidised form+ne−→Reduced formE⊖ (in volts, at 298 K)
Reading the Table
The standard-potential table (Table 7.1 in the Class 11 chapter) runs from
F2/F− at +2.87 V down to Li+/Li at −3.05 V.
Two rules unlock it:
- More positive E⊖ → stronger oxidising agent (the oxidised form is hungrier for electrons). F₂ tops the table; that is why fluorine oxidises almost everything.
- More negative E⊖ → stronger reducing agent (the reduced form gives electrons up most easily). Li, K, Ca, Na at the bottom are the great electron donors. A negative E⊖ means the couple is a stronger reducing agent than the H⁺/H₂ couple; a positive one, weaker.
Predicting Whether a Reaction Goes
For any proposed redox reaction, the species being reduced acts as the cathode couple
and the species being oxidised as the anode couple:
Ecell⊖=Ecathode⊖−Eanode⊖
A positive Ecell⊖ means the reaction is feasible
(spontaneous) under standard conditions; a negative one means the reverse reaction
is the spontaneous direction.
Worked feel: can Fe³⁺ oxidise iodide? E⊖(Fe3+/Fe2+)=+0.77 V is above E⊖(I2/I−)=+0.54 V, so
Ecell⊖=+0.23 V — yes. Can silver metal reduce Fe³⁺?
0.77−0.80=−0.03 V — no.
This is also the logic of the activity series: a metal displaces, from solution, …
Why this formula?
Galvanic Corrosion: Why the Key Formulas Hold
Galvanic corrosion occurs when two dissimilar metals are electrically connected in the presence of an electrolyte. The key formula that governs this is the mixed potential theory, which leads to the galvanic current and corrosion rate expressions.
Let's build the reasoning step-by-step.
1. The Core Idea: Two Electrodes, One Circuit
When metals M₁ (more active, e.g., zinc) and M₂ (more noble, e.g., copper) are connected:
- M₁ acts as the anode — it oxidizes (corrodes):
M1→M1n++ne−
- M₂ acts as the cathode — it reduces something (e.g., oxygen or H⁺):
O2+2H2O+4e−→4OH−(in neutral/alkaline)
or
2H++2e−→H2(in acidic)
The two metals are electrically connected (via a wire or direct contact), and the electrolyte completes the circuit. Electrons flow from M₁ to M₂.
2. The Mixed Potential: Why It Exists
Each metal, when alone in the electrolyte, has its own open-circuit potential (OCP) — the equilibrium potential for its half-reaction. For M₁, it's Ecorr,1; for M₂, it's Ecorr,2.
When connected, the system cannot stay at two different potentials. The entire metal couple must reach a single potential — the mixed potential Emix.
- Emix lies between Ecorr,1 and Ecorr,2.
- At Emix, the total anodic current from M₁ equals the total cathodic current from M₂ (charge conservation):
Ianode=Icathode
This is the fundamental equation of galvanic corrosion.
3. Deriving the Galvanic Current
Assume each electrode follows Butler-Volmer kinetics (for activation-controlled reactions). For the anode (M₁), the anodic current density ia at potential E is:
ia=i0,1exp(RTαaF(E−E0,1))
For the cathode (M₂), the cathodic current density ic is:
ic=i0,2exp(−RTαcF(E−E0,2))
Where:
- i0,1,i0,2 = exchange current densities
- αa,αc = transfer coefficients (typically ~0.5)
- F = Faraday constant
- R = gas constant
- T = temperature
- E0,1,E0,2 = standard reduction potentials
At the mixed potential Emix:
Igalvanic=A1⋅ia(Emix)=A2⋅ic(Emix)
Where A1 and A2 are the surface areas of the anode and cathode.
Why this holds: The net current from the anode must exactly balance the net current consumed at the cathode — otherwise, charge would accumulate, which is impossible in a steady-state circuit.
4. The Corrosion Rate Formula
The corrosion rate (mass loss per time) of the anode is given by Faraday's law:
Corrosion rate=n⋅F⋅ρIgalvanic⋅M
Where:
- M = molar mass of the anode metal
- n = number of electrons transferred per atom
- ρ = density of the metal
- F = Faraday constant (96,485 C/mol)
Why this holds: Each mole of metal oxidized releases n moles of electrons. The total charge passed Q=Igalvanic⋅t corresponds to moles of metal lost:
moles lost=nFQ=nFIgalvanic⋅t
Multiply by M/ρ to get volume or thickness loss.
5. The Area Effect: Why It Matters
From the mixed potential equation:
A1⋅ia(Emix)=A2⋅ic(Emix)
If the cathode area A2 is large relative to the anode area A1, then ia(Emix) must be large to balance the current. This means:
- Small anode + large cathode → severe galvanic corrosion (high current density on the anode). …
Part (b)Concept understanding — Stability of Oxidation States
Stability of Oxidation States – From Intuition to Precision
Imagine you're holding a ball on a hill. If you place it exactly at the top, it's balanced — but the slightest push sends it rolling down. That's an unstable position. If you place it in a small dip on the hillside, it stays put even if nudged — that's stable. Oxidation states work the same way: some are like the hilltop (easily changed), others like the dip (hard to change).
The Core Intuition
An oxidation state is just a number we assign to an atom to track how many electrons it has gained or lost compared to its neutral state. But atoms don't "want" to stay in arbitrary oxidation states — they want to reach a configuration that minimises their energy.
Stability here means: how reluctant is that oxidation state to change under normal conditions? A stable oxidation state resists being oxidised further or reduced further. An unstable one readily changes into something else.
The Precise Statement
Stability of an oxidation state refers to the tendency of an element to maintain that particular oxidation state under given conditions (temperature, pH, presence of other reagents). A stable oxidation state is one that does not easily undergo redox reactions — it is neither easily oxidised nor easily reduced.
This depends on three key factors:
- Electronic configuration – Half-filled and fully-filled d or f subshells confer extra stability (e.g., Fe3+ with d5 is more stable than Fe2+ with d6 in some contexts).
- Inert pair effect – Heavier p-block elements (like Tl, Pb, Bi) show lower oxidation states (e.g., +1 for Tl) as more stable than higher ones (+3 for Tl), because the s-electrons become reluctant to participate.
- Disproportionation tendency – Some oxidation states are unstable because they spontaneously convert into two other states (e.g., Cu+ in aqueous solution gives Cu2+ and Cu).
Stability is relative — it depends on the environment. Mn2+ is stable in acidic solution but easily oxidised in alkaline medium. Always specify conditions when discussing stability.
Examples That Make It Concrete
Transition metals – Cr3+ (d3) and Mn2+ (d5) are exceptionally stable because half-filled/half-filled-like configurations have low energy. Cr2+ (d4) is easily oxidised to Cr3+ — it's unstable.
p-block elements – Pb2+ is stable, Pb4+ is a strong oxidising agent (unstable). Sn2+ is a reducing agent (easily oxidised to Sn4+), so Sn4+ is more stable for tin.
Common pattern – For most elements, the most common oxidation state is the most stable one under standard conditions. But "most common" isn't always "most stable" — e.g., Fe3+ is common but Fe2+ is more stable in acidic solution.
Do not confuse "stability" with "occurrence". Mn7+ (as MnO4−) is common in the lab but is a powerful oxidising agent — it is not stable in the sense of resisting change. It readily accepts electrons.
How to Think About It in Exams …
Why this formula?
Stability of Oxidation States: Why It Works
This concept explains why certain oxidation states of an element are more stable than others — and why some states are never observed at all.
The Core Idea: Energy Minimisation
An oxidation state is stable when the total energy of the system is at a minimum. This depends on three competing factors:
- Ionisation energy (energy needed to remove electrons)
- Lattice energy (for ionic compounds) or bond energy (for covalent compounds)
- Electronic configuration (half-filled / fully-filled subshells)
There is no single formula for stability — instead, we use trends and principles that act as "formulae" for prediction.
Key Principle 1: Inert Pair Effect (for p-block elements)
Why it holds:
For heavier elements (e.g., Tl, Pb, Bi), the 6s² electrons are held very tightly due to poor shielding and relativistic effects. They resist removal.
- Result: Lower oxidation state (e.g., +1 for Tl, +2 for Pb) becomes more stable than the higher state (+3, +4).
- Example: TlX3+ is a strong oxidising agent — it readily gains two electrons to become TlX+.
Derivation logic:
The energy cost to remove the 6s² electrons is greater than the energy gained by forming additional bonds or lattice. So the system stays in the lower state.
Key Principle 2: Half-Filled / Fully-Filled Subshell Stability
Why it holds:
A half-filled (d5, f7) or fully-filled (d10, f14) subshell has extra exchange energy and symmetry — making it unusually stable.
- Example: MnX2+ (d5) is more stable than MnX3+ (d4). FeX3+ (d5) is more stable than FeX2+ (d6).
Derivation logic:
The exchange energy (Hund's rule) is maximum for half-filled configurations. Removing an electron from a half-filled shell costs extra energy — so the half-filled state is favoured.
Key Principle 3: Lattice Energy / Hydration Energy Compensation
For transition metals, stability of a particular oxidation state in aqueous solution depends on:
ΔG∘=ΔHhydration∘−ΔHionisation∘
Why it holds:
- Higher oxidation states have higher ionisation energy (harder to remove electrons).
- But they also have higher hydration energy (smaller, more charged ions attract water more strongly).
- The balance determines which state is stable.
Example:
- CuX+ is unstable in water because its hydration energy is too low to compensate for the loss of the second electron.
- CuX2+ is stable in water.
Key Principle 4: Disproportionation
Some oxidation states are unstable and spontaneously convert to two other states:
2CuX+Cu+CuX2+
Why it holds: …
Part (a)
- Cu is a transition element, Zn is not: A transition element has an incompletely filled d-subshell in its atom or a common ion. Cu (3d104s1) forms Cu2+ (3d9) — partly filled → transition. Zn (3d104s2) forms only Zn2+ (3d10) — completely filled → not a transition element.
- Variety of oxidation states: The (n−1)d and ns orbitals are close in energy, so both ns and a variable number of (n−1)d electrons take part in bonding, giving many oxidation states differing by one unit. (c)(i) Irregular EM2+/M∘ trend: because it depends on the sum of sublimation, (1st+2nd) ionisation and hydration enthalpies, which vary irregularly (extra stability of half-filled Mn2+ d5, distortion/high hydration of Cu2+, filled Zn2+ d10). …
Part (a): Cu2+ (d9) is incomplete so Cu is a transition element, unlike Zn2+ (d10); variable oxidation states arise from close (n−1)d/ns energies; the E∘ trend is irregular because sublimation, ionisation and hydration enthalpies vary irregularly; transition metals change oxidation state in steps of 1.
Part (b): Cr2+ (d4) is reducing (→d3), Mn3+ (d4) is oxidising (→d5); 2MnO4−+4H2O+6I−→2MnO2+3I2+8OH−.
Part (a)
(a) Cu vs Zn
A transition element has an incomplete d-subshell in the atom or a common ion. Neutral Cu is [Ar]3d104s1, but its common ion Cu2+ is [Ar]3d9 (incomplete) → Cu qualifies. Zn is [Ar]3d104s2 and forms only Zn2+ ([Ar]3d10, complete) → Zn is not a transition element.
(b) Variety of oxidation states
The (n−1)d and ns orbitals have nearly the same energy, so after the ns electrons, d-electrons can also be lost one at a time. This gives a range of oxidation states (e.g. Mn from +2 to +7), typically differing by one unit.
(c)(i) Irregular EM2+/M∘ trend
M(s)→M2+(aq):ΔH=ΔHsub+(IE1+IE2)+ΔHhyd
These three enthalpies do not vary smoothly across the series, and extra stabilities (half-filled Mn2+ d5, high hydration of Cu2+, filled Zn2+ d10) further distort the trend. Hence E∘ is irregular (e.g. V and Mn both −1.18 V, Cr −0.91 V, Cu +0.34 V).
(c)(ii) Difference from non-transition elements …
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 on this concept.
- CBSE 2026Set 56/3/11 markMCQQ.In aqueous solution, Cr2O72− ion converts to which of the following in alkaline medium ? (A) Cr3+ (B) CrO42− (C) CrO (D) CrO3
›Reveal solutionSolution
In alkaline medium, dichromate (Cr2O72−) converts to chromate (CrO42−) without any change in oxidation state — it’s a simple acid-base equilibrium, not a redox reaction. The correct option is (B).
The key to this question lies in understanding that the conversion of dichromate to chromate is not a redox reaction — the oxidation state of chromium remains +6 throughout. Many students instinctively think of reduction to Cr3+ because they associate dichromate with strong oxidizing behaviour, but that only happens in acidic medium. In alkaline conditions, the chemistry is entirely different.
Let’s walk through the reasoning step by step.
-
Recall the oxidation state of chromium in dichromate.
In Cr2O72−, each oxygen is -2, so total from seven oxygens is -14. The ion has a -2 charge, so the sum of oxidation states of the two chromium atoms must be +12. Hence each Cr is in the +6 state.
-
Now consider the alkaline medium.
When you add a base (like NaOH) to a solution of K2Cr2O7, the dichromate ion reacts with hydroxide ions. The reaction is:
Cr2O72−+2OH−→2CrO42−+H2O
Notice that the oxidation state of Cr in CrO42− is also +6 (four oxygens at -2 give -8, charge -2, so Cr = +6). No electrons are transferred — this is an acid-base equilibrium, not a redox change.
- Why does this happen? Dichromate exists in equilibrium with chromate, and the position depends on pH. In acidic solution, the equilibrium shifts toward dichromate; in alkaline solution, it shifts toward chromate. The reaction is:
2CrO42−+2H+⇌Cr2O72−+H2O
Adding OH− removes H+, pulling the equilibrium to the left — producing chromate. …
-
- CBSE 2026Set 56/3/11 markMCQQ.On electrolysis of very dilute aqueous solution of NaCl using platinum electrodes : (A) H2 gas is evolved at anode. (B) Na is produced at cathode. (C) O2 gas is evolved at anode. (D) H2 gas is evolved at cathode.
›Reveal solutionSolution
In very dilute aqueous NaCl with inert Pt electrodes, water’s reduction to H2 at the cathode and water’s oxidation to O2 at the anode outcompete the NaCl reactions. So H2 is produced at the cathode and O2 at the anode — making option (C) and (D) correct.
Why standard electrode potentials decide the outcome
Electrolysis is a battle of competing half-reactions. At each electrode, the species that is easier to oxidise (at the anode) or easier to reduce (at the cathode) will react first. “Easier” means having a more positive reduction potential for reduction, or a more negative reduction potential for oxidation (equivalently, a more positive oxidation potential).
For a very dilute aqueous solution of NaCl, the possible species are:
- Cathode (reduction): Na+ ions and H2O molecules.
- Anode (oxidation): Cl− ions and H2O molecules.
We compare their standard reduction potentials (at 298 K, 1 M concentration, 1 atm pressure). But remember: concentration matters. In very dilute NaCl, [Cl−] is tiny, which shifts the actual potential of the chlorine half-reaction significantly.
Step-by-step reasoning
1. What happens at the cathode?
Two reduction half-reactions compete:
Na++e−2H2O+2e−→Na(s)E∘=−2.71 V→H2(g)+2OH−E∘=−0.83 V
The reduction of water to hydrogen gas has a much less negative (i.e., more positive) standard potential. Even though the actual potential for water reduction depends slightly on pH (here neutral to slightly basic), it remains far above −2.71 V. So water is reduced preferentially.
Watch outA common mistake is to think that because Na+ is present, sodium metal will plate out. But sodium’s reduction potential is so negative that water (even in neutral solution) is reduced first. Sodium metal would instantly react with water anyway — it’s never produced in aqueous electrolysis.
Result at cathode: H2 gas is evolved. This matches option (D).
2. What happens at the anode?
Two oxidation half-reactions compete (written as reductions for comparison):
Cl2(g)+2e−O2(g)+4H++4e−→2Cl−E∘=+1.36 V→2H2OE∘=+1.23 V …
- CBSE 2026Set 56/1/11 markMCQQ.Assertion (A) : Actinoids show wide range of oxidation states. Reason (R) : Actinoids are radioactive in nature. (A) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of the Assertion (A). (B) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of the Assertion (A). (C) Assertion (A) is true, but Reason (R) is false. (D) Assertion (A) is false, but Reason (R) is true.
›Reveal solutionSolution
The assertion that actinoids show a wide range of oxidation states is true, but the reason given — that they are radioactive — is not the correct explanation. The correct explanation lies in the small energy gap between 5f, 6d, and 7s orbitals, which allows many electrons to participate in bonding. So the answer is option (B).
The question tests your understanding of why actinoids (elements 90–103, from thorium to lawrencium) exhibit so many different oxidation states. Many students memorise that “actinoids show variable oxidation states” and also know they are radioactive, so they assume the second explains the first. That’s a trap.
Let’s break it down properly.
-
Is Assertion (A) true?
Yes. Actinoids display a remarkably wide range of oxidation states. For example, uranium shows +3, +4, +5, and +6; neptunium and plutonium go from +3 to +7. This is far more varied than most d-block elements. The reason is that the 5f, 6d, and 7s orbitals are very close in energy. Electrons from all three can be lost with relatively little energy cost, so many different oxidation numbers become accessible.
-
Is Reason (R) true?
Yes, actinoids are indeed radioactive. All actinoid nuclei are unstable and decay over time. So the reason statement is factually correct.
-
Does the radioactivity explain the wide range of oxidation states?
No. Radioactivity is a nuclear property — it depends on the instability of the nucleus (proton/neutron ratio, nuclear binding energy). Oxidation states are an electronic property — they depend on how easily electrons are lost from the outer orbitals. These two phenomena are completely independent.
Watch outA common mistake is to think that because both statements are true, the reason must be the explanation. But correlation is not causation. Radioactivity does not cause variable oxidation states; the orbital energy structure does.
-
What actually causes the wide range of oxidation states in actinoids? …
-
- CBSE 2026Set 56/2/11 markMCQQ.Consider the following reaction : Zn(s)+Ag2O(s)+H2O(l)→Zn2+(aq)+2Ag(s)+2OH−(aq) Given : EAg+/Ago=0.80 V, EZn2+/Zno=−0.76 V, 1F=96500 C mol−1 ΔrGo for the above reaction is : (A) −301.080 kJ mol−1 (B) +310.080 kJ mol−1 (C) −326.070 kJ mol−1 (D) −375.060 kJ mol−1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Zinc is oxidised and silver is reduced, giving Ecello=0.80−(−0.76)=1.56 V with n=2. Then ΔrGo=−nFEcello=−301.080 kJ mol−1, which is option (A).
The standard Gibbs energy of a cell reaction is linked to its standard cell potential by
ΔrGo=−nFEcello
so we first find Ecello, then n, and finally ΔrGo.
1. Identify the electrodes. Zinc is oxidised (anode) and silver is reduced (cathode):
Anode:Zn→Zn2++2e−
Cathode:Ag2O+H2O+2e−→2Ag+2OH−
2. Standard cell potential. Using the given reduction potentials,
Ecello=Ecathodeo−Eanodeo=0.80−(−0.76)=1.56 V
3. Electrons transferred. Each half-reaction involves 2 electrons, so n=2. …
- CBSE 2026Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.Which of the following oxidation states is common for all lanthanoids?(a) +2(b) +3(c) +4(d) +5
›Reveal solutionSolution
All lanthanoids show a characteristic +3 oxidation state because it corresponds to a stable, similar electronic configuration achieved after losing the two 6s and one 4f (or 5d) electron.
Lanthanoids have the general electronic configuration [Xe] 4f^(1-14) 5d^(0-1) 6s2. Removal of the two 6s electrons and one more electron (from 4f or 5d) gives the Ln3+ ion, which is the most stable and commonly observed oxidation state across the entire series, from Ce to Lu.
…
- CBSE 2025Set 56/4/11 markMCQQ.The product of the oxidation of I− with MnO4− in alkaline medium is : (A) IO4− (B) I2 (C) IO− (D) IO3−
›Reveal solutionSolution
In alkaline medium, permanganate (MnO4−) oxidises iodide (I−) to iodate (IO3−), not to iodine or periodate. The balanced reaction shows I− loses 6 electrons to form IO3−, while MnO4− gains 3 electrons to form MnO2. The correct product is IO3−, option (D).
Why the medium matters
The oxidation state of iodine in its products depends heavily on the pH of the solution. Permanganate is a powerful oxidising agent, but its reduction product changes with medium:
- In acidic medium: MnO4−→Mn2+ (gains 5 electrons)
- In neutral/alkaline medium: MnO4−→MnO2 (gains 3 electrons)
This difference in electron gain per mole of permanganate directly affects how far it can oxidise iodide. In alkaline medium, permanganate is a milder oxidising agent (gains only 3 electrons) compared to acidic medium (gains 5 electrons). Yet it still oxidises I− all the way to IO3−, not stopping at I2.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Identify the half-reactions
Iodide (I−) has oxidation state −1. The possible products given are:
- IO4−: iodine in +7 state
- I2: iodine in 0 state
- IO−: iodine in +1 state (hypoiodite)
- IO3−: iodine in +5 state (iodate)
In alkaline medium, permanganate reduces to MnO2 (manganese in +4 state, from +7 in MnO4−).
-
Balance the oxidation half-reaction
Iodide going to iodate:
I−→IO3−
Balance oxygen with water (alkaline medium):
I−+3H2O→IO3−+6H+
Balance charge: left side has −1, right side has −1+6=+5. Add 6 electrons to right:
I−+3H2O→IO3−+6H++6e−
In alkaline medium, add OH− to neutralise H+:
I−+6OH−→IO3−+3H2O+6e−
So each I− loses 6 electrons to become IO3−.
-
Balance the reduction half-reaction
Permanganate to manganese dioxide in alkaline medium:
MnO4−→MnO2
Balance oxygen with water:
MnO4−+2H2O→MnO2+4OH−
Balance charge: left −1, right −4. Add 3 electrons to left:
MnO4−+2H2O+3e−→MnO2+4OH−
So each MnO4− gains 3 electrons.
-
Combine the half-reactions
To equalise electrons: multiply reduction half by 2 (gives 6 electrons gained) and oxidation half by 1 (gives 6 electrons lost):
2MnO4−+4H2O+6e−→2MnO2+8OH−
I−+6OH−→IO3−+3H2O+6e−
Adding:
2MnO4−+I−+4H2O+6OH−→2MnO2+IO3−+3H2O+8OH−
Cancel 3H2O from both sides and 6OH− from both sides: …
- CBSE 2025Set 56/6/11 markMCQQ.For the following question, two statements are given — one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labelled as Reason (R). Select the correct answer from the codes (A), (B), (C) and (D) as given below. (A) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of the Assertion (A). (B) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of the Assertion (A). (C) Assertion (A) is true, but Reason (R) is false. (D) Assertion (A) is false, but Reason (R) is true. Assertion (A) : Actinoids show wide range of oxidation states. Reason (R) : Actinoids are radioactive in nature.
›Reveal solutionSolution
The assertion that actinoids show a wide range of oxidation states is true, but the reason given — that they are radioactive — does not explain this property. The correct answer is (B).
The question tests your understanding of why actinoids exhibit variable oxidation states. The key is to separate two distinct facts: actinoids are radioactive, and they do show many oxidation states — but the radioactivity is not the cause of the oxidation state variability.
Let’s break this down.
-
Why do actinoids show a wide range of oxidation states?
The 5f, 6d, and 7s orbitals in actinoids are very close in energy. This means electrons can be removed from any of these orbitals with relatively little energy cost. As you move across the actinoid series, the 5f orbitals gradually become more stable, but early actinoids (like Th, Pa, U, Np, Pu) can lose anywhere from 3 to 7 electrons. For example, uranium shows +3, +4, +5, and +6; plutonium shows +3, +4, +5, +6, and +7. This is the real reason for the wide range — it’s an electronic structure effect, not a nuclear one.
-
What about radioactivity?
Yes, all actinoids are radioactive — their nuclei are unstable and decay over time. But radioactivity is a nuclear property, while oxidation states depend on electron configuration. A nucleus decaying does not directly change how many electrons an atom can lose or gain in a chemical reaction. So while both statements are factually true, the reason does not explain the assertion. …
-
- CBSE 2025Set D1 markMCQQ.The electromotive force of the following cell is: Zn | Zn2+ (1M) || Fe2+ (1M) | Fe, given E°Zn2+|Zn = -0.76 V, E°Fe2+|Fe = -0.44 V(a) 1.2 V(b) 0.32 V(c) -1.2 V(d) -0.32 V
›Reveal solutionSolution
E(cell) = E(cathode) - E(anode) = -0.44 - (-0.76) = +0.32 V.
In the cell notation Zn | Zn2+ || Fe2+ | Fe, zinc is the anode (oxidation, written left) and iron is the cathode (reduction, written right). The standard cell EMF is:
E(cell) = E(cathode) - E(anode)
E(cell) = E(Fe2+/Fe) - E(Zn2+/Zn)
E(cell) = (-0.44) - (-0.76) …
- CBSE 2025Set A1 markQ.Write True or False: The cell potential is the addition of the electrode potentials (reduction potentials) of the cathode and anode.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Cell potential is obtained by subtracting the anode's reduction potential from the cathode's, not by adding the two reduction potentials.
The standard cell potential is defined as:
Ecell∘=Ecathode(reduction)∘−Eanode(reduction)∘
If both electrode potentials are taken as reduction potentials (as the statement specifies), the correct operation is a subtraction (cathode minus anode), not an addition. The 'addition' phrasing is only valid if the anode's contribution is expressed as an oxidation potential (= −reduction potential): then …
- CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 markQ.What is the common oxidation state of Lanthanoids?
›Reveal solutionSolution
All lanthanoids overwhelmingly favour the +3 oxidation state, since their poorly-bonding 4f electrons are not readily involved, leaving the same outer 5d/6s electrons available across the series.
Across the entire lanthanide series, the +3 oxidation state is by far the most common and stable one, shown by essentially every lanthanoid. This is because the 4f electrons are deeply buried and well-shielded, taking little part in bonding, while the outer 5d0−16s2 electrons are readily lost to give the stable Ln3+ ion. Occasional +2 or +4 states occur only for a few elements whe …
- CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 markQ.Answer in one word/sentence: Given the standard electrode potentials, arrange these metals in their increasing order of reducting power: K+/K = -2.93 V, Ag+/Ag = 0.80 V, Hg2+/Hg = 0.79 V, Mg2+/Mg = -2.37 V.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Reducing power increases as the standard electrode (reduction) potential becomes more negative, so we simply rank the four E° values from most positive to most negative.
Given standard reduction potentials:
K+/K=−2.93 V,Mg2+/Mg=−2.37 V,Hg2+/Hg=+0.79 V,Ag+/Ag=+0.80 V
A more negative (or less positive) standard reduction potential means the metal has a greater tendency to lose electrons (be oxidised) — i.e. it is a stronger reducing agent. Conversely, a metal with a highly positive reduction potential prefers to stay reduced (gain electrons), making it a poor reducing agent (like Ag, a "noble" metal).
…
- CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 markQ.Write two applications of electrochemical series.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Electrochemical series: predicts reaction feasibility and metal-displacement reactivity.
The electrochemical series arranges elements/ions in order of their standard reduction potentials (E°). Two common applications:
- Predicting feasibility of a redox reaction: a reaction is spontaneous if the species with the higher (more positive) reduction potential is reduced while the species with the lower (more negative) reduction potential is oxidized, i.e. E°cell=E°cathode−E°anode>0. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.