Skip to content
Exercise 5.1 · Q18

Q.For what value of λ\lambda is the function defined by f(x)={λ(x2−2x),if x≤04x+1,if x>0f(x) = \begin{cases} \lambda(x^2-2x), & \text{if } x \le 0 \\ 4x+1, & \text{if } x > 0 \end{cases} continuous at x=0x=0? What about continuity at x=1x=1?

CBSENCERTSubjective· 3mImportance★★★★★
6% · 18/281 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

For continuity at x=0x=0, the left-hand limit and right-hand limit must equal f(0)f(0). This forces λ\lambda to be undefined (no real number works), so ff cannot be made continuous at 00 for any λ\lambda. At x=1x=1, the function is given by 4x+14x+1 near 11, which is a polynomial, so it is automatically continuous — no condition on λ\lambda is needed.


The core idea: continuity at a point

A function ff is continuous at x=ax = a if three things match perfectly:

  1. f(a)f(a) is defined.
  2. lim⁡x→af(x)\lim_{x \to a} f(x) exists (both sides agree).
  3. That limit equals f(a)f(a).

For a piecewise function, the danger zone is always the boundary between the two pieces. At x=0x=0, the definition switches from λ(x2−2x)\lambda(x^2 - 2x) (for x≤0x \le 0) to 4x+14x+1 (for x>0x > 0). So we must check the left-hand limit, the right-hand limit, and the value at 00 itself.


Step-by-step work

1. Find f(0)f(0)

Since x=0x=0 falls in the first piece (x≤0x \le 0), we use f(x)=λ(x2−2x)f(x) = \lambda(x^2 - 2x):

f(0)=λ(02−2⋅0)=λ⋅0=0f(0) = \lambda(0^2 - 2 \cdot 0) = \lambda \cdot 0 = 0

So f(0)=0f(0) = 0 for any λ\lambda. That's fine — the function is defined at 00 no matter what.

2. Left-hand limit as x→0−x \to 0^-

For xx just less than 00, we are still in the first piece:

lim⁡x→0−f(x)=lim⁡x→0−λ(x2−2x)\lim_{x \to 0^-} f(x) = \lim_{x \to 0^-} \lambda(x^2 - 2x)

Both x2x^2 and −2x-2x are continuous, so we can substitute directly:

=λ(02−2⋅0)=0= \lambda(0^2 - 2 \cdot 0) = 0

So the left-hand limit is 00, regardless of λ\lambda.

3. Right-hand limit as x→0+x \to 0^+

For xx just greater than 00, we use the second piece:

lim⁡x→0+f(x)=lim⁡x→0+(4x+1)\lim_{x \to 0^+} f(x) = \lim_{x \to 0^+} (4x + 1)

Again, substitute directly:

=4⋅0+1=1= 4 \cdot 0 + 1 = 1

So the right-hand limit is 11, and it does not depend on λ\lambda at all.

4. The clash at x=0x=0

For continuity at 00, we need:

lim⁡x→0−f(x)=lim⁡x→0+f(x)=f(0)\lim_{x \to 0^-} f(x) = \lim_{x \to 0^+} f(x) = f(0)

We have:

  • Left-hand limit = 00
  • Right-hand limit = 11
  • f(0)=0f(0) = 0

The left-hand limit equals f(0)f(0), but the right-hand limit is 11, not 00. No matter what λ\lambda we pick, the right-hand limit stays 11. So the two one-sided limits never agree — the overall limit does not exist. …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.