Q."Globalisation has benefited Indian consumers but has also increased India's exposure to global economic shocks." Discuss this statement with examples.
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →This statement is broadly correct and captures a genuine two-sided effect of globalisation studied in this chapter.
Benefits to consumers: with import restrictions eased and foreign firms allowed to compete in the Indian market, consumers gained access to a much wider range of goods — from electronics to automobiles to consumer durables — often at more competitive prices than the domestic monopolies of the pre-1991 era could offer. Competition from imports and multinational entrants also pushed domestic producers to improve product quality and after-sales service to retain customers.
Increased exposure to global shocks: the same channels that bring these benefits — freer capital flows, greater trade dependence, and integration with world financial markets — also transmit disturbances originating outside India more directly into the domestic economy. For example, a global financial crisis can trigger sudden outflows of foreign portfolio investment, putting pressure on the rupee's exchange rate; a sharp rise in global crude-oil prices raises India's import bill and can worsen inflation and the current-account deficit; and a slowdown in major export-destination economies (like the US or EU) can directly reduce demand for Indian exports, particularly IT and manufactured goods. …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.