Q.Λm(H2O)0 is equal to _______________. (Two or more than two options may be correct.)
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Molar Conductivity
From Resistance to Conductance: Flipping the Idea
You already know resistance (R) — it tells you how much a material opposes the flow of current. A high resistance means the wire fights the current; a low resistance means it lets current through easily.
Now flip that thought. Instead of asking "how much does it resist?", ask "how easily does it let current flow?" That's exactly what conductance measures.
Conductance (G) is the reciprocal of resistance:
G=R1
Unit: siemens (S) — named after Werner von Siemens. 1 S = 1 A/V (ampere per volt).
If a wire has R=10 Ω, its conductance is G=0.1 S. If R=0.5 Ω, G=2 S — it conducts twice as well.
Ohm's Law in Conductance Form
You know V=IR. Rearranging:
I=RV=GV
So current = conductance × voltage. A high-conductance material draws a large current for the same voltage — it's a "good conductor."
Now, Conductivity: The Material's Intrinsic Property
Resistance depends on two things: the material itself (its "resistivity" ρ) and the geometry (length L, cross-sectional area A):
R=ρAL
Conductance also depends on geometry. A thicker wire (larger A) or a shorter wire (smaller L) has higher conductance. To isolate the material's inherent ability to conduct, we define conductivity (σ):
σ=ρ1
And for a uniform wire:
G=σLA
Conductivity is the reciprocal of resistivity. It tells you how well the material itself conducts, independent of shape and size.
- Unit: siemens per metre (S/m).
- High σ → good conductor (copper: ≈5.8×107 S/m).
- Low σ → poor conductor / insulator (glass: ≈10−12 S/m).
Don't confuse conductance (property of a specific object, depends on geometry) with conductivity (property of the material, independent of geometry). A short thick copper wire has high conductance; a long thin copper wire has lower conductance — but both have the same conductivity.
The Big Picture in One Table
| Quantity | Symbol | Definition | Depends on | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resistance | R | V/I | Material + geometry | Ω |
| Resistivity | ρ | RA/L | Material only | Ω⋅m |
| Conductance | G | 1/R | Material + geometry | S |
| Conductivity | σ | 1/ρ | Material only | S/m |
Intuitive Analogy
Think of a water pipe:
- Resistance = how hard it is to push water through (narrow, long pipe).
- Conductance = how easily water flows (wide, short pipe). …
Why this formula?
Conductance and Conductivity: Why the Formulas Hold
Let's build this from first principles — understanding the why before the what.
1. The Core Idea: How Easily Does Current Flow?
Think of a conductor (like a copper wire). When you apply a voltage across it, electrons drift through the material. Two questions arise:
- How much current flows for a given voltage? → This is conductance (G).
- How well does the material itself allow current? → This is conductivity (σ).
The key distinction: Conductance depends on the size and shape of the object. Conductivity is an intrinsic property of the material.
2. Ohm's Law in Terms of Conductance
You know Ohm's law:
V=IR
But we can rewrite it as:
I=RV
Define conductance G as the reciprocal of resistance:
G=R1
So:
I=GV
Why this makes sense:
- A larger G means more current for the same voltage — the conductor "conducts" better.
- G has units of siemens (S) = A/V.
3. From Resistance to Conductivity: The Geometry Factor
Resistance of a uniform conductor depends on:
- Length L (longer → more resistance)
- Cross-sectional area A (thicker → less resistance)
- Material property ρ (resistivity)
The formula:
R=ρAL
Now, conductivity σ is the reciprocal of resistivity:
σ=ρ1
So:
R=σ1⋅AL
Why this form?
- If you double the length, electrons have to travel twice as far, colliding more → resistance doubles.
- If you double the area, there's twice as many "lanes" for electrons → resistance halves.
4. The Key Formula: Conductance in Terms of Conductivity
Since G=1/R, we get:
G=σLA
This is the central relationship. Let's see why it holds:
- σ tells you how well the material conducts (intrinsic).
- A/L tells you how the geometry amplifies or reduces that.
Intuition:
- A fat, short wire (A large, L small) has high conductance.
- A thin, long wire (A small, L large) has low conductance.
- A material with high σ (like copper) gives higher G than one with low σ (like iron), for the same shape.
5. Microscopic Derivation (Why σ Exists)
At the microscopic level, conductivity arises from electron motion:
σ=neμ
Where:
- n = number of free electrons per unit volume
- e = electron charge …
Concept: Molar Conductivity at infinite dilution — Kohlrausch’s law states that Λm0 of an electrolyte is the sum of the limiting molar conductivities of its constituent ions. For water, Λm(H2O)0=λH+0+λOH−0. Only combinations built from strong electrolytes count, since a strong electrolyte's Λm0 is the only kind that can be measured directly.
We need to combine strong electrolytes so that the net ionic sum equals λH+0+λOH−0.
Step 1: Write the ionic contributions for each option.
For (i):
Λm(HCl)0=λH+0+λCl−0
Λm(NaOH)0=λNa+0+λOH−0
Λm(NaCl)0=λNa+0+λCl−0
Sum: (λH+0+λCl−0)+(λNa+0+λOH−0)−(λNa+0+λCl−0)=λH+0+λOH−0 ✓
Step 2: Check (ii):
Λm(HNO3)0=λH+0+λNO3−0
Λm(NaNO3)0=λNa+0+λNO3−0
Λm(NaOH)0=λNa+0+λOH−0
Sum: (λH+0+λNO3−0)+(λNa+0+λNO3−0)−(λNa+0+λOH−0)=λH+0+2λNO3−0−λOH−0 ✗
Step 3: Check (iii):
Λm(HNO3)0=λH+0+λNO3−0
Λm(NaOH)0=λNa+0+λOH−0
Λm(NaNO3)0=λNa+0+λNO3−0 …
The limiting molar conductivity of water, Λm(H2O)0, is found by applying Kohlrausch’s law of independent migration of ions. It equals the sum of the limiting conductivities of its constituent ions, H+ and OH−, which can be obtained by combining the conductivities of strong electrolytes. The correct expressions are (i) and (iii).
The key idea here is Kohlrausch’s law: at infinite dilution, each ion contributes a fixed amount to the molar conductivity of an electrolyte, independent of the other ion it travels with. So Λm0 for any electrolyte is simply the sum of the limiting conductivities of its cation and anion.
For water, which dissociates as H2O⇌H++OH−, its limiting molar conductivity is:
Λm(H2O)0=λH+0+λOH−0
We don’t know these individual ionic conductivities directly, but we can get them by combining data from strong electrolytes that contain these ions — strong electrolytes are the ones whose Λm0 can actually be measured directly, by extrapolating Λm vs c to zero concentration.
Let’s check each option step by step.
-
Option (i): Λm(HCl)0+Λm(NaOH)0−Λm(NaCl)0
Write each in terms of ionic conductivities:
- Λm(HCl)0=λH+0+λCl−0
- Λm(NaOH)0=λNa+0+λOH−0
- Λm(NaCl)0=λNa+0+λCl−0
Adding the first two and subtracting the third:
(λH+0+λCl−0)+(λNa+0+λOH−0)−(λNa+0+λCl−0)
The λNa+0 and λCl−0 cancel, leaving λH+0+λOH−0, which is exactly Λm(H2O)0. HCl, NaOH and NaCl are all strong electrolytes, so this is a legitimate calculation. (i) is correct.
-
Option (ii): Λm(HNO3)0+Λm(NaNO3)0−Λm(NaOH)0
Write them out:
- Λm(HNO3)0=λH+0+λNO3−0
- Λm(NaNO3)0=λNa+0+λNO3−0
- Λm(NaOH)0=λNa+0+λOH−0
Sum the first two and subtract the third:
(λH+0+λNO3−0)+(λNa+0+λNO3−0)−(λNa+0+λOH−0)
The λNa+0 cancels, but we get λH+0+2λNO3−0−λOH−0, which is not λH+0+λOH−0. So (ii) is incorrect.
-
Option (iii): Λm(HNO3)0+Λm(NaOH)0−Λm(NaNO3)0
Write:
- Λm(HNO3)0=λH+0+λNO3−0
- Λm(NaOH)0=λNa+0+λOH−0
- Λm(NaNO3)0=λNa+0+λNO3−0
Adding the first two and subtracting the third:
(λH+0+λNO3−0)+(λNa+0+λOH−0)−(λNa+0+λNO3−0)
The λNa+0 and λNO3−0 cancel, leaving λH+0+λOH−0. HNO₃, NaOH and NaNO₃ are all strong electrolytes, so this is also legitimate. (iii) is correct.
- Option (iv): Λm(NH4OH)0+Λm(HCl)0−Λm(NH4Cl)0
Write:
- Λm(NH4OH)0=λNH4+0+λOH−0
- Λm(HCl)0=λH+0+λCl−0
- Λm(NH4Cl)0=λNH4+0+λCl−0 …
Method: Kohlrausch’s Law of Independent Migration of Ions
Concept: At infinite dilution, each ion contributes a fixed amount to the molar conductivity of an electrolyte, independent of the other ion it is paired with. This lets you build Λm0 of one substance from other substances' Λm0 values — provided every substance used is a strong electrolyte (only strong-electrolyte Λm0 can be measured directly, by extrapolating Λm vs c to c=0).
Steps:
- Write the expression for Λm0 of water Water dissociates as:
H2O⇌H++OH−
So,
Λm(H2O)0=λH+0+λOH−0
-
Express each given electrolyte in terms of ionic conductivities
For example:
- Λm(HCl)0=λH+0+λCl−0
- Λm(NaOH)0=λNa+0+λOH−0
- Λm(NaCl)0=λNa+0+λCl−0
-
Combine to isolate λH+0+λOH−0
Take option (i):
Λm(HCl)0+Λm(NaOH)0−Λm(NaCl)0
Substitute:
=(λH+0+λCl−0)+(λNa+0+λOH−0)−(λNa+0+λCl−0)
Cancel λNa+0 and λCl−0:
=λH+0+λOH−0=Λm(H2O)0
HCl, NaOH, NaCl are all strong electrolytes — valid.
- Check other options similarly
- Option (iii) also works, using only strong electrolytes HNO₃, NaOH, NaNO₃: …
Common Mistakes & How to Avoid Them
Mistake 1: Not recognising Kohlrausch’s Law of independent migration of ions
Students often try to memorise the formula without understanding the logic behind it.
How to avoid:
Kohlrausch’s law says:
Λm0=λ+0+λ−0
For water (H2O), the ions are H+ and OH−. So:
Λm(H2O)0=λH+0+λOH−0
Now, any combination of strong electrolytes that gives you λH+0+λOH−0 is correct.
Mistake 2: Confusing addition/subtraction signs
Students often misplace the signs when combining electrolytes.
How to avoid:
Write each electrolyte’s ionic contributions explicitly:
- Λm(HCl)0=λH+0+λCl−0
- Λm(NaOH)0=λNa+0+λOH−0
- Λm(NaCl)0=λNa+0+λCl−0
Now compute:
Λm(HCl)0+Λm(NaOH)0−Λm(NaCl)0=(λH+0+λCl−0)+(λNa+0+λOH−0)−(λNa+0+λCl−0)
Cancel λNa+0 and λCl−0 → λH+0+λOH−0 ✓
Mistake 3: Assuming only one combination is correct
The question says two or more options may be correct, but students often stop after finding one.
How to avoid:
Check every option using the same method. For option (iii):
Λm(HNO3)0+Λm(NaOH)0−Λm(NaNO3)0
- Λm(HNO3)0=λH+0+λNO3−0
- Λm(NaOH)0=λNa+0+λOH−0
- Λm(NaNO3)0=λNa+0+λNO3−0
Cancel λNa+0 and λNO3−0 → λH+0+λOH−0 ✓
So both (i) and (iii) are correct.
Mistake 4: Wrongly accepting option (iv) because the ion algebra 'cancels'
Option (iv) is Λm(NH4OH)0+Λm(HCl)0−Λm(NH4Cl)0. If you write it out formally:
(λNH4+0+λOH−0)+(λH+0+λCl−0)−(λNH4+0+λCl−0)=λH+0+λOH−0
This LOOKS identical to (i) and (iii) — but it is not accepted as a valid answer, and it's a genuine trap.
Why it's wrong: …
- GUJCET 2025Set 031 markMCQQ.Which relation is correct for Λm(H2O)0? (A) Λm(HCl)0+Λm(NH4Cl)0−Λm(NH4OH)0 (B) Λm(HCl)0+Λm(NaOH)0−Λm(NaCl)0 (C) Λm(HNO3)0+Λm(NaNO3)0−Λm(NaOH)0 (D) Λm(HNO3)0+Λm(Ba(OH)2)0−Λm(Ba(NO3)2)0
›Reveal solutionSolution
[!TLDR]
Adding HCl and NaOH conductivities and subtracting NaCl cancels Na+ and Cl−, giving Λm0(H2O)=Λ0(H+)+Λ0(OH−).
Concept
Kohlrausch's law: at infinite dilution the molar conductivity is the sum of independent ionic contributions. So conductivities of appropriate electrolytes can be combined to obtain that of a weak electrolyte like water.
Solution
We need Λm0(H2O)=λ0(H+)+λ0(OH−).
Take option (B):
Λm0(HCl)+Λm0(NaOH)−Λm0(NaCl) …
- GSEB Higher Secondary Certificate (HSC) Examination 2025Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.The conductivity of 0.40M solution of KCl at 298K is 0.0248 S cm-1. Its Molar conductivity is _____ S cm2 mol-1.(a) 62(b) 96(c) 124(d) 48
›Reveal solutionSolution
Molar conductivity = conductivity x 1000 / molarity (with conductivity in S/cm and molarity in mol/L).
Given: kappa = 0.0248 S cm-1, M = 0.40 mol/L.
Formula: Lambda_m = (kappa x 1000) / M
…
- GSEB Higher Secondary Certificate (HSC) Examination 2024Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.Lambda-m-degree for NaCl, HCl and NaAc are 126.4, 425.9 and 91.0 S cm2 mol-1 respectively. Calculate Lambda-degree for HAc.(a) 461.3 Scm2mol-1(b) 208.5 Scm2mol-1(c) 643.3 Scm2mol-1(d) 390.5 Scm2mol-1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Kohlrausch's law of independent migration of ions lets a weak electrolyte's limiting molar conductivity be built from strong electrolytes sharing its ions.
lambda-degree-m(HAc) = lambda-degree-m(HCl) + lambda-degree-m(NaAc) - lambda-degree-m(NaCl)
= 425.9 + 91.0 - 126.4
= 390.5 S cm2 mol-1
…
- GUJCET 2023Set 091 markMCQQ.Resistance of a conductivity cell filled with 0.1 M KCl solution is 100 Ω and conductivity of solution is 1.29 s/m. Then what will be the value of conductivity cell constant. (A) 1.29 cm−1 (B) 1.29 m−1 (C) 1.24 cm−1 (D) 0.248 m−1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Cell constant G∗=κ×R.
Concept: Conductivity κ=R1⋅Al, so the cell constant Al=κ×R.
G∗=1.29 S m−1×100 Ω=129 m−1. …
- GUJCET 2020Set 071 markMCQQ.For which of the following electrolytes the graph of Λm against C gives a negative slope. (A) Ammonium hydroxide (B) Sodium acetate (C) Acetic acid (D) Water
›Reveal solutionSolution
The linear negative slope of Λm vs C (Debye–Hückel–Onsager) is characteristic of a strong electrolyte — sodium acetate.
Concept — strong vs. weak electrolyte conductance. For strong electrolytes Λm=Λm0−bC, a straight line of negative slope. Weak electrolytes (acetic acid …
- GSEB Higher Secondary Certificate (HSC) Examination 2020Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.Λ°m(HAc) is equal to ______.(a) Λ°m(KCl) + Λ°m(KAc) - Λ°m(HCl)(b) Λ°m(HCl) + Λ°m(NaAc) - Λ°m(NaCl)(c) Λ°m(AcH) + Λ°m(KAc) + Λ°m(NaAc)(d) Λ°m(KCl) + Λ°m(NaAc) - Λ°m(NaCl)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Kohlrausch's law of independent migration of ions lets the limiting molar conductivity of a weak electrolyte be built from the limiting conductivities of strong electrolytes that share its ions.
HAc (acetic acid) is a weak electrolyte, so Λ°m(HAc) cannot be measured directly by extrapolation. Kohlrausch's law: Λ°m(HAc) = λ°(H+) + λ°(Ac-). Using strong electrolytes: Λ°m(HCl) = λ°(H+)+λ°(Cl-); Λ°m(NaAc) = λ°(Na+)+λ°(Ac-); Λ°m(NaCl) = λ°(Na+)+λ°(Cl-). Addin …
- GSEB Higher Secondary Certificate (HSC) Examination 2019Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.What is correct for the limiting molar conductivity of ammonium hydroxide, Lambda°m(NH4OH)?(a) Lambda°m(NH4Cl) + Lambda°m(NaOH) - Lambda°m(NaCl)(b) Lambda°m(NH4Cl) + Lambda°m(NaCl) - Lambda°m(NaOH)(c) Lambda°m(NaOH) + Lambda°m(NH4Cl) - Lambda°m(HCl)(d) Lambda°m(NaCl) + Lambda°m(NH4Cl) + Lambda°m(NaOH)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Kohlrausch's law lets the limiting molar conductivity of a WEAK electrolyte be built from the limiting molar conductivities of STRONG electrolytes that share its ions.
NH4OH is a weak electrolyte, so its limiting (infinite dilution) molar conductivity cannot be measured directly by extrapolation (its conductivity does not vary linearly with concentration near zero concentration). Instead, Kohlrausch's law of independent migration of ions is used: choose combinations of STRONG electrolytes that, added and subtracted, give exactly the ions NH4+ and OH-.
Lambda-degree-m(NH4Cl) supplies NH4+ and Cl-.
Lambda-degree-m(NaOH) supplies Na+ and OH-. …
- GSEB Higher Secondary Certificate (HSC) Examination 2018Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.The limiting molar conductivity and molar conductivity of acetic acid are 390.5 s.cm2.mol^-1 and 48.15 s.cm2.mol^-1 respectively. Calculate the degree of dissociation of the weak acid?(a) 12.33(b) 0.1233(c) 1.233(d) 0.01233
›Reveal solutionSolution
alpha = Lambda_m / Lambda_m(infinity) = 48.15/390.5 = 0.1233.
For a weak electrolyte, the degree of dissociation equals the ratio of its molar conductivity at the given concentration to its limiting (infinite-dilution) molar conductivity:
…
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.