Q.Predict the order of reactivity of the following compounds in SN1 and SN2 reactions:
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Ambident Nucleophile Reactivity
Ambident Nucleophile Reactivity
Most nucleophiles attack through a single, obvious atom — a single lone pair, a single reactive site. An ambident nucleophile is unusual: it has TWO different atoms that each carry enough electron density to act as the attacking site, so it can bond to an electrophile through either one, giving two structurally different products from the same reagent.
Why This Happens: Resonance Delocalisation
An ambident nucleophile's negative charge (or lone pair) is delocalised by resonance across more than one atom, so more than one atom is genuinely nucleophilic.
Cyanide ion, CN−: −C≡N:↔:C=N−. Both the carbon and the nitrogen carry real electron density and can attack an electrophile.
- Attack through carbon gives an alkyl cyanide (nitrile), R−C≡N.
- Attack through nitrogen gives an alkyl isocyanide (isonitrile), R−N≡C.
Nitrite ion, NO2−: the negative charge is shared between nitrogen and the oxygens.
- Attack through oxygen gives an alkyl nitrite, R−O−N=O.
- Attack through nitrogen gives a nitroalkane, R−NO2.
What Decides Which End Attacks: The Counter-Ion Matters
For cyanide specifically, the identity of the metal counter-ion changes which end of CN− ends up bonded to the electrophile — this is the classic KCN-vs-AgCN contrast:
- KCN is genuinely ionic: it dissociates fully to give a FREE CN− ion. The carbon end is intrinsically the more nucleophilic site (more polarisable, and it forms the stronger C–C bond with the alkyl carbon), so KCN reacts through carbon, giving the nitrile as the major product.
- AgCN is covalent, with silver bonded to the CARBON of the cyanide group (Ag−C≡N). With the carbon end already occupied by silver, it is the NITROGEN lone pair that is left free to attack the alkyl halide — so AgCN gives the isocyanide as the major product.
A common mistake is to assume silver coordinates to nitrogen (since nitrogen is "more electronegative" or "harder"). It is the opposite: silver bonds to carbon, and it is precisely THAT occupation of the carbon end that forces attack to happen through nitrogen instead. …
Why this formula?
Ambident Nucleophile Reactivity: Why the Rules Hold
Ambident nucleophiles are nucleophiles that have two (or more) different atoms capable of donating a lone pair to form a bond with an electrophile. Classic examples include:
- Cyanide ion (CNX−): can attack via carbon or nitrogen
- Nitrite ion (NOX2X−): can attack via oxygen or nitrogen
- Enolate ions: can attack via carbon or oxygen
The key question: Why does one atom react preferentially over the other?
The Core Principle: Hard-Soft Acid-Base (HSAB) Theory
The reactivity of ambident nucleophiles is governed by HSAB theory, which states:
Hard acids prefer hard bases; soft acids prefer soft bases.
Why this holds — the reasoning:
- Hard species are small, highly charged, and non-polarizable. Their interactions are dominated by ionic (electrostatic) forces.
- Soft species are large, polarizable, and have diffuse electron clouds. Their interactions are dominated by covalent (orbital overlap) forces.
For an ambident nucleophile, the two attacking atoms differ in hardness/softness:
| Ambident Nucleophile | Harder Atom | Softer Atom |
|---|---|---|
| CNX− | N (hard) | C (soft) |
| NOX2X− | O (hard) | N (soft) |
| Enolate (CHX2=CH−OX−) | O (hard) | C (soft) |
The Key Formula(e) and Their Derivation
1. Charge Density Rule (for hard-hard interactions)
For a hard electrophile (e.g., HX+, CHX3X+, AlClX3):
The nucleophile attacks via the atom with higher charge density (more negative charge).
Why?
Hard-hard interactions are electrostatic. The force between charges is:
F=r2k⋅q1⋅q2
- q1, q2 = charges on the species
- r = distance between them
A hard electrophile has a localized positive charge. The nucleophile's atom with greater negative charge density (more concentrated charge) exerts a stronger electrostatic attraction. This atom is typically the more electronegative one (e.g., O in enolate, N in cyanide).
Example:
Enolate with CHX3I (hard electrophile) → O-alkylation (harder O attacks)
2. Polarizability Rule (for soft-soft interactions)
For a soft electrophile (e.g., CHX3CHX2I, HgX2+, BrX2):
The nucleophile attacks via the atom with higher polarizability (softer atom).
Why?
Soft-soft interactions are covalent and depend on orbital overlap. The softer atom has:
- Larger, more diffuse orbitals (e.g., 3p vs 2p)
- Lower electronegativity
- Greater polarizability — its electron cloud can distort easily to form a bond
The energy of orbital overlap is approximated by:
ΔE∝energy gap(overlap integral)2
A softer atom has a higher-energy HOMO (closer to the electrophile's LUMO), giving a smaller energy gap and stronger interaction.
Example: …
Concept: SN1 vs SN2 Reactivity. The key is carbocation stability for SN1 and steric hindrance for SN2.
(i) Four isomeric bromobutanes
-
SN1 depends on carbocation stability: tertiary > secondary > primary. Of the two primary bromides, the carbocation from 1-bromo-2-methylpropane ((CH3)2CHCH2Br) is more stable than from 1-bromobutane, because of the stronger electron-donating inductive effect of the (CH3)2CH− group -- so 1-bromo-2-methylpropane is more reactive than 1-bromobutane in SN1.
SN1: tert-butyl bromide > sec-butyl bromide > 1-bromo-2-methylpropane > 1-bromobutane.
-
SN2 depends on steric hindrance: methyl > primary > secondary > tertiary.
SN2: n-butyl > isobutyl > sec-butyl > tert-butyl.
(ii) Benzylic/allylic bromides
- SN1 follows carbocation stability: C6H5CH(C6H5)Br gives a diphenylmethyl carbocation (very stable, resonance with two phenyls). C6H5C(CH3)(C6H5)Br gives a tertiary benzylic carbocation (even more stable due to +I of methyl). C6H5CH(CH3)Br gives a secondary benzylic carbocation. C6H5CH2Br gives a primary benzylic carbocation (least stable among these). …
SN1 rate follows carbocation stability (3∘>2∘>1∘, resonance-stabilised benzylic cations winning); SN2 rate follows the reverse - the least hindered carbon reacts fastest.
Part (i): the four isomeric bromobutanes
CH3CH2CH2CH2Br (1-bromobutane, 1∘), CH3CH2CHBrCH3 (2-bromobutane, 2∘), (CH3)2CHCH2Br (1-bromo-2-methylpropane, 1∘), (CH3)3CBr (2-bromo-2-methylpropane, 3∘).
SN1 (carbocation stability): among the two primary bromides, the carbocation formed from (CH3)2CHCH2Br is more stable than the one from CH3CH2CH2CH2Br, because of the greater electron-donating inductive effect of the (CH3)2CH− group -- so 1-bromo-2-methylpropane is more reactive than 1-bromobutane in SN1:
2-bromo-2-methylpropane>2-bromobutane>1-bromo-2-methylpropane>1-bromobutane
SN2 (least steric hindrance fastest -- the reverse order):
1-bromobutane>1-bromo-2-methylpropane>2-bromobutane>2-bromo-2-methylpropane
Part (ii): benzylic bromides
(A) C6H5CH2Br (1∘ benzylic), (B) C6H5CH(C6H5)Br (2∘, two Ph), (C) C6H5CH(CH3)Br (2∘, one Ph), (D) C6H5C(CH3)(C6H5)Br (3∘, two Ph). …
Method: Carbocation Stability & Steric Hindrance Analysis
This method uses two fundamental principles:
- SN1 depends on carbocation stability (more stable carbocation → faster reaction)
- SN2 depends on steric hindrance (less hindered substrate → faster reaction)
(i) The four isomeric bromobutanes
Compounds:
- 1-bromobutane (primary)
- 2-bromobutane (secondary)
- 1-bromo-2-methylpropane (primary, branched)
- 2-bromo-2-methylpropane (tertiary)
SN1 Reactivity Order
Step 1: Identify the carbocation formed after Br⁻ leaves.
| Substrate | Carbocation type | Stability |
|---|---|---|
| 1-bromobutane | Primary | Least stable |
| 1-bromo-2-methylpropane | Primary, but stabilised more by the stronger +I effect of the (CH3)2CH− group | More stable than the n-butyl cation |
| 2-bromobutane | Secondary | Moderate |
| 2-bromo-2-methylpropane | Tertiary | Most stable |
Step 2: Order by carbocation stability. Of the two primary bromides, the carbocation from 1-bromo-2-methylpropane is more stable than from 1-bromobutane, because of the greater electron-donating inductive effect of the (CH3)2CH− group.
SN1 order:
2-bromo-2-methylpropane > 2-bromobutane > 1-bromo-2-methylpropane > 1-bromobutane
SN2 Reactivity Order
Step 1: Count the number of alkyl groups on the carbon bearing Br (steric hindrance).
| Substrate | Carbon type | Hindrance |
|---|---|---|
| 1-bromobutane | Primary (1°) | Least |
| 1-bromo-2-methylpropane | Primary (1°) but neopentyl-like | Moderate |
| 2-bromobutane | Secondary (2°) | High |
| 2-bromo-2-methylpropane | Tertiary (3°) | Maximum |
Step 2: Order by increasing steric hindrance.
SN2 order:
1-bromobutane > 1-bromo-2-methylpropane > 2-bromobutane > 2-bromo-2-methylpropane
(ii) Benzylic/allylic bromides
Compounds:
- C6H5CH2Br (primary benzylic)
- C6H5CH(CH3)Br (secondary benzylic)
- C6H5CH(C6H5)Br (secondary benzylic, diphenyl)
- C6H5C(CH3)(C6H5)Br (tertiary benzylic)
SN1 Reactivity Order
Step 1: Evaluate carbocation stability — benzylic carbocations are stabilized by resonance with the phenyl ring. More phenyl groups = more resonance stabilization.
| Carbocation | Stabilizing groups | Stability |
|---|---|---|
| C6H5CH2+ | 1 phenyl | Moderate |
Common Mistakes: SN1 vs SN2 Substitution Reactivity
This question tests your understanding of carbocation stability (for SN1) and steric hindrance (for SN2). Here are the most frequent errors students make:
Mistake 1: Confusing SN1 and SN2 Reactivity Trends
The error: Students often apply the same reasoning to both mechanisms — e.g., assuming that what makes a compound reactive in SN1 also makes it reactive in SN2.
Why it happens: Both reactions involve breaking the C–Br bond, but the rate-determining steps are completely different.
How to avoid:
- SN1 → Rate depends on carbocation stability (more substituted = more stable = faster)
- SN2 → Rate depends on steric hindrance (less hindered = faster)
Key rule: For SN1, think tertiary > secondary > primary > methyl. For SN2, think methyl > primary > secondary > tertiary.
Mistake 2: Forgetting Resonance Stabilisation in Benzylic Systems
The error: Treating C6H5CH2Br (benzyl bromide) as a simple primary alkyl halide.
Why it happens: Students memorise "primary = fast SN2, slow SN1" without considering special cases.
How to avoid:
- The benzyl carbocation (C6H5CH2+) is resonance-stabilised — the positive charge is delocalised into the benzene ring.
- This makes benzyl halides very reactive in SN1 despite being "primary" in a formal sense.
- Similarly, the benzylic position is less hindered than it looks — the flat benzene ring doesn't block backside attack as much as an alkyl group would.
Mistake 3: Misordering the Benzylic Series
The error: Assuming C6H5CH(C6H5)Br (diphenylmethyl bromide) is less reactive than C6H5CH(CH3)Br in SN1.
Why it happens: Students count alkyl groups but forget that phenyl rings stabilise carbocations even more than alkyl groups.
How to avoid:
- Compare carbocation stability: more phenyl groups = more resonance stabilisation
- Order for SN1: C6H5C(CH3)(C6H5)Br (tertiary + 2 phenyl) > C6H5CH(C6H5)Br (secondary + 2 phenyl) > C6H5CH(CH3)Br (secondary + 1 phenyl) > C6H5CH2Br (primary + 1 phenyl)
Mistake 4: Ignoring Steric Effects in SN2 for Benzylic Halides
The error: Assuming all benzylic halides are equally fast in SN2 because they're "benzylic."
Why it happens: Students over-focus on the benzylic stabilisation and forget that bulky groups still block backside attack.
How to avoid:
- For SN2, steric hindrance dominates:
- C6H5CH2Br (least hindered) → fastest
- C6H5CH(CH3)Br (one methyl group) → slower
- C6H5CH(C6H5)Br (one phenyl group) → even slower
- C6H5C(CH3)(C6H5)Br (tertiary, two bulky groups) → very slow or no reaction
Mistake 5: Mixing Up the Isomeric Bromobutanes …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.