Q.The sum of the surface areas of a rectangular parallelopiped with sides x, 2x and 3x and a sphere is given to be constant. Prove that the sum of their volumes is minimum if x is equal to three times the radius of the sphere. Also find the minimum value of the sum of their volumes.
Imagine planning a garden with 40 metres of fencing and wanting the largest rectangular area. A long, thin rectangle wastes space; a square feels roomier; somewhere in between lies the best shape. That is an optimisation problem — a fixed resource and a quantity to make as large (or as small) as possible.
Every optimisation word problem has the same skeleton: the best outcome — maximum area, minimum cost, largest volume, shortest time — under a constraint — limited material, a fixed budget, a given perimeter.
The Plan of Attack
The problem gives you a story, not a graph. Your job is to turn it into a single-variable function and find its peak or valley:
Name the quantity to optimise — call it Q, and write it using variables.
Find the constraint — a relation between those variables (e.g. "perimeter =40").
Reduce to one variable — use the constraint to eliminate the rest.
Differentiate — solve Q′(x)=0 to find the critical points.
Confirm — use Q′′(x)<0 for a maximum or Q′′(x)>0 for a minimum.
Answer the question asked — give the actual dimensions/cost, not just x.
Note
In board exams these problems almost always reduce to a quadratic or cubic. Once Q(x) is written, the calculus is mechanical.
The Garden, Worked
40 m of fencing encloses a rectangle; maximise the area.
Objective:A=lw.
Constraint:2l+2w=40, so l+w=20.
Reduce:w=20−l, giving A(l)=l(20−l)=20l−l2.
Differentiate:A′(l)=20−2l=0⟹l=10.
Confirm:A′′(l)=−2<0, a maximum.
So l=w=10 m — a 10 m × 10 m square.
Watch out
A common slip: solving A′(l)=0 and stopping. Always check max vs min, and answer in the units asked.
The Common Families
| Problem type | Typical objective | Typical constraint |
We treat the sum of surface areas as a fixed constant, express the sphere’s radius in terms of x, then write the sum of volumes as a function of x alone. Using calculus (second derivative test) we show the minimum occurs when x=3r, and compute that minimum sum as 94πk, where k is the constant surface area sum.
This is a classic optimization problem where two shapes share a fixed total surface area, and we want to minimise their combined volume. The key is to use the constraint to eliminate one variable, leaving a single-variable function to minimise.
1. Write the given data and the constraint
The rectangular parallelepiped has sides x, 2x, and 3x.
At x=3r, using k−6x2=4πr2, we get (k−6x2)1/2=2rπ. Substituting and simplifying (the algebra is straightforward but lengthy) yields V′′(x)>0, confirming a minimum. …
Method: Optimizing a Combined Quantity for Two Shapes Sharing One Constraint
Some problems give you two separate shapes (here, a box and a sphere) whose individual surface areas or volumes are unrelated, but a single combined quantity (their total surface area, say) is held fixed. You're then asked to optimize a different combined quantity (their total volume). The technique is the same optimization skeleton, applied with two shape-formulas at once.
Steps
Step 1: Write each shape's surface area and volume in terms of its own defining variable.
Express everything the problem depends on (side length x for the box, radius r for the sphere) using the standard formulas for that shape.
Step 2: Write the shared constraint as a single equation equal to a constant.
Sshape 1(x)+Sshape 2(r)=k(constant).
Step 3: Write the objective — the combined quantity to optimize — as a function of both variables.
V(x,r)=Vshape 1(x)+Vshape 2(r).
Step 4: Reduce to one variable, either by direct substitution or by Lagrange multipliers. …
Mistake 1: Miscounting the parallelopiped's surface area
Why it's wrong: With sides x, 2x, 3x, the surface area is 2(x⋅2x+2x⋅3x+3x⋅x)=6x2 — students often forget the factor of 2 (each pair of opposite faces counted once, then doubled) or miscompute one of the three face-pair products. Correct approach: list all three distinct face-pair areas first, sum them, then double the sum.
Mistake 2: Losing track of k as a constant, not a value to solve for
Why it's wrong: k=6x2+4πr2 is given to be constant but its numeric value is never stated — the final minimum volume must stay expressed in terms of k (or equivalently r). Treating k as an unknown to be solved for, or dropping it partway through, produces a numerically meaningless "answer." Correct approach: carry k symbolically throughout, and only substitute r's relation to k at the very end.
Mistake 3: Sign/chain-rule slip differentiating r implicitly with respect to x …
Same / Similar Concept — real previous-year questions on the same or a closely similar concept, not this exact question.
GSEB Higher Secondary Certificate (HSC) Examination 2026Set ANNUAL4 marks
Q.[For general students] Prove that the height of the right circular cone of maximum volume that can be inscribed in a sphere of radius r is 34r.
OR
[For visually impaired students only] Find the maximum and minimum values of f(x)=3x4−8x3+12x2−48x+25 on the interval [0,3].
›Reveal solutionSolution
Express the cone's base-radius in terms of its height using the sphere's geometry, write volume as a function of height alone, and maximize.
(Answering the general-students version.) Let the sphere have radius r and centre O, and let the cone have height h and base radius x. If the cone's apex and the centre are positioned so the base is at perpendicular distance (h−r) from the centre, then by the Pythagorean relation on the base circle:
GSEB Higher Secondary Certificate (HSC) Examination 2025Set ANNUAL4 marks
Q.Prove that when the curved surface area of a right circular cone is minimum for a given volume, the height of the cone is 2 times the radius of its base.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Express curved surface area in terms of r alone (using the fixed-volume constraint to eliminate h), then minimize.
Volume V=31πr2h (fixed) ⇒h=πr23V.
Curved surface area S=πrl=πrr2+h2. Work with S2=π2r2(r2+h2)=π2r4+π2r2h2.
Substituting h2=π2r49V2: S2=π2r4+r29V2. Let f(r)=π2r4+r29V2 (minimizing S is equivalent to minimizing f since S>0).