In which of the following compounds the carbon marked with asterisk is expected to have greatest positive char

NCERT Exemplar · Q11

Q. In which of the following compounds the carbon marked with asterisk is expected to have greatest positive charge?

(i) *CH3—CH2—Cl

(ii) *CH3—CH2—Mg^+Cl^-

(iii) *CH3—CH2—Br

(iv) *CH3—CH2—CH3

Jharkhand JacMCQ· 1mImportance★★★★★

58% · 75/130 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Inductive Effect

Inductive Effect on Acidity – From Intuition to Precision

Imagine you are holding a rope tied to a heavy box. If you pull the rope, the box moves toward you. Now imagine the rope is made of rubber bands — the pull still reaches the box, but it gets weaker the farther away you are. That is exactly how the inductive effect works inside a molecule.

The Core Intuition

An acid donates a proton ( $H^+$ ). After it does, the remaining part (the conjugate base) carries a negative charge. The stability of that negative charge determines how willing the molecule is to give up the proton. More stable conjugate base → stronger acid.

Now, some atoms or groups are electron-withdrawing — they pull electron density toward themselves through the sigma bonds. If such a group is attached near the acidic proton, it pulls some electron density away from the negative charge on the conjugate base. That spreads out (delocalises) the negative charge, making the conjugate base more stable. The acid becomes stronger.

Conversely, electron-donating groups push electron density toward the negative charge, concentrating it and making the conjugate base less stable. The acid becomes weaker.

Note

The inductive effect operates through sigma bonds only. It does not involve pi bonds or resonance. It is a permanent, through-bond polarisation.

The Precise Statement

Inductive effect on acidity: The acidity of a compound increases with the presence of electron-withdrawing groups (EWGs) near the acidic site, and decreases with electron-donating groups (EDGs). The effect is strongest when the group is closest to the acidic proton, and diminishes rapidly with distance.

Mathematically, for a series of substituted carboxylic acids:

\text{R-COOH} \quad \text{where R = substituent}

The acid dissociation constant $K_a$ changes as:

If R is electron-withdrawing (e.g., $-\text{Cl}$ , $-\text{NO}_2$ , $-\text{CF}_3$ ): $K_a$ increases → stronger acid.
If R is electron-donating (e.g., $-\text{CH}_3$ , $-\text{C}_2\text{H}_5$ ): $K_a$ decreases → weaker acid.

Why Distance Matters

The inductive effect falls off with distance because sigma bonds are localised. Each bond attenuates the effect by roughly a factor of 2–3. For example, compare:

Compound	$pK_a$	Explanation
$\text{CH}_3\text{COOH}$	4.76	Reference (no EWG)
$\text{ClCH}_2\text{COOH}$	2.86	Cl withdraws through one bond
$\text{Cl}_2\text{CHCOOH}$	1.29	Two Cl atoms, stronger withdrawal
$\text{Cl}_3\text{CCOOH}$	0.65	Three Cl atoms, strongest withdrawal
$\text{CH}_3\text{CH}_2\text{COOH}$	4.87	Ethyl group is electron-donating (slightly weaker acid)

Notice: $\text{ClCH}_2\text{COOH}$ is about 100 times stronger than acetic acid ( $\Delta pK_a \approx 1.9$ ). But if the Cl is moved further away:

Compound	$pK_a$
$\text{ClCH}_2\text{CH}_2\text{COOH}$	4.08
$\text{ClCH}_2\text{CH}_2\text{CH}_2\text{COOH}$	4.52

The effect fades as the chlorine moves farther from the carboxyl group. …

Why this formula?

Inductive Effect: Why the Key Ideas Hold

The inductive effect is a fundamental concept in organic chemistry that explains how electron density shifts along a sigma ( $\sigma$ ) bond due to differences in electronegativity. Let's break down why the key principles work — not just what they are.

1. The Core Idea: Polarization of $\sigma$ Bonds

What happens?

When two atoms with different electronegativities form a $\sigma$ bond, the bonding electrons are not shared equally. The more electronegative atom pulls electron density toward itself.

Why does this happen?

Electronegativity is a measure of an atom's ability to attract shared electrons.
The $\sigma$ bond is a region of high electron density between the nuclei.
The more electronegative atom's nucleus exerts a stronger electrostatic pull on these electrons.
Result: The bond becomes polarized — one end becomes slightly negative ( $\delta^-$ ), the other slightly positive ( $\delta^+$ ).

Key formula (conceptual):

$\delta^- \leftarrow \text{Atom A} \rightarrow \delta^+$

where A is more electronegative than B.

2. Why the Effect Transmits Along a Chain

The puzzle:

If the inductive effect is about a single bond, how does it affect atoms several bonds away?

The reasoning:

The $\delta^+$ on the less electronegative atom creates a partial positive charge.
This partial charge polarizes the next $\sigma$ bond in the chain.
The effect is relayed through successive bonds, like a chain of dominoes.

Why does it weaken with distance?

Each bond acts as a dielectric medium — it partially screens the charge.
The electrostatic influence falls off with distance according to Coulomb's law:

F \propto \frac{q_1 q_2}{r^2}

In a molecular chain, the effective distance $r$ increases, so the induced dipole in each subsequent bond is smaller.

Key result: Inductive effect is significant only up to 3–4 bonds away.

3. The Quantitative Measure: Inductive Effect Constant ( $\sigma_I$ )

What is $\sigma_I$ ?

It's a Hammett-type constant that quantifies the electron-withdrawing or electron-donating power of a substituent through sigma bonds only.

Why does it have this form?

The inductive effect is additive — each substituent contributes independently.
For a substituent X attached to a carbon chain:

\sigma_I = \log \left( \frac{K_a(\text{X-CH}_2\text{COOH})}{K_a(\text{CH}_3\text{COOH})} \right)

where $K_a$ is the acid dissociation constant.

Why use acid dissociation?

The carboxyl group ( $-\text{COOH}$ ) is a sensitive probe.
An electron-withdrawing group (EWG) stabilizes the conjugate base ( $\text{R-COO}^-$ ) by dispersing its negative charge.
This increases $K_a$ (stronger acid).
An electron-donating group (EDG) destabilizes the conjugate base, decreasing $K_a$ .

Key formula:

$\sigma_I > 0$ for EWGs (e.g., $-\text{Cl}$ , $-\text{NO}_2$ )

$\sigma_I < 0$ for EDGs (e.g., $-\text{CH}_3$ , $-\text{C(CH}_3)_3$ )

4. Why Inductive Effect is Not Resonance

Common confusion:

Students often mix inductive and resonance effects.

The critical difference:

Property	Inductive Effect	Resonance Effect
Electron movement	Through $\sigma$ bonds only	Through $\pi$ bonds or lone pairs
Distance dependence	Dies off after 3–4 bonds	Can transmit over long distances in conjugated systems
Permanent or temporary	Permanent polarization	Can be temporary (delocalization)

Why this matters for exam problems:

In alkyl halides, the inductive effect of $-\text{Cl}$ explains the $\delta^+$ on carbon.
In benzene derivatives, the combined inductive and resonance effects determine reactivity.

--- …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The carbon bearing the greatest positive charge is the one attached to the most electron-withdrawing group. Since Cl is more electronegative than Br, Mg, or C, the asterisk carbon in *CH₃—CH₂—Cl carries the largest partial positive charge. Answer: (i)

Understanding Inductive Effect and Partial Charge

When a carbon atom bonds to an atom or group with different electronegativity, electron density shifts along the σ-bond. This transmission of charge through the chain is the inductive effect.

An electronegative atom (like a halogen) pulls electrons toward itself, creating a partial positive charge ( $\delta^+$ ) on the carbon it's attached to. The more electronegative the substituent, the stronger the electron withdrawal and the larger the positive charge on carbon.

Conversely, an electropositive group (like a metal) pushes electrons toward carbon, creating a partial negative charge ( $\delta^-$ ).

The question asks which asterisk carbon has the greatest positive charge, so we need to identify which substituent withdraws electrons most strongly from the $\ce{CH3}$ group.

Step-by-Step Analysis

*Option (i): CH₃—CH₂—Cl

The $\ce{CH2}$ group is bonded to chlorine. Chlorine is highly electronegative (EN = 3.16), so it withdraws electrons from the $\ce{CH2}$ carbon. This makes $\ce{CH2}$ electron-deficient, which in turn pulls electrons from the *CH₃ carbon through the chain. The asterisk carbon acquires a partial positive charge.
*Option (ii): CH₃—CH₂—Mg⁺Cl⁻

This is a Grignard reagent. The carbon-magnesium bond is polarised $\ce{C^{\delta-}—Mg^{\delta+}}$ because carbon is more electronegative than magnesium (EN of Mg ≈ 1.31). Magnesium donates electron density to the $\ce{CH2}$ carbon, making it electron-rich. This electron density is then transmitted to the *CH₃ carbon, giving it a partial negative charge—opposite to what we want.
*Option (iii): CH₃—CH₂—Br

Bromine is electronegative (EN = 2.96), but less so than chlorine. It withdraws electrons from $\ce{CH2}$ , which in turn withdraws from *CH₃. The asterisk carbon has a partial positive charge, but smaller than in option (i).
*Option (iv): CH₃—CH₂—CH₃

All three groups are alkyl (carbon chains). Carbon atoms have identical electronegativity, so there is no significant charge separation. The asterisk carbon is essentially neutral.

Comparing the Magnitudes …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

←Previous questionQ10 — Correct IUPAC name for H3C—CH(C2H5)—CH(C2H5)—CH3 is ___. (i) 2-ethyl-3…→Next questionQ12 — Ionic species are stabilised by the dispersal of charge. Which of the …

Q.In which of the following compounds the carbon marked with asterisk is expected to have greatest positive charge?

Understanding Inductive Effect and Partial Charge

Step-by-Step Analysis

Comparing the Magnitudes …

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Unlock everything free for 14 days