Q.Evaluate limy→0y(x+y)sec(x+y)−xsecx.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Difference Quotient
The Difference Quotient: What It Is and Why It Matters
Imagine you're tracking the distance a car has travelled over time. At 2:00 PM, the odometer reads 40 km. At 2:30 PM, it reads 70 km. How fast was the car going on average during that half-hour?
You'd calculate: 0.5 hours70−40=60 km/h.
That fraction — change in distance divided by change in time — is the average rate of change. The difference quotient is just a formal, algebraic way of writing that same idea for any function.
The Intuition: Slope of a Secant Line
Take any function f(x). Pick two points on its graph: (x,f(x)) and (x+h,f(x+h)), where h is some horizontal step (positive or negative). The line that cuts through both points is called a secant line.
The slope of that secant line is:
slope=runrise=(x+h)−xf(x+h)−f(x)=hf(x+h)−f(x)
That expression — hf(x+h)−f(x) — is the difference quotient.
The name comes from "difference" (you subtract two function values) and "quotient" (you divide by h). It's literally a quotient of differences.
The Precise Statement
hf(x+h)−f(x),h=0
This gives the average rate of change of f over the interval from x to x+h. Geometrically, it's the slope of the secant line through (x,f(x)) and (x+h,f(x+h)).
Key restrictions:
- h cannot be zero (you can't divide by zero).
- x and x+h must both be in the domain of f.
A Concrete Example
Let f(x)=x2. Compute the difference quotient at x=3 with h=0.1:
0.1f(3+0.1)−f(3)=0.1(3.1)2−9=0.19.61−9=0.10.61=6.1
This tells us: over the interval [3,3.1], the function x2 increases at an average rate of 6.1 units per unit change in x.
If you shrink h to 0.01, you'd get 6.01. As h gets smaller, the average rate approaches 6 — which is exactly the instantaneous rate of change (the derivative) of x2 at x=3.
The difference quotient is the bridge between average rates (which you can compute with simple algebra) and instantaneous rates (which require limits). When you take the limit as h→0, you get the derivative.
Why You'll See It Everywhere
The difference quotient isn't just a classroom exercise. It's the foundation of calculus: …
Concept: Limit Of Polynomial (in disguise — this is the derivative of f(x)=xsecx).
The given limit is exactly the definition of the derivative of f(x)=xsecx with respect to x:
f′(x)=limy→0yf(x+y)−f(x).
So we simply differentiate xsecx:
This limit is the derivative of f(x)=xsecx with respect to x, evaluated at the point x. The answer is secx+xsecxtanx.
The expression you’ve written is the definition of the derivative of a function — but not of xsecx with respect to y. Look carefully: the variable approaching zero is y, and the numerator is f(x+y)−f(x) where f(t)=tsect. So this is exactly
limy→0yf(x+y)−f(x)=f′(x).
That’s the core insight. Once you see that, the problem reduces to differentiating xsecx with respect to x.
Why this works
The limit-of-polynomial idea extends to any differentiable function: if you have a function g(t) that is smooth at a point, then near that point it behaves like a linear function plus higher-order terms. The limit above isolates the coefficient of the linear term — that’s the derivative. Here g(t)=tsect is differentiable for all t where sect is defined (i.e., t=2π+nπ), so the limit exists and equals g′(x).
Step-by-step
-
Recognise the derivative form
The limit is y→0limyf(x+y)−f(x) with f(t)=tsect. By definition, this is f′(x).
-
Differentiate f(x)=xsecx
Use the product rule:
f′(x)=dxd(x)⋅secx+x⋅dxd(secx).
We know dxd(secx)=secxtanx.
- Compute each piece
- KCET 2025Set A-11 markMCQQ.The function f(x)={ex+ax,b(x−1)2,x<0x≥0 is differentiable at x=0. Then (A) a=1,b=1 (B) a=3,b=1 (C) a=−3,b=1 (D) a=3,b=−1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Differentiability at a junction of a piecewise function forces two conditions — the values must agree (continuity) and the one-sided derivatives must agree — giving two equations for a and b.
f(x)={ex+ax,b(x−1)2,x<0x≥0
Step 1 — Continuity at x=0 (necessary for differentiability).
limx→0−f(x)=e0+a(0)=1,f(0)=b(0−1)2=b.
A differentiable function is always continuous, so these must be equal:
b=1
Step 2 — Left-hand derivative at x=0. For x<0, f′(x)=ex+a, so
LHD=limx→0−(ex+a)=1+a.
Step 3 — Right-hand derivative at x=0. For x≥0, f′(x)=2b(x−1), so
RHD=2b(0−1)=−2b=−2(using b=1). …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-E1 markMCQQ.Evaluate: limx→0x31+x−31−x (A) 1 (B) 0 (C) 32 (D) 31
›Reveal solutionSolution
This limit is a derivative in disguise: the expression is the difference quotient for the cube‑root function at x=0. The limit equals 32, which corresponds to option (C).
The core idea is that a limit of the form
limx→0xf(0+x)−f(0−x)
is actually twice the derivative of f at 0, provided the derivative exists. Here f(t)=3t=t1/3, so we can avoid messy algebra by using the derivative rule.
- Recognize the derivative structure Write the limit as
limx→0x31+x−31−x.
Let f(t)=3t. Then the numerator is f(1+x)−f(1−x). For small x,
f(1+x)≈f(1)+f′(1)x,f(1−x)≈f(1)−f′(1)x,
so their difference is approximately 2f′(1)x. Dividing by x gives 2f′(1).
- Compute the derivative f(t)=t1/3 so f′(t)=31t−2/3. At t=1,
f′(1)=31⋅1−2/3=31.
Hence the limit is 2⋅31=32.
- Verify with algebraic manipulation (optional) Use the identity a3−b3=(a−b)(a2+ab+b2) with a=31+x,b=31−x. Multiply numerator and denominator by a2+ab+b2: xa−b=x(a2+ab+b2)a3−b3=x(a2+ab+b2)(1+x)−(1−x)=x(a2+ab+b2)2x=a2+ab+b22. …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-M1 markMCQQ.Find the value of h→0limh(a+h)2sin(a+h)−a2sina (A) −a2sina (B) 0 (C) 1 (D) a2cosa+2asina
›Reveal solutionSolution
This limit is the definition of the derivative of f(x)=x2sinx at x=a. The derivative is 2xsinx+x2cosx, so the limit equals a2cosa+2asina, which is option (D).
The key insight is recognizing that the expression
limh→0h(a+h)2sin(a+h)−a2sina
is exactly the definition of the derivative of the function f(x)=x2sinx evaluated at x=a.
So instead of manipulating the limit directly, we can differentiate f(x) and then plug in x=a.
- Identify the function and the derivative definition The general definition of the derivative is
f′(a)=limh→0hf(a+h)−f(a).
Here, f(x)=x2sinx, so f(a+h)=(a+h)2sin(a+h) and f(a)=a2sina.
Thus the given limit is simply f′(a).
- Differentiate f(x)=x2sinx Use the product rule:
f′(x)=(x2)′sinx+x2(sinx)′=2xsinx+x2cosx.
- Evaluate at x=a
f′(a)=2asina+a2cosa.
- Match with the options …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-A1 markMCQQ.
[!FORMULA] The value of limx→0xsin(a+x)−sin(a−x) is
(A) 1 (B) 0 (C) 2cosa (D) 2sina›Reveal solutionSolution
This limit is the definition of the derivative of sinx at x=a, but with a symmetric difference. The value is 2cosa, so the correct option is (C).
The key insight is that the numerator sin(a+x)−sin(a−x) is a difference of two sines. Instead of memorizing formulas, think: as x→0, both sin(a+x) and sin(a−x) approach sina, so we have a 00 form. The natural tool is either the sine difference identity or recognizing this as a derivative.
- Use the sine difference identity Recall: sinP−sinQ=2cos(2P+Q)sin(2P−Q). Here P=a+x, Q=a−x. Then
sin(a+x)−sin(a−x)=2cos(2(a+x)+(a−x))sin(2(a+x)−(a−x))
Simplify:
=2cos(22a)sin(22x)=2cosa⋅sinx.
- Rewrite the limit The original limit becomes
limx→0x2cosa⋅sinx=2cosa⋅limx→0xsinx.
- Apply the fundamental limit We know x→0limxsinx=1. Therefore, limx→0xsin(a+x)−sin(a−x)=2cosa⋅1=2cosa. …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-M1 markMCQQ.limx→0xa(a+x)a+x−a equals to (A) a−23 (B) 2a231 (C) 21 (D) 2a−23
›Reveal solutionSolution
The limit simplifies by rationalizing the numerator and cancelling the factor of x, yielding 2a3/21; the correct option is (B).
We are asked to evaluate
limx→0xa(a+x)a+x−a.
The direct substitution x=0 gives 00, an indeterminate form. The presence of square roots suggests rationalizing the numerator — a classic trick that turns a difference of square roots into an expression where the x cancels cleanly.
- Rationalize the numerator Multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate a+x+a:
xa(a+x)a+x−a⋅a+x+aa+x+a=xa(a+x)(a+x+a)(a+x)−a.
- Simplify the numerator The numerator becomes (a+x)−a=x. So we have:
xa(a+x)(a+x+a)x.
- Cancel the common factor x (valid for x=0, which is fine since we take the limit):
a(a+x)(a+x+a)1.
- Take the limit as x→0 Now substitute x=0: a(a+0)(a+0+a)1=a2(a+a)1. …
- KCET 2023Set A-21 markMCQQ.If f(x) and g(x) are two functions with g(x)=x−x1 and fog(x)=x3−x31 then f′(x)= (A) 3x2+x43 (B) x2−x21 (C) 1−x21 (D) 3x2+3
›Reveal solutionSolution
Rewrite x3−x31 as a cubic in g(x)=x−x1; that identifies f explicitly, and then f′ is immediate.
Step 1 — What we are given.
g(x)=x−x1,(f∘g)(x)=f(g(x))=x3−x31
To find f′ we must first know f as a function of its own argument — so we must express x3−x31 purely in terms of (x−x1).
Step 2 — Use the algebraic identity.
Recall (a−b)3=a3−b3−3ab(a−b). Put a=x, b=x1 (so ab=1):
(x−x1)3=x3−x31−3(x−x1)
Rearranging,
x3−x31=(x−x1)3+3(x−x1)
Step 3 — Read off f.
The right-hand side is written entirely in terms of g(x):
f(g(x))=[g(x)]3+3g(x)
Since this holds for every x (and g takes all real values), the rule of f is
f(t)=t3+3t.
Step 4 — Differentiate.
f′(t)=3t2+3⟹f′(x)=3x2+3
Step 5 — Verify with the chain rule (independent check).
dxd(x3−x31)=3x2+x43, and g′(x)=1+x21. The chain rule demands f′(g(x))g′(x)=3x2+x43, i.e. …
- KCET 2023Set A-21 markMCQQ.If f(x)=1+nx+2n(n−1)x2+6n(n−1)(n−2)x3+…+xn then f′′(1)= (A) n(n−1)2n−2 (B) n(n−1)2n (C) 2n−1 (D) (n−1)2n−1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Recognise the series as (1+x)n, differentiate twice, then substitute x=1.
Step 1 — Identify the function.
The coefficients 1,n,2n(n−1),6n(n−1)(n−2),…,1 are precisely (0n),(1n),(2n),(3n),…,(nn), because
(2n)=2!n(n−1)=2n(n−1),(3n)=3!n(n−1)(n−2)=6n(n−1)(n−2).
So by the binomial theorem
f(x)=∑k=0n(kn)xk=(1+x)n.
This is the key move: instead of differentiating a long polynomial term by term, we collapse it to a closed form.
Step 2 — Differentiate twice.
Using the power/chain rule, …
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-E1 markMCQQ.
[!FORMULA] limx→0xax−bx is equal to
(A) logab (B) logb (C) logba (D) loga›Reveal solutionSolution
Using limx→0xax−1=loga, the limit equals loga−logb=logba.
Write
xax−bx=x(ax−1)−(bx−1).
As x→0, xax−1→loga and xbx−1→logb, so …
- KCET 2022Set C-41 markMCQQ.If f(1)=1, f′(1)=3 then the derivatives of f(f(f(x)))+(f(x))2 at x=1 is (A) 33 (B) 35 (C) 12 (D) 10
›Reveal solutionSolution
Chain rule on the triple composite plus power rule on (f(x))2; because f(1)=1 is a fixed point, every inner argument stays 1 and every factor becomes f′(1)=3.
Step 1 — Note the key fact: x=1 is a fixed point
We are given f(1)=1. Therefore
f(f(1))=f(1)=1,f(f(f(1)))=1
So whenever we substitute x=1, every inner argument collapses to 1, and every derivative factor becomes f′(1)=3. This is what makes the problem tractable without knowing f.
Step 2 — Differentiate the composite f(f(f(x)))
Apply the chain rule from the outside in:
dxdf(f(f(x)))=f′(f(f(x)))⋅f′(f(x))⋅f′(x)
Evaluate at x=1:
=f′(f(f(1)))⋅f′(f(1))⋅f′(1)=f′(1)⋅f′(1)⋅f′(1)=3×3×3=27 …
- KCET 2022Set C-41 markMCQQ.limy→0y33+y3−3= (A) 321 (B) 23 (C) 32 (D) 231
›Reveal solutionSolution
Put t=y3 to turn the expression into the standard ta+t−a form, then rationalise the numerator to kill the 00 indeterminacy.
Step 1 — Recognise the indeterminate form
L=limy→0y33+y3−3
As y→0, the numerator →3−3=0 and the denominator y3→0: the form is 00, so direct substitution is not allowed.
Step 2 — Substitute to simplify
Notice that y appears only as y3. Put
t=y3so that y→0⟺t→0
L=limt→0t3+t−3
Step 3 — Rationalise the numerator
The standard tool for a surd difference is multiplication by the conjugate, because (A−B)(A+B)=A−B removes the radicals from the numerator:
t3+t−3×3+t+33+t+3=t(3+t+3)(3+t)−3=t(3+t+3)t
Since t=0 in the limiting process, cancel t: …
- KCET 2018Set A-11 markMCQQ.If f(x)={x1+kx−1−kxx−12x+1if −1≤x<0if 0≤x≤1 is continuous at x=0, then the value of k is (A) k=1 (B) k=−1 (C) k=0 (D) k=2
›Reveal solutionSolution
For continuity at x=0, the left-hand limit must equal the right-hand limit, which is f(0)=−1. Evaluating the left-hand limit using rationalisation gives 1k=k, so k=−1.
The key idea here is that continuity at a point means the function's value at that point equals the limit from both sides. For a piecewise function, we must check the boundary where the definition changes — here, x=0.
The left-hand piece (−1≤x<0) involves a difference of square roots, which is a classic indeterminate form 00 when x→0. The right-hand piece (0≤x≤1) is a rational function, and at x=0 it gives a finite value directly.
Let's work through it step by step.
- Find f(0) from the right-hand definition. Since 0≤x≤1 includes x=0, we use the second piece:
f(0)=0−12(0)+1=−11=−1.
For continuity, the left-hand limit must also equal −1.
- Set up the left-hand limit. For −1≤x<0, we have
f(x)=x1+kx−1−kx.
As x→0−, both numerator and denominator approach 0, so we need to simplify.
- Rationalise the numerator. Multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate:
x1+kx−1−kx⋅1+kx+1−kx1+kx+1−kx.
The numerator becomes:
(1+kx)−(1−kx)=2kx.
So the expression simplifies to:
x(1+kx+1−kx)2kx=1+kx+1−kx2k.
- Take the limit as x→0−. As x→0, both 1+kx and 1−kx approach 1=1. So: limx→0−f(x)=1+12k=22k=k. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.