Q.Explain why is ortho nitrophenol more acidic than ortho methoxyphenol?
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Acidity Of Phenol
Inductive Effect on Acidity – From Intuition to Precision
Imagine you are holding a rope tied to a heavy box. If you pull the rope, the box moves toward you. Now imagine the rope is made of rubber bands — the pull still reaches the box, but it gets weaker the farther away you are. That is exactly how the inductive effect works inside a molecule.
The Core Intuition
An acid donates a proton (H+). After it does, the remaining part (the conjugate base) carries a negative charge. The stability of that negative charge determines how willing the molecule is to give up the proton. More stable conjugate base → stronger acid.
Now, some atoms or groups are electron-withdrawing — they pull electron density toward themselves through the sigma bonds. If such a group is attached near the acidic proton, it pulls some electron density away from the negative charge on the conjugate base. That spreads out (delocalises) the negative charge, making the conjugate base more stable. The acid becomes stronger.
Conversely, electron-donating groups push electron density toward the negative charge, concentrating it and making the conjugate base less stable. The acid becomes weaker.
The inductive effect operates through sigma bonds only. It does not involve pi bonds or resonance. It is a permanent, through-bond polarisation.
The Precise Statement
Inductive effect on acidity: The acidity of a compound increases with the presence of electron-withdrawing groups (EWGs) near the acidic site, and decreases with electron-donating groups (EDGs). The effect is strongest when the group is closest to the acidic proton, and diminishes rapidly with distance.
Mathematically, for a series of substituted carboxylic acids:
R-COOHwhere R = substituent
The acid dissociation constant Ka changes as:
- If R is electron-withdrawing (e.g., −Cl, −NO2, −CF3): Ka increases → stronger acid.
- If R is electron-donating (e.g., −CH3, −C2H5): Ka decreases → weaker acid.
Why Distance Matters
The inductive effect falls off with distance because sigma bonds are localised. Each bond attenuates the effect by roughly a factor of 2–3. For example, compare:
| Compound | pKa | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| CH3COOH | 4.76 | Reference (no EWG) |
| ClCH2COOH | 2.86 | Cl withdraws through one bond |
| Cl2CHCOOH | 1.29 | Two Cl atoms, stronger withdrawal |
| Cl3CCOOH | 0.65 | Three Cl atoms, strongest withdrawal |
| CH3CH2COOH | 4.87 | Ethyl group is electron-donating (slightly weaker acid) |
Notice: ClCH2COOH is about 100 times stronger than acetic acid (ΔpKa≈1.9). But if the Cl is moved further away:
| Compound | pKa |
|---|---|
| ClCH2CH2COOH | 4.08 |
| ClCH2CH2CH2COOH | 4.52 |
The effect fades as the chlorine moves farther from the carboxyl group. …
Why this formula?
Acidity of Phenol: Why It's More Acidic Than Alcohols
Let's build this from first principles — understanding why phenol is acidic is the key to mastering organic chemistry.
1. The Core Observation
Phenol (CX6HX5OH) has a pKa ≈ 10, while ethanol (CHX3CHX2OH) has a pKa ≈ 16.
This means phenol is about 1 million times more acidic than a typical alcohol.
The question: Why does the O–H bond in phenol break so much more easily?
2. The Key: Stability of the Conjugate Base
Acidity is determined by the stability of the conjugate base after losing HX+.
- Alcohol conjugate base: CHX3CHX2OX− (alkoxide ion) — negative charge is localized on oxygen.
- Phenol conjugate base: CX6HX5OX− (phenoxide ion) — negative charge is delocalized into the benzene ring.
The Resonance Explanation
The phenoxide ion has multiple resonance structures:
CX6HX5OX−↔(several resonance forms where negative charge moves to ortho/para carbons)
Draw the structures mentally:
- One structure has the negative charge on oxygen.
- Other structures show the negative charge on carbon atoms at the ortho and para positions of the ring.
This delocalization spreads the negative charge over more atoms, making the ion more stable.
Key principle: The more stable the conjugate base, the stronger the acid.
3. Why Alcohols Can't Do This
In an alkoxide ion (ROX−), the negative charge is stuck on oxygen.
There are no empty p-orbitals or conjugated π systems nearby to accept the charge.
Result: The alkoxide is less stable, so the alcohol is less acidic.
4. The Inductive Effect Also Helps (But Resonance Dominates)
The benzene ring is slightly electron-withdrawing (due to its sp2 carbons being more electronegative than sp3).
This inductive effect pulls electron density away from the O–H bond, making the proton slightly more positive and easier to remove.
However, resonance stabilization of the conjugate base is the dominant factor — inductive effects alone cannot explain the million-fold difference.
5. The Quantitative Picture (pKa Values)
| Compound | pKa | Conjugate base stability |
|---|---|---|
| Ethanol | ~16 | Localized charge on O |
| Phenol | ~10 | Delocalized charge via resonance |
| Acetic acid | ~4.76 | Even more resonance (two O atoms) |
The key idea is the electronic effect of substituents on the acidity of phenol. Acidity depends on how well the substituent stabilises the phenoxide ion formed after losing H+.
- Ortho nitrophenol: The −NO2 group is strongly electron-withdrawing via both inductive (−I) and resonance (−M) effects. It pulls electron density away from the oxygen of the phenoxide ion, delocalising the negative charge and making the ion more stable.
- Ortho methoxyphenol: The −OCH3 group is electron-donating via resonance (+M), which pushes electron density towards the oxygen. This destabilises the phenoxide ion by concentrating the negative charge, making it harder to lose H+. …
The key difference lies in the electronic effects of the substituents: the nitro group (−NO2) is a strong electron-withdrawing group that stabilises the phenoxide ion through both inductive and resonance effects, while the methoxy group (−OCH3) is an electron-donating group that destabilises the phenoxide ion, making ortho-nitrophenol more acidic.
Why This Question Matters
Acidity of phenols is a classic topic in organic chemistry because it tests your understanding of how substituents influence electron density and ion stability. The ortho position is especially interesting — unlike para or meta, it introduces steric effects and intramolecular hydrogen bonding, which can either enhance or reduce acidity. Here, we compare two ortho-substituted phenols: one with a nitro group (o-nitrophenol) and one with a methoxy group (o-methoxyphenol).
The core idea: the more stable the conjugate base (phenoxide ion), the stronger the acid. So we need to compare how the substituent affects the stability of the phenoxide ion.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
1. Recall the baseline: phenol itself
Phenol (C6H5OH) is weakly acidic because the phenoxide ion (C6H5O−) is stabilised by resonance — the negative charge can be delocalised into the aromatic ring. The pKa of phenol is about 10.
Any substituent that withdraws electron density from the oxygen will stabilise the negative charge further, making the phenol more acidic. Any substituent that donates electron density will destabilise the negative charge, making it less acidic.
2. The nitro group (−NO2) in ortho position
The nitro group is a strong electron-withdrawing group by both:
- Inductive effect (through sigma bonds): pulls electrons away from the ring due to the high electronegativity of nitrogen and oxygen.
- Resonance effect (through pi system): the nitro group has a positive nitrogen that can accept electron density from the ring, especially at ortho and para positions.
In o-nitrophenol, the resonance effect is particularly powerful. When the phenoxide ion forms, the negative charge can be delocalised onto the nitro group:
Resonance stabilisation of o-nitrophenoxide ion:
The negative charge can be delocalised onto the oxygen atoms of the nitro group, creating additional resonance structures.
This extra delocalisation significantly stabilises the phenoxide ion, making o-nitrophenol a stronger acid than phenol itself (pKa≈7.2).
3. The methoxy group (−OCH3) in ortho position
The methoxy group is an electron-donating group by:
- Resonance effect: the lone pairs on oxygen can be donated into the ring, increasing electron density at ortho and para positions.
- Inductive effect: slightly electron-withdrawing (due to oxygen's electronegativity), but the resonance effect dominates.
In o-methoxyphenol, when the phenoxide ion forms, the methoxy group donates electron density into the ring. This increases the negative charge density on the oxygen, making the phenoxide ion less stable (more basic). Hence, o-methoxyphenol is a weaker acid than phenol (pKa≈10.2).
A common mistake is to think that the methoxy group's inductive withdrawal (due to oxygen's electronegativity) makes it electron-withdrawing overall. It does not — the resonance donation is far stronger, so the net effect is electron-donating. Always check the resonance structures.
4. Direct comparison: ortho vs ortho
Now we compare the two:
| Property | o-Nitrophenol | o-Methoxyphenol | …
Method: Inductive & Resonance Effect Analysis (IER)
This method compares acidity by analyzing how substituents stabilize the phenoxide ion (the conjugate base) through two key electronic effects.
Step 1: Write the equilibrium
Phenol (C6H5OH) donates a proton to form phenoxide ion (C6H5O−).
A stronger acid has a more stable conjugate base.
Step 2: Identify the substituent effects
| Substituent | Effect on phenoxide ion |
|---|---|
| –NO₂ (ortho) | Strong –R (resonance withdrawing) + strong –I (inductive withdrawing) |
| –OCH₃ (ortho) | Strong +R (resonance donating) + weak –I (inductive withdrawing) |
Step 3: Analyze stabilization of phenoxide ion
-
Ortho-nitrophenol: The –NO₂ group withdraws electron density from the ring via resonance and induction. This delocalizes the negative charge on the phenoxide oxygen into the ring, making the ion more stable.
-
Ortho-methoxyphenol: The –OCH₃ group donates electrons via resonance (+R effect). This increases electron density on the phenoxide oxygen, making the negative charge less stable (harder to hold).
Step 4: Compare acidity …
This is a classic comparison in organic chemistry that tests your understanding of electronic effects and steric factors in phenols. Here is a breakdown of the common mistakes students make and how to avoid them.
🧠 The Core Concept First
The acidity of a phenol depends on the stability of its conjugate base (phenoxide ion).
Any factor that stabilizes the negative charge on oxygen makes the phenol more acidic.
- Ortho-nitrophenol has a strong electron-withdrawing group (−NO2) at the ortho position.
- Ortho-methoxyphenol has an electron-donating group (−OCH3) at the ortho position.
So, ortho-nitrophenol is more acidic because −NO2 stabilizes the phenoxide ion, while −OCH3 destabilizes it.
✗ Common Mistake #1: Ignoring the Ortho Effect
What students do wrong:
They compare only the para or meta effects and forget that ortho substituents have additional steric and hydrogen-bonding effects.
How to avoid:
Always remember:
- For ortho substituents, steric inhibition of resonance and intramolecular hydrogen bonding can override simple inductive/resonance effects.
- In ortho-nitrophenol, the −NO2 group can hydrogen bond with the −OH hydrogen, making the O–H bond weaker and the conjugate base more stable.
- In ortho-methoxyphenol, the −OCH3 group can hydrogen bond with the −OH hydrogen, but this stabilizes the neutral phenol, not the phenoxide — so acidity decreases.
✓ Key takeaway: Always check if the ortho group can form an intramolecular H-bond with the –OH.
✗ Common Mistake #2: Confusing Electron-Donating vs Withdrawing
What students do wrong:
They think −OCH3 is electron-withdrawing because of the electronegative oxygen.
How to avoid:
- −OCH3 is electron-donating by resonance (lone pair on oxygen can delocalize into the ring).
- It is weakly electron-withdrawing by induction, but resonance dominates.
- So overall, −OCH3 decreases acidity compared to phenol.
✓ Remember: Resonance effects > inductive effects for substituents like −OCH3, −OH, −NH2.
✗ Common Mistake #3: Forgetting to Compare with Phenol
What students do wrong:
They directly compare ortho-nitrophenol and ortho-methoxyphenol without referencing the baseline (phenol itself).
How to avoid:
- First note: Phenol has pKa≈10.
- Ortho-nitrophenol: pKa≈7.2 (more acidic).
- Ortho-methoxyphenol: pKa≈10.2 (slightly less acidic).
- So the difference is not just relative — it’s about how much each deviates from phenol.
✓ Always anchor your reasoning to phenol’s acidity.
✗ Common Mistake #4: Ignoring Steric Hindrance in Resonance
What students do wrong: …
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-A1 markMCQQ.Choose the incorrect statement. (A) Cyclic C4H7OH exists as four structural isomers (B) p- Nitrophenol is more acidic than p- Cresol (C) Relative ease of dehydration of alcohols on heating with a protic acid is Primary > Secondary > Tertiary (D) Reaction of alcohols with anhydrides is carried out in the presence of small amounts of Conc. H2SO4 to remove the water formed
›Reveal solutionSolution
The question asks for the incorrect statement among four organic chemistry claims. The key is to recall that dehydration ease follows Tertiary > Secondary > Primary, opposite to option (C), making (C) the false statement.
Concept & Intuition
This problem tests your grasp of alcohol reactivity, isomerism, and acidity trends. The trick is to spot the reversal of a well-known order: dehydration of alcohols with acid favors more substituted carbocations (tertiary > secondary > primary) because the reaction proceeds via a carbocation intermediate. Option (C) states the opposite, so it’s the clear outlier. The other options require checking structural isomer counts, the electron-withdrawing effect of nitro vs. methyl groups, and the role of acid in esterification.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
-
Evaluate option (A): Cyclic C4H7OH — a cyclobutanol derivative. The formula suggests a four-carbon ring with one OH group. Structural isomers include:
- Cyclobutanol (OH on a 4-membered ring)
- 1-Methylcyclopropanol (OH on a 3-membered ring with a methyl)
- 2-Methylcyclopropanol (OH on a different carbon of the cyclopropane)
- Cyclopropylmethanol (OH on a side chain) These are four distinct structural isomers, so (A) is correct.
-
Evaluate option (B): p-Nitrophenol vs. p-cresol. The nitro group (−NO2) is strongly electron-withdrawing, stabilizing the phenoxide ion by resonance, making p-nitrophenol more acidic. The methyl group (−CH3) in p-cresol is electron-donating, destabilizing the phenoxide, so p-cresol is less acidic. Thus (B) is correct. …
-
- KCET 2026Set D31 markMCQQ.Carboxylic acids are more acidic than phenols because (A) Formation of dimers (B) Intermolecular hydrogen bonding (C) More covalent nature (D) More resonance stabilisation of their conjugate base
›Reveal solutionSolution
Acid strength tracks how well the conjugate base's negative charge is stabilised; the carboxylate ion is stabilised more effectively by resonance than the phenoxide ion is.
Step 1 — Conjugate base of a carboxylic acid
Deprotonating R−COOH gives the carboxylate ion R−COO−. Its two C–O bonds are equivalent by resonance: the negative charge and the double-bond character are shared equally between both oxygens, so each oxygen carries only half a unit of negative charge. This symmetric, low-energy delocalisation is very effective at stabilising the anion.
Step 2 — Conjugate base of phenol
Deprotonating phenol gives the phenoxide ion, C6H5−O−. Its negative charge can delocalise into the benzene ring through resonance, but this places some negative charge on ring carbons (less electronegative than oxygen) and, more importantly, disrupts the ring's aromatic stability in some resonance contributors — a less favourable and less effective stabilisation than the symmetric carboxylate case.
Step 3 — Why the other options are wrong …
- KCET 2025Set D-41 markMCQQ.Phenol can be distinguished from propanol by using the reagent (A) Bromine water (B) Iron metal (C) Iodine in alcohol (D) Sodium metal
›Reveal solutionSolution
Phenol's ring is so activated by the –OH that bromine water alone brominates it three times, precipitating white 2,4,6-tribromophenol; propanol does nothing.
Step 1 — What a distinguishing test must do.
It must give an observable change with one compound and no change (or a clearly different change) with the other. Both phenol and propanol contain an –OH group, so any test that keys on the –OH alone will fail. The reagent must exploit what makes them different: phenol's –OH is attached to a benzene ring; propanol's is on an alkyl chain.
Step 2 — Why phenol reacts with bromine water.
In phenol, the oxygen's lone pair is delocalised into the ring (+M effect):
C6H5O¨H⟷resonance structures with −ve charge at o- and p-positions
This floods the ortho and para carbons with electron density, making the ring enormously more nucleophilic than benzene. It is so activated that it attacks even the weakly polarised Br2 present in bromine water — no Lewis-acid catalyst (FeBr3/AlBr3) is needed, and the reaction does not stop at one substitution:
C6H5OH+3Br2 aq. 2,4,6-tribromophenol↓+3HBr
2,4,6-Tribromophenol is insoluble in water, so it appears immediately as a white precipitate — and the brown colour of the bromine water is discharged. Both changes are unmistakable.
Step 3 — Why propanol does not.
CH3CH2CH2OH is a saturated alcohol: no aromatic ring, no C=C, nothing for an electrophile to attack. Bromine water is not decolourised and no precipitate forms.
The contrast is therefore complete: white ppt ⇒ phenol; no change ⇒ propanol.
Step 4 — Why the other reagents fail.
- (D) Sodium metal — the classic trap. Both phenol and propanol have an acidic O–H and both liberate hydrogen gas: …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.Two statements, One Assertion and the other Reason, are given. Which one of the following is the correct option? Assertion: The acid strength of 4 compounds in the descending order is p- Nitrophenol > p-Methoxyphenol > Phenol > p-chlorophenol. Reason: Electron withdrawing groups increase the acid strength while Electron donating groups decrease the acid strength of Phenol and its derivatives. (A) Assertion is correct but Reason is wrong. (B) Both Assertion and Reason are wrong. (C) Assertion is wrong but Reason is correct. (D) Both Assertion and Reason are correct.
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is that electron-withdrawing groups (EWGs) increase phenol acidity, while electron-donating groups (EDGs) decrease it. The given order is wrong because p-chlorophenol is more acidic than phenol, and p-methoxyphenol is less acidic than phenol. So the Assertion is false, but the Reason is true. The correct option is (C).
The problem asks us to judge both an Assertion (a specific ordering of acid strengths) and a Reason (a general principle about substituent effects). We need to check each separately.
Concept & Intuition
Phenol’s acidity comes from the stability of the phenoxide ion (the conjugate base). The negative charge on oxygen can be delocalized into the benzene ring. Any substituent that pulls electron density away from the oxygen (electron-withdrawing group, EWG) stabilizes the phenoxide ion, making the phenol more acidic. Any substituent that pushes electron density toward the oxygen (electron-donating group, EDG) destabilizes the phenoxide ion, making the phenol less acidic. This is the core principle behind the Reason.
Now, let’s test the Assertion’s order:
p-Nitrophenol > p-Methoxyphenol > Phenol > p-Chlorophenol.
-
p-Nitrophenol – The nitro group (−NO₂) is a strong EWG (by both inductive and resonance effects). It strongly stabilizes the phenoxide ion. So p-nitrophenol is indeed the most acidic among these four. ✓
-
p-Methoxyphenol – The methoxy group (−OCH₃) is a strong EDG (by resonance, it donates electrons into the ring). This destabilizes the phenoxide ion, making p-methoxyphenol less acidic than phenol. So placing it second (more acidic than phenol) is already wrong. ✗
-
Phenol – This is the reference compound. Its acidity is moderate.
-
p-Chlorophenol – Chlorine (−Cl) is a weak EWG (inductive withdrawal outweighs its weak resonance donation). It slightly stabilizes the phenoxide ion, so p-chlorophenol is more acidic than phenol. Placing it last (least acidic) is also wrong. ✗
So the correct descending order should be:
p-Nitrophenol > p-Chlorophenol > Phenol > p-Methoxyphenol. …
-
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-E1 markMCQQ.Choose the incorrect statement. (A) Cresols are less acidic than Phenol because electron releasing groups do not favour formation of Phenoxide ion. (B) Ethanol acts as Nucleophile when the O−H bond is broken and acts as Electrophile on getting protonated. (C) In the acid catalysed hydration of Ethene, an Oxonium ion is formed when it reacts with H3O+and a Carbocation is formed when the Oxonium ion reacts with water. (D) In the reaction between Ethanol and Conc. H2SO4 at 413 K , an Oxonium ion is formed when Ethanol gets protonated.
›Reveal solutionSolution
The question asks for the incorrect statement. By analyzing each option, we find that (C) contains a factual error in the mechanism of acid-catalyzed hydration of ethene, making it the wrong statement.
Concept & Intuition:
This problem tests your understanding of organic reaction mechanisms, acidity trends, and the dual role of alcohols as nucleophiles and electrophiles. The key is to recall the exact sequence of steps in well-known reactions and to recognize when a statement misrepresents the order of bond-making and bond-breaking. A common pitfall is confusing the role of the oxonium ion (protonated alcohol/water) with the carbocation that forms after it loses water.
Step-by-step analysis:
-
Option (A): Cresols are methylphenols. The methyl group is an electron-donating group (EDG) via hyperconjugation and induction. EDGs increase electron density on the benzene ring, which destabilizes the phenoxide ion (negative charge is less well dispersed). This makes cresols less acidic than phenol. The reasoning given is correct. So (A) is a true statement.
-
Option (B): Ethanol has an O–H bond. When the O–H bond breaks heterolytically, the oxygen retains the electron pair, forming an ethoxide ion — this is a nucleophile (donates electrons). When ethanol gets protonated (oxygen accepts a proton), it becomes CH3CH2OH2+, which is electron-deficient and can act as an electrophile (accepts electrons). The statement is accurate. So (B) is true.
-
Option (C): In acid-catalyzed hydration of ethene:
- Step 1: Ethene reacts with H3O+ (the acid). The proton adds to the double bond, forming a carbocation (not an oxonium ion). …
-
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-M1 markMCQQ.Arrange the following in the decreasing order of their pKa values. (A) A>C>D>B (B) C>A>B>D (C) B>D>C>A (D) D>C>A>B
›Reveal solutionSolution
Electron-withdrawing groups lower a phenol's pKa and electron-donating groups raise it. Ordering the four para-substituted phenols by decreasing pKa gives A>C>D>B, so the correct option is (A).
Concept
The pKa of a phenol measures how readily it loses its −OH proton: the more stable the resulting phenoxide ion, the stronger the acid and the lower the pKa. A substituent on the ring shifts this stability:
- Electron-withdrawing groups (EWG) such as −NO2 and −Cl pull electron density away, spread the negative charge of the phenoxide and stabilise it ⇒ stronger acid ⇒ lower pKa.
- Electron-donating groups (EDG) such as −NH2 and −OCH3 push electron density in, concentrate the negative charge and destabilise the phenoxide ⇒ weaker acid ⇒ higher pKa.
Because the question asks for decreasing pKa, we start with the least acidic (highest pKa) and end with the most acidic (lowest pKa).
Solution
Assign each labelled compound its para substituent and its approximate pKa:
- A (−NH2): strong EDG (nitrogen lone pair donates strongly into the ring), most destabilised phenoxide ⇒ highest pKa≈10.3.
- C (−OCH3): EDG by resonance, but slightly weaker net donor than −NH2 here ⇒ pKa≈10.2, just below A. …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-A1 markMCQQ.Arrange the following compounds in the decreasing order of their acidic strength. (I) m-cresol (II) Phenol (III) m-aminophenol (IV) m-methoxyphenol (A) I > III > IV > II (B) I > II > III > IV (C) IV > III > II > I (D) III > I > II > IV
›Reveal solutionSolution
At meta only inductive effects operate: –OCH3 and –NH2 are −I (acid-strengthening), –CH3 is +I (acid-weakening), giving IV > III > II > I.
Phenol acidity depends on how well the substituent stabilizes the phenoxide anion. All substituents here are meta to –OH, so their resonance interaction with the oxygen-bearing carbon is not effective; the dominant effect is induction.
- (IV) m-methoxyphenol: –OCH3 has a strong −I (electron-withdrawing) inductive effect at meta (oxygen is highly electronegative) → stabilizes the anion most → most acidic (pKa≈9.65). …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-E1 markMCQQ.4 statements are given below. Identify the incorrect statement A. Phenol has lower pKa value than p-cresol B. 2-Chlorophenol is more acidic than phenol C. Ortho and para nitrophenols can be separated by steam distillation since p-Nitrophenol is more steam volatile than o-Nitrophenol D. Phenol on reaction with H+Cr2O72− yields a conjugated diketone (A) C (B) B (C) D (D) A
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to evaluate each statement about phenol acidity, substituent effects, steam distillation, and oxidation; the incorrect statement is C, because p‑nitrophenol is less steam volatile than o‑nitrophenol due to stronger intermolecular hydrogen bonding.
Concept & Intuition
This question tests four distinct concepts in organic chemistry:
- Acidity of phenols depends on the stability of the phenoxide ion. Electron-withdrawing groups (EWG) increase acidity (lower pKₐ), while electron-donating groups (EDG) decrease acidity (higher pKₐ).
- Ortho-substituent effects can involve both electronic and steric factors, plus intramolecular hydrogen bonding.
- Steam distillation separates compounds based on volatility; stronger intermolecular forces (like hydrogen bonding) reduce volatility.
- Oxidation of phenols with strong oxidants like dichromate can yield quinones (conjugated diketones).
Let’s examine each statement carefully.
-
Statement A: “Phenol has lower pKₐ than p‑cresol”
- p‑Cresol has a methyl group at the para position. Methyl is an electron-donating group (+I effect).
- This destabilizes the phenoxide ion (increases negative charge density), making p‑cresol less acidic than phenol.
- Hence phenol (pKₐ ≈ 10) is more acidic than p‑cresol (pKₐ ≈ 10.2). So A is correct.
-
Statement B: “2‑Chlorophenol is more acidic than phenol”
- Chlorine is an electron-withdrawing group (−I effect), which stabilizes the phenoxide ion by delocalizing the negative charge.
- Additionally, ortho‑chlorophenol can form an intramolecular hydrogen bond between the –OH and –Cl, which further stabilizes the conjugate base.
- Therefore, 2‑chlorophenol (pKₐ ≈ 8.5) is indeed more acidic than phenol (pKₐ ≈ 10). So B is correct.
-
Statement C: “Ortho and para nitrophenols can be separated by steam distillation since p‑Nitrophenol is more steam volatile than o‑Nitrophenol”
- o‑Nitrophenol has intramolecular hydrogen bonding (between –OH and –NO₂), reducing its ability to form intermolecular hydrogen bonds with water. This makes it more steam volatile. …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-M1 markMCQQ.From the following compounds, identify the one which is most acidic. (A) B (B) D (C) A (D) C
›Reveal solutionSolution
p-Nitrophenol [C] is most acidic — the para nitro group stabilises the phenoxide anion by resonance/–M, far more than plain phenol or the alcohols.
Compare the four –OH compounds:
- [B] dicyclohexyl-carbinol and [D] cyclohexanol are simple alcohols; their alkoxides get no resonance stabilisation, so they are the weakest acids.
- [A] phenol: the phenoxide is resonance-stabilised over the aromatic ring, so phenol is markedly more acidic than alcohols. …
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-E1 markMCQQ.Choose the incorrect statement. (A) m - Cresol is a weaker acid than Phenol. (B) Acidic nature of Phenol is due to -I effect of oxygen of the hydroxyl group. (C) Acetylation of Salicylic acid produces 2-Acetoxybenzoic acid. (D) Phenol on heating with Conc. H2SO4 yields sulphanilic acid.
›Reveal solutionSolution
(A) m-Cresol (3-methylphenol) - the electron-releasing -CH3 group destabilises the phenoxide ion, so m-cresol IS a weaker acid than phenol. CORRECT statement. (B) The acidity of phenol is attributed to the electron-withdrawing (-I) effect of the sp2/attached oxygen plus resonance stabilisation of the phenoxide ion. As stated in NCERT terms this is taken as a correct statement. (C) Acetylation of salicylic acid (with acetic anhydride) gives 2-acetoxybenzoic acid = aspirin. CORRECT statement. (D) Phenol heated with conc. H2SO4 gives PHENOL-4-SULPHONIC ACID (p-hydroxybenzenesulphonic acid), NOT s
Concept: check each statement about phenol.
(A) m-Cresol (3-methylphenol) - the electron-releasing -CH3 group destabilises the phenoxide ion, so m-cresol IS a weaker acid than phenol. CORRECT statement.
(B) The acidity of phenol is attributed to the electron-withdrawing (-I) effect of the sp2/attached oxygen plus resonance stabilisation of the phenoxide ion. As stated in NCERT terms this is taken as a correct statement. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.