Q.A reaction is second order with respect to a reactant. How is the rate of reaction affected if the concentration of the reactant is
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Effect of Concentration
Effect of Concentration: The Intuition
Imagine you're in a large, empty hall with just one other person. The two of you are trying to bump into each other accidentally. It'll take a while, right? Now imagine the same hall packed with a thousand people. Bumping into someone becomes almost certain within seconds.
That's the core idea behind the effect of concentration on reaction rates. Concentration simply means how much of a substance is packed into a given space. Higher concentration = more particles in the same volume.
When particles are more crowded, they collide more frequently. And since chemical reactions happen only when particles collide with enough energy and the right orientation, more collisions mean more reactions per second. The reaction speeds up.
The Precise Statement
For most chemical reactions, the rate of a reaction is directly proportional to the molar concentration of the reactants (raised to some power, which we'll get to).
Rate∝[Reactant]n
Here, [ ] means "concentration in moles per litre" (mol/L or M), and n is the order of reaction with respect to that reactant.
What does "order" mean?
For a simple reaction like A→Products:
- First order (n=1): Double the concentration of A → double the rate.
- Second order (n=2): Double the concentration of A → quadruple the rate (22=4).
- Zero order (n=0): Changing concentration has no effect on the rate. This happens when the reaction is limited by something else (like a catalyst surface that's already fully covered).
The order n is not the same as the stoichiometric coefficient from the balanced equation. It must be determined experimentally. For example, the reaction 2A→B could be first order in A, not second order.
Why does this happen? The collision theory
The rate depends on two things:
- Collision frequency — how often particles meet.
- Fraction of effective collisions — how many of those collisions have enough energy (activation energy) and the right orientation.
Doubling the concentration doubles the number of particles per unit volume. This roughly doubles the collision frequency. For a first-order reaction, that directly doubles the rate. For higher orders, the effect compounds because multiple reactant particles must meet simultaneously.
A concrete example
Consider the reaction between hydrochloric acid and sodium thiosulphate:
Na2S2O3(aq)+2HCl(aq)→2NaCl(aq)+S(s)+SO2(g)+H2O(l) …
Why this formula?
Effect of Concentration on Reaction Rate — The Reasoning
The Effect of Concentration is rooted in collision theory. The key idea is simple:
More particles in the same volume → more frequent collisions → higher reaction rate.
Let's break down why the mathematical relationships hold.
1. The Rate Law — Why r=k[A]m[B]n?
This is not derived from theory alone — it is empirical (found experimentally). But the reasoning behind its form comes from collision probability.
For an elementary reaction (one step):
Consider:
A+B→products
- The rate depends on how often A and B molecules meet.
- In a given volume, the number of A molecules is proportional to [A], and the number of B molecules is proportional to [B].
- The number of A–B collisions per second is proportional to the product:
Collision frequency∝[A]×[B]
- Therefore:
r∝[A][B]
or
r=k[A][B]
For a reaction with coefficient aA+bB:
If the reaction is elementary, the stoichiometric coefficients become the exponents:
r=k[A]a[B]b
Why? Because for 2A to react, two A molecules must collide simultaneously — the probability of that happening is proportional to [A]×[A]=[A]2.
2. The Integrated Rate Laws — Why These Forms?
These come from solving the differential equation r=−dtd[A]=k[A]n.
Zero-order (n=0):
−dtd[A]=k
- Reasoning: Rate is independent of concentration. This happens when the reaction is limited by something else (e.g., a saturated catalyst surface).
- Integrate:
∫[A]0[A]d[A]=−k∫0tdt
⇒[A]=[A]0−kt
First-order (n=1):
−dtd[A]=k[A]
- Reasoning: Rate is directly proportional to [A]. Each molecule has a constant probability of reacting per unit time (like radioactive decay).
- Integrate:
∫[A]0[A][A]d[A]=−k∫0tdt
⇒ln[A]=ln[A]0−kt
or
[A]=[A]0e−kt
Second-order (n=2):
−dtd[A]=k[A]2
- Reasoning: Rate depends on two molecules of A colliding. Doubling [A] quadruples the collision frequency.
- Integrate:
∫[A]0[A][A]2d[A]=−k∫0tdt
⇒[A]1=[A]01+kt
3. The Half-Life — Why It Depends on Order …
The key idea is that for a second-order reaction, the rate depends on the square of the reactant's concentration.
Let the rate law be:
Rate=k[A]2
-
If [A] is doubled, new concentration =2[A].
New rate =k(2[A])2=4k[A]2=4×original rate.
-
If [A] is reduced to half, new concentration =21[A]. …
For a second-order reaction, rate ∝ [reactant]². Doubling the concentration quadruples the rate; halving it reduces the rate to one-fourth.
Why the rate changes this way
The order of a reaction tells you how the rate depends on the concentration of each reactant. For a reaction that is second order with respect to a single reactant A, the rate law is:
Rate=k[A]2
Here k is the rate constant (which does not change when you change concentration). The exponent 2 is the key: it means the rate is proportional to the square of the concentration.
If you change [A] by some factor, the rate changes by the square of that factor. That is the entire physical idea — no more, no less.
A common mistake is to think "second order means double the concentration → double the rate". That would be true only for a first-order reaction. For second order, the exponent 2 means the effect is amplified: a factor of 2 in concentration becomes a factor of 22=4 in rate.
Step-by-step calculation
Let the initial concentration be [A]0 and the initial rate be r0=k[A]02.
1. Concentration is doubled
New concentration: [A]1=2[A]0
New rate: r1=k(2[A]0)2=k⋅4[A]02=4⋅k[A]02=4r0
So the rate becomes four times the original rate.
2. Concentration is reduced to half
New concentration: [A]2=21[A]0 …
Method: Rate Law Substitution Method
This method uses the rate law expression for a second-order reaction and directly substitutes the changed concentration to find the new rate.
Steps
Step 1: Write the rate law for a second-order reaction
For a reaction that is second order with respect to reactant A:
Rate=k[A]2
where k is the rate constant and [A] is the concentration.
Step 2: Let the initial concentration be [A]0 and initial rate be r0
r0=k[A]02
(i) When concentration is doubled
Step 3: New concentration [A]′=2[A]0
Step 4: Substitute into rate law
r′=k(2[A]0)2=k⋅4[A]02=4⋅k[A]02
Step 5: Compare with initial rate
r′=4r0
Result: The rate becomes 4 times the original rate.
(ii) When concentration is reduced to half
Step 3: New concentration [A]′′=21[A]0
Step 4: Substitute into rate law …
Here are the common mistakes students make when solving this type of question, along with how to avoid each.
✗ Mistake 1: Confusing order with the exponent
The error:
Students think "second order" means the rate is simply multiplied by 2 when concentration is doubled. They write:
Rate becomes 2× original (wrong)
Why it happens:
They confuse the order (which is an exponent) with a simple multiplication factor.
How to avoid:
Always write the rate law first. For a second-order reaction with respect to reactant A:
Rate=k[A]2
The exponent 2 tells you the rate depends on the square of concentration, not the concentration itself.
✗ Mistake 2: Incorrect factor for doubling concentration
The error:
When [A] is doubled, students write:
New rate =k(2[A])=2k[A] (wrong)
How to avoid:
Substitute correctly into the rate law:
New rate=k(2[A])2=k⋅4[A]2=4×(original rate)
Key result: Doubling concentration quadruples the rate.
✗ Mistake 3: Incorrect factor for halving concentration
The error:
When [A] is halved, students write:
New rate =k(2[A])=21k[A] (wrong)
How to avoid:
Again, use the rate law correctly:
New rate=k(2[A])2=k⋅4[A]2=41×(original rate)
Key result: Halving concentration reduces the rate to one-fourth.
✗ Mistake 4: Forgetting to square the factor
The error:
Students apply the factor to [A] but forget to square it. For example:
- Doubling: factor = 2, but they forget 22=4
- Halving: factor = 21, but they forget (21)2=41
How to avoid: …
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 on this concept.
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-A1 markMCQQ.
[!FORMULA] When the concentration of the reactant in a given reaction is halved and if the rate of reaction is halved, the order of the reaction is:
(A) 3 (B) 2 (C) 1 (D) 0›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is that the order of a reaction tells us how the rate changes when the concentration of a reactant changes. Here, halving the concentration halves the rate, so the rate is directly proportional to the concentration — this is a first-order reaction. The correct option is (C).
Concept and Intuition
The order of a reaction with respect to a reactant is the exponent to which its concentration is raised in the rate law. If the rate law is rate=k[A]n, then when you change [A], the rate changes by a factor of (new [A]/old [A])n. In this problem, halving [A] (multiply by 1/2) causes the rate to also halve (multiply by 1/2). So we need to find n such that (1/2)n=1/2. That’s only true when n=1. This is the simplest case of a first-order reaction — the rate is directly proportional to the concentration.
Step-by-step reasoning
- Write the general rate law For a reaction where the rate depends only on one reactant A, the rate law is:
rate=k[A]n
Here, n is the order of the reaction with respect to A, and k is the rate constant (which doesn’t change when we change concentration).
- Express the initial and changed conditions Let the initial concentration be [A]0 and the initial rate be r0:
r0=k[A]0n
When the concentration is halved, the new concentration is [A]new=21[A]0. The problem states the new rate is also halved:
rnew=21r0
- Substitute into the rate law for the new condition
rnew=k(21[A]0)n=k(21)n[A]0n
- Relate the new rate to the original rate Since rnew=21r0 and r0=k[A]0n, we have:
k(21)n[A]0n=21(k[A]0n)
Cancel k[A]0n (which is nonzero) from both sides:
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-M1 markMCQQ.Rate law can be determined from a balanced chemical equation if (A) one of the reactants is in excess (B) there is a sequence of elementary reactions (C) it is a reversible reaction (D) it is an elementary reaction
›Reveal solutionSolution
The rate law of a reaction can be written directly from the balanced equation only if the reaction is an elementary step — otherwise the rate law must be determined experimentally. The correct choice is (D).
Why this approach works
The rate law expresses how the reaction rate depends on reactant concentrations. For a single-step (elementary) reaction, the molecularity tells us exactly how many molecules must collide, so the exponents in the rate law equal the stoichiometric coefficients. But for a multi-step mechanism, the overall balanced equation is just the net result of several elementary steps; the slowest step (rate-determining step) controls the rate, and its rate law often involves only some of the reactants, possibly with fractional or zero exponents. Therefore, you cannot simply read the rate law from the overall balanced equation unless you know the reaction is elementary.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Recall the definition of an elementary reaction
An elementary reaction occurs in a single molecular event (e.g., a collision). Its rate law is directly given by the law of mass action: for aA+bB→products, the rate is k[A]a[B]b. This is the only case where the balanced equation and the rate law match exactly.
-
Consider the other options
- (A) One reactant in excess: Excess reactant makes its concentration nearly constant, so the rate law may appear to depend only on other reactants (pseudo‑order). But the true rate law is unchanged; you still cannot deduce it from the balanced equation.
- (B) Sequence of elementary reactions: This describes a mechanism. The overall rate law is determined by the slowest step, which may involve intermediates or have coefficients different from the overall equation. …
-
- KCET 2025Set D-41 markMCQQ.For the reaction 2N2O5(g)→4NO2(g)+O2(g), initial concentration of N2O5 is 2.0 mol L−1 and after 300 min, it is reduced to 1.4 mol L−1. The rate of production of NO2 (in mol L−1 min−1) is (A) 2.5×10−4 (B) 4×10−4 (C) 2.5×10−3 (D) 4×10−3
›Reveal solutionSolution
Find the average rate of disappearance of N2O5, then scale it by the stoichiometric ratio 4:2=2 to get the rate of appearance of NO2.
Step 1 — Rate of disappearance of N2O5.
Δ[N2O5]=1.4−2.0=−0.6 molL−1,Δt=300 min
−ΔtΔ[N2O5]=3000.6=2×10−3 molL−1min−1
Step 2 — Write the rate of reaction using stoichiometric coefficients.
For 2N2O5→4NO2+O2, the unique rate of reaction divides each species' rate by its coefficient (with a minus sign for reactants):
Rate=−21dtd[N2O5]=+41dtd[NO2]=+11dtd[O2]
This normalisation is what makes "the rate" a single number for the whole reaction, independent of which species you watch.
Step 3 — Solve for the rate of production of NO2.
Equating the first two expressions:
41dtd[NO2]=21(2×10−3)=1×10−3
dtd[NO2]=4×(1×10−3)=4×10−3 molL−1min−1
Step 4 — Sanity check by mole bookkeeping. …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-E1 markMCQQ.The order of a reaction W+X−−−−→Y+Z with respect to W is 3 and with respect to X is 1. If the concentrations of both W and X are tripled, the rate of reaction will increase by _________ times. (A) 81 (B) 27 (C) 51 (D) 15
›Reveal solutionSolution
The rate law is r=k[W]3[X]1; tripling both concentrations multiplies the rate by 33×31=81, so the answer is 81.
The key idea is that the order of a reaction tells you how the rate scales when you change the concentration of a reactant. If the order with respect to W is 3, then tripling [W] multiplies the rate by 33=27. If the order with respect to X is 1, then tripling [X] multiplies the rate by 31=3. Because the effects are independent (the rate law is a product), the total factor is 27×3=81.
- Write the rate law. The general form is r=k[W]m[X]n, where m and n are the orders. Here m=3 and n=1, so
r=k[W]3[X]1.
- Apply the concentration changes. Let the initial concentrations be [W]0 and [X]0, giving initial rate r0=k[W]03[X]0. After tripling: [W]′=3[W]0 and [X]′=3[X]0. The new rate is
r′=k(3[W]0)3(3[X]0)1=k⋅27[W]03⋅3[X]0=81k[W]03[X]0.
- Find the factor increase. Compare r′ to r0: r0r′=k[W]03[X]081k[W]03[X]0=81. …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-E1 markMCQQ.During a chemical reaction X→Y, the rates of reaction starting with initial concentrations of X as 4.0×10−3M and 2.0×10−3M are 4.8×10−4 mol L−1/s and 1.2×10−4 mol L−1/s respectively. What is the order of reaction with respect to X ? (A) 2 (B) 3 (C) 1.5 (D) 1
›Reveal solutionSolution
The order of reaction is found by comparing how the initial rate changes when the initial concentration is halved. Here, halving the concentration reduces the rate by a factor of 4, so the order is 2. The correct option is (A).
Concept & Intuition
For a reaction like X→Y, the rate law is typically
Rate=k[X]n
where n is the order with respect to X. If we know two different initial concentrations and their corresponding initial rates, we can find n without needing the rate constant k. The trick: take the ratio of the two rates — the k cancels, leaving only the ratio of concentrations raised to the power n. This is a classic method for determining order from initial rate data.
Step-by-step reasoning
- Write the rate law for both experiments For experiment 1:
Rate1=k[X]1n=4.8×10−4mol L−1s−1
with [X]1=4.0×10−3M.
For experiment 2:
Rate2=k[X]2n=1.2×10−4mol L−1s−1
with [X]2=2.0×10−3M.
- Take the ratio of the two rate equations
Rate2Rate1=k[X]2nk[X]1n=([X]2[X]1)n
The rate constant k cancels out — this is the key simplification.
- Plug in the numbers
1.2×10−44.8×10−4=(2.0×10−34.0×10−3)n
Simplify the left side:
1.24.8=4… - COMEDK 2025Set 2025-M1 markMCQQ.The following results were obtained during study of the reaction 2NO(g)+Cl2( g)→2NOCl(g). Determine the value of [X] in mol/L .tg {border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:0;} .tg td{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg th{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; font-weight:normal;overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg .tg-c3ow{border-color:inherit;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-7btt{border-color:inherit;font-weight:bold;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-0pky{border-color:inherit;text-align:left;vertical-align:top} Experiment [NO] mol / L [Cl2] mol / L Initial rate of formation. [NOCl] mol / L / min I 0.2 0.2 6.0×10−3 II 0.2 0.4 2.4×10−2 III 0.4 0.2 1.2×10−2 IV X 0.6 1.35×10−1 (A) [X]=0.8 (B) [X]=0.3 (C) [X]=0.4 (D) [X]=0.5
›Reveal solutionSolution
Using the method of initial rates, the reaction is first order in NO and second order in Cl2: rate=k[NO][Cl2]2. Solving experiment IV gives [X]=0.5 mol/L — option (D).
We are given initial-rate data for 2NO(g)+Cl2(g)→2NOCl(g). To find [X] in experiment IV, first determine the rate law by comparing experiments where only one concentration changes.
Concept
The rate law gives the dependence of the initial rate on each reactant concentration; the orders are found experimentally, not from stoichiometry.
Solution
-
Order in Cl2 (I vs II, [NO] fixed): [Cl2] doubles, rate goes 6.0×10−3→2.4×10−2, a factor of 4=22 → second order.
-
Order in NO (I vs III, [Cl2] fixed): [NO] doubles, rate goes 6.0×10−3→1.2×10−2, a factor of 2=21 → first order.
-
Rate law: rate=k[NO][Cl2]2.
-
Rate constant from I: …
-
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-E1 markMCQQ.For a given reaction, ,X(g)+Y(g→Z(g), the order of reaction with respect to X and Y are m and n respectively. If the concentration of X is tripled and that of Y is decreased to one third, what is the ratio between the new rate to the original rate of the reaction? (A) 3(m−n) (B) 3(n−m) (C) (m+n) (D) 3(m+n)1
›Reveal solutionSolution
With rate =k[X]m[Y]n, tripling [X] and cutting [Y] to a third scales the rate by 3m⋅3−n=3(m−n).
The rate law is rate1=k[X]m[Y]n.
New conditions: [X]→3[X] and [Y]→31[Y]. …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-E1 markMCQQ.The following data was recorded for the decomposition of XY compound at 750K .tg {border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:0;} .tg td{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg th{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; font-weight:normal;overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg .tg-c3ow{border-color:inherit;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-7btt{border-color:inherit;font-weight:bold;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} [XY] mol / L Rate of decomposition of XY mol / L s 0.4 5.5×10−7 0.8 22.0×10−7 1.2 49.5×10−7 What is the order of reaction with respect to decomposition of XY? (A) 0 (B) 2 (C) 1 (D) 1.5
›Reveal solutionSolution
The rate scales as the square of [XY], so the reaction is second order.
Compare data pairs. When [XY] doubles (0.4→0.8):
5.5×10−722.0×10−7=4=2n⇒n=2
Check with tripling (0.4→1.2): …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-M1 markMCQQ.For the reaction Cl2( g)+2NO(g)→2NOCl(g), the following data was obtained: .tg {border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:0;} .tg td{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg th{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; font-weight:normal;overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg .tg-baqh{text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-amwm{font-weight:bold;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} Experiment No. Initial concentration of Cl2 (M) Initial concentration of NO (M) Initial reaction rate (M/min) I 0.15 0.15 0.60 II 0.30 0.15 1.20 III 0.15 0.3 2.40 IV 0.25 0.25 2.78 Identify the order of the reaction with respect to Cl2,NO and the value of Rate constant. (A) Order with respect to Cl2=2 Order with respect to NO=1k=355.5 mol−2 L2 min−1 (B) Order with respect to Cl2=0 Order with respect to NO=1k=8.0 min−1 (C) Order with respect to Cl2=1 Order with respect to NO=2k=177.7 mol−2 L2 min−1 (D) Order with respect to Cl2=1 Order with respect to NO=1k=26.66 mol−1Lmin−1
›Reveal solutionSolution
The reaction is first order in Cl₂ and second order in NO, giving an overall third‑order rate law. Using data from Experiment I, the rate constant is k≈177.7 M−2min−1, which matches option (C).
We are given the reaction
Cl2(g)+2NO(g)→2NOCl(g)
and a table of initial rates at different initial concentrations. The goal is to determine the orders with respect to each reactant and the value of the rate constant k.
The rate law has the general form
Rate=k[Cl2]m[NO]n
where m and n are the orders we need to find. The method of initial rates compares how the rate changes when we change only one concentration at a time.
1. Find the order with respect to Cl2 (call it m)
Compare Experiment I and Experiment II:
Exp [Cl2] (M) [NO] (M) Rate (M/min) I 0.15 0.15 0.60 II 0.30 0.15 1.20 Here [NO] is constant. When [Cl2] doubles (from 0.15 to 0.30), the rate also doubles (from 0.60 to 1.20).
Since 2m=2, we have m=1.
So the reaction is first order in Cl2.
2. Find the order with respect to NO (call it n)
Compare Experiment I and Experiment III:
Exp [Cl2] (M) [NO] (M) Rate (M/min) I 0.15 0.15 0.60 III 0.15 0.30 2.40 Here [Cl2] is constant. When [NO] doubles (from 0.15 to 0.30), the rate quadruples (from 0.60 to 2.40).
Since 2n=4, we have n=2.
So the reaction is second order in NO.
3. Write the rate law and compute k
The rate law is
Rate=k[Cl2]1[NO]2
Now use data from any experiment to find k. Using Experiment I:
0.60=k×(0.15)×(0.15)2
0.60=k×0.15×0.0225
0.60=k×0.003375
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-E1 markMCQQ.For a reaction of the type, 2X+Y→A+B, the following is the data collected: .tg {border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:0;} .tg td{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg th{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; font-weight:normal;overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg .tg-c3ow{border-color:inherit;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-7btt{border-color:inherit;font-weight:bold;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-0pky{border-color:inherit;text-align:left;vertical-align:top} Experiment [X] [Y] Initial rate of formation of A 1 0.2 0.2 12.0×10−3 2 0.6 0.4 14.4×10−2 3 0.6 0.8 5.76×10−1 4. 0.8 0.2 4.8×10−2 What is the overall order of the reaction? (A) 2.5 (B) 3 (C) 2 (D) 1.5
›Reveal solutionSolution
Overall order = 1 + 2 = 3.
Concept: determine the order in each reactant by comparing experiments in which only one concentration changes.
Order in X - compare Exp 1 and Exp 4 ([Y] fixed at 0.2):
[X]: 0.2 -> 0.8 (x4); rate: 12.0 x 10^-3 -> 4.8 x 10^-2 = 48 x 10^-3 (x4)
4 = 4^a -> a = 1
Order in Y - compare Exp 2 and Exp 3 ([X] fixed at 0.6):
[Y]: 0.4 -> 0.8 (x2); rate: 14.4 x 10^-2 = 0.144 -> 5.76 x 10^-1 = 0.576 (x4)
4 = 2^b -> b = 2
Rate law: rate = k [X]^1 [Y]^2 …
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-E1 markMCQQ.Match the details given in Column I with those given in Column II .tg {border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:0;} .tg td{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg th{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; font-weight:normal;overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg .tg-c3ow{border-color:inherit;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-7btt{border-color:inherit;font-weight:bold;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-0pky{border-color:inherit;text-align:left;vertical-align:top} S.No. Column I S.No. Column II A For complex reactions order is determined by P Rate of reaction. B For Zero order reaction unit of k is same as that of Q Slope =k/2.303 C Mathematical expression which gives relationship between rate of reaction and concentrations of reactants is called R Slowest rate determining step. D For a first order reaction plot of log[R0]/[R] vs time gives S Rate law. (A) A=SB=RC=PD=Q (B) A=SB=RC=QD=P (C) A=RB=PC=SD=Q (D) A=RB=SC=QD=P
›Reveal solutionSolution
[!TLDR]
Matching each chemical-kinetics statement to its definition gives A=R, B=P, C=S, D=Q.
Concept
Chemical Kinetics (CBSE/NCERT Class 12): order of a complex reaction is decided by the rate-determining (slowest) step; the rate law relates rate to reactant concentrations; and the integrated first-order equation log[R][R0]=2.303kt gives a straight line of slope k/2.303.
Solution
- A – For complex reactions the order is determined by the slowest rate-determining step ⇒ R.
- B – For a zero-order reaction, rate =k[R]0=k, so the unit of k equals the unit of the rate of reaction (molL−1s−1) ⇒ P. …
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-M1 markMCQQ.For a reaction, 2A+B⟶ products, If concentration of B is kept constant and concentration of A is doubled then rate of reaction is (A) doubled (B) quadrupled (C) halved (D) remain same
›Reveal solutionSolution
For the elementary reaction 2A+B→ products, rate ∝[A]2; doubling [A] increases the rate four-fold.
Treating 2A+B→ products as an elementary step, the rate law follows the stoichiometry:
rate=k[A]2[B].
Keeping [B] constant and doubling [A]: …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.