Skip to content
Question

Q.Assertion (A) : Order of reaction is applicable to elementary as well as complex reactions. Reason (R) : Order of a reaction is an experimental quantity. Options : (A) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of the Assertion (A). (B) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of the Assertion (A). (C) Assertion (A) is true, but Reason (R) is false. (D) Assertion (A) is false, but Reason (R) is true.

CBSECBSE Class XII Board 2026MCQ· 1mImportance★★★★★
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The assertion is false because order is defined only for simple rate laws (elementary steps or overall reactions with a simple rate expression), not for all complex reactions. The reason is true: order is experimental. So the correct option is (D).

Concept First: What "Order" Really Means

The order of a reaction is the sum of the exponents of concentration terms in the experimentally determined rate law. For an elementary reaction (a single step), the order equals the molecularity — that’s straightforward. But for a complex reaction (a sequence of steps), the overall rate law can be messy: it might involve fractional exponents, negative exponents, or even terms that don’t look like a simple power law at all. In such cases, the concept of "order" simply doesn’t apply in the usual sense.

The reason given is a fundamental truth: order is always found by experiment, never deduced from the balanced equation (except for elementary steps). That’s correct.

Now let’s examine the assertion carefully.

Step-by-Step Reasoning

  1. What does "applicable" mean here?

    The assertion says order is "applicable" to both elementary and complex reactions. If a reaction has a rate law of the form r=k[A]m[B]nr = k[\text{A}]^m[\text{B}]^n, then we can define order =m+n= m+n. For an elementary reaction, this always works. For a complex reaction, it works only if the overall rate law happens to be a simple power law — which is not guaranteed.

  2. Counterexample: a complex reaction where order is not defined

    Consider the reaction 2NO+O2→2NO22\text{NO} + \text{O}_2 \rightarrow 2\text{NO}_2. Its mechanism involves a pre-equilibrium, and the experimental rate law is r=k[NO]2[O2]r = k[\text{NO}]^2[\text{O}_2]. Here order = 3, so it is applicable. But take the decomposition of N2O5\text{N}_2\text{O}_5: the rate law is r=k[N2O5]r = k[\text{N}_2\text{O}_5], so order = 1 — again applicable.

    However, consider a reaction like H2+Br2→2HBr\text{H}_2 + \text{Br}_2 \rightarrow 2\text{HBr}. The experimental rate law is:

r=k[H2][Br2]1/21+k′[HBr]/[Br2]r = \frac{k[\text{H}_2][\text{Br}_2]^{1/2}}{1 + k'[\text{HBr}]/[\text{Br}_2]}

This is not of the form k[A]m[B]nk[\text{A}]^m[\text{B}]^n — it has a denominator with a concentration term. You cannot assign a single "order" to this reaction. The concept of order is simply not applicable here. …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.