Q.The conversion of molecules X to Y follows second order kinetics. If concentration of X is increased to three times how will it affect the rate of formation of Y?
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Effect of Concentration
Effect of Concentration: The Intuition
Imagine you're in a large, empty hall with just one other person. The two of you are trying to bump into each other accidentally. It'll take a while, right? Now imagine the same hall packed with a thousand people. Bumping into someone becomes almost certain within seconds.
That's the core idea behind the effect of concentration on reaction rates. Concentration simply means how much of a substance is packed into a given space. Higher concentration = more particles in the same volume.
When particles are more crowded, they collide more frequently. And since chemical reactions happen only when particles collide with enough energy and the right orientation, more collisions mean more reactions per second. The reaction speeds up.
The Precise Statement
For most chemical reactions, the rate of a reaction is directly proportional to the molar concentration of the reactants (raised to some power, which we'll get to).
Rate∝[Reactant]n
Here, [ ] means "concentration in moles per litre" (mol/L or M), and n is the order of reaction with respect to that reactant.
What does "order" mean?
For a simple reaction like A→Products:
- First order (n=1): Double the concentration of A → double the rate.
- Second order (n=2): Double the concentration of A → quadruple the rate (22=4).
- Zero order (n=0): Changing concentration has no effect on the rate. This happens when the reaction is limited by something else (like a catalyst surface that's already fully covered).
The order n is not the same as the stoichiometric coefficient from the balanced equation. It must be determined experimentally. For example, the reaction 2A→B could be first order in A, not second order.
Why does this happen? The collision theory
The rate depends on two things:
- Collision frequency — how often particles meet.
- Fraction of effective collisions — how many of those collisions have enough energy (activation energy) and the right orientation.
Doubling the concentration doubles the number of particles per unit volume. This roughly doubles the collision frequency. For a first-order reaction, that directly doubles the rate. For higher orders, the effect compounds because multiple reactant particles must meet simultaneously.
A concrete example
Consider the reaction between hydrochloric acid and sodium thiosulphate:
Na2S2O3(aq)+2HCl(aq)→2NaCl(aq)+S(s)+SO2(g)+H2O(l) …
Why this formula?
Effect of Concentration on Reaction Rate — The Reasoning
The Effect of Concentration is rooted in collision theory. The key idea is simple:
More particles in the same volume → more frequent collisions → higher reaction rate.
Let's break down why the mathematical relationships hold.
1. The Rate Law — Why r=k[A]m[B]n?
This is not derived from theory alone — it is empirical (found experimentally). But the reasoning behind its form comes from collision probability.
For an elementary reaction (one step):
Consider:
A+B→products
- The rate depends on how often A and B molecules meet.
- In a given volume, the number of A molecules is proportional to [A], and the number of B molecules is proportional to [B].
- The number of A–B collisions per second is proportional to the product:
Collision frequency∝[A]×[B]
- Therefore:
r∝[A][B]
or
r=k[A][B]
For a reaction with coefficient aA+bB:
If the reaction is elementary, the stoichiometric coefficients become the exponents:
r=k[A]a[B]b
Why? Because for 2A to react, two A molecules must collide simultaneously — the probability of that happening is proportional to [A]×[A]=[A]2.
2. The Integrated Rate Laws — Why These Forms?
These come from solving the differential equation r=−dtd[A]=k[A]n.
Zero-order (n=0):
−dtd[A]=k
- Reasoning: Rate is independent of concentration. This happens when the reaction is limited by something else (e.g., a saturated catalyst surface).
- Integrate:
∫[A]0[A]d[A]=−k∫0tdt
⇒[A]=[A]0−kt
First-order (n=1):
−dtd[A]=k[A]
- Reasoning: Rate is directly proportional to [A]. Each molecule has a constant probability of reacting per unit time (like radioactive decay).
- Integrate:
∫[A]0[A][A]d[A]=−k∫0tdt
⇒ln[A]=ln[A]0−kt
or
[A]=[A]0e−kt
Second-order (n=2):
−dtd[A]=k[A]2
- Reasoning: Rate depends on two molecules of A colliding. Doubling [A] quadruples the collision frequency.
- Integrate:
∫[A]0[A][A]2d[A]=−k∫0tdt
⇒[A]1=[A]01+kt
3. The Half-Life — Why It Depends on Order …
The key idea is that for a second-order reaction, the rate depends on the square of the concentration of the reactant.
Reasoning:
- For the conversion X→Y following second-order kinetics, the rate law is:
Rate=k[X]2
- Let the initial concentration be [X]0, so the initial rate is r0=k[X]02. …
For a second-order reaction, rate depends on the square of the concentration. Tripling [X] multiplies the rate by 32=9, so the rate of formation of Y becomes 9 times the original.
Why concentration matters this way
The rate of a chemical reaction tells us how fast reactants turn into products. For the conversion X→Y, the rate of formation of Y is exactly the rate at which X is consumed (assuming no side reactions). The problem states this follows second order kinetics. That means the rate law is:
Rate=k[X]2
where k is the rate constant (depends only on temperature, not on concentration). The exponent 2 is what makes it second order — and that exponent is the key to the entire question.
A common mistake is to think "second order" means the rate doubles when concentration doubles. That would be true only for first order. For second order, the effect is squared, not linear.
Step-by-step reasoning
- Write the original rate. Let the initial concentration of X be [X]0. Then the original rate r0 is:
r0=k[X]02
- Apply the change. The concentration is increased to three times its original value:
[X]new=3[X]0
- Write the new rate. …
Method: Rate Law Analysis for Second-Order Kinetics
Step 1: Write the general rate law for a second-order reaction
For a second-order reaction involving a single reactant X:
Rate=k[X]2
Here:
- k = rate constant (depends only on temperature, not on concentration)
- [X] = concentration of X
- Rate = rate of formation of Y (since X → Y)
Step 2: Identify the initial condition
Let the initial concentration be [X]0.
The initial rate is:
Rate1=k[X]02
Step 3: Apply the change in concentration
Concentration of X is increased to three times:
[X]new=3[X]0
Step 4: Calculate the new rate
Rate2=k(3[X]0)2=k⋅9[X]02
Step 5: Compare the rates …
Here are the common mistakes students make on this question, along with clear strategies to avoid them.
Mistake 1: Confusing Order of Reaction with Stoichiometry
- The Mistake: Students see "conversion of X to Y" and assume the rate law is r=k[X]1 (first order) because the balanced equation looks like a 1:1 conversion. They then incorrectly calculate the new rate as 3× the original.
- Why it's wrong: The order (second order) is given in the problem statement. It is an experimental fact, not derived from the balanced chemical equation. For a second-order reaction, the rate depends on [X]2, not [X].
- How to Avoid: Always underline the given order in the question. Before writing any formula, ask yourself: "What is the order? What is the exponent on concentration?" Here, second order means exponent = 2.
Mistake 2: Forgetting to Square the Concentration Change
- The Mistake: Students correctly identify the rate law as r=k[X]2, but then plug in the new concentration incorrectly. They write:
- Original rate: r1=k[X]2
- New concentration: [X]new=3[X]
- New rate: r2=k×3[X] (missing the square)
- Result: r2=3×r1 (wrong)
- Why it's wrong: The rate law says square the concentration, not multiply by the factor. You must substitute the entire new concentration into the squared term.
- How to Avoid: Write the substitution step explicitly:
r2=k(3[X])2=k×9[X]2=9×(k[X]2)=9r1
Bold the key step: (3[X])2=9[X]2.
Mistake 3: Misinterpreting "Rate of Formation of Y"
- The Mistake: Students think the rate of formation of Y is different from the rate of disappearance of X. They try to use stoichiometric ratios (e.g., −dtd[X]=dtd[Y]) and get confused.
- Why it's wrong: For the reaction X→Y, the rate of disappearance of X equals the rate of formation of Y (since 1 mole of X gives 1 mole of Y). The question asks for the effect on the rate of formation of Y, which is exactly the same as the rate of the reaction.
- How to Avoid: Remember: For a simple conversion A→B, the rate of reaction = rate of formation of product = rate of consumption of reactant. No extra steps needed. Just apply the rate law directly.
Mistake 4: Not Stating the Final Answer Clearly …
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 on this concept.
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-A1 markMCQQ.
[!FORMULA] When the concentration of the reactant in a given reaction is halved and if the rate of reaction is halved, the order of the reaction is:
(A) 3 (B) 2 (C) 1 (D) 0›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is that the order of a reaction tells us how the rate changes when the concentration of a reactant changes. Here, halving the concentration halves the rate, so the rate is directly proportional to the concentration — this is a first-order reaction. The correct option is (C).
Concept and Intuition
The order of a reaction with respect to a reactant is the exponent to which its concentration is raised in the rate law. If the rate law is rate=k[A]n, then when you change [A], the rate changes by a factor of (new [A]/old [A])n. In this problem, halving [A] (multiply by 1/2) causes the rate to also halve (multiply by 1/2). So we need to find n such that (1/2)n=1/2. That’s only true when n=1. This is the simplest case of a first-order reaction — the rate is directly proportional to the concentration.
Step-by-step reasoning
- Write the general rate law For a reaction where the rate depends only on one reactant A, the rate law is:
rate=k[A]n
Here, n is the order of the reaction with respect to A, and k is the rate constant (which doesn’t change when we change concentration).
- Express the initial and changed conditions Let the initial concentration be [A]0 and the initial rate be r0:
r0=k[A]0n
When the concentration is halved, the new concentration is [A]new=21[A]0. The problem states the new rate is also halved:
rnew=21r0
- Substitute into the rate law for the new condition
rnew=k(21[A]0)n=k(21)n[A]0n
- Relate the new rate to the original rate Since rnew=21r0 and r0=k[A]0n, we have:
k(21)n[A]0n=21(k[A]0n)
Cancel k[A]0n (which is nonzero) from both sides:
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-M1 markMCQQ.Rate law can be determined from a balanced chemical equation if (A) one of the reactants is in excess (B) there is a sequence of elementary reactions (C) it is a reversible reaction (D) it is an elementary reaction
›Reveal solutionSolution
The rate law of a reaction can be written directly from the balanced equation only if the reaction is an elementary step — otherwise the rate law must be determined experimentally. The correct choice is (D).
Why this approach works
The rate law expresses how the reaction rate depends on reactant concentrations. For a single-step (elementary) reaction, the molecularity tells us exactly how many molecules must collide, so the exponents in the rate law equal the stoichiometric coefficients. But for a multi-step mechanism, the overall balanced equation is just the net result of several elementary steps; the slowest step (rate-determining step) controls the rate, and its rate law often involves only some of the reactants, possibly with fractional or zero exponents. Therefore, you cannot simply read the rate law from the overall balanced equation unless you know the reaction is elementary.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Recall the definition of an elementary reaction
An elementary reaction occurs in a single molecular event (e.g., a collision). Its rate law is directly given by the law of mass action: for aA+bB→products, the rate is k[A]a[B]b. This is the only case where the balanced equation and the rate law match exactly.
-
Consider the other options
- (A) One reactant in excess: Excess reactant makes its concentration nearly constant, so the rate law may appear to depend only on other reactants (pseudo‑order). But the true rate law is unchanged; you still cannot deduce it from the balanced equation.
- (B) Sequence of elementary reactions: This describes a mechanism. The overall rate law is determined by the slowest step, which may involve intermediates or have coefficients different from the overall equation. …
-
- KCET 2025Set D-41 markMCQQ.For the reaction 2N2O5(g)→4NO2(g)+O2(g), initial concentration of N2O5 is 2.0 mol L−1 and after 300 min, it is reduced to 1.4 mol L−1. The rate of production of NO2 (in mol L−1 min−1) is (A) 2.5×10−4 (B) 4×10−4 (C) 2.5×10−3 (D) 4×10−3
›Reveal solutionSolution
Find the average rate of disappearance of N2O5, then scale it by the stoichiometric ratio 4:2=2 to get the rate of appearance of NO2.
Step 1 — Rate of disappearance of N2O5.
Δ[N2O5]=1.4−2.0=−0.6 molL−1,Δt=300 min
−ΔtΔ[N2O5]=3000.6=2×10−3 molL−1min−1
Step 2 — Write the rate of reaction using stoichiometric coefficients.
For 2N2O5→4NO2+O2, the unique rate of reaction divides each species' rate by its coefficient (with a minus sign for reactants):
Rate=−21dtd[N2O5]=+41dtd[NO2]=+11dtd[O2]
This normalisation is what makes "the rate" a single number for the whole reaction, independent of which species you watch.
Step 3 — Solve for the rate of production of NO2.
Equating the first two expressions:
41dtd[NO2]=21(2×10−3)=1×10−3
dtd[NO2]=4×(1×10−3)=4×10−3 molL−1min−1
Step 4 — Sanity check by mole bookkeeping. …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-E1 markMCQQ.The order of a reaction W+X−−−−→Y+Z with respect to W is 3 and with respect to X is 1. If the concentrations of both W and X are tripled, the rate of reaction will increase by _________ times. (A) 81 (B) 27 (C) 51 (D) 15
›Reveal solutionSolution
The rate law is r=k[W]3[X]1; tripling both concentrations multiplies the rate by 33×31=81, so the answer is 81.
The key idea is that the order of a reaction tells you how the rate scales when you change the concentration of a reactant. If the order with respect to W is 3, then tripling [W] multiplies the rate by 33=27. If the order with respect to X is 1, then tripling [X] multiplies the rate by 31=3. Because the effects are independent (the rate law is a product), the total factor is 27×3=81.
- Write the rate law. The general form is r=k[W]m[X]n, where m and n are the orders. Here m=3 and n=1, so
r=k[W]3[X]1.
- Apply the concentration changes. Let the initial concentrations be [W]0 and [X]0, giving initial rate r0=k[W]03[X]0. After tripling: [W]′=3[W]0 and [X]′=3[X]0. The new rate is
r′=k(3[W]0)3(3[X]0)1=k⋅27[W]03⋅3[X]0=81k[W]03[X]0.
- Find the factor increase. Compare r′ to r0: r0r′=k[W]03[X]081k[W]03[X]0=81. …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-E1 markMCQQ.During a chemical reaction X→Y, the rates of reaction starting with initial concentrations of X as 4.0×10−3M and 2.0×10−3M are 4.8×10−4 mol L−1/s and 1.2×10−4 mol L−1/s respectively. What is the order of reaction with respect to X ? (A) 2 (B) 3 (C) 1.5 (D) 1
›Reveal solutionSolution
The order of reaction is found by comparing how the initial rate changes when the initial concentration is halved. Here, halving the concentration reduces the rate by a factor of 4, so the order is 2. The correct option is (A).
Concept & Intuition
For a reaction like X→Y, the rate law is typically
Rate=k[X]n
where n is the order with respect to X. If we know two different initial concentrations and their corresponding initial rates, we can find n without needing the rate constant k. The trick: take the ratio of the two rates — the k cancels, leaving only the ratio of concentrations raised to the power n. This is a classic method for determining order from initial rate data.
Step-by-step reasoning
- Write the rate law for both experiments For experiment 1:
Rate1=k[X]1n=4.8×10−4mol L−1s−1
with [X]1=4.0×10−3M.
For experiment 2:
Rate2=k[X]2n=1.2×10−4mol L−1s−1
with [X]2=2.0×10−3M.
- Take the ratio of the two rate equations
Rate2Rate1=k[X]2nk[X]1n=([X]2[X]1)n
The rate constant k cancels out — this is the key simplification.
- Plug in the numbers
1.2×10−44.8×10−4=(2.0×10−34.0×10−3)n
Simplify the left side:
1.24.8=4… - COMEDK 2025Set 2025-M1 markMCQQ.The following results were obtained during study of the reaction 2NO(g)+Cl2( g)→2NOCl(g). Determine the value of [X] in mol/L .tg {border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:0;} .tg td{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg th{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; font-weight:normal;overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg .tg-c3ow{border-color:inherit;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-7btt{border-color:inherit;font-weight:bold;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-0pky{border-color:inherit;text-align:left;vertical-align:top} Experiment [NO] mol / L [Cl2] mol / L Initial rate of formation. [NOCl] mol / L / min I 0.2 0.2 6.0×10−3 II 0.2 0.4 2.4×10−2 III 0.4 0.2 1.2×10−2 IV X 0.6 1.35×10−1 (A) [X]=0.8 (B) [X]=0.3 (C) [X]=0.4 (D) [X]=0.5
›Reveal solutionSolution
Using the method of initial rates, the reaction is first order in NO and second order in Cl2: rate=k[NO][Cl2]2. Solving experiment IV gives [X]=0.5 mol/L — option (D).
We are given initial-rate data for 2NO(g)+Cl2(g)→2NOCl(g). To find [X] in experiment IV, first determine the rate law by comparing experiments where only one concentration changes.
Concept
The rate law gives the dependence of the initial rate on each reactant concentration; the orders are found experimentally, not from stoichiometry.
Solution
-
Order in Cl2 (I vs II, [NO] fixed): [Cl2] doubles, rate goes 6.0×10−3→2.4×10−2, a factor of 4=22 → second order.
-
Order in NO (I vs III, [Cl2] fixed): [NO] doubles, rate goes 6.0×10−3→1.2×10−2, a factor of 2=21 → first order.
-
Rate law: rate=k[NO][Cl2]2.
-
Rate constant from I: …
-
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-E1 markMCQQ.For a given reaction, ,X(g)+Y(g→Z(g), the order of reaction with respect to X and Y are m and n respectively. If the concentration of X is tripled and that of Y is decreased to one third, what is the ratio between the new rate to the original rate of the reaction? (A) 3(m−n) (B) 3(n−m) (C) (m+n) (D) 3(m+n)1
›Reveal solutionSolution
With rate =k[X]m[Y]n, tripling [X] and cutting [Y] to a third scales the rate by 3m⋅3−n=3(m−n).
The rate law is rate1=k[X]m[Y]n.
New conditions: [X]→3[X] and [Y]→31[Y]. …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-E1 markMCQQ.The following data was recorded for the decomposition of XY compound at 750K .tg {border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:0;} .tg td{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg th{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; font-weight:normal;overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg .tg-c3ow{border-color:inherit;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-7btt{border-color:inherit;font-weight:bold;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} [XY] mol / L Rate of decomposition of XY mol / L s 0.4 5.5×10−7 0.8 22.0×10−7 1.2 49.5×10−7 What is the order of reaction with respect to decomposition of XY? (A) 0 (B) 2 (C) 1 (D) 1.5
›Reveal solutionSolution
The rate scales as the square of [XY], so the reaction is second order.
Compare data pairs. When [XY] doubles (0.4→0.8):
5.5×10−722.0×10−7=4=2n⇒n=2
Check with tripling (0.4→1.2): …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-M1 markMCQQ.For the reaction Cl2( g)+2NO(g)→2NOCl(g), the following data was obtained: .tg {border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:0;} .tg td{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg th{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; font-weight:normal;overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg .tg-baqh{text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-amwm{font-weight:bold;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} Experiment No. Initial concentration of Cl2 (M) Initial concentration of NO (M) Initial reaction rate (M/min) I 0.15 0.15 0.60 II 0.30 0.15 1.20 III 0.15 0.3 2.40 IV 0.25 0.25 2.78 Identify the order of the reaction with respect to Cl2,NO and the value of Rate constant. (A) Order with respect to Cl2=2 Order with respect to NO=1k=355.5 mol−2 L2 min−1 (B) Order with respect to Cl2=0 Order with respect to NO=1k=8.0 min−1 (C) Order with respect to Cl2=1 Order with respect to NO=2k=177.7 mol−2 L2 min−1 (D) Order with respect to Cl2=1 Order with respect to NO=1k=26.66 mol−1Lmin−1
›Reveal solutionSolution
The reaction is first order in Cl₂ and second order in NO, giving an overall third‑order rate law. Using data from Experiment I, the rate constant is k≈177.7 M−2min−1, which matches option (C).
We are given the reaction
Cl2(g)+2NO(g)→2NOCl(g)
and a table of initial rates at different initial concentrations. The goal is to determine the orders with respect to each reactant and the value of the rate constant k.
The rate law has the general form
Rate=k[Cl2]m[NO]n
where m and n are the orders we need to find. The method of initial rates compares how the rate changes when we change only one concentration at a time.
1. Find the order with respect to Cl2 (call it m)
Compare Experiment I and Experiment II:
Exp [Cl2] (M) [NO] (M) Rate (M/min) I 0.15 0.15 0.60 II 0.30 0.15 1.20 Here [NO] is constant. When [Cl2] doubles (from 0.15 to 0.30), the rate also doubles (from 0.60 to 1.20).
Since 2m=2, we have m=1.
So the reaction is first order in Cl2.
2. Find the order with respect to NO (call it n)
Compare Experiment I and Experiment III:
Exp [Cl2] (M) [NO] (M) Rate (M/min) I 0.15 0.15 0.60 III 0.15 0.30 2.40 Here [Cl2] is constant. When [NO] doubles (from 0.15 to 0.30), the rate quadruples (from 0.60 to 2.40).
Since 2n=4, we have n=2.
So the reaction is second order in NO.
3. Write the rate law and compute k
The rate law is
Rate=k[Cl2]1[NO]2
Now use data from any experiment to find k. Using Experiment I:
0.60=k×(0.15)×(0.15)2
0.60=k×0.15×0.0225
0.60=k×0.003375
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-E1 markMCQQ.For a reaction of the type, 2X+Y→A+B, the following is the data collected: .tg {border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:0;} .tg td{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg th{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; font-weight:normal;overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg .tg-c3ow{border-color:inherit;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-7btt{border-color:inherit;font-weight:bold;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-0pky{border-color:inherit;text-align:left;vertical-align:top} Experiment [X] [Y] Initial rate of formation of A 1 0.2 0.2 12.0×10−3 2 0.6 0.4 14.4×10−2 3 0.6 0.8 5.76×10−1 4. 0.8 0.2 4.8×10−2 What is the overall order of the reaction? (A) 2.5 (B) 3 (C) 2 (D) 1.5
›Reveal solutionSolution
Overall order = 1 + 2 = 3.
Concept: determine the order in each reactant by comparing experiments in which only one concentration changes.
Order in X - compare Exp 1 and Exp 4 ([Y] fixed at 0.2):
[X]: 0.2 -> 0.8 (x4); rate: 12.0 x 10^-3 -> 4.8 x 10^-2 = 48 x 10^-3 (x4)
4 = 4^a -> a = 1
Order in Y - compare Exp 2 and Exp 3 ([X] fixed at 0.6):
[Y]: 0.4 -> 0.8 (x2); rate: 14.4 x 10^-2 = 0.144 -> 5.76 x 10^-1 = 0.576 (x4)
4 = 2^b -> b = 2
Rate law: rate = k [X]^1 [Y]^2 …
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-E1 markMCQQ.Match the details given in Column I with those given in Column II .tg {border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:0;} .tg td{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg th{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; font-weight:normal;overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg .tg-c3ow{border-color:inherit;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-7btt{border-color:inherit;font-weight:bold;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-0pky{border-color:inherit;text-align:left;vertical-align:top} S.No. Column I S.No. Column II A For complex reactions order is determined by P Rate of reaction. B For Zero order reaction unit of k is same as that of Q Slope =k/2.303 C Mathematical expression which gives relationship between rate of reaction and concentrations of reactants is called R Slowest rate determining step. D For a first order reaction plot of log[R0]/[R] vs time gives S Rate law. (A) A=SB=RC=PD=Q (B) A=SB=RC=QD=P (C) A=RB=PC=SD=Q (D) A=RB=SC=QD=P
›Reveal solutionSolution
[!TLDR]
Matching each chemical-kinetics statement to its definition gives A=R, B=P, C=S, D=Q.
Concept
Chemical Kinetics (CBSE/NCERT Class 12): order of a complex reaction is decided by the rate-determining (slowest) step; the rate law relates rate to reactant concentrations; and the integrated first-order equation log[R][R0]=2.303kt gives a straight line of slope k/2.303.
Solution
- A – For complex reactions the order is determined by the slowest rate-determining step ⇒ R.
- B – For a zero-order reaction, rate =k[R]0=k, so the unit of k equals the unit of the rate of reaction (molL−1s−1) ⇒ P. …
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-M1 markMCQQ.For a reaction, 2A+B⟶ products, If concentration of B is kept constant and concentration of A is doubled then rate of reaction is (A) doubled (B) quadrupled (C) halved (D) remain same
›Reveal solutionSolution
For the elementary reaction 2A+B→ products, rate ∝[A]2; doubling [A] increases the rate four-fold.
Treating 2A+B→ products as an elementary step, the rate law follows the stoichiometry:
rate=k[A]2[B].
Keeping [B] constant and doubling [A]: …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.