Q.Give evidence that [Co(NH3)5Cl]SO4 and [Co(NH3)5(SO4)]Cl are ionisation isomers.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Werner Coordination Theory
Werner Coordination Theory: The Idea That Changed Inorganic Chemistry
Imagine you're looking at a salt like cobalt(III) chloride. The formula is written as CoClX3, and when you dissolve it in water, you expect to find CoX3+ and ClX− ions. But something strange happens: when you add silver nitrate (which precipitates chloride ions), only some of the chlorine comes out as silver chloride. Not all of it. And the amount that precipitates depends on how you made the compound.
This was the puzzle that faced chemists in the late 1800s. Compounds like CoClX3⋅6NHX3 (orange-yellow) and CoClX3⋅5NHX3 (purple) had the same metal and the same ligands (ammonia), but different colours, different conductivities in solution, and different numbers of chloride ions that could be precipitated. The old ideas of fixed valency couldn't explain it.
Alfred Werner proposed a radical solution in 1893. He said: a metal ion has two kinds of valency.
The Core Intuition
Think of a metal ion like a king in a castle. The king has two types of relationships:
-
Primary valency (today: oxidation state) — this is the king's royal authority. It's fixed, non-directional, and satisfied by negative ions. For cobalt(III), this is +3. It's like the king's crown: it doesn't change.
-
Secondary valency (today: coordination number) — this is the king's personal bodyguard. The king can have a fixed number of guards (usually 4 or 6) who stand in specific positions around him. These guards can be neutral molecules (like ammonia) or negative ions (like chloride). The key: these guards are directly attached to the metal, forming a stable cluster called the coordination sphere.
The revolutionary idea: the chloride ions that act as bodyguards (inside the coordination sphere) do not behave like free ions. They don't precipitate with silver nitrate. They don't conduct electricity. They are "locked" to the metal.
The Precise Statement
Werner Coordination Theory (1893)
-
Every metal atom has two types of valency:
- Primary valency (ionisable): corresponds to the oxidation state. It is satisfied by negative ions. These ions are outside the coordination sphere and behave as free ions in solution.
- Secondary valency (non-ionisable): corresponds to the coordination number. It is satisfied by neutral molecules or negative ions directly bonded to the metal. These are inside the coordination sphere and do not dissociate.
-
The secondary valencies are directional — they point to fixed positions in space around the metal, giving the complex a definite geometry (e.g., octahedral for coordination number 6, square planar for 4).
-
The primary valency is non-directional — it is just a number, not a spatial arrangement.
How It Explains the Puzzle
Take the compound CoClX3⋅6NHX3 (orange-yellow). Werner said:
- Cobalt has primary valency +3 (needs three negative charges to satisfy it).
- Cobalt has secondary valency 6 (can hold six ligands around it).
- The six ammonia molecules satisfy all six secondary valencies. So the chloride ions cannot be inside the coordination sphere — they must be outside, as free ions.
- Structure: [Co(NHX3)X6]ClX3. All three chlorides precipitate with AgNOX3.
Now take CoClX3⋅5NHX3 (purple):
- Again, primary valency +3, secondary valency 6.
- Five ammonia molecules satisfy five secondary valencies. One chloride ion must fill the sixth spot — it becomes a ligand inside the sphere.
- The other two chlorides are outside as free ions.
- Structure: [Co(NHX3)X5Cl]ClX2. Only two chlorides precipitate.
The number of free ions in solution determines the conductivity and the number of precipitable chlorides. Werner's theory predicted exactly these numbers — and experiments confirmed them.
The Geometry Insight …
Why this formula?
Werner Coordination Theory: Why the Key Formulas Hold
Werner Coordination Theory (1893) revolutionized inorganic chemistry by explaining how metal ions bind ligands. Let's build the reasoning from first principles — not just memorize formulas.
1. The Core Observation: Primary vs. Secondary Valence
Werner noticed that metal compounds had two types of bonding capacity:
- Primary valence (now oxidation state): Satisfies the metal's charge — ionic in nature.
- Secondary valence (now coordination number): Determines how many ligands attach — directional, spatial in nature.
Why this distinction?
Consider CoClX3 ⋅6NHX3 (one of Werner's classic compounds).
- The compound is electrically neutral overall.
- Adding AgNOX3 precipitates all 3 Cl⁻ as AgCl — meaning all chlorides are free ions.
- Therefore, the NHX3 molecules must be directly bonded to Co, not the chlorides.
This forces the idea: Co has a fixed capacity for direct ligand attachment (secondary valence = 6 here), separate from its charge balance (primary valence = +3).
2. The Key Formula: Coordination Number = Number of Ligands Attached
Formula:
Coordination number=number of donor atoms directly bonded to the metal
Why this holds:
- Werner's experiments showed that only a fixed number of ligands could be replaced without breaking the compound's identity.
- For CoClX3 ⋅6NHX3, adding acid doesn't remove NHX3 easily — they are coordinated.
- The maximum number of such tightly bound ligands is the coordination number — a property of the metal ion, not the counterions.
Derivation from data:
If you have [Co(NHX3)X6]ClX3, conductivity measurements show 4 ions in solution ([Co(NHX3)X6]X3+ + 3 Cl⁻).
If you had [Co(NHX3)X5Cl]ClX2, conductivity shows 3 ions.
The number of chlorides inside the coordination sphere (non-precipitable) plus those outside must sum to the total chlorides. This gives the coordination number directly.
3. The Geometry Formula: Coordination Number Determines Shape
Werner proposed that secondary valences are directed in space — leading to specific geometries.
| Coordination Number | Geometry | Why? |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Linear | Minimizes repulsion between 2 ligands |
| 4 | Tetrahedral or Square planar | 4 points in space — two arrangements possible |
| 6 | Octahedral | 6 ligands at 90° angles — most symmetric |
Why octahedral for 6?
- 6 ligands around a central atom must be placed to maximize separation.
- The octahedron (6 vertices, all equidistant from center, 90° between adjacent bonds) is the only regular polyhedron with 6 vertices.
- This explains why [Co(NHX3)X6]X3+ is octahedral — no other arrangement gives equal bond angles and distances.
4. The Isomer Counting Formula: Why 2n or n! Appears
Werner used isomer counts to confirm geometry. For an octahedral complex [MaX2bX2cX2]:
Number of geometrical isomers = 5 (not 6, not 4)
Why this formula?
- Place the two 'a' ligands: they can be cis (90°) or trans (180°).
- For each, place 'b' and 'c' in remaining positions — but symmetry reduces duplicates. …
Concept: Werner Coordination Theory — ionisation isomers exchange a ligand with the counter-ion, producing different ions in solution.
Reasoning:
- In [Co(NH3)5Cl]SO4, the chloride is coordinated to cobalt and sulphate is the free counter-ion. Dissolved in water, it gives SO42− ions, which precipitate with Ba2+ as white BaSO4.
- In [Co(NH3)5(SO4)]Cl, sulphate is coordinated and chloride is free. This isomer gives Cl− ions in solution, which precipitate with Ag+ as white AgCl. …
Ionisation isomers exchange a ligand inside the coordination sphere with an ion outside, producing different ions in solution — here, one isomer gives ClX− and the other gives SOX4X2− as the free ion, confirmed by precipitation tests.
The core idea: Werner’s coordination theory
Alfred Werner showed that in coordination compounds, a metal ion is surrounded by a fixed number of ligands in a primary (coordination) sphere. Ions outside this sphere are free to dissociate in solution. Ionisation isomers arise when the same set of atoms can be arranged so that a different ion is inside the coordination sphere versus outside. The two isomers have the same molecular formula but produce different ions when dissolved.
For the pair [Co(NHX3)X5Cl]SOX4 and [Co(NHX3)X5(SOX4)]Cl, the difference is simple: in the first, chloride is coordinated and sulfate is free; in the second, sulfate is coordinated and chloride is free. This swapping changes the electrical conductivity and, more importantly, the identity of the precipitate formed with appropriate reagents.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Identify the coordination sphere in each isomer
In [Co(NHX3)X5Cl]SOX4, the square brackets enclose the coordination sphere: CoX3+ is bonded to five NHX3 molecules and one ClX− ligand. The sulfate ion SOX4X2− lies outside, as a counterion.
In [Co(NHX3)X5(SOX4)]Cl, the sphere contains CoX3+ with five NHX3 and one SOX4X2− ligand. Now chloride ClX− is the free counterion.
-
What happens when each isomer dissolves in water?
The free ions dissociate completely.
- Isomer A: [Co(NHX3)X5Cl]SOX4[Co(NHX3)X5Cl]X2++SOX4X2−
- Isomer B: [Co(NHX3)X5(SOX4)]Cl[Co(NHX3)X5(SOX4)]X++ClX−
So the solution of isomer A contains free sulfate ions; the solution of isomer B contains free chloride ions.
-
Use a precipitation test to distinguish them
Add a solution of barium chloride (BaClX2) to each.
- With isomer A: free SOX4X2− reacts with BaX2+ to form a white precipitate of BaSOX4.
- With isomer B: no free sulfate is present — the sulfate is bound inside the coordination sphere and does not react. No precipitate forms.
Now add silver nitrate (AgNOX3) to fresh samples.
- With isomer A: no free chloride — no precipitate of AgCl.
- With isomer B: free ClX− gives a white curdy precipitate of AgCl.
A common mistake is to assume that because both isomers contain chlorine and sulfur, they will give the same precipitates. But only the free ions react — coordinated ligands do not precipitate with simple reagents like AgNOX3 or BaClX2.
- Confirm the charges and conductivities …
Method: Conductivity & Precipitation Test for Ionisation Isomers
Concept: Werner’s coordination theory distinguishes between ionisable (outside coordination sphere) and non-ionisable (inside coordination sphere) groups. Ionisation isomers exchange a ligand inside the sphere with a counter-ion outside, giving different ions in solution.
Steps to prove [Co(NH3)5Cl]SO4 and [Co(NH3)5(SO4)]Cl are ionisation isomers:
-
Write the dissociation equations
- Isomer A: [Co(NH3)5Cl]SO4H2O[Co(NH3)5Cl]2++SO42−
- Isomer B: [Co(NH3)5(SO4)]ClH2O[Co(NH3)5(SO4)]++Cl−
-
Conductivity measurement
- Isomer A gives 2 ions: [Co(NH3)5Cl]2+ + SO42− — a 2:2-type electrolyte (a doubly charged ion pair).
- Isomer B gives 2 ions: [Co(NH3)5(SO4)]+ + Cl− — a 1:1-type electrolyte (a singly charged ion pair).
- Both give the same number of ions, but the ionic charges differ, so their molar conductivities differ (the 2+/2− pair conducts more strongly).
-
Precipitation test with BaCl2 (test for free SO42−)
- Isomer A: White precipitate of BaSO4 forms immediately because SO42− is free. …
Common Mistakes Students Make with Ionisation Isomers (Werner's Theory)
Mistake 1: Confusing the Counter-Ion with the Ligand
The error: Students often think the sulphate (SO42−) is always a ligand or always a counter-ion. They fail to check where it appears in the formula.
Why it's wrong: In [Co(NH3)5Cl]SO4, the sulphate is outside the square bracket — it is a free counter-ion. In [Co(NH3)5(SO4)]Cl, the sulphate is inside the bracket — it is a ligand bonded to cobalt.
How to avoid: Always draw a box around the coordination sphere. Everything inside is a ligand; everything outside is a counter-ion. If the same ion appears in different positions, you likely have ionisation isomers.
Mistake 2: Thinking the Compounds Are Identical
The error: Students see the same atoms (Co, NH3, Cl, SO4) and assume the compounds are the same.
Why it's wrong: The arrangement of ions between the coordination sphere and the free counter-ion changes. This changes which ions are released in solution.
How to avoid: Write the dissociation equations:
-
[Co(NH3)5Cl]SO4→[Co(NH3)5Cl]2++SO42−
(gives sulphate ions in solution)
-
[Co(NH3)5(SO4)]Cl→[Co(NH3)5(SO4)]++Cl−
(gives chloride ions in solution)
Key result: Different ions are released — this is the evidence for ionisation isomerism.
Mistake 3: Forgetting to Test with a Precipitating Agent
The error: Students state the isomers are different but don't mention how to prove it experimentally.
Why it's wrong: Werner's theory requires experimental evidence. Simply writing formulas is not enough.
How to avoid: Remember the BaCl₂ test and AgNO₃ test:
| Isomer | Add BaCl₂ (tests for SO42−) | Add AgNO₃ (tests for Cl−) |
|---|---|---|
| [Co(NH3)5Cl]SO4 | White precipitate of BaSO4 | No precipitate |
| [Co(NH3)5(SO4)]Cl | No precipitate | White precipitate of AgCl |
Key result: The first isomer gives BaSO4 precipitate; the second gives AgCl precipitate. This is direct evidence of different free ions.
Mistake 4: Confusing Ionisation Isomerism with Linkage Isomerism
The error: Students think this is about how SO4 binds (through O or S) — that's linkage isomerism.
Why it's wrong: In ionisation isomerism, the position of the ion (inside vs outside the coordination sphere) changes. The bonding mode of the ligand is irrelevant here.
How to avoid:
- Ionisation isomerism: Same atoms, different free ions. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 on this concept.
- KCET 2026Set D31 markMCQQ.How many ions per molecule are produced from the complex [Co(NH3)6]Cl3 in solution? (A) 6 (B) 4 (C) 3 (D) 2
›Reveal solutionSolution
The number of ions per formula unit equals the complex ion plus the free counter-ions written outside the coordination sphere.
Step 1 — Identify the coordination sphere
In [Co(NH3)6]Cl3, all six NH3 ligands are bound directly to cobalt inside the square brackets, so they do not ionize; only what is written outside the brackets ionizes in solution.
Step 2 — Write the dissociation …
- KCET 2025Set D-41 markMCQQ.A ligand which has two different donor atoms and either of the two ligates with the central metal atom/ion in the complex is called (A) Chelate ligand (B) Unidentate ligand (C) Polydentate ligand (D) Ambidentate ligand
›Reveal solutionSolution
The defining phrase is "two different donor atoms, either of the two ligates" — one binding site used at a time, chosen from two candidates — which is exactly the definition of an ambidentate ligand.
Step 1 — Parse the definition given in the stem
The stem specifies three things:
- the ligand has two different donor atoms;
- either one of them can bond to the metal;
- (implicitly) only one at a time actually coordinates — hence "either", not "both".
So the ligand occupies only one coordination site, but it has a choice of which of its own atoms to use.
Step 2 — Run through the four terms and see which fits
(A) Chelate ligand — a di- or polydentate ligand that grips the metal through two or more donor atoms simultaneously, forming a ring (the "claw"). E.g. ethylenediamine (en) binds through both N atoms at once; oxalate through both O's. ✗ — this binds through both, not either.
(B) Unidentate (monodentate) ligand — donates through exactly one donor atom, and it has only that one available. E.g. NHX3 (N only), ClX−, HX2O. ✗ — it uses one site, yes, but there is no choice of two different donor atoms. That is precisely the feature the stem adds.
(C) Polydentate ligand — binds through several donor atoms at once. E.g. EDTA⁴⁻ is hexadentate (2 N + 4 O, all six coordinating). ✗ — again, all sites used together.
(D) Ambidentate ligand — from Latin ambi = "both / either of two". It has two different donor atoms but coordinates through only one of them at a time. ✓ This is exactly the stem.
Step 3 — The standard examples (worth knowing)
Ligand Donor used Name of complex prefix Example NOX2X− N nitro (−NOX2) [Co(NHX3)X5(NOX2)]2+ NOX2X− O nitrito (−ONO) [Co(NHX3)X5(ONO)]2+ - KCET 2025Set D-41 markMCQQ.In the complex ion [Fe(C2O4)3]3−, the co-ordination number of Fe is (A) 4 (B) 5 (C) 6 (D) 3
›Reveal solutionSolution
Coordination number counts donor atoms, not ligand molecules — oxalate is bidentate, so three oxalates supply 3×2=6 donor atoms.
Step 1 — The concept: coordination number ≠ number of ligands
The coordination number (CN) of the central metal is the number of donor atoms (i.e. the number of sigma bonds / ligand bonds) directly attached to it — not the number of ligand molecules or ions.
These two counts agree only when every ligand is unidentate. Whenever a chelating ligand is present, you must multiply by its denticity:
CN=∑ligands(number of that ligand)×(its denticity)
Step 2 — What is the denticity of oxalate?
The oxalate ion, CX2OX4X2− (abbreviated ox), is the conjugate base of oxalic acid:
X−X22−OX2C−COX2X−
It carries two carboxylate groups, and one oxygen from each group coordinates to the metal. Both donor atoms bind simultaneously, wrapping around the metal to close a stable five-membered chelate ring (M–O–C–C–O).
∴ oxalate is BIDENTATE(denticity=2)
This is why oxalate is a chelating ligand and why [Fe(CX2OX4)X3]3− is unusually stable (the chelate effect).
Step 3 — Count the donor atoms
The complex is [Fe(CX2OX4)X3]3− — three oxalate ligands, each bidentate:
CN=3ligands×2liganddonor atoms=6
All six donor atoms are oxygens, arranged octahedrally about the iron.
Step 4 — The trap …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-M1 markMCQQ.An aqueous solution of CrCl3.6H2O (Molar mass =266.5 g/mol ) containing 2.665 g of the solute after processing, when treated with excess of AgNO3 gave 2.87 g of AgCl (Molar mass of AgCl=143.5 g/mol ) Choose the correct formula of the compound which give these results. (A) [Cr(H2O)4Cl2]Cl⋅2H2O (B) [Cr(H2O)3Cl3]⋅3H2O (C) [Cr(H2O)5Cl]Cl2⋅H2O (D) [Cr(H2O)6]Cl3
›Reveal solutionSolution
The AgCl formed shows 2 free chloride ions per formula unit, which fixes the structure as [Cr(H2O)5Cl]Cl2⋅H2O — option (C).
Concept
In a coordination compound, chloride ions bound to the metal (written inside the square brackets) stay put, while chloride ions outside the coordination sphere are free ions that precipitate with AgNO3 as AgCl. So counting the AgCl tells us the number of ionizable chlorides.
Solution
- Moles of complex: 266.52.665=0.0100mol.
- Moles of AgCl: 143.52.87=0.0200mol.
- Free chlorides per formula unit: 0.01000.0200=2.
- Test the options for the number of chlorides outside the bracket:
- (A) [Cr(H2O)4Cl2]Cl⋅2H2O: 1 free Cl.
- (B) [Cr(H2O)3Cl3]⋅3H2O: 0 free Cl.
- (C) [Cr(H2O)5Cl]Cl2⋅H2O: 2 free Cl. …
- KCET 2024Set B-21 markMCQQ.On treating 100 mL of 0.1 M aqueous solution of the complex CrCl3.6H2O with excess of AgNO3, 2.86 g of AgCl was obtained. The complex is : (A) [Cr(H2O)3Cl3].3H2O (B) [Cr(H2O)4Cl2]Cl.2H2O (C) [Cr(H2O)5Cl]Cl2.H2O (D) [Cr(H2O)6]Cl3
›Reveal solutionSolution
The number of moles of AgCl precipitated tells us how many chloride ions are free (outside the coordination sphere). From the given data, 0.02 mol of AgCl forms from 0.01 mol of complex, meaning 2 Cl⁻ are free — so the complex has one Cl inside and two outside. The correct option is (C).
The key idea is that only chloride ions that are outside the coordination sphere — the counter-ions — will react with AgNO₃ to give AgCl. Chloride ions that are coordinated to the metal (inside the square brackets) do not precipitate. So the mass of AgCl tells us exactly how many free Cl⁻ ions each formula unit releases.
-
Find moles of AgCl formed.
Molar mass of AgCl = 108 + 35.5 = 143.5 g/mol.
Moles of AgCl = 143.52.86≈0.02 mol.
-
Find moles of the complex taken.
Volume = 100 mL = 0.1 L, concentration = 0.1 M.
Moles of complex = 0.1×0.1=0.01 mol.
-
Find the ratio of free Cl⁻ per complex molecule.
moles complexmoles AgCl=0.010.02=2.
So each formula unit of the complex gives 2 chloride ions that precipitate with Ag⁺.
-
Interpret the ratio.
The complex has the formula CrCl3⋅6H2O, so there are 3 Cl atoms total. If 2 are free (outside the coordination sphere), then only 1 Cl is inside the coordination sphere (bonded to Cr). The water molecules also distribute between inside and outside.
-
Match with the options.
- (A) [Cr(H2O)3Cl3]⋅3H2O — all 3 Cl are inside → 0 free Cl⁻. Wrong. …
-
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-A1 markMCQQ.The molar conductivity of the complex CoCl3⋅4NH3⋅2H2O is found to be the same as that of a 1:3 electrolyte. The structural formula of the compound is : (A) [Co(NH3)4(H2O)2]Cl3 (B) [Co(NH3)4Cl(H2O)]Cl2H2O (C) [Co(NH3)4(H2O)Cl2]ClH2O (D) [Co(NH3)4(H2O)2Cl]Cl2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Behaving as a 1:3 electrolyte (4 ions) requires all three Cl− outside the coordination sphere: [Co(NH3)4(H2O)2]Cl3.
A 1:3 electrolyte dissociates into 4 ions total: one complex cation and three anions. So all three chloride ions must be outside the coordination sphere (ionisable), and both water molecules coordinate to cobalt. The complex cation is
[Co(NH3)4(H2O)2]3+
(giving Co its +3 oxidation state, coordination number 6), balanced by 3Cl−: …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-M1 markMCQQ.A Coordination compound is represented by the formula [CoBr3(en)x]. This compound required one mole of AgNO3 to form a pale yellow precipitate of AgBr. What is the value of x in the compound? (A) 2 (B) 1 (C) 4 (D) 3
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key is that one mole of AgNO₃ precipitates one mole of free Br⁻ ions; the complex has only one ionic bromide, so the coordination sphere must contain the other two bromides and the ethylenediamine (en) ligands, giving x = 2.
Concept & Intuition
Coordination compounds can have some ligands tightly bound inside the coordination sphere (non‑ionic) and others outside as counter‑ions (ionic). When you add AgNO₃, only the free, ionic bromide ions (Br⁻) react to form pale yellow AgBr precipitate. The problem says exactly one mole of AgNO₃ is needed per mole of the compound, meaning only one Br⁻ is ionic. The rest must be inside the coordination sphere. Since the formula is written as [CoBr3(en)x], the square brackets indicate the coordination sphere. The total number of bromides is 3, but only one is outside the brackets (ionic), so the other two must be inside. That forces the charge balance and tells us how many neutral en ligands are needed.
Step‑by‑step reasoning
-
Identify the ionic bromide count
One mole of AgNO₃ gives one mole of AgBr precipitate. This means the compound releases exactly one mole of free Br⁻ ions per mole of complex. So there is one ionic bromide outside the coordination sphere.
-
Determine the composition of the coordination sphere
The formula is written as [CoBr3(en)x]. The square brackets enclose the coordination sphere. Since there are three bromine atoms total and only one is ionic, the other two bromine atoms must be inside the brackets as ligands. So the coordination sphere contains Co, two Br ligands, and x molecules of ethylenediamine (en).
-
Balance the charge
Cobalt in this complex is typically in the +3 oxidation state (common for Co(III) ammine/amine complexes). Each bromide ligand inside the sphere carries a –1 charge, so two bromides contribute –2. The en ligand is neutral. Therefore the charge on the complex ion is:
Charge=(+3)+2(−1)=+1
So the complex ion is [CoBr2(en)x]+. To balance this, there must be one counter‑ion — and that counter‑ion is the one ionic Br⁻ we already identified. This matches perfectly: the compound is [CoBr2(en)x]Br.
- Determine x from coordination number …
-
- KCET 2023Set D-21 markMCQQ.The number of protons, neutrons and electrons in the ion 1632S2− respectively are (A) 16,18,16 (B) 16,16,18 (C) 18,16,16 (D) 16,16,16
›Reveal solutionSolution
The atomic number gives protons and electrons in a neutral atom; the mass number gives neutrons; the charge tells how many extra electrons are present. For 1632S2−, the counts are 16 protons, 16 neutrons, and 18 electrons — option (B).
The key is to read the notation 1632S2− piece by piece. The subscript (16) is the atomic number Z — that’s the number of protons. In any atom or ion, the number of protons never changes; it defines the element. So protons = 16.
The superscript (32) is the mass number A, which is the sum of protons and neutrons. Neutrons = A−Z=32−16=16.
Now the charge: 2− means the ion has gained two extra electrons compared to the neutral atom. A neutral sulfur atom has as many electrons as protons — 16. With a 2− charge, it has 16+2=18 electrons.
Let’s check each option:
- Protons: always 16. That eliminates (A) and (C) immediately, since they show 18 or 16 but in the wrong order.
- Neutrons: 16. Both remaining options (B) and (D) have 16 neutrons — so far so good. …
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-E1 markMCQQ.Match the Coordination compounds given in Column I with their characteristic features listed in Column II. .tg {border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:0;} .tg td{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg th{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; font-weight:normal;overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg .tg-c3ow{border-color:inherit;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-7btt{border-color:inherit;font-weight:bold;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-0pky{border-color:inherit;text-align:left;vertical-align:top} S.No. Coordination compounds S.No. Characteristic features W [Co(NH3)5Cl]Cl3 P Oxidation state =+3 Configuration =d5μ=5.92BM X K4[Mn(CN)6 Q Oxidation state =+3 Configuration =d3μ=3.87BM Y [CrCl3(py)3] R Oxidation state =+3 Configuration =d6μ=0BM Z Cs[FeCl4] S Oxidation state =+2 Configuration =d5μ=1.732BM (A) W=SX=RY=QZ=P (B) W=SX=PY=QZ=R (C) W=RX=SY=PZ=Q (D) W=RX=SY=QZ=P
›Reveal solutionSolution
[!TLDR]
Work out oxidation state, d-count and spin state for each complex; the spin-only moments identify W=R (d⁶, μ=0), X=S (d⁵ LS, μ=1.73), Y=Q (d³, μ=3.87), Z=P (d⁵ HS, μ=5.92).
Concept
Spin-only magnetic moment μ=n(n+2) BM, where n is the number of unpaired electrons. Strong-field ligands (CN⁻, NH₃) tend to pair electrons (low spin); weak-field ligands (Cl⁻) keep them unpaired (high spin) — core CBSE/NCERT coordination-chemistry ideas.
Solution
W = [Co(NH₃)₅Cl]³⁺ type, Co(III): d6. With ammine ligands it is low spin, all electrons paired, n=0, μ=0 → feature R (d6, μ=0).
X = K₄[Mn(CN)₆], Mn(II): d5. CN⁻ is strong field → low spin, one unpaired electron, n=1, μ=1⋅3=1.73 BM → feature S (OS +2, d5, μ=1.732). …
- KCET 2022Set B-31 markMCQQ.The complex hexamine platinum (IV) chloride will give ______ number of ions on ionization. (A) 3 (B) 2 (C) 5 (D) 4
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key is to determine the correct formula of the complex and then count the ions produced when it dissociates in solution. Hexamine platinum(IV) chloride gives 5 ions on ionization.
The question asks about "complex hexamine platinum (IV) chloride". The name tells you the coordination compound directly. "Hexamine" means six ammonia (NH3) ligands are attached to the central metal. "Platinum (IV)" tells you the oxidation state of platinum is +4. "Chloride" at the end indicates that chlorine is present as a counter-ion (outside the coordination sphere), not as a ligand.
So the coordination sphere is [Pt(NH3)6]4+. To balance the +4 charge, you need four chloride ions, each with a -1 charge. The full formula is therefore [Pt(NH3)6]Cl4.
Now, when this compound is dissolved in water (ionization), the complex ion and the chloride ions separate. The coordination sphere itself does not break apart — the NH3 ligands remain firmly attached to platinum. So the ionization is:
[Pt(NH3)6]Cl4→[Pt(NH3)6]4++4Cl−
Count the ions produced: one complex cation and four chloride anions. That gives a total of 5 ions. …
- KCET 2021Set B-21 markMCQQ.Homoleptic complexes among the following are (A) K3[Al(C2O4)3], (B) [CoCl2(en)2]+ (C) K2[Zn(OH)4] (A) A only (B) (A) and (B) only (C) (A) and (C) only (D) (C) only
›Reveal solutionSolution
Homoleptic = one ligand type only; the oxalato-aluminate and the tetrahydroxozincate qualify, the mixed chloro/en cobalt complex does not.
Step 1 — The definition.
In a homoleptic complex the central metal ion is bonded to only one type of donor (ligand). If two or more different ligands are attached, the complex is heteroleptic.
Step 2 — Examine each complex.
-
K3[Al(C2O4)3] — the coordination entity is [Al(C2O4)3]3−. The only ligand present is the oxalate ion C2O42− (three of them, each bidentate, giving CN = 6). One ligand type ⇒ homoleptic.
-
[CoCl2(en)2]+ — here cobalt is bonded to two different ligands: two chloride ions Cl− and two ethylenediamine molecules (en). Two ligand types ⇒ heteroleptic. …
-
- COMEDK 2021Set 20211 markMCQQ.Which type of ligand is EDTA? (A) Monodentate (B) Hexadentate (C) Bidentate (D) Tridentate
›Reveal solutionSolution
Total = 6 donor atoms, so EDTA is a HEXADENTATE chelating ligand; it wraps around an octahedral metal ion occupying all six coordination sites (e.g. [Ca(EDTA)]2-).
Concept: Denticity of a ligand = number of donor atoms it uses to bind the metal.
EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetate, EDTA4-) has:
- 2 nitrogen donor atoms (the two amine N of the ethylenediamine backbone)
- 4 oxygen donor atoms (one from each of the four carboxylate arms) …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.