Q.Write down the electronic configuration of:
Concept understanding — Stability of Oxidation States
Stability of Oxidation States – From Intuition to Precision
Imagine you're holding a ball on a hill. If you place it exactly at the top, it's balanced — but the slightest push sends it rolling down. That's an unstable position. If you place it in a small dip on the hillside, it stays put even if nudged — that's stable. Oxidation states work the same way: some are like the hilltop (easily changed), others like the dip (hard to change).
The Core Intuition
An oxidation state is just a number we assign to an atom to track how many electrons it has gained or lost compared to its neutral state. But atoms don't "want" to stay in arbitrary oxidation states — they want to reach a configuration that minimises their energy.
Stability here means: how reluctant is that oxidation state to change under normal conditions? A stable oxidation state resists being oxidised further or reduced further. An unstable one readily changes into something else.
The Precise Statement
Stability of an oxidation state refers to the tendency of an element to maintain that particular oxidation state under given conditions (temperature, pH, presence of other reagents). A stable oxidation state is one that does not easily undergo redox reactions — it is neither easily oxidised nor easily reduced.
This depends on three key factors:
- Electronic configuration – Half-filled and fully-filled d or f subshells confer extra stability (e.g., Fe3+ with d5 is more stable than Fe2+ with d6 in some contexts).
- Inert pair effect – Heavier p-block elements (like Tl, Pb, Bi) show lower oxidation states (e.g., +1 for Tl) as more stable than higher ones (+3 for Tl), because the s-electrons become reluctant to participate.
- Disproportionation tendency – Some oxidation states are unstable because they spontaneously convert into two other states (e.g., Cu+ in aqueous solution gives Cu2+ and Cu).
Stability is relative — it depends on the environment. Mn2+ is stable in acidic solution but easily oxidised in alkaline medium. Always specify conditions when discussing stability.
Examples That Make It Concrete
Transition metals – Cr3+ (d3) and Mn2+ (d5) are exceptionally stable because half-filled/half-filled-like configurations have low energy. Cr2+ (d4) is easily oxidised to Cr3+ — it's unstable.
p-block elements – Pb2+ is stable, Pb4+ is a strong oxidising agent (unstable). Sn2+ is a reducing agent (easily oxidised to Sn4+), so Sn4+ is more stable for tin.
Common pattern – For most elements, the most common oxidation state is the most stable one under standard conditions. But "most common" isn't always "most stable" — e.g., Fe3+ is common but Fe2+ is more stable in acidic solution.
Do not confuse "stability" with "occurrence". Mn7+ (as MnO4−) is common in the lab but is a powerful oxidising agent — it is not stable in the sense of resisting change. It readily accepts electrons.
How to Think About It in Exams
When asked "Explain the stability of oxidation states of [element]", follow this mental checklist:
- Write the electronic configuration of the atom.
- Write configurations for each possible oxidation state.
- Look for half-filled, fully-filled, or inert pair effects.
- Check if the state can disproportionate (common for +1 states of Cu, Au, and +3 states of Mn).
- Mention the medium (acidic/alkaline) if relevant.
For d-block elements, remember: d0, d5, and d10 are especially stable. For p-block, the inert pair effect makes lower oxidation states more stable as you go down the group.
The Bottom Line
Stability of an oxidation state is a measure of how strongly an atom holds onto that oxidation number — how hard it is to push it up or down. It's determined by electronic structure, the element's position in the periodic table, and the chemical environment. Master this, and you'll predict redox behaviour without memorising every reaction.
Stability of oxidation states among transition and inner-transition elements is discussed in the NCERT/CBSE Class 12 Chemistry chapter on d- and f-Block Elements, and ‘stability of oxidation states in transition elements’ is a frequently searched important-question topic for board exams, JEE Main and NEET. Predicting which oxidation state is most stable is a reasoning skill regularly tested in competitive-exam inorganic chemistry MCQs.
Why this formula?
Stability of Oxidation States: Why It Works
This concept explains why certain oxidation states of an element are more stable than others — and why some states are never observed at all.
The Core Idea: Energy Minimisation
An oxidation state is stable when the total energy of the system is at a minimum. This depends on three competing factors:
- Ionisation energy (energy needed to remove electrons)
- Lattice energy (for ionic compounds) or bond energy (for covalent compounds)
- Electronic configuration (half-filled / fully-filled subshells)
There is no single formula for stability — instead, we use trends and principles that act as "formulae" for prediction.
Key Principle 1: Inert Pair Effect (for p-block elements)
Why it holds:
For heavier elements (e.g., Tl, Pb, Bi), the 6s² electrons are held very tightly due to poor shielding and relativistic effects. They resist removal.
- Result: Lower oxidation state (e.g., +1 for Tl, +2 for Pb) becomes more stable than the higher state (+3, +4).
- Example: TlX3+ is a strong oxidising agent — it readily gains two electrons to become TlX+.
Derivation logic:
The energy cost to remove the 6s² electrons is greater than the energy gained by forming additional bonds or lattice. So the system stays in the lower state.
Key Principle 2: Half-Filled / Fully-Filled Subshell Stability
Why it holds:
A half-filled (d5, f7) or fully-filled (d10, f14) subshell has extra exchange energy and symmetry — making it unusually stable.
- Example: MnX2+ (d5) is more stable than MnX3+ (d4). FeX3+ (d5) is more stable than FeX2+ (d6).
Derivation logic:
The exchange energy (Hund's rule) is maximum for half-filled configurations. Removing an electron from a half-filled shell costs extra energy — so the half-filled state is favoured.
Key Principle 3: Lattice Energy / Hydration Energy Compensation
For transition metals, stability of a particular oxidation state in aqueous solution depends on:
ΔG∘=ΔHhydration∘−ΔHionisation∘
Why it holds:
- Higher oxidation states have higher ionisation energy (harder to remove electrons).
- But they also have higher hydration energy (smaller, more charged ions attract water more strongly).
- The balance determines which state is stable.
Example:
- CuX+ is unstable in water because its hydration energy is too low to compensate for the loss of the second electron.
- CuX2+ is stable in water.
Key Principle 4: Disproportionation
Some oxidation states are unstable and spontaneously convert to two other states:
2CuX+Cu+CuX2+
Why it holds:
The free energy change ΔG∘ for the reaction is negative. This happens when the intermediate oxidation state is less stable than the extremes.
Formula (for aqueous ions):
If Ereduction∘ for the higher state is more positive than for the lower state, disproportionation is spontaneous.
Summary Table: Why Each "Formula" Holds
| Principle | Why it works | Key exam example |
|---|---|---|
| Inert pair effect | 6s² electrons are too tightly bound | PbX2+ stable, PbX4+ oxidising |
| Half-filled stability | Extra exchange energy | MnX2+ > MnX3+ |
| Hydration vs ionisation | Energy balance in solution | CuX2+ stable, CuX+ not |
| Disproportionation | ΔG<0 for intermediate state | CuX+ in water |
Final Takeaway for Exams
Never memorise stability blindly. Always ask:
- Is the electronic configuration special? (half-filled / inert pair)
- Is the medium aqueous or solid? (hydration vs lattice)
- Does the element belong to a heavier group? (inert pair effect)
The "formula" is really a balance of energies — and the reasoning is what gets you marks.
Concept: Stability of Oxidation States — ions with half-filled, fully-filled, or empty d/f subshells are particularly stable.
Reasoning:
- Write the ground-state configuration of the neutral atom.
- Remove electrons from the outermost orbitals (ns before (n−1)d for transition metals; 6s before 4f for lanthanides/actinides).
- Adjust for stability: Cr3+ loses the 4s1 electron first, then two 3d electrons.
- Cr: [Ar]3d54s1 → remove 4s1 + two 3d → [Ar]3d3
- Pm: [Xe]4f56s2 → remove 6s2 + one 4f → [Xe]4f4
- Cu: [Ar]3d104s1 → remove 4s1 → [Ar]3d10
- Ce: [Xe]4f15d16s2 → remove 6s2 + 5d1 + one 4f → [Xe] (empty 4f)
- Co: [Ar]3d74s2 → remove 4s2 → [Ar]3d7
- Lu: [Xe]4f145d16s2 → remove 6s2 (2 e⁻, matching the +2 charge) → [Xe]4f145d1
- Mn: [Ar]3d54s2 → remove 4s2 → [Ar]3d5
- Th: [Rn]6d27s2 → remove 7s2 + 6d2 → [Rn]
✓Final answer
(i) [Ar]3d3 (ii) [Xe]4f4 (iii) [Ar]3d10 (iv) [Xe] (v) [Ar]3d7 (vi) [Xe]4f145d1 (vii) [Ar]3d5 (viii) [Rn]
The key idea is to first write the ground-state configuration of the neutral atom, then remove electrons from the outermost shells (highest n, then highest l within that n) to form the cation. The final configurations are: (i) [Ar]3d3,
(ii) [Xe]4f4,
(iii) [Ar]3d10,
(iv) [Xe]4f0,
(v) [Ar]3d7,
(vi) [Xe]4f145d1,
(vii) [Ar]3d5,
(viii) [Rn].
When writing electronic configurations for ions, the most common mistake is to remove electrons from the last filled subshell in the neutral atom. That is wrong. The correct rule: electrons are removed from the orbital with the highest principal quantum number n first. If two orbitals share the same n, remove from the one with the higher azimuthal quantum number l (i.e., p before s, d before p, etc.). This is because orbitals with higher n are farther from the nucleus and less tightly bound.
For transition metals and lanthanides/actinides, this means that the ns electrons (where n is the period number) are lost before the (n−1)d or (n−2)f electrons. Let’s apply this step by step.
1. Cr3+
Neutral Cr (Z=24) has configuration: [Ar]3d54s1.
Why 3d54s1 and not 3d44s2? Because a half-filled d subshell (d5) is extra stable — this is an exception you must remember.
To form Cr3+, remove 3 electrons. Start with the highest n: the 4s electron goes first. That gives [Ar]3d5. Then remove two more from the 3d subshell (since n=3 is now the highest). 3d5 minus 2 electrons = 3d3.
Do not remove 4s electrons last. Many students write [Ar]3d24s1 for Cr3+, which is incorrect. The 4s orbital is higher in energy than 3d once the atom is ionized.
Answer: [Ar]3d3
2. Pm3+
Promethium (Pm, Z=61) is a lanthanide. Neutral configuration: [Xe]4f56s2.
Lanthanides fill the 4f subshell after 6s. For Pm3+, remove 3 electrons. Highest n is 6: remove both 6s electrons first. Then remove one more from the 4f subshell (next highest n is 4). 4f5 minus 1 = 4f4.
Answer: [Xe]4f4
3. Cu+
Copper (Cu, Z=29) neutral: [Ar]3d104s1 (another exception — full d subshell is stable).
Remove 1 electron. Highest n is 4: remove the 4s electron. That leaves [Ar]3d10.
Cu+ has a completely filled d subshell (d10), which is very stable. This is why copper(I) compounds are common.
Answer: [Ar]3d10
4. Ce4+
Cerium (Ce, Z=58) neutral: [Xe]4f15d16s2 (NCERT Table 4.9's form; the alternative 4f26s2 is sometimes quoted in the literature).
Remove 4 electrons. First, remove both 6s electrons, then the 5d electron, then the single 4f electron. So the configuration is just the noble gas core [Xe].
Answer: [Xe]
5. Co2+
Cobalt (Co, Z=27) neutral: [Ar]3d74s2.
Remove 2 electrons. Highest n is 4: remove both 4s electrons. That leaves [Ar]3d7.
Answer: [Ar]3d7
6. Lu2+
Lutetium (Lu, Z=71) neutral: [Xe]4f145d16s2.
Remove 2 electrons. Highest n is 6: remove both 6s electrons. That leaves [Xe]4f145d1.
Lu is the last lanthanide; its 4f subshell is full (4f14). The 5d electron is present because after 4f14, the next electron goes into 5d (not 4f).
Answer: [Xe]4f145d1
7. Mn2+
Manganese (Mn, Z=25) neutral: [Ar]3d54s2.
Remove 2 electrons. Highest n is 4: remove both 4s electrons. That leaves [Ar]3d5.
Mn2+ has a half-filled d subshell (d5), which gives it extra stability. This is why manganese(II) is a common oxidation state.
Answer: [Ar]3d5
8. Th4+
Thorium (Th, Z=90) is an actinide. Neutral: [Rn]6d27s2.
Remove 4 electrons. Highest n is 7: remove both 7s electrons. Then remove two from 6d: 6d2 minus 2 = 6d0. So the configuration is just [Rn].
Answer: [Rn]
The configurations are: (i) [Ar]3d3,
(ii) [Xe]4f4,
(iii) [Ar]3d10,
(iv) [Xe],
(v) [Ar]3d7,
(vi) [Xe]4f145d1,
(vii) [Ar]3d5,
(viii) [Rn].
Method: Electronic Configuration Using the Aufbau Principle + Ionization Sequence
This method uses the Aufbau order (filling order: 1s, 2s, 2p, 3s, 3p, 4s, 3d, 4p, 5s, 4d, 5p, 6s, 4f, 5d, 6p, 7s, 5f, 6d, 7p) and the rule that for ions, electrons are removed first from the outermost shell (highest n), not from the subshell that was filled last.
Steps
- Write the ground-state configuration of the neutral atom using the Aufbau order.
- Remove electrons equal to the positive charge, starting from the highest principal quantum number (n) shell.
- Write the final configuration in order of increasing n (and within same n, increasing ℓ).
Solutions
(i) Cr3+
- Neutral Cr (Z = 24): [Ar]3d54s1 (Exception: half-filled d-subshell stability)
- Remove 3 electrons: first from 4s (1 e⁻), then from 3d (2 e⁻)
- Cr3+: [Ar]3d3
(ii) Pm3+
- Neutral Pm (Z = 61): [Xe]4f56s2
- Remove 3 electrons: from 6s (2 e⁻), then from 4f (1 e⁻)
- Pm3+: [Xe]4f4
(iii) Cu+
- Neutral Cu (Z = 29): [Ar]3d104s1 (Exception: fully filled d-subshell)
- Remove 1 electron: from 4s
- Cu+: [Ar]3d10
(iv) Ce4+
- Neutral Ce (Z = 58): [Xe]4f15d16s2 (Actual ground state: [Xe]4f15d16s2)
- Remove 4 electrons: from 6s (2 e⁻), then 5d (1 e⁻), then 4f (1 e⁻)
- Ce4+: [Xe] (noble gas core)
(v) Co2+
- Neutral Co (Z = 27): [Ar]3d74s2
- Remove 2 electrons: from 4s
- Co2+: [Ar]3d7
(vi) Lu2+
- Neutral Lu (Z = 71): [Xe]4f145d16s2
- Remove 2 electrons: from 6s (2 e⁻)
- Lu2+: [Xe]4f145d1
(vii) Mn2+
- Neutral Mn (Z = 25): [Ar]3d54s2
- Remove 2 electrons: from 4s
- Mn2+: [Ar]3d5
(viii) Th4+
- Neutral Th (Z = 90): [Rn]6d27s2
- Remove 4 electrons: from 7s (2 e⁻), then 6d (2 e⁻)
- Th4+: [Rn] (noble gas core)
Key Exam Insight
Stability of oxidation states is linked to half-filled (d5, f7) or fully filled (d10, f14) subshells.
For example:
- Mn2+ (d5) is stable → half-filled stability
- Cu+ (d10) is stable → fully filled stability
- Ce4+ ([Xe]) is stable → noble gas configuration
Here are the most common mistakes students make when writing electronic configurations for ions, especially in the context of Stability of Oxidation States (d- and f-block elements), and how to avoid each.
Mistake 1: Forgetting that electrons are removed from the 4s orbital first (for d-block ions)
The Error:
For Cr3+, writing [Ar]3d14s2 — removing all three electrons from 3d and leaving the 4s pair untouched.
The same wrong removal order turns Co2+ into [Ar]3d54s2 instead of the correct [Ar]3d7.
Why it happens:
Students memorise "4s is filled before 3d" but forget that when forming cations, electrons are removed from the 4s orbital first (because 4s is higher in energy once occupied).
How to avoid:
- For any d-block ion, always remove from 4s before 3d.
- Write the neutral atom configuration first, then strip the outermost s-electrons.
- Example:
- Neutral Cr: [Ar]3d54s1
- Cr3+: remove 1 from 4s, then 2 from 3d → [Ar]3d3
- Neutral Co: [Ar]3d74s2
- Co2+: remove 2 from 4s → [Ar]3d7
Mistake 2: Ignoring the stability of half-filled and fully-filled d-subshells
The Error:
For Cu+, students write [Ar]3d94s0 (which is technically possible) but miss that Cu+ is actually [Ar]3d10 (fully filled d — very stable).
Similarly, for Cr3+, they might write [Ar]3d24s1 instead of [Ar]3d3.
Why it happens:
They don't check if a half-filled (d5) or fully-filled (d10) configuration is possible after ionisation.
How to avoid:
- After removing electrons, check if the d-subshell becomes d5 or d10 — these are extra stable.
- For Cu+:
- Neutral Cu: [Ar]3d104s1
- Remove 1 electron (from 4s) → [Ar]3d10 (fully filled) — this is the correct configuration.
- For Cr3+:
- Neutral Cr: [Ar]3d54s1
- Remove 3 electrons (1 from 4s, 2 from 3d) → [Ar]3d3 (not half-filled, but correct).
Mistake 3: Writing f-block configurations with the wrong removal order (6s must go first)
The Error:
For Pm3+, students remove all three electrons from 4f, writing [Xe]4f26s2 instead of the correct [Xe]4f4 (remove the 6s pair first, then one 4f).
For Ce4+, they write [Xe]4f15d1 or [Xe]4f2 instead of [Xe] (empty f — f0).
For Lu2+, they remove the 5d electron first, writing [Xe]4f146s1 instead of the correct [Xe]4f145d1 (the 6s pair goes first).
Why it happens:
f-block elements have complex filling order (4f, 5d, 6s). Students forget that for lanthanides, the 4f is filled before 5d and 6s, and that stable oxidation states often correspond to f⁰, f⁷, f¹⁴.
How to avoid:
- For lanthanides (Ce to Lu), the neutral configuration is [Xe]4fn5d0 or [Xe]4fn−15d1 (exceptions: La, Gd, Lu).
- When forming ions, remove 6s electrons first, then 4f (if needed).
- Examples:
- Ce4+: Neutral Ce = [Xe]4f15d16s2 (or [Xe]4f26s2). Remove 4 electrons → [Xe] (f⁰ — very stable).
- Pm3+: Neutral Pm = [Xe]4f56s2. Remove 3 electrons (2 from 6s, 1 from 4f) → [Xe]4f4.
- Lu2+: Neutral Lu = [Xe]4f145d16s2. Remove 2 electrons (from 6s) → [Xe]4f145d1 (but note: Lu2+ is unstable; the stable ion is Lu3+ = [Xe]4f14).
Mistake 4: Confusing actinide configurations with lanthanides
The Error:
For Th4+, students write [Rn]5f06d07s0 (which is correct) but they might write [Rn]5f2 or [Rn]6d2 because they misremember the neutral configuration.
Why it happens:
Actinides have 5f, 6d, 7s filling that is less regular than lanthanides. Thorium (Th) is an exception: neutral Th = [Rn]6d27s2, not [Rn]5f2.
How to avoid:
- Memorise key exceptions:
- Th (Z=90): [Rn]6d27s2
- Pa (Z=91): [Rn]5f26d17s2
- U (Z=92): [Rn]5f36d17s2
- For Th4+: remove 4 electrons (2 from 7s, 2 from 6d) → [Rn] (noble gas core, f⁰ — very stable).
Mistake 5: Not checking for exceptions in neutral configurations before ionising
The Error:
For Cr3+, students start from [Ar]3d44s2 (wrong neutral Cr) and then remove 3 electrons → [Ar]3d34s0 (correct final, but wrong reasoning).
For Cu+, they start from [Ar]3d94s2 (wrong neutral Cu) → [Ar]3d9 (wrong).
Why it happens:
They don't memorise the anomalous configurations of Cr and Cu in the neutral state.
How to avoid:
- Memorise these neutral exceptions:
- Cr: [Ar]3d54s1 (not 3d44s2)
- Cu: [Ar]3d104s1 (not 3d94s2)
- Also: Nb, Mo, Ru, Rh, Pd, Ag, Pt, Au have similar anomalies.
- Always write the correct neutral configuration first, then remove electrons.
Quick Reference Table for the Given Ions
| Ion | Correct Configuration | Common Mistake |
|---|---|---|
| Cr3+ | [Ar]3d3 | [Ar]3d14s2 or [Ar]3d24s1 |
| Pm3+ | [Xe]4f4 | [Xe]4f5 or [Xe]4f35d1 |
| Cu+ | [Ar]3d10 | [Ar]3d94s0 |
| Ce4+ | [Xe] (f⁰) | [Xe]4f2 or [Xe]4f15d1 |
| Co2+ | [Ar]3d7 | [Ar]3d54s2 (wrong removal order) |
| Lu2+ | [Xe]4f145d1 (unstable) | [Xe]4f135d2 or [Xe]4f146s2 |
| Mn2+ | [Ar]3d5 | [Ar]3d34s2 |
| Th4+ | [Rn] (f⁰) | [Rn]5f2 or [Rn]6d2 |
Final Exam Tip
Always write the neutral configuration first, then remove electrons from the outermost s-orbital (and then d or f if needed). Check for half-filled/full-filled stability. For f-block, remember f⁰, f⁷, f¹⁴ are especially stable.
- KCET 2025Set D-41 markMCQQ.Which of the following statements are true about [NiCl4]2−?(a) The complex has tetrahedral geometry(b) Co-ordination number of Ni is 2 and oxidation state is +4(c) The complex is sp3 hybridised(d) It is a high spin complex(e) The complex is paramagnetic (A) a, c, d and e (B) a, b, d and e (C) b, c, d and e (D) a, b, c and d
›Reveal solutionSolution
Find the oxidation state (+2, so d8), note Cl⁻ is a weak-field ligand so no pairing occurs, giving a high-spin sp3 tetrahedral paramagnetic complex — every statement is true except (b), whose CN and oxidation state are both wrong.
Step 1 — Oxidation state and d-configuration of nickel
Let the oxidation state of Ni be x. Chloride carries −1 each, and the overall charge is −2:
x+4(−1)=−2⟹x=−2+4=+2
So the metal is NiX2+.
Nickel is Z=28: Ni=[Ar]3d84s2. Removing the two 4s electrons:
NiX2+=[Ar]3d8(a d8 ion)
Step 2 — Coordination number
Chloride is a unidentate ligand (one donor atom, Cl). With four of them:
Coordination number=4
Step 3 — This already settles statement (b)
(b) "Co-ordination number of Ni is 2 and oxidation state is +4"
Both halves are wrong — the CN is 4 (Step 2) and the oxidation state is +2 (Step 1). (b) is FALSE.
This is decisive: every option containing (b) — namely (B), (C) and (D) — is eliminated at once. Only (A) a, c, d and e remains. Let us verify that all four of those statements are indeed true.
Step 4 — Ligand field strength decides everything else
In the spectrochemical series, chloride sits near the weak-field end:
IX−<BrX−<Cl−<FX−<HX2O<NHX3<en<CNX−≈CO
ClX− is a weak-field ligand, so the splitting energy Δ it produces is small — smaller than the electron pairing energy P:
Δ<P
When Δ<P, it costs less energy for an electron to occupy a higher orbital than to pair up in a lower one. Therefore no pairing occurs — the 3d8 configuration is left untouched, with its two unpaired electrons intact.
Since the 3d orbitals are not vacated, no inner 3d orbital is available for hybridisation.
Step 5 — Hybridisation and geometry ⇒ statements (a) and (c)
With the 3d set unavailable, Ni²⁺ must use its outer orbitals: one 4s and three 4p.
4s+4px+4py+4pz⟶four sp3 hybrid orbitals
Four sp3 orbitals point to the corners of a tetrahedron (109.5∘).
- (a) "The complex has tetrahedral geometry" — TRUE ✓
- (c) "The complex is sp3 hybridised" — TRUE ✓
(This is an outer-orbital / high-spin complex. Contrast it with [Ni(CN)X4]2−: CNX− is a strong-field ligand, Δ>P, so the d8 electrons pair into a single 3d orbital, freeing it for dsp2 hybridisation ⇒ square planar and diamagnetic. Same metal ion, opposite answer — the ligand is what decides.)
Step 6 — Spin state and magnetism ⇒ statements (d) and (e)
Because pairing did not occur (Step 4), the complex has the maximum possible number of unpaired electrons:
- (d) "It is a high spin complex" — TRUE ✓ (weak-field Cl⁻ ⇒ high spin)
Counting unpaired electrons in d8 under a tetrahedral weak field (e4t24): n=2.
The spin-only magnetic moment:
μ=n(n+2) BM=2(2+2)=8≈2.83 BM
Since μ=0 (there are unpaired electrons), the complex is attracted into a magnetic field:
- (e) "The complex is paramagnetic" — TRUE ✓
Step 7 — Verdict table
Statement Claim True? a Tetrahedral geometry ✓ TRUE b CN = 2, oxidation state = +4 ✗ FALSE (CN = 4, state = +2) c sp3 hybridised ✓ TRUE d High spin complex ✓ TRUE e Paramagnetic (μ≈2.83 BM) ✓ TRUE The true statements are a, c, d and e.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — a, c, d and e.
ANSWER: A
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.Larger number of oxidation states are exhibited by the actinoids than those of lanthanoids. The reason is: (A) Lesser energy difference between 5 f and 6 d than between 4 f and 5 d orbitals (B) More energy difference between 5 f and 6 d than between 4 f and 5 d orbitals (C) 4 f orbitals are more diffused than 5 f orbitals (D) Highly reactive nature of the actinoids
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is that actinoids show more oxidation states because their 5f and 6d orbitals are closer in energy than the 4f and 5d orbitals of lanthanoids, making it easier to involve f-electrons in bonding. The correct option is (A).
The question asks why actinoids exhibit a larger number of oxidation states than lanthanoids. This is a classic comparison in f-block chemistry, rooted in the electronic structure of the two series.
Concept and Intuition
Oxidation states arise when an atom loses electrons. For f-block elements, the electrons lost can come from both the f and d orbitals. The ease of removing f-electrons depends on how tightly they are held, which is related to the energy gap between the f and d orbitals. A smaller gap means f-electrons can be promoted to d orbitals more readily, allowing a wider range of oxidation states. Actinoids (5f series) have a smaller 5f–6d energy difference than lanthanoids (4f–5d), so they can access more oxidation states.
Let’s break it down step by step.
-
Understand the orbital energy trends
In lanthanoids, the 4f orbitals are deeply buried inside the atom, shielded by outer electrons. The 5d orbitals are at a significantly higher energy. This large 4f–5d energy gap makes it difficult to remove or promote 4f electrons, so lanthanoids typically show only +3 (and occasionally +2 or +4) oxidation states.
In actinoids, the 5f orbitals are less shielded and more extended (diffuse). The 5f and 6d orbitals are much closer in energy. This small energy difference allows 5f electrons to be easily promoted to 6d orbitals or directly lost, enabling a variety of oxidation states (e.g., +3, +4, +5, +6, and even +7 in some cases like neptunium and plutonium).
-
Evaluate the options
- (A) Lesser energy difference between 5f and 6d than between 4f and 5d orbitals — This matches the explanation above.
- (B) More energy difference — This would make it harder to involve f-electrons, reducing oxidation states, so incorrect.
- (C) 4f orbitals are more diffused than 5f orbitals — Actually, 5f orbitals are more diffused (less tightly held) due to poorer shielding, so this is false.
- (D) Highly reactive nature of the actinoids — Reactivity is a consequence, not the fundamental reason for more oxidation states.
-
Confirm with a classic example
Uranium (actinoid) shows oxidation states +3, +4, +5, and +6. Europium (lanthanoid) shows only +2 and +3. The difference is directly tied to the 5f–6d energy gap being smaller.
Watch outA common mistake is to think that "more diffused orbitals" (option C) means easier electron loss. While 5f orbitals are indeed more diffused than 4f, the reason for more oxidation states is the energy gap, not diffusion alone. Diffusion contributes to the gap, but the gap is the direct cause.
TipA neat way to remember: The 5f series is like the 4f series but with the f and d orbitals "squeezed closer" in energy. This is why actinoids are more variable in oxidation states — they can "dip into" f-electrons more easily.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A).
ANSWER: A
-
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-E1 markMCQQ.Identify the correct statement from the following. (A) The green manganate ion shows diamagnetic nature but the permanganate ion exhibits paramagnetic nature (B) Interstitial compounds of transition metals have lower melting points than that of pure transition metals and their compounds are chemically reactive (C) Cerium is a lanthanoid metal which exists in a stable oxidation state of +4 , besides exhibiting an oxidation state of +3 (D) Cr(VI) is more stable than W(VI) and hence acts as a good oxidising agent
›Reveal solutionSolution
The question tests knowledge of transition metal chemistry: magnetic properties of manganate vs. permanganate, properties of interstitial compounds, oxidation states of cerium, and stability of Cr(VI) vs. W(VI). Only statement (C) is correct.
Let’s examine each statement carefully, using chemical principles to decide which one is accurate.
-
Statement (A): “The green manganate ion shows diamagnetic nature but the permanganate ion exhibits paramagnetic nature.”
- The manganate ion is MnO42−, where manganese is in the +6 oxidation state. Electronic configuration of Mn in +6: [Ar]3d1. That’s one unpaired electron → paramagnetic, not diamagnetic.
- The permanganate ion is MnO4−, with Mn in +7: [Ar]3d0. No unpaired electrons → diamagnetic.
- So the statement gets both magnetic natures backwards. False.
-
Statement (B): “Interstitial compounds of transition metals have lower melting points than that of pure transition metals and their compounds are chemically reactive.”
- Interstitial compounds (e.g., carbides, nitrides, hydrides) form when small atoms like C, N, or H occupy holes in the metal lattice. This usually increases hardness and melting point (often very high), and they are chemically inert (not reactive).
- Both claims here are opposite to reality. False.
-
Statement (C): “Cerium is a lanthanoid metal which exists in a stable oxidation state of +4, besides exhibiting an oxidation state of +3.”
- Cerium (Ce, atomic number 58) has the electron configuration [Xe]4f15d16s2. The common +3 state arises from losing the 5d and 6s electrons.
- The +4 state is also stable because losing one more electron gives a 4f0 configuration (empty f-subshell), which is especially stable. Ce(IV) is well-known in compounds like CeO2 and ceric ammonium nitrate.
- This is a textbook fact. True.
-
Statement (D): “Cr(VI) is more stable than W(VI) and hence acts as a good oxidising agent.”
- In group 6, the stability of the +6 oxidation state increases down the group: W(VI) is more stable than Cr(VI). Cr(VI) (as in CrO42− or Cr2O72−) is a strong oxidising agent precisely because it is less stable and readily gets reduced.
- The statement has the stability order reversed. False.
Watch outA common mistake is to assume that higher oxidation states are always more stable for lighter elements. In fact, for transition metals, the heavier congeners (like W) often stabilise higher oxidation states better.
TipRemember the trend: For group 6, the +6 state becomes more stable as you go down (Cr < Mo < W). So Cr(VI) is a strong oxidiser, while W(VI) is quite stable.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C).
ANSWER: C
-
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-M1 markMCQQ.Choose the incorrect statement from the following (A) The ability of Fluorine to stabilise the higher oxidation states of transition metals exceeds that of Oxygen (B) Cu (I) compounds in aqueous medium undergo disproportionation reaction (C) Cr2+ is a stronger reducing agent than Fe2+ (D) MoO3 and WO3 are not as strong oxidants as CrO3
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to evaluate each statement about transition-metal chemistry using periodic trends and redox stability; the incorrect statement is (A) because fluorine cannot exceed oxygen in stabilising high oxidation states.
Let’s go through each option carefully, building the reasoning step by step.
-
Option (A): “The ability of Fluorine to stabilise the higher oxidation states of transition metals exceeds that of Oxygen”
- In transition-metal oxyanions (like CrO42−, MnO4−), oxygen stabilises high oxidation states via strong π-bonding (O donates electron density to the metal, reducing its effective charge).
- Fluorine is more electronegative than oxygen, but it is a poor π-donor (it has no available d-orbitals for back-bonding) and forms weaker multiple bonds.
- For example, Mn2O7 (Mn in +7) is stable, but MnF7 does not exist; the highest fluoride of Mn is MnF4 (+4).
- Conclusion: Oxygen stabilises high oxidation states better than fluorine. So statement (A) is false.
-
Option (B): “Cu(I) compounds in aqueous medium undergo disproportionation reaction”
- Disproportionation: 2Cu+→Cu+Cu2+.
- In water, the standard reduction potentials: Cu++e−→Cu (E∘=+0.52V) and Cu2++e−→Cu+ (E∘=+0.16V).
- The net cell potential for disproportionation is Ecell∘=0.52−0.16=+0.36V>0, so it is spontaneous.
- Conclusion: Statement (B) is true.
-
Option (C): “Cr2+ is a stronger reducing agent than Fe2+”
- Standard reduction potentials: Cr3++e−→Cr2+ (E∘=−0.41V) Fe3++e−→Fe2+ (E∘=+0.77V)
- A more negative reduction potential means the reduced form (here Cr2+) is more easily oxidised — i.e., a stronger reducing agent.
- Cr2+ has E∘=−0.41V vs Fe2+’s +0.77V; indeed Cr2+ is the stronger reductant.
- Conclusion: Statement (C) is true.
-
Option (D): “MoO3 and WO3 are not as strong oxidants as CrO3”
- Down group 6, the stability of the +6 oxidation state increases (due to lanthanide contraction and better orbital overlap for Mo and W).
- CrO3 is a strong oxidant (e.g., oxidises alcohols), while MoO3 and WO3 are much more inert and require stronger conditions to act as oxidants.
- Conclusion: Statement (D) is true.
Watch outA common mistake is to think that higher electronegativity always means better stabilisation of high oxidation states. But fluorine’s inability to form strong π-bonds makes it inferior to oxygen for this purpose.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A).
ANSWER: A
-
- KCET 2023Set D-21 markMCQQ.In which one of the following pairs, both the elements does not have (n−1)d10ns2 configuration in its elementary state? (A) Zn, Cd (B) Cd, Hg (C) Hg, Cn (D) Cu, Zn
›Reveal solutionSolution
The configuration (n−1)d10ns2 is the ground-state pattern of group-12 elements. Copper is the exception — it is (n−1)d10ns1, not ns2 — so the pair in which the configuration fails is (D) Cu, Zn.
The pattern (n−1)d10ns2 means a filled (n−1)d subshell together with a filled ns subshell. This is the hallmark of the group-12 elements — Zn, Cd, Hg and Cn — in their ground state. To find the pair that breaks the pattern, we check each element's configuration.
-
Option (A): Zn, Cd.
Zn (Z=30) is [Ar]3d104s2; Cd (Z=48) is [Kr]4d105s2. Both group 12 — both fit the pattern.
-
Option (B): Cd, Hg.
Cd fits; Hg (Z=80) is [Xe]4f145d106s2. Both group 12 — both fit.
-
Option (C): Hg, Cn.
Hg fits; Cn (Z=112) is the group-12 element [Rn]5f146d107s2. Both fit.
-
Option (D): Cu, Zn.
Zn is 3d104s2 (fits), but Cu (Z=29) is the classic exception: its ground state is [Ar]3d104s1, not 3d94s2, because a completely filled d10 subshell is especially stable and pulls one electron out of 4s. So Cu is (n−1)d10ns1 and does not show the ns2 configuration.
Since copper breaks the (n−1)d10ns2 pattern, (D) is the pair in which the configuration does not hold for both elements.
Watch outCopper (and chromium) are the standard "expected vs actual" exceptions in the 3d series. Always recall Cu =3d104s1, not 3d94s2.
TipGroup-12 elements (Zn, Cd, Hg, Cn) all end in (n−1)d10ns2; the odd one out here comes from group 11 (Cu). This periodic-table reasoning is standard in NCERT Class 12 Chemistry (d- and f-block) and JEE Main.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) Cu, Zn.
-
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-E1 markMCQQ.Identify the incorrect statement. (A) Ability of Fluorine to stabilise higher oxidation states in transition metals is due to the low lattice enthalpy of the fluorides. (B) The second and third Ionisation enthalpies of Mn2+ and Fe3+ respectively have lower values than expected. (C) Transition metals readily form alloys because their metallic radii are within about 15% of each other. (D) Cr2+ acts as reducing agent while Mn3+ acts as an oxidising agent though both the ions have d4 configuration.
›Reveal solutionSolution
The incorrect statement is (A): fluorine stabilises higher oxidation states because of the high lattice (and bond) enthalpy of its compounds, not the low lattice enthalpy. B, C and D are correct NCERT statements.
Option (A) — incorrect. Fluorine, being small and highly electronegative, forms fluorides with high lattice enthalpy (and high M–F bond enthalpy). It is this high lattice/bond enthalpy that lets fluorine stabilise the highest oxidation states of transition metals. The statement wrongly attributes it to "low lattice enthalpy."
Option (B) — correct. The irregular ionisation enthalpies in this series arise from the stability of the half-filled d5 configurations produced (Mn2+, Fe3+), as noted in NCERT.
Option (C) — correct. Transition metals form alloys readily because their metallic radii are similar (within ~15%).
Option (D) — correct. Cr2+ (d4) is a reducing agent (oxidation to d3 Cr3+ is favourable), while Mn3+ (d4) is an oxidising agent (reduction to d5 Mn2+ is favourable).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — Ability of Fluorine to stabilise higher oxidation states in transition metals is due to the low lattice enthalpy of the fluorides.
- KCET 2019Set A-11 markMCQQ.Incorrect statement with reference to Ce(Z=58) (A) Ce4+ is a reducing agent. (B) Atomic size of Ce is more than that of Lu. (C) Ce in +3 oxidation state is more stable than in +4. (D) Ce shows common oxidation states of +3 and +4.
›Reveal solutionSolution
The question tests your understanding of lanthanide chemistry, specifically the stability and redox behaviour of cerium. The incorrect statement is (A): Ce4+ is an oxidising agent, not a reducing agent.
Concept & Intuition
Cerium is the first element in the lanthanide series (Z=58). Its ground-state electronic configuration is [Xe]4f15d16s2. The key to its chemistry lies in the stability of the empty 4f subshell (4f0) and the half-filled 4f subshell (4f7). For cerium, losing four electrons gives the Ce4+ ion with a [Xe] configuration — a noble gas core, which is exceptionally stable. This stability makes Ce4+ a strong oxidising agent (it readily accepts electrons to go back to the more common Ce3+ state). In contrast, Ce3+ has a [Xe]4f1 configuration and is the most stable oxidation state for cerium in aqueous solution.
Now let’s examine each statement.
-
Statement (A): Ce4+ is a reducing agent.
A reducing agent is a substance that donates electrons (gets oxidised itself). Ce4+ has a strong tendency to gain one electron and become Ce3+ (the 4f1 configuration is more stable than 4f0 in most chemical environments). This means Ce4+ is an oxidising agent, not a reducing agent. In fact, Ce4+ is a well-known oxidising agent in analytical chemistry (e.g., in cerimetric titrations). So this statement is false.
-
Statement (B): Atomic size of Ce is more than that of Lu.
This is true. Across the lanthanide series (from Ce, Z=58, to Lu, Z=71), there is a steady decrease in atomic and ionic radii — the lanthanide contraction. The 4f electrons are poorly shielding, so as nuclear charge increases, the electron cloud is pulled inward. Ce is near the beginning of the series, Lu at the end, so Ce has a larger atomic radius than Lu.
-
Statement (C): Ce in +3 oxidation state is more stable than in +4.
This is true. In aqueous solution and most compounds, Ce3+ is the stable form. Ce4+ is a strong oxidising agent and tends to get reduced to Ce3+ unless stabilised by a suitable ligand or in a non-aqueous environment. The +3 state is the common stable state for all lanthanides.
-
Statement (D): Ce shows common oxidation states of +3 and +4.
This is true. While most lanthanides exhibit only the +3 state, cerium is one of the exceptions (along with Eu, Yb, etc.) that also shows a +4 state due to the special stability of the 4f0 configuration.
Watch outA common mistake is to confuse "oxidising agent" with "reducing agent". Remember: an oxidising agent gets reduced (gains electrons), while a reducing agent gets oxidised (loses electrons). Since Ce4+ readily gains an electron to become Ce3+, it is an oxidising agent.
✓Final answerThe incorrect statement is (A).
-
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.