Q.Which metal in the first series of transition metals exhibits +1 oxidation state most frequently and why?
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Lanthanide Contraction
Lanthanide Contraction: The Intuition
Imagine you are walking through a dense forest. With every step forward, you push through thick undergrowth. The deeper you go, the more tired you become — each step feels a little harder, and you find yourself hunching forward, your shoulders pulling inward. That inward pull is exactly what happens inside the lanthanide atoms.
The lanthanides are the 14 elements from cerium (Ce, atomic number 58) to lutetium (Lu, atomic number 71). As you move from one element to the next, you add one proton to the nucleus and one electron to the atom. The new electron goes into a 4f orbital — a set of orbitals that are shaped like clover leaves and sit deep inside the atom, close to the nucleus.
Here is the key: 4f orbitals are poorly shielded. They do not spread out far from the nucleus, and they do not block the nuclear charge from pulling on the outer electrons. So when you add a proton, the nucleus gets stronger, and the 4f electrons do almost nothing to stop that extra pull. The result? The entire electron cloud — especially the outermost electrons — gets pulled inward. The atom shrinks.
Shielding is the ability of inner electrons to "block" the outer electrons from feeling the full positive charge of the nucleus. Electrons in s and p orbitals shield well; 4f electrons shield very poorly.
The Precise Statement
Lanthanide contraction is the steady and significant decrease in the atomic and ionic radii of the lanthanide elements as atomic number increases from 58 (Ce) to 71 (Lu).
Atomic radius∝Zeff1
where Zeff (effective nuclear charge) increases by about 0.3–0.4 per element across the lanthanide series.
The total contraction across the entire series is about 15–20 picometers — roughly 10–15% of the initial radius. That is a substantial shrinkage for a single row of the periodic table.
Why It Matters
This contraction has two enormous consequences in chemistry:
-
Similarity of post-lanthanide elements: After lutetium, the next elements are hafnium (Hf, 72), tantalum (Ta, 73), and tungsten (W, 74). Because the lanthanide contraction has made the atoms so small, these elements have almost identical atomic and ionic radii to their counterparts directly above them in the periodic table — zirconium (Zr), niobium (Nb), and molybdenum (Mo). This is why zirconium and hafnium are chemically almost inseparable — they are the same size.
-
Difficulty in separating lanthanides: All lanthanide ions (Ln3+) have nearly identical chemical properties because their radii change so gradually. Separating them requires hundreds of repeated steps (ion-exchange chromatography, solvent extraction) — a painstaking process that was a major challenge in early nuclear chemistry.
A common mistake is to think lanthanide contraction means the atoms get smaller because the 4f orbitals are "full" or because of some repulsion effect. It is purely due to poor shielding of the 4f electrons, which lets the nuclear charge pull everything inward.
The Numbers (for reference)
| Element | Atomic Number | Ionic Radius (Ln3+, pm) |
|---|---|---|
| Ce | 58 | 103.4 |
| Pr | 59 | 101.3 |
| Nd | 60 | 99.5 |
Why this formula?
Lanthanide Contraction: Why It Happens
The Lanthanide Contraction is the steady decrease in atomic and ionic radii of the lanthanide elements (Ce to Lu) as atomic number increases. The key observation: the radii shrink by about 1–2 pm per element, despite adding electrons to the 4f subshell.
The Core Question
Why does adding electrons not increase the size, but instead decrease it?
The Formula That Governs It
The effective nuclear charge (Zeff) experienced by an electron is:
Zeff=Z−S
Where:
- Z = atomic number (protons in nucleus)
- S = shielding constant (screening by inner electrons)
The key formula for the trend in ionic radii (r) across the lanthanides is:
r∝Zeffn2
Where n is the principal quantum number of the outermost electron (here, n=6 for the 6s orbital).
The Derivation: Step by Step
1. What happens when you add a proton and an electron?
Each lanthanide adds:
- +1 proton to the nucleus (increases Z by 1)
- +1 electron to the 4f subshell
2. The 4f orbital is "penetrating" but poorly shielding
- The 4f orbital has a radial distribution that peaks close to the nucleus (inside the 5s and 5p shells).
- However, 4f electrons are very poor at shielding the outer 6s electrons from the nuclear charge.
Why?
The 4f orbital is diffuse and deeply buried — it does not effectively screen the outer electrons because:
- Its shape (complex, multi-lobed) means it doesn't occupy the space between the nucleus and the 6s electrons efficiently.
- The 4f electrons are inside the 5s/5p shells, so they don't block the nuclear pull on the 6s electrons.
3. The net effect on Zeff
When you add one proton (ΔZ=+1) and one 4f electron (ΔS≈0.85 to 0.95), the change in effective nuclear charge is:
ΔZeff≈+1−0.85=+0.15 to +0.05
Result: Zeff increases slightly with each element.
4. How this shrinks the radius
From the formula r∝Zeffn2:
- n (the principal quantum number of the 6s orbital) stays constant at 6.
- Zeff increases.
- Therefore, r decreases. …
The key idea is that the stability of the +1 oxidation state in the first transition series depends on the electronic configuration of the ion.
Reasoning:
- For a transition metal to show a +1 state, removing one electron must leave a stable configuration — either a half-filled d5 or a fully-filled d10 subshell.
- Copper (Cu, atomic number 29) has the ground state configuration [Ar]3d104s1. Losing the single 4s electron gives CuX+ with [Ar]3d10, a completely filled d-subshell. …
The 3d transition metal that most frequently shows a +1 oxidation state is copper (Cu), because its 3d10 configuration (achieved after losing one electron) is exceptionally stable due to a completely filled d-subshell.
1. The core idea: stability of electronic configurations
The question asks about the first transition series — Sc through Zn. In this series, the common oxidation states are +2 and +3. A +1 state is rare because removing a single electron from a neutral atom usually leaves an unstable dn configuration that wants to lose another electron to become either half-filled (d5) or fully filled (d10).
The key is to look for an element where losing one electron gives a particularly stable electronic arrangement. That stability would make the +1 state more accessible than for other metals in the series.
2. Scanning the series
Let’s check the ground-state configurations of the neutral atoms and what happens after one electron is removed:
| Element | Neutral atom config | After losing 1 e⁻ (M⁺) | Stability of M⁺ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sc | 3d14s2 | 3d14s1 | Unstable — wants to lose another e⁻ |
| Ti | 3d24s2 | 3d24s1 | Unstable |
| V | 3d34s2 | 3d34s1 | Unstable |
| Cr | 3d54s1 | 3d5 | Half-filled d⁵ — a stable-looking configuration, yet Cr(+1) chemistry is still rare: chromium's real chemistry is dominated by +2, +3 and +6 |
| Mn | 3d54s2 | 3d54s1 | Unstable |
| Fe | 3d64s2 | 3d64s1 | Unstable |
| Co | 3d74s2 | 3d74s1 | Unstable |
| Ni | 3d84s2 | 3d84s1 | Unstable |
| Cu | 3d104s1 | 3d10 | Fully filled d¹⁰ — extremely stable |
| Zn | 3d104s2 | 3d104s1 | Unstable — wants to lose the 4s¹ to become d10 |
A common mistake is to think that because Zn has a d10 configuration in its neutral state, it should easily form Zn⁺. But Zn⁺ has a d104s1 configuration — the 4s electron is loosely held and easily lost, so Zn⁺ is actually unstable and quickly becomes Zn²⁺ (d10). The stability comes from the final configuration after losing two electrons, not one.
3. Why copper stands out
Copper’s neutral atom has the configuration 3d104s1. When it loses the single 4s electron, it becomes Cu⁺ with a 3d10 configuration — a completely filled d-subshell. This is an exceptionally stable arrangement because:
- A filled d-subshell has spherical symmetry and maximum exchange energy.
- There is no driving force to lose another electron (the next ionization energy is much higher). …
Which First-Series Transition Metal Shows the +1 Oxidation State Most Frequently?
Method: Electronic Configuration Analysis
Step 1: Recall the general electronic configuration of first-row transition metals:
[Ar]3d1−104s1−2
Step 2: Identify the condition for a stable +1 oxidation state.
- A +1 state means losing the 4s electron(s) first (since 4s is higher in energy than 3d once occupied).
- Stability of +1 state increases if the resulting dn configuration is half-filled or fully filled (exchange energy + stability).
Step 3: Check each metal systematically:
| Metal | Ground state config | M⁺ configuration (Table 4.2) | Stability of +1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sc | 3d14s2 | 3d14s1 | Unstable |
| Ti | 3d24s2 | 3d24s1 | Unstable |
| V | 3d34s2 | 3d34s1 | Unstable |
| Cr | 3d54s1 | 3d5 | Half-filled — yet +1 chemistry still rare |
| Mn | 3d54s2 | 3d54s1 | Unstable (a 4s electron remains; +1 is not a notable Mn state) |
| Fe | 3d64s2 | 3d64s1 | Unstable |
| Co | 3d74s2 | 3d74s1 | Unstable |
| Ni | 3d84s2 | 3d84s1 | Unstable |
| Cu | 3d104s1 | 3d10 | Fully filled → very stable |
| Zn | 3d104s2 | 3d104s1 | Unstable (loses the remaining 4s electron to give Zn²⁺) |
Step 4: Identify the most frequent +1 state.
- Only copper loses a single electron to land directly on a stable configuration: Cu⁺ = 3d10. Every other 3d metal's M⁺ ion still carries an easily-lost 4s electron — and even Cr⁺, though it is d5, has only rare +1 chemistry. …
Common Mistakes: The +1 Oxidation State in the First Transition Series
The Question
Which metal in the first series of transition metals exhibits +1 oxidation state most frequently and why?
Correct answer: Copper (Cu) — due to its stable 3d10 configuration in the +1 state.
🚩 Mistake #1: Assuming the +1 state is common across the whole series
What students do wrong:
Because +2 is common for nearly every 3d metal, students assume +1 must also be reasonably common and pick a metal almost at random.
Why it's wrong:
The +1 state needs the special case where losing just ONE electron leaves a stable configuration. Table 4.2's M⁺ row shows that for almost every 3d metal, the M⁺ ion still carries an easily-lost 4s electron (3dn4s1) — only Cu⁺ lands directly on the stable 3d10.
How to avoid:
- Check the M⁺ configuration, not the atom's: only Cu (3d104s1 → Cu⁺ 3d10) reaches a full d-subshell by losing a single electron.
🚩 Mistake #2: Picking Zinc (Zn) because of 3d10
What students do wrong:
Zn has 3d104s2 and loses two electrons to form Zn2+ (also 3d10). Students think Zn should show +1.
Why it's wrong:
- Zn never shows +1 in stable compounds.
- Zn+ would be 3d104s1 — an unstable, unpaired 4s electron.
- Zn prefers +2 because removing both 4s electrons gives a completely filled d-subshell (3d10).
How to avoid:
- Remember: Zn is not a true transition metal by IUPAC definition (it has a full d-subshell in both atom and common ion).
- For +1 stability, look for half-filled or fully-filled d-subshell after losing one electron, not before.
🚩 Mistake #3: Choosing Chromium (Cr) because of 3d5 stability
What students do wrong:
Cr has 3d54s1 (half-filled d-subshell). Students think losing one electron gives Cr+ with 3d5 — very stable.
Why it's misleading:
- Cr+ does exist, but Cr3+ is far more common.
- The question asks "most frequently" — Cr shows +1 only in a few complexes, not as a general trend.
How to avoid:
- Compare actual oxidation state frequencies:
- Cu: +1 common in oxides (Cu2O), halides (CuCl), many complexes.
- Cr: +1 is rare; +3 and +6 dominate.
- "Most frequently" means most often encountered in stable compounds, not just theoretically possible.
🚩 Mistake #4: Forgetting the 3d10 special stability for Cu
What students do wrong:
Students know Cu has 3d104s1 configuration, but don't connect it to +1 stability.
The correct reasoning:
| Element | Configuration | After losing 1 e⁻ | Stability reason | …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.Choose the statements which are incorrect in the case of Lanthanoids. A. Ce4+ is diamagnetic while Sm3+ is paramagnetic. B. The atomic size of the transition metals having atomic number greater than 71 are very close to that of the elements above them. C. Lanthanoids react with hot water forming water soluble Ln(OH)3 with the liberation of O2. D. The general electronic configuration of Lanthanoids is (n−2)f1−145 d06 s2, where n=6. (A) C & D (B) B & D (C) A & B (D) A & D
›Reveal solutionSolution
The question asks which statements about lanthanoids are incorrect. After checking each statement, the incorrect ones are C and D, so the correct option is (A).
Concept & Intuition
Lanthanoids are the 14 elements from Ce (58) to Lu (71) where the 4f subshell is progressively filled. Their chemistry is dominated by the +3 oxidation state, but some elements show +4 or +2 states due to stability of empty, half-filled, or fully-filled f-subshells. Magnetic properties depend on unpaired electrons. Their atomic sizes show the “lanthanoid contraction” — a steady decrease across the series — which makes post-lanthanoid transition metals (like Hf, Ta, W) have nearly identical atomic radii to their 4d counterparts above them. Also, lanthanoid hydroxides are not water-soluble, and the general electronic configuration is often written with a possible 5d¹ electron for some elements (like La, Gd, Lu). Let’s examine each statement.
Step-by-step analysis
-
Statement A: Ce4+ is diamagnetic while Sm3+ is paramagnetic.
- Ce (atomic number 58) has configuration [Xe]4f15d16s2. Ce⁴⁺ loses all 4f, 5d, and 6s electrons → [Xe] (no unpaired electrons) → diamagnetic.
- Sm (atomic number 62) has [Xe]4f66s2. Sm³⁺ loses 6s² and one 4f → 4f5. With 5 unpaired electrons (Hund’s rule), it is paramagnetic.
- So statement A is correct.
-
Statement B: The atomic size of the transition metals having atomic number greater than 71 are very close to that of the elements above them.
- Elements with Z > 71 are the 5d transition metals (Hf, Ta, W, etc.). Their 4f counterparts (Zr, Nb, Mo, etc.) are directly above them in the periodic table.
- Due to lanthanoid contraction (poor shielding by 4f electrons), the atomic radii of 5d metals are nearly equal to those of the 4d metals above them.
- This is a well-known fact. So statement B is correct.
-
Statement C: Lanthanoids react with hot water forming water soluble Ln(OH)3 with the liberation of O2. …
-
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-E1 markMCQQ.Choose the correct metal/ ion from the brackets which ------------------------- A. has chemical reactivity similar to that of the first few members of the Lanthanoids (Zn,Ca,Fe,Cu). B. has stable 4f7 electronic configuration, but acts as a strong reducing agent and converts to M3+ state. (Eu2+,Ce2+,Pr2+,Dy2+) C. is a colorless ion (Tm3+,Lu3+,Gd3+,Sm3+). D. shows stable +2 oxidation state and is diamagnetic ( Ce,Sm,Ho,Yb ) (A) A: Cu B: Dy2+ C: Sm3+ D: Ho (B) A:Zn B: Ce2+, C: Gd3+ D: Sm (C) A: Fe B: Pr2+ C: Tm3+ D: Ce (D) A: Ca B: Eu2+ C: Lu3+ D:Yb
›Reveal solutionSolution
The question tests knowledge of lanthanoid chemistry: chemical similarity to early lanthanoids, the stability of half-filled 4f⁷, colourless ions, and diamagnetic +2 states. The correct matching is A: Ca, B: Eu²⁺, C: Lu³⁺, D: Yb — option (D).
Concept & Intuition
Lanthanoids (elements 58–71) have similar chemistry due to the gradual filling of 4f orbitals, but subtle differences arise from electronic configurations, oxidation states, and magnetic properties.
- Part A: The first few lanthanoids (La–Nd) are highly electropositive and reactive, resembling the alkaline earth metal Ca more than transition metals like Zn, Fe, or Cu.
- Part B: A half-filled 4f⁷ subshell is exceptionally stable. Eu²⁺ has [Xe]4f⁷, but it readily loses one electron to become Eu³⁺ (still 4f⁷? No — Eu³⁺ is 4f⁶, but the driving force is the stability of the +3 state common to lanthanoids; Eu²⁺ is a strong reducing agent because it wants to reach +3).
- Part C: Colour in lanthanoid ions arises from f–f transitions. Ions with empty (4f⁰), half-filled (4f⁷), or fully filled (4f¹⁴) subshells have no such transitions and are colourless. Lu³⁺ is 4f¹⁴ — colourless.
- Part D: A diamagnetic +2 ion must have all electrons paired. Yb²⁺ has [Xe]4f¹⁴ — completely filled, hence diamagnetic and stable in +2 state.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Part A: Chemical reactivity similar to early lanthanoids
Early lanthanoids (La, Ce, Pr, Nd) are highly electropositive, react readily with water and acids, and typically exhibit +3 oxidation state. Among the options, Ca (an alkaline earth metal) shares this high reactivity and electropositivity. Zn, Fe, and Cu are less reactive and have different chemical behaviour.
→ So A should be Ca.
-
Part B: Stable 4f⁷ configuration but acts as a strong reducing agent to M³⁺
Eu²⁺ has the configuration [Xe]4f⁷ — half-filled, stable. However, the standard reduction potential for Eu³⁺/Eu²⁺ is about –0.35 V, meaning Eu²⁺ is easily oxidised to Eu³⁺ (strong reducing agent). Ce²⁺, Pr²⁺, Dy²⁺ are less common and do not have the 4f⁷ stability.
→ So B should be Eu²⁺.
-
Part C: Colourless ion
Colour in lanthanoid ions is due to f–f transitions, which require partially filled 4f orbitals.
- Tm³⁺: 4f¹² — coloured.
- Lu³⁺: 4f¹⁴ — fully filled, no f–f transitions, colourless.
- Gd³⁺: 4f⁷ — half-filled, also colourless in theory, but Lu³⁺ is more reliably colourless and is the classic example.
- Sm³⁺: 4f⁵ — coloured. → So C should be Lu³⁺. …
- KCET 2024Set B-21 markMCQQ.Which of the following statements related to lanthanoids is incorrect? (A) Lanthanoids are silvery white soft metals (B) Samarium shows +2 oxidation state (C) CeX4+ solutions are widely used as oxidising agents in titrimetric analysis (D) Colour of Lanthanoid ion in solution is due to d–d transition
›Reveal solutionSolution
The incorrect statement is the one about the colour origin: lanthanoid ion colours arise from f–f transitions, not d–d transitions. So option (D) is wrong.
The question tests your understanding of the lanthanoid series — their physical nature, variable oxidation states, common uses, and the origin of their colours. Each option touches a distinct property, so we need to check them one by one against known facts.
-
Option (A): Lanthanoids are silvery white soft metals
This is correct. All lanthanoids (elements 57–71, except perhaps promethium which is radioactive and less studied) are silvery-white, relatively soft metals. They tarnish quickly in air, but their fresh surfaces have that characteristic appearance. Softness increases across the series — they can be cut with a knife, like sodium, though they are harder than alkali metals.
-
Option (B): Samarium shows +2 oxidation state
This is correct. Samarium (Sm, atomic number 62) has the electronic configuration [Xe]4f66s2. By losing the two 6s electrons, it reaches +2 (Sm2+). The 4f6 configuration in Sm2+ is half-filled (since f orbitals can hold 14 electrons, 7 is half-filled; 6 is one short, but still relatively stable). More importantly, the +2 state is stabilised by the proximity to the half-filled 4f7 configuration of Eu2+. In practice, Sm2+ is known in compounds like SmI2 and SmCl2, though it is less stable than the common +3 state.
-
Option (C): CeX4+ solutions are widely used as oxidising agents in titrimetric analysis
This is correct. Cerium(IV) (Ce4+) is a strong oxidising agent — it gets reduced to Ce3+ (with a standard reduction potential of about +1.72 V in acidic medium). Ce4+ solutions are stable, have a sharp colour change (yellow to colourless), and are used in redox titrations, especially for determining iron(II), oxalates, and other reducing agents. This is a standard application in analytical chemistry.
-
Option (D): Colour of Lanthanoid ion in solution is due to d–d transition …
-
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-A1 markMCQQ.Consider the following statements in respect of lanthanides, which of the statements are incorrect?(i) La(OH)3 is least basic among the hydroxides of lanthanides(ii) The lanthanide ions Yb2+,Lu3+ and Ce4+ are diamagnetic in nature.(iii) Ce4+ can act as an oxidising agent(iv) Ln (III) compounds are generally colourless(v) Ionic radii of Ce3+ is greater than Yb3+ (A) (i),(ii) and(iii) (B)(i) and(iv) (C) (iii),(iv) and(v) (D)(iii) and (iv)
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to evaluate each statement about lanthanide properties (basicity trends, magnetism, redox behavior, color, and ionic radii) against known periodic trends. The incorrect statements are (i) and (iv), so the correct option is (B).
Concept and Intuition
Lanthanides are the 4f-block elements (La to Lu). Their chemistry is dominated by the +3 oxidation state, but some ions show +2 or +4 states due to stability of empty, half-filled, or fully filled 4f subshells. Basicity of hydroxides decreases across the series as ionic radius decreases (lanthanide contraction). Magnetic behavior depends on unpaired 4f electrons; diamagnetic means all electrons paired. Color arises from f–f transitions; Ln(III) ions with no unpaired f-electrons (like La³⁺, Lu³⁺) are colorless, but most are colored. Ionic radii decrease from Ce³⁺ to Yb³⁺ due to lanthanide contraction.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Statement (i): "La(OH)₃ is least basic among the hydroxides of lanthanides"
- Basicity of lanthanide hydroxides decreases as the ionic radius decreases (smaller cation polarizes the OH bond more, making it more acidic).
- La³⁺ has the largest ionic radius among Ln³⁺ ions, so La(OH)₃ is the most basic, not the least.
- Therefore, (i) is incorrect.
-
Statement (ii): "Yb²⁺, Lu³⁺, and Ce⁴⁺ are diamagnetic"
- Yb²⁺: Yb (atomic number 70) has electron configuration [Xe]4f¹⁴. Yb²⁺ loses two electrons, still 4f¹⁴ — all f-orbitals are fully filled, so no unpaired electrons → diamagnetic.
- Lu³⁺: Lu (71) is [Xe]4f¹⁴5d¹6s²; Lu³⁺ loses three electrons → [Xe]4f¹⁴, fully filled → diamagnetic.
- Ce⁴⁺: Ce (58) is [Xe]4f¹5d¹6s²; Ce⁴⁺ loses four electrons → [Xe] (no f-electrons) → diamagnetic.
- Thus, (ii) is correct.
-
Statement (iii): "Ce⁴⁺ can act as an oxidizing agent"
- Ce⁴⁺ has a strong tendency to gain an electron to become Ce³⁺ (which has a stable half-filled 4f¹ configuration? Actually Ce³⁺ is 4f¹, but the reduction potential Ce⁴⁺/Ce³⁺ is about +1.72 V in acidic medium, making Ce⁴⁺ a strong oxidizing agent).
- Therefore, (iii) is correct.
-
Statement (iv): "Ln(III) compounds are generally colorless" …
-
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-M1 markMCQQ.Match the compounds given in Column I with their characteristic features listed in Column II .tg {border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:0;} .tg td{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg th{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; font-weight:normal;overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg .tg-c3ow{border-color:inherit;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-7btt{border-color:inherit;font-weight:bold;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-0pky{border-color:inherit;text-align:left;vertical-align:top} No. Column I No. Column II A La(OH)3 P Acidic in nature B Mn2O7 Q Least basic C Lu(OH)3 R Interstitial compound D Fe3H S Most basic (A) A=SB=PC=QD=R (B) A=SB=RC=QD=P (C) A=QB=PC=SD=R (D) A=RB=PC=SD=Q
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is that basicity of lanthanide hydroxides decreases across the series (La(OH)₃ most basic, Lu(OH)₃ least basic), Mn₂O₇ is acidic, and Fe₃H is an interstitial compound. The correct matching is A→S, B→P, C→Q, D→R, which corresponds to option (A).
Concept & Intuition
This question tests two separate ideas: (1) the trend in basicity of lanthanide hydroxides, and (2) the classification of oxides and hydrides. For the lanthanides, as atomic number increases, the ionic radius decreases (lanthanide contraction), making the M–OH bond stronger and harder to break — so basicity decreases. La³⁺ is the largest, so La(OH)₃ is the most basic; Lu³⁺ is the smallest, so Lu(OH)₃ is the least basic. Mn₂O₇ is a well-known acidic oxide (it’s the anhydride of permanganic acid). Fe₃H is a metallic hydride where hydrogen occupies interstitial sites in the iron lattice — hence an interstitial compound.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Identify the nature of La(OH)₃ and Lu(OH)₃
Both are hydroxides of lanthanides. Basicity of lanthanide hydroxides decreases from La to Lu due to lanthanide contraction. La³⁺ has the largest ionic radius, so La–OH bond is weakest → most basic. Lu³⁺ has the smallest radius → least basic.
→ La(OH)₃ = Most basic (S)
→ Lu(OH)₃ = Least basic (Q)
-
Identify the nature of Mn₂O₇
Mn in +7 oxidation state forms an oxide that is strongly acidic. Mn₂O₇ reacts with water to give HMnO₄ (permanganic acid), a strong acid.
→ Mn₂O₇ = Acidic in nature (P)
-
Identify the nature of Fe₃H …
-
- COMEDK 2021Set 2021-B1 markMCQQ.Lanthanides are a group of 14 elements which are metals. Identify the correct statement from among the 4 statements given below: (A) Shielding power of 4f electrons is quite strong. (B) As a result of Lanthanide contraction, the elements of the second and third transition series resemble each other in their chemical properties. (C) Due to Lanthanide contraction, the size of Lanthanoid ions increases regularly with increase in atomic number. (D) It is very easy to separate the Lanthanide elements from each other and obtain them in the pure state.
›Reveal solutionSolution
[!TLDR]
Lanthanide contraction makes the 2nd and 3rd transition series resemble each other, so statement (B) is the correct one.
Concept
The 4f electrons shield the nuclear charge very poorly, so as atomic number rises across the lanthanoids the effective nuclear charge felt by outer electrons grows and the size of the atoms/ions shrinks steadily. This is the lanthanide contraction (CBSE/NCERT Class 12, d- and f-block elements).
Solution
Check each statement:
- (A) 4f electrons have poor (diffuse) shielding power, not strong — false.
- (B) The contraction cancels the expected size increase down a group, so pairs like Zr/Hf and Nb/Ta have nearly identical sizes and therefore very similar chemistry — true. …
- KCET 2020Set A-11 markMCQQ.The oxide of potassium that does not exist is (A) K2O3 (B) K2O (C) KO2 (D) K2O2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Potassium forms oxides in which it exists as K+ ions, and the only stable oxidation states of oxygen in these compounds are −2 (oxide), −1 (peroxide), and −21 (superoxide). The formula K2O3 would require oxygen in an oxidation state of −34, which is not possible — so it does not exist.
The key to this question lies in understanding the oxidation states that oxygen can take in its compounds with alkali metals. Potassium, being a highly electropositive metal, always forms K+ ions. The oxygen species present in the solid then determines the formula.
-
Recall the common oxides of potassium.
Potassium reacts with oxygen to form three well-known compounds:
- Normal oxide: K2O — contains O2− (oxide ion, oxidation state −2).
- Peroxide: K2O2 — contains O22− (peroxide ion, oxidation state −1 per oxygen).
- Superoxide: KO2 — contains O2− (superoxide ion, oxidation state −21 per oxygen). These are all stable and well-characterised.
-
Check the oxidation state of oxygen in K2O3.
Let the oxidation state of oxygen be x. Since each K is +1, the total positive charge is 2×(+1)=+2. For a neutral compound:
2(+1)+3x=0⇒3x=−2⇒x=−32.
This would mean oxygen exists in an average oxidation state of −32, which is not a known stable oxygen species. Oxygen in ionic compounds only appears as O2−, O22−, O2−, or (rarely) O− — never as a fractional or −32 state.
- Why the other options are valid.
- K2O: oxygen is −2, perfectly normal. …
-
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.