Q.Why is the highest oxidation state of a metal exhibited in its oxide or fluoride only?
Concept understanding — Lanthanide Contraction
Lanthanide Contraction: The Intuition
Imagine you are walking through a dense forest. With every step forward, you push through thick undergrowth. The deeper you go, the more tired you become — each step feels a little harder, and you find yourself hunching forward, your shoulders pulling inward. That inward pull is exactly what happens inside the lanthanide atoms.
The lanthanides are the 14 elements from cerium (Ce, atomic number 58) to lutetium (Lu, atomic number 71). As you move from one element to the next, you add one proton to the nucleus and one electron to the atom. The new electron goes into a 4f orbital — a set of orbitals that are shaped like clover leaves and sit deep inside the atom, close to the nucleus.
Here is the key: 4f orbitals are poorly shielded. They do not spread out far from the nucleus, and they do not block the nuclear charge from pulling on the outer electrons. So when you add a proton, the nucleus gets stronger, and the 4f electrons do almost nothing to stop that extra pull. The result? The entire electron cloud — especially the outermost electrons — gets pulled inward. The atom shrinks.
Shielding is the ability of inner electrons to "block" the outer electrons from feeling the full positive charge of the nucleus. Electrons in s and p orbitals shield well; 4f electrons shield very poorly.
The Precise Statement
Lanthanide contraction is the steady and significant decrease in the atomic and ionic radii of the lanthanide elements as atomic number increases from 58 (Ce) to 71 (Lu).
Atomic radius∝Zeff1
where Zeff (effective nuclear charge) increases by about 0.3–0.4 per element across the lanthanide series.
The total contraction across the entire series is about 15–20 picometers — roughly 10–15% of the initial radius. That is a substantial shrinkage for a single row of the periodic table.
Why It Matters
This contraction has two enormous consequences in chemistry:
-
Similarity of post-lanthanide elements: After lutetium, the next elements are hafnium (Hf, 72), tantalum (Ta, 73), and tungsten (W, 74). Because the lanthanide contraction has made the atoms so small, these elements have almost identical atomic and ionic radii to their counterparts directly above them in the periodic table — zirconium (Zr), niobium (Nb), and molybdenum (Mo). This is why zirconium and hafnium are chemically almost inseparable — they are the same size.
-
Difficulty in separating lanthanides: All lanthanide ions (Ln3+) have nearly identical chemical properties because their radii change so gradually. Separating them requires hundreds of repeated steps (ion-exchange chromatography, solvent extraction) — a painstaking process that was a major challenge in early nuclear chemistry.
A common mistake is to think lanthanide contraction means the atoms get smaller because the 4f orbitals are "full" or because of some repulsion effect. It is purely due to poor shielding of the 4f electrons, which lets the nuclear charge pull everything inward.
The Numbers (for reference)
| Element | Atomic Number | Ionic Radius (Ln3+, pm) |
|---|---|---|
| Ce | 58 | 103.4 |
| Pr | 59 | 101.3 |
| Nd | 60 | 99.5 |
| Pm | 61 | 97.9 |
| Sm | 62 | 96.4 |
| Eu | 63 | 95.0 |
| Gd | 64 | 93.8 |
| Tb | 65 | 92.3 |
| Dy | 66 | 90.8 |
| Ho | 67 | 89.4 |
| Er | 68 | 88.1 |
| Tm | 69 | 86.9 |
| Yb | 70 | 85.8 |
| Lu | 71 | 84.8 |
The trend is clear: a smooth, steady decrease of about 1–2 pm per element.
The Bottom Line
Lanthanide contraction is the gradual shrinking of atomic/ionic size across the lanthanide series (Ce → Lu) caused by poor shielding of 4f electrons, leading to an increasing effective nuclear charge that pulls the electron cloud inward. This explains why post-lanthanide elements resemble their lighter congeners and why lanthanides are so hard to separate.
Lanthanide contraction is a signature topic of the NCERT/CBSE Class 12 Chemistry chapter on the d- and f-Block Elements, and ‘lanthanide contraction causes and consequences’ is one of the most frequently asked important questions in board exams, JEE Main and NEET. This concept also explains several periodic-trend anomalies that show up regularly in competitive-exam inorganic chemistry questions.
Why this formula?
Lanthanide Contraction: Why It Happens
The Lanthanide Contraction is the steady decrease in atomic and ionic radii of the lanthanide elements (Ce to Lu) as atomic number increases. The key observation: the radii shrink by about 1–2 pm per element, despite adding electrons to the 4f subshell.
The Core Question
Why does adding electrons not increase the size, but instead decrease it?
The Formula That Governs It
The effective nuclear charge (Zeff) experienced by an electron is:
Zeff=Z−S
Where:
- Z = atomic number (protons in nucleus)
- S = shielding constant (screening by inner electrons)
The key formula for the trend in ionic radii (r) across the lanthanides is:
r∝Zeffn2
Where n is the principal quantum number of the outermost electron (here, n=6 for the 6s orbital).
The Derivation: Step by Step
1. What happens when you add a proton and an electron?
Each lanthanide adds:
- +1 proton to the nucleus (increases Z by 1)
- +1 electron to the 4f subshell
2. The 4f orbital is "penetrating" but poorly shielding
- The 4f orbital has a radial distribution that peaks close to the nucleus (inside the 5s and 5p shells).
- However, 4f electrons are very poor at shielding the outer 6s electrons from the nuclear charge.
Why?
The 4f orbital is diffuse and deeply buried — it does not effectively screen the outer electrons because:
- Its shape (complex, multi-lobed) means it doesn't occupy the space between the nucleus and the 6s electrons efficiently.
- The 4f electrons are inside the 5s/5p shells, so they don't block the nuclear pull on the 6s electrons.
3. The net effect on Zeff
When you add one proton (ΔZ=+1) and one 4f electron (ΔS≈0.85 to 0.95), the change in effective nuclear charge is:
ΔZeff≈+1−0.85=+0.15 to +0.05
Result: Zeff increases slightly with each element.
4. How this shrinks the radius
From the formula r∝Zeffn2:
- n (the principal quantum number of the 6s orbital) stays constant at 6.
- Zeff increases.
- Therefore, r decreases.
The 6s orbital is pulled closer to the nucleus because the nuclear charge is less effectively screened.
The "Why" in Simple Terms
| Step | What happens | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Add 1 proton | Nuclear pull increases |
| 2 | Add 1 electron to 4f | Poor shielding — doesn't cancel the proton's pull |
| 3 | Net effect | Zeff increases slightly |
| 4 | Outer 6s electrons feel stronger pull | Radius contracts |
The contraction is not because 4f electrons are "heavy" — it's because they are bad at shielding.
Exam-Relevant Takeaway
Lanthanide contraction occurs because the 4f electrons are poor at shielding the outer 6s electrons from the increasing nuclear charge, causing a steady decrease in atomic/ionic radii.
This explains:
- Why Yttrium (Y) has similar properties to heavier lanthanides (its radius is comparable due to the contraction).
- Why Zr and Hf have nearly identical radii (the 4f contraction cancels the expected increase from the 5d series).
Memorize: ΔZeff>0 → radius decreases.
The key idea is high-oxidation-state stabilisation by small, highly electronegative elements — only oxygen and fluorine can oxidise a metal all the way up to its highest oxidation state.
Reasoning:
- A very high oxidation state (e.g., +7 in Mn, +8 in Os) means the metal has lost many electrons, leaving it with a high positive charge density.
- To stabilise this unstable cation, the surrounding atoms must be small and highly electronegative — so they can withdraw electron density effectively and form strong, covalent bonds.
- Oxygen and fluorine are the smallest and most electronegative elements (F is the most electronegative; O is next). They are the only common ligands that can sufficiently polarise electron density toward themselves to make the high oxidation state kinetically and thermodynamically feasible.
- Larger, less electronegative atoms (Cl, Br, S, etc.) cannot stabilise such extreme positive charges — the compound would either decompose or the metal would get reduced.
The highest oxidation state of a metal is exhibited only in its oxide or fluoride because oxygen and fluorine are the smallest and most electronegative elements, uniquely capable of stabilising the extremely high positive charge density through strong covalent bonding.
The highest oxidation state of a transition metal is stabilised only in oxides or fluorides because oxygen and fluorine are the most electronegative elements, forming strong ionic/covalent bonds that remove the maximum number of electrons from the metal, while also being small enough to avoid excessive steric hindrance.
The question touches on a beautiful pattern in transition metal chemistry: why do metals like manganese show +7 in KMnOX4 or MnX2OX7, but never in simple chlorides or sulphides? The answer lies in the interplay of electronegativity, bond strength, and the ability to stabilise high positive charge.
The core idea: To achieve a very high oxidation state, the metal must lose many electrons. This creates an intensely positive metal ion. Only the most electronegative elements — oxygen and fluorine — can pull electron density away from the metal strongly enough to stabilise this high charge. They also form strong bonds that compensate for the energy cost of removing so many electrons.
Let’s break this down step by step.
-
The problem of high oxidation states. When a metal reaches an oxidation state like +7 or +8, the metal ion is tiny and has an enormous positive charge. This ion is extremely unstable on its own — it desperately wants to pull electrons back. To keep it stable, the atoms bonded to it must be able to:
- Withdraw electron density from the metal (high electronegativity).
- Form strong bonds that don’t break easily.
- Avoid being oxidised themselves (they must already be in a high oxidation state or be resistant to further oxidation).
-
Why oxygen and fluorine are special. Oxygen (electronegativity 3.44) and fluorine (3.98) are the two most electronegative elements. When they bond to a metal in a high oxidation state, they pull electron density away from the metal through both sigma and pi bonding. This reduces the effective positive charge on the metal, stabilising the whole compound. No other element comes close — chlorine (3.16) is significantly less electronegative, and sulphur (2.58) is weaker still.
-
The size factor. Both oxygen and fluorine are small atoms. This matters because a high oxidation state metal ion is very small. Large ligands like chlorine or bromine would crowd around the metal, causing steric repulsion. For example, MnX2OX7 is stable, but MnClX7 doesn’t exist — chlorine atoms are too big to fit seven around manganese without clashing.
-
The bond strength argument. The bonds formed by oxygen and fluorine with high oxidation state metals are exceptionally strong. Consider the bond dissociation energies: Mn−O bonds in permanganate are very strong, while Mn−Cl bonds would be much weaker. The energy released when these strong bonds form compensates for the huge energy required to remove so many electrons from the metal.
A quick way to remember: the highest oxidation state of any transition metal is always found in its oxide, fluoride, or oxyfluoride. For example, osmium shows +8 in OsOX4, ruthenium in RuOX4, and iridium in IrFX6 (not oxide, because IrOX4 is unstable — fluorine wins here).
-
What about other halogens? Chlorine, bromine, and iodine are too large and too weakly electronegative. They cannot stabilise very high oxidation states. The highest chloride known is WClX6 (tungsten +6), but tungsten’s highest oxide is WOX3 (+6 as well — here both work). For manganese, chlorides stop at MnClX2 (+2) — even the +4 halide exists only as the fluoride MnFX4 (Table 4.5) — while the oxide goes all the way to +7. The difference is dramatic.
-
Why not nitrogen or sulphur? Nitrogen is electronegative (3.04) but forms weak multiple bonds with metals in high oxidation states. Sulphur is even less electronegative and larger. Neither can match oxygen or fluorine.
A common mistake is to think that any highly electronegative element will work. But consider chlorine: it is electronegative, yet MnClX7 doesn’t exist. The reason is that chlorine is too large (steric hindrance) and forms weaker bonds. Both electronegativity and size matter.
- The special case of fluorine vs oxygen. Fluorine is more electronegative than oxygen, so why aren’t all highest oxidation states fluorides? Because oxygen can form multiple bonds (double bonds) with metals, which is crucial for stabilising very high oxidation states. Fluorine can only form single bonds. For example, OsOX4 (osmium +8) is stable, but OsFX8 doesn’t exist — eight fluorines around osmium would be too crowded, and single bonds alone can’t stabilise +8. So oxygen wins for the very highest states.
The stability of a high oxidation state compound depends on:
Stability∝Electronegativity of ligand×Bond strength×Ligand size1
- A concrete example: manganese. Manganese shows oxidation states from +2 to +7. The +7 state exists beautifully in KMnOX4 (permanganate) and MnX2OX7 (manganese heptoxide). But try to make MnClX7 — it’s impossible. The chlorine atoms would be too large, too weakly electronegative, and the Mn−Cl bonds too weak. The +7 state simply cannot be stabilised by chlorine.
The highest oxidation state of a metal is exhibited only in its oxide or fluoride because oxygen and fluorine are the most electronegative elements, form the strongest bonds, and are small enough to avoid steric hindrance, making them uniquely capable of stabilising the extremely high positive charge on the metal ion.
Method: Electronic Configuration & Lattice Energy Analysis
This method explains the stability of high oxidation states in oxides/fluorides by combining electronic structure reasoning with thermodynamic principles.
Step 1 – Recall what a very high oxidation state demands
A metal in its highest oxidation state has lost (or shared away) many electrons, leaving a centre of very high positive charge density. Stabilising it requires partners that are:
- Strongly oxidising — able to pull the metal up to that state in the first place
- Small and highly electronegative — able to hold the resulting electron distribution in strong bonds
Step 2 – Identify the key property of oxides and fluorides
Both oxide (O2−) and fluoride (F−) ions are:
- Small in size
- Highly electronegative
These properties allow them to stabilise a metal in a very high oxidation state via:
- High lattice energy (proportional to r++r−q+⋅q−)
- Strong covalent character (Fajan’s rules)
Step 3 – Compare with other anions
Other anions (e.g., Cl−, Br−, S2−) are larger and less electronegative. They:
- Produce lower lattice energy
- Are easily oxidised themselves by the highly oxidised metal centre
Example: MnX7+ is stable in KMnOX4 (oxide) but not in MnClX7 — chlorine would be oxidised to Cl2 instead.
Step 4 – Note the oxygen-vs-fluorine fine print
Fluorine and oxygen both reach very high states, but they are not interchangeable:
- Oxygen's ability to form multiple bonds with the metal lets it stabilise even higher states than fluorine manages with single bonds
- Classic case: manganese shows +7 in MnX2OX7 (and MnOX4X−), while its highest simple fluoride is only MnFX4
Final Answer
The highest oxidation state of a metal is exhibited in its oxide or fluoride only because these small, highly electronegative anions provide maximum lattice energy and covalent stabilisation, preventing the anion from being oxidised — a condition not met by larger, less electronegative anions.
Common Mistakes: Highest Oxidation States in Oxides and Fluorides
Students often struggle with the question: "Why is the highest oxidation state of a metal exhibited in its oxide or fluoride only?" Here are the most frequent errors and how to avoid them.
✗ Mistake 1: Confusing "Oxide/Fluoride" with "All Compounds"
What students do wrong:
They answer generally — "because oxygen and fluorine are highly electronegative" — without linking to stabilisation of high oxidation states.
How to avoid:
Understand the real reason:
- High oxidation states are unstable because removing many electrons requires huge energy.
- Oxygen (O2−) and fluorine (F−) are small, highly electronegative ions that form strong covalent bonds with the metal.
- This bond energy compensates for the energy spent in removing electrons.
- Other anions (like Cl−, Br−) are larger, form weaker bonds, and cannot stabilise very high oxidation states.
Key point: It's not just electronegativity — it's the small size + high charge density of O2− and F− that makes them special.
✗ Mistake 2: Treating Oxygen and Fluorine as Interchangeable
What students do wrong:
They stop at "both are small and electronegative" and miss that the two are not equivalent — oxygen can take a metal even higher than fluorine.
How to avoid:
Note the difference explicitly:
- Oxygen can form multiple bonds with the metal, so it stabilises even higher states than fluorine manages with its single bonds.
- Both elements owe their power to small size + high electronegativity — that is what lets them oxidise the metal to its maximum state at all.
Example: Manganese reaches +7 in Mn2O7 (oxide), but its highest simple fluoride is only MnF4.
✗ Mistake 3: Saying "Only Fluorine and Oxygen" Without Explaining Why Not Others
What students do wrong:
They list oxygen and fluorine but don't explain why chlorine, bromine, or sulfur fail.
How to avoid:
Compare anion properties:
| Property | F− | O2− | Cl− | Br− |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ionic radius (pm) | 133 | 140 | 181 | 196 |
| Electronegativity | 4.0 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 2.8 |
| Bond strength with metal | Very high | High | Moderate | Low |
Conclusion: Larger anions cannot stabilise high oxidation states because:
- Weaker bonds → less energy compensation.
- Steric hindrance → poor lattice packing.
✗ Mistake 4: Ignoring the "Highest" Oxidation State
What students do wrong:
They explain why oxides/fluorides form, but not why only these can achieve the maximum oxidation state.
How to avoid:
Emphasise that:
- The highest oxidation state is the most electron-deficient state.
- It requires the strongest possible stabilisation — only O2− and F− provide that.
- For example, Mn shows +7 in Mn2O7 and MnO4− (oxide), reaches +4 only with fluorine (MnF4), and with chlorine stops at MnCl2 (Table 4.5).
✓ Quick Revision Checklist
| Mistake | Fix |
|---|---|
| Vague "electronegativity" answer | Mention small size + high charge density of O2− and F− |
| Treating O and F as interchangeable | Note oxygen's multiple bonding pushes the ceiling even higher (Mn2O7 vs MnF4) |
| Not comparing with other anions | Show why Cl−, Br− fail |
| Missing "highest" | Clarify that only the strongest stabilisers can achieve the maximum oxidation state |
Final tip: In exams, write:
"The highest oxidation state is exhibited only in oxides and fluorides because oxygen and fluorine are small and highly electronegative — they can oxidise the metal to its highest state and form strong bonds that compensate for the high ionisation energy."
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.Choose the statements which are incorrect in the case of Lanthanoids. A. Ce4+ is diamagnetic while Sm3+ is paramagnetic. B. The atomic size of the transition metals having atomic number greater than 71 are very close to that of the elements above them. C. Lanthanoids react with hot water forming water soluble Ln(OH)3 with the liberation of O2. D. The general electronic configuration of Lanthanoids is (n−2)f1−145 d06 s2, where n=6. (A) C & D (B) B & D (C) A & B (D) A & D
›Reveal solutionSolution
The question asks which statements about lanthanoids are incorrect. After checking each statement, the incorrect ones are C and D, so the correct option is (A).
Concept & Intuition
Lanthanoids are the 14 elements from Ce (58) to Lu (71) where the 4f subshell is progressively filled. Their chemistry is dominated by the +3 oxidation state, but some elements show +4 or +2 states due to stability of empty, half-filled, or fully-filled f-subshells. Magnetic properties depend on unpaired electrons. Their atomic sizes show the “lanthanoid contraction” — a steady decrease across the series — which makes post-lanthanoid transition metals (like Hf, Ta, W) have nearly identical atomic radii to their 4d counterparts above them. Also, lanthanoid hydroxides are not water-soluble, and the general electronic configuration is often written with a possible 5d¹ electron for some elements (like La, Gd, Lu). Let’s examine each statement.
Step-by-step analysis
-
Statement A: Ce4+ is diamagnetic while Sm3+ is paramagnetic.
- Ce (atomic number 58) has configuration [Xe]4f15d16s2. Ce⁴⁺ loses all 4f, 5d, and 6s electrons → [Xe] (no unpaired electrons) → diamagnetic.
- Sm (atomic number 62) has [Xe]4f66s2. Sm³⁺ loses 6s² and one 4f → 4f5. With 5 unpaired electrons (Hund’s rule), it is paramagnetic.
- So statement A is correct.
-
Statement B: The atomic size of the transition metals having atomic number greater than 71 are very close to that of the elements above them.
- Elements with Z > 71 are the 5d transition metals (Hf, Ta, W, etc.). Their 4f counterparts (Zr, Nb, Mo, etc.) are directly above them in the periodic table.
- Due to lanthanoid contraction (poor shielding by 4f electrons), the atomic radii of 5d metals are nearly equal to those of the 4d metals above them.
- This is a well-known fact. So statement B is correct.
-
Statement C: Lanthanoids react with hot water forming water soluble Ln(OH)3 with the liberation of O2.
- Lanthanoids do react with hot water to give Ln(OH)3 and hydrogen gas (H2), not oxygen.
- Example: 2Eu+6H2O→2Eu(OH)3+3H2
- Also, Ln(OH)3 are insoluble in water (like most metal hydroxides).
- So statement C is incorrect on two counts: wrong gas and wrong solubility.
-
Statement D: The general electronic configuration of Lanthanoids is (n−2)f1−145 d06 s2, where n=6.
- For lanthanoids, n=6 (6th period), so (n−2)=4. The configuration is 4f1−145d0−16s2.
- The statement says 5d0 always, but exceptions exist:
- La (57): 5d16s2 (no 4f electron)
- Gd (64): 4f75d16s2 (half-filled f-shell stability)
- Lu (71): 4f145d16s2
- So the 5d0 part is not universally true. Hence statement D is incorrect.
Conclusion: Incorrect statements are C and D.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A).
ANSWER: A
-
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-E1 markMCQQ.Choose the correct metal/ ion from the brackets which ------------------------- A. has chemical reactivity similar to that of the first few members of the Lanthanoids (Zn,Ca,Fe,Cu). B. has stable 4f7 electronic configuration, but acts as a strong reducing agent and converts to M3+ state. (Eu2+,Ce2+,Pr2+,Dy2+) C. is a colorless ion (Tm3+,Lu3+,Gd3+,Sm3+). D. shows stable +2 oxidation state and is diamagnetic ( Ce,Sm,Ho,Yb ) (A) A: Cu B: Dy2+ C: Sm3+ D: Ho (B) A:Zn B: Ce2+, C: Gd3+ D: Sm (C) A: Fe B: Pr2+ C: Tm3+ D: Ce (D) A: Ca B: Eu2+ C: Lu3+ D:Yb
›Reveal solutionSolution
The question tests knowledge of lanthanoid chemistry: chemical similarity to early lanthanoids, the stability of half-filled 4f⁷, colourless ions, and diamagnetic +2 states. The correct matching is A: Ca, B: Eu²⁺, C: Lu³⁺, D: Yb — option (D).
Concept & Intuition
Lanthanoids (elements 58–71) have similar chemistry due to the gradual filling of 4f orbitals, but subtle differences arise from electronic configurations, oxidation states, and magnetic properties.
- Part A: The first few lanthanoids (La–Nd) are highly electropositive and reactive, resembling the alkaline earth metal Ca more than transition metals like Zn, Fe, or Cu.
- Part B: A half-filled 4f⁷ subshell is exceptionally stable. Eu²⁺ has [Xe]4f⁷, but it readily loses one electron to become Eu³⁺ (still 4f⁷? No — Eu³⁺ is 4f⁶, but the driving force is the stability of the +3 state common to lanthanoids; Eu²⁺ is a strong reducing agent because it wants to reach +3).
- Part C: Colour in lanthanoid ions arises from f–f transitions. Ions with empty (4f⁰), half-filled (4f⁷), or fully filled (4f¹⁴) subshells have no such transitions and are colourless. Lu³⁺ is 4f¹⁴ — colourless.
- Part D: A diamagnetic +2 ion must have all electrons paired. Yb²⁺ has [Xe]4f¹⁴ — completely filled, hence diamagnetic and stable in +2 state.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Part A: Chemical reactivity similar to early lanthanoids
Early lanthanoids (La, Ce, Pr, Nd) are highly electropositive, react readily with water and acids, and typically exhibit +3 oxidation state. Among the options, Ca (an alkaline earth metal) shares this high reactivity and electropositivity. Zn, Fe, and Cu are less reactive and have different chemical behaviour.
→ So A should be Ca.
-
Part B: Stable 4f⁷ configuration but acts as a strong reducing agent to M³⁺
Eu²⁺ has the configuration [Xe]4f⁷ — half-filled, stable. However, the standard reduction potential for Eu³⁺/Eu²⁺ is about –0.35 V, meaning Eu²⁺ is easily oxidised to Eu³⁺ (strong reducing agent). Ce²⁺, Pr²⁺, Dy²⁺ are less common and do not have the 4f⁷ stability.
→ So B should be Eu²⁺.
-
Part C: Colourless ion
Colour in lanthanoid ions is due to f–f transitions, which require partially filled 4f orbitals.
- Tm³⁺: 4f¹² — coloured.
- Lu³⁺: 4f¹⁴ — fully filled, no f–f transitions, colourless.
- Gd³⁺: 4f⁷ — half-filled, also colourless in theory, but Lu³⁺ is more reliably colourless and is the classic example.
- Sm³⁺: 4f⁵ — coloured. → So C should be Lu³⁺.
-
Part D: Stable +2 oxidation state and diamagnetic
A diamagnetic ion has no unpaired electrons.
- Ce: common +3, +4; +2 is rare and paramagnetic (4f²).
- Sm: +2 exists but Sm²⁺ is 4f⁶ — paramagnetic (6 unpaired).
- Ho: +2 is unstable, Ho²⁺ is 4f¹¹ — paramagnetic.
- Yb: Yb²⁺ is [Xe]4f¹⁴ — fully filled, diamagnetic, and stable in +2 state (e.g., YbCl₂). → So D should be Yb.
-
Match with options
- (A) A: Cu ✗, B: Dy²⁺ ✗, C: Sm³⁺ ✗, D: Ho ✗
- (B) A: Zn ✗, B: Ce²⁺ ✗, C: Gd³⁺ ✗, D: Sm ✗
- (C) A: Fe ✗, B: Pr²⁺ ✗, C: Tm³⁺ ✗, D: Ce ✗
- (D) A: Ca ✓, B: Eu²⁺ ✓, C: Lu³⁺ ✓, D: Yb ✓
TipRemember: For lanthanoid ions, colourless = 4f⁰, 4f⁷, or 4f¹⁴. For diamagnetic +2, look for 4f¹⁴ (Yb²⁺) or 4f⁰ (not common in +2). Eu²⁺ is 4f⁷ but paramagnetic (7 unpaired electrons) — so it’s not diamagnetic, which is why Yb is the correct choice for D.
Watch outA common mistake is to think Eu²⁺ is diamagnetic because 4f⁷ is “half-filled stable”. But half-filled means 7 unpaired electrons — highly paramagnetic! Only fully filled (4f¹⁴) or empty (4f⁰) are diamagnetic.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D).
ANSWER: D
- KCET 2024Set B-21 markMCQQ.Which of the following statements related to lanthanoids is incorrect? (A) Lanthanoids are silvery white soft metals (B) Samarium shows +2 oxidation state (C) CeX4+ solutions are widely used as oxidising agents in titrimetric analysis (D) Colour of Lanthanoid ion in solution is due to d–d transition
›Reveal solutionSolution
The incorrect statement is the one about the colour origin: lanthanoid ion colours arise from f–f transitions, not d–d transitions. So option (D) is wrong.
The question tests your understanding of the lanthanoid series — their physical nature, variable oxidation states, common uses, and the origin of their colours. Each option touches a distinct property, so we need to check them one by one against known facts.
-
Option (A): Lanthanoids are silvery white soft metals
This is correct. All lanthanoids (elements 57–71, except perhaps promethium which is radioactive and less studied) are silvery-white, relatively soft metals. They tarnish quickly in air, but their fresh surfaces have that characteristic appearance. Softness increases across the series — they can be cut with a knife, like sodium, though they are harder than alkali metals.
-
Option (B): Samarium shows +2 oxidation state
This is correct. Samarium (Sm, atomic number 62) has the electronic configuration [Xe]4f66s2. By losing the two 6s electrons, it reaches +2 (Sm2+). The 4f6 configuration in Sm2+ is half-filled (since f orbitals can hold 14 electrons, 7 is half-filled; 6 is one short, but still relatively stable). More importantly, the +2 state is stabilised by the proximity to the half-filled 4f7 configuration of Eu2+. In practice, Sm2+ is known in compounds like SmI2 and SmCl2, though it is less stable than the common +3 state.
-
Option (C): CeX4+ solutions are widely used as oxidising agents in titrimetric analysis
This is correct. Cerium(IV) (Ce4+) is a strong oxidising agent — it gets reduced to Ce3+ (with a standard reduction potential of about +1.72 V in acidic medium). Ce4+ solutions are stable, have a sharp colour change (yellow to colourless), and are used in redox titrations, especially for determining iron(II), oxalates, and other reducing agents. This is a standard application in analytical chemistry.
-
Option (D): Colour of Lanthanoid ion in solution is due to d–d transition
This is incorrect. Lanthanoid ions have partially filled 4f orbitals. The colours arise from f–f transitions — electrons in the 4f subshell absorb visible light and get excited to higher 4f levels. These transitions are Laporte-forbidden (f→f is parity-forbidden) but become weakly allowed due to vibronic coupling, giving pale colours. In contrast, d–d transitions occur in transition metal ions (d-block elements), where the d-orbitals split in the ligand field. Lanthanoids are f-block elements; their f-orbitals are deeply buried and do not split significantly by ligand fields, so the colour mechanism is fundamentally different.
Watch outA common mistake is to assume all coloured ions in the periodic table owe their colour to d–d transitions. Remember: transition metals (d-block) → d–d transitions; lanthanoids/actinoids (f-block) → f–f transitions. The two are not interchangeable.
✓Final answerThe incorrect statement is (D) — the colour of lanthanoid ions in solution is due to f–f transitions, not d–d transitions.
-
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-A1 markMCQQ.Consider the following statements in respect of lanthanides, which of the statements are incorrect?(i) La(OH)3 is least basic among the hydroxides of lanthanides(ii) The lanthanide ions Yb2+,Lu3+ and Ce4+ are diamagnetic in nature.(iii) Ce4+ can act as an oxidising agent(iv) Ln (III) compounds are generally colourless(v) Ionic radii of Ce3+ is greater than Yb3+ (A) (i),(ii) and(iii) (B)(i) and(iv) (C) (iii),(iv) and(v) (D)(iii) and (iv)
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to evaluate each statement about lanthanide properties (basicity trends, magnetism, redox behavior, color, and ionic radii) against known periodic trends. The incorrect statements are (i) and (iv), so the correct option is (B).
Concept and Intuition
Lanthanides are the 4f-block elements (La to Lu). Their chemistry is dominated by the +3 oxidation state, but some ions show +2 or +4 states due to stability of empty, half-filled, or fully filled 4f subshells. Basicity of hydroxides decreases across the series as ionic radius decreases (lanthanide contraction). Magnetic behavior depends on unpaired 4f electrons; diamagnetic means all electrons paired. Color arises from f–f transitions; Ln(III) ions with no unpaired f-electrons (like La³⁺, Lu³⁺) are colorless, but most are colored. Ionic radii decrease from Ce³⁺ to Yb³⁺ due to lanthanide contraction.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Statement (i): "La(OH)₃ is least basic among the hydroxides of lanthanides"
- Basicity of lanthanide hydroxides decreases as the ionic radius decreases (smaller cation polarizes the OH bond more, making it more acidic).
- La³⁺ has the largest ionic radius among Ln³⁺ ions, so La(OH)₃ is the most basic, not the least.
- Therefore, (i) is incorrect.
-
Statement (ii): "Yb²⁺, Lu³⁺, and Ce⁴⁺ are diamagnetic"
- Yb²⁺: Yb (atomic number 70) has electron configuration [Xe]4f¹⁴. Yb²⁺ loses two electrons, still 4f¹⁴ — all f-orbitals are fully filled, so no unpaired electrons → diamagnetic.
- Lu³⁺: Lu (71) is [Xe]4f¹⁴5d¹6s²; Lu³⁺ loses three electrons → [Xe]4f¹⁴, fully filled → diamagnetic.
- Ce⁴⁺: Ce (58) is [Xe]4f¹5d¹6s²; Ce⁴⁺ loses four electrons → [Xe] (no f-electrons) → diamagnetic.
- Thus, (ii) is correct.
-
Statement (iii): "Ce⁴⁺ can act as an oxidizing agent"
- Ce⁴⁺ has a strong tendency to gain an electron to become Ce³⁺ (which has a stable half-filled 4f¹ configuration? Actually Ce³⁺ is 4f¹, but the reduction potential Ce⁴⁺/Ce³⁺ is about +1.72 V in acidic medium, making Ce⁴⁺ a strong oxidizing agent).
- Therefore, (iii) is correct.
-
Statement (iv): "Ln(III) compounds are generally colorless"
- Most Ln³⁺ ions have unpaired 4f electrons (e.g., Pr³⁺, Nd³⁺, Sm³⁺, Eu³⁺, etc.) and exhibit characteristic colors due to f–f transitions. Only La³⁺ (4f⁰) and Lu³⁺ (4f¹⁴) are colorless.
- So "generally colorless" is false; they are generally colored.
- Thus, (iv) is incorrect.
-
Statement (v): "Ionic radii of Ce³⁺ is greater than Yb³⁺"
- Lanthanide contraction: ionic radii decrease steadily from La³⁺ to Lu³⁺. Ce (58) comes before Yb (70), so Ce³⁺ is larger than Yb³⁺.
- Hence, (v) is correct.
Summary of correctness:
- Incorrect: (i) and (iv)
- Correct: (ii), (iii), (v)
This matches option (B).
Watch outA common mistake is to think La(OH)₃ is least basic because La is the first lanthanide — but basicity decreases across the series, so La is most basic. Also, many assume all Ln(III) compounds are colorless, but only La³⁺ and Lu³⁺ are; most are colored.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B).
ANSWER: B
-
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-M1 markMCQQ.Match the compounds given in Column I with their characteristic features listed in Column II .tg {border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:0;} .tg td{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg th{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; font-weight:normal;overflow:hidden;padding:10px 5px;word-break:normal;} .tg .tg-c3ow{border-color:inherit;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-7btt{border-color:inherit;font-weight:bold;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-0pky{border-color:inherit;text-align:left;vertical-align:top} No. Column I No. Column II A La(OH)3 P Acidic in nature B Mn2O7 Q Least basic C Lu(OH)3 R Interstitial compound D Fe3H S Most basic (A) A=SB=PC=QD=R (B) A=SB=RC=QD=P (C) A=QB=PC=SD=R (D) A=RB=PC=SD=Q
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is that basicity of lanthanide hydroxides decreases across the series (La(OH)₃ most basic, Lu(OH)₃ least basic), Mn₂O₇ is acidic, and Fe₃H is an interstitial compound. The correct matching is A→S, B→P, C→Q, D→R, which corresponds to option (A).
Concept & Intuition
This question tests two separate ideas: (1) the trend in basicity of lanthanide hydroxides, and (2) the classification of oxides and hydrides. For the lanthanides, as atomic number increases, the ionic radius decreases (lanthanide contraction), making the M–OH bond stronger and harder to break — so basicity decreases. La³⁺ is the largest, so La(OH)₃ is the most basic; Lu³⁺ is the smallest, so Lu(OH)₃ is the least basic. Mn₂O₇ is a well-known acidic oxide (it’s the anhydride of permanganic acid). Fe₃H is a metallic hydride where hydrogen occupies interstitial sites in the iron lattice — hence an interstitial compound.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Identify the nature of La(OH)₃ and Lu(OH)₃
Both are hydroxides of lanthanides. Basicity of lanthanide hydroxides decreases from La to Lu due to lanthanide contraction. La³⁺ has the largest ionic radius, so La–OH bond is weakest → most basic. Lu³⁺ has the smallest radius → least basic.
→ La(OH)₃ = Most basic (S)
→ Lu(OH)₃ = Least basic (Q)
-
Identify the nature of Mn₂O₇
Mn in +7 oxidation state forms an oxide that is strongly acidic. Mn₂O₇ reacts with water to give HMnO₄ (permanganic acid), a strong acid.
→ Mn₂O₇ = Acidic in nature (P)
-
Identify the nature of Fe₃H
Fe₃H is a non-stoichiometric hydride where hydrogen atoms occupy interstitial sites in the iron metal lattice. It is not a salt or covalent hydride; it’s a classic example of an interstitial compound.
→ Fe₃H = Interstitial compound (R)
-
Match the pairs
- A (La(OH)₃) → S
- B (Mn₂O₇) → P
- C (Lu(OH)₃) → Q
- D (Fe₃H) → R
This matches option (A).
Watch outA common mistake is to think that Lu(OH)₃ is more basic because it’s heavier — but basicity decreases across the lanthanide series, not increases. Also, don’t confuse Mn₂O₇ with MnO (which is basic); the oxidation state matters hugely.
TipRemember the mnemonic: La is Large → Least basic? No — La is large → Most basic. Lu is tiny → Least basic. For transition metal oxides, high oxidation state = acidic, low oxidation state = basic.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A).
ANSWER: A
-
- COMEDK 2021Set 2021-B1 markMCQQ.Lanthanides are a group of 14 elements which are metals. Identify the correct statement from among the 4 statements given below: (A) Shielding power of 4f electrons is quite strong. (B) As a result of Lanthanide contraction, the elements of the second and third transition series resemble each other in their chemical properties. (C) Due to Lanthanide contraction, the size of Lanthanoid ions increases regularly with increase in atomic number. (D) It is very easy to separate the Lanthanide elements from each other and obtain them in the pure state.
›Reveal solutionSolution
[!TLDR]
Lanthanide contraction makes the 2nd and 3rd transition series resemble each other, so statement (B) is the correct one.
Concept
The 4f electrons shield the nuclear charge very poorly, so as atomic number rises across the lanthanoids the effective nuclear charge felt by outer electrons grows and the size of the atoms/ions shrinks steadily. This is the lanthanide contraction (CBSE/NCERT Class 12, d- and f-block elements).
Solution
Check each statement:
- (A) 4f electrons have poor (diffuse) shielding power, not strong — false.
- (B) The contraction cancels the expected size increase down a group, so pairs like Zr/Hf and Nb/Ta have nearly identical sizes and therefore very similar chemistry — true.
- (C) Lanthanoid ion size decreases regularly with atomic number, not increases — false.
- (D) Because all Ln3+ ions are so similar in size, separating them is notoriously difficult — false.
Only (B) is correct.
[!ANSWER]
(B) As a result of lanthanide contraction, the elements of the second and third transition series resemble each other in their chemical properties.
- KCET 2020Set A-11 markMCQQ.The oxide of potassium that does not exist is (A) K2O3 (B) K2O (C) KO2 (D) K2O2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Potassium forms oxides in which it exists as K+ ions, and the only stable oxidation states of oxygen in these compounds are −2 (oxide), −1 (peroxide), and −21 (superoxide). The formula K2O3 would require oxygen in an oxidation state of −34, which is not possible — so it does not exist.
The key to this question lies in understanding the oxidation states that oxygen can take in its compounds with alkali metals. Potassium, being a highly electropositive metal, always forms K+ ions. The oxygen species present in the solid then determines the formula.
-
Recall the common oxides of potassium.
Potassium reacts with oxygen to form three well-known compounds:
- Normal oxide: K2O — contains O2− (oxide ion, oxidation state −2).
- Peroxide: K2O2 — contains O22− (peroxide ion, oxidation state −1 per oxygen).
- Superoxide: KO2 — contains O2− (superoxide ion, oxidation state −21 per oxygen). These are all stable and well-characterised.
-
Check the oxidation state of oxygen in K2O3.
Let the oxidation state of oxygen be x. Since each K is +1, the total positive charge is 2×(+1)=+2. For a neutral compound:
2(+1)+3x=0⇒3x=−2⇒x=−32.
This would mean oxygen exists in an average oxidation state of −32, which is not a known stable oxygen species. Oxygen in ionic compounds only appears as O2−, O22−, O2−, or (rarely) O− — never as a fractional or −32 state.
- Why the other options are valid.
- K2O: oxygen is −2, perfectly normal.
- KO2: oxygen is −21 (superoxide), stable for large alkali metals like K, Rb, Cs.
- K2O2: oxygen is −1 (peroxide), also stable.
Watch outA common mistake is to think that K2O3 might be a "sesquioxide" like Al2O3. But aluminium is not an alkali metal — it forms covalent oxides with O2−. Potassium cannot stabilise an O32− or any polyoxide with a non-integer oxidation state.
TipFor alkali metals, the size of the cation determines which oxide is most stable. Lithium (small) forms only Li2O; sodium forms Na2O and Na2O2; potassium, rubidium, and caesium form all three types, but never M2O3.
✓Final answerThe oxide of potassium that does not exist is (A) K2O3.
-
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.