Q.Suppose that 6% of the people with blood group O are left handed and 10% of those with other blood groups are left handed. 30% of the people have blood group O. If a left handed person is selected at random, what is the probability that he/she will have blood group O?
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Conditional Probability
Conditional Probability
Roll a die and ask "what is the chance of an even number?" — that is 3/6. But suppose someone tells you the result is greater than 3. Now you are no longer looking at all six faces, only at {4,5,6}, and two of those (4 and 6) are even, so the probability becomes 2/3. That change — from the probability of A to the probability of A given that B has already occurred — is conditional probability.
The Idea: Shrink the Sample Space
Conditioning on B throws away every outcome where B is false and treats B as the new "whole world." You measure A only against what is still possible.
Think of filtering a table of data: unconditional probability uses every row; conditional probability keeps only the rows where the condition is true.
The Definition
For events A and B with P(B)>0,
P(A∣B)=P(B)P(A∩B).
We divide by P(B) to rescale so that B itself has probability 1; the surviving part of A is the overlap A∩B. Checking the die: P(A∩B)=P({4,6})=62 and P(B)=63, so P(A∣B)=3/62/6=32, matching the intuition.
Rearranging gives the multiplication rule P(A∩B)=P(A∣B)P(B), which is usually the easier way to compute a joint probability when a problem says "given that."
Two Cautions
- P(A∣B) and P(B∣A) are generally not equal; swapping them is the classic mistake. They are linked by Bayes' theorem, P(A∣B)=P(B)P(B∣A)P(A). …
Concept: Conditional Probability (Bayes' Theorem)
Let O = event that a person has blood group O, and L = event that a person is left-handed.
We are given:
- P(O)=0.30, so P(O′)=0.70
- P(L∣O)=0.06
- P(L∣O′)=0.10
We need P(O∣L).
Step 1: Find P(L) using the law of total probability:
P(L)=P(L∣O)P(O)+P(L∣O′)P(O′)=(0.06)(0.30)+(0.10)(0.70)=0.018+0.07=0.088
Step 2: Apply Bayes' Theorem: …
This is a classic Bayes’ theorem problem. We are given the prevalence of blood group O (30%) and the conditional probabilities of being left-handed given O (6%) and given not-O (10%). The probability that a randomly selected left-handed person has blood group O is approximately 0.2045 or 20.45%.
We start with the idea of conditional probability: we want P(O∣left-handed), the probability that a person has blood group O given that they are left-handed. The direct data we have is the other way around — left-handedness given blood group. Bayes’ theorem is the natural tool to reverse the conditioning.
Let’s define events clearly:
- Let O = event that a person has blood group O.
- Let L = event that a person is left-handed.
We are told:
- P(O)=0.30 (30% of people have blood group O).
- P(L∣O)=0.06 (6% of people with blood group O are left-handed).
- P(L∣Oc)=0.10 (10% of people with other blood groups are left-handed).
We want P(O∣L).
- Find the probability of being left-handed overall, P(L). This is the total probability, which we get by considering both ways a person can be left-handed: either they have blood group O and are left-handed, or they don’t have O and are left-handed.
P(L)=P(L∩O)+P(L∩Oc)
Using the multiplication rule:
P(L∩O)=P(O)⋅P(L∣O)=0.30×0.06=0.018
P(L∩Oc)=P(Oc)⋅P(L∣Oc)=(1−0.30)×0.10=0.70×0.10=0.07
So:
P(L)=0.018+0.07=0.088
That is, 8.8% of the population is left-handed.
- Apply Bayes’ theorem. Bayes’ theorem states:
P(O∣L)=P(L)P(L∣O)⋅P(O)
We already have all three pieces:
P(O∣L)=0.0880.06×0.30=0.0880.018
- Simplify the fraction. …
Method: Bayes' Theorem with a Two-Group Partition
Use this when a population splits into a group and its complement, each with a known rate of some trait, and you want to reverse the conditioning.
Steps
Step 1: Name the partition and the observed trait.
Let O and Oc be the two groups with priors P(O), P(Oc)=1−P(O); let L be the observed trait, with rates P(L∣O) and P(L∣Oc).
Step 2: Get the total probability of the trait. …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Putting only one group in the denominator.
Why it's wrong: P(L) must count left-handers from both blood-group O and non-O; using only P(L∣O)P(O) understates the denominator. Correct approach: use total probability, P(L)=P(L∣O)P(O)+P(L∣Oc)P(Oc)=0.088.
Mistake 2: Reporting P(L∣O) when P(O∣L) is asked. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 on this concept.
- KCET 2021Set A-11 markMCQQ.A car manufacturing factory has two plants X and Y. Plant X manufactures 70% of cars and plant Y manufactures 30% of cars. 80% of cars at plant X and 90% of cars at plant Y are rated as standard quality. A car is chosen at random and is found to be of standard quality. The probability that it has come from plant X is (A) 7356 (B) 8456 (C) 8356 (D) 7956
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a reverse-probability question (effect → cause), so use Bayes' theorem with the total probability of a standard-quality car in the denominator.
Step 1 — Define the events.
- X: the car came from plant X — P(X)=0.70
- Y: the car came from plant Y — P(Y)=0.30
- S: the car is of standard quality
The conditional (likelihood) data given:
P(S∣X)=0.80,P(S∣Y)=0.90
Note X and Y are mutually exclusive and exhaustive (0.7+0.3=1), which is exactly what Bayes' theorem needs.
Step 2 — Why Bayes and not simple conditioning.
We are told the effect (the chosen car is standard) and asked for the probability of the cause (it came from X). That inversion — P(X∣S) from P(S∣X) — is precisely Bayes' theorem:
P(X∣S)=P(X)P(S∣X)+P(Y)P(S∣Y)P(X)P(S∣X)
Step 3 — Compute the numerator.
P(X)P(S∣X)=0.70×0.80=0.56
Step 4 — Compute the denominator (total probability of a standard car).
P(S)=0.70×0.80+0.30×0.90=0.56+0.27=0.83
Step 5 — Divide. …
- COMEDK 2021Set 2021-B1 markMCQQ.At a certain university 4% of male students are over 6 feet tall and 1% of female students are over 6 feet tall. The total student population is divided in the ratio 3 : 2, in favor of female students. If a student is selected at random from amongst all those over 6 feet tall, what is the probability that the student is a female? (A) 1/3 (B) 2/5 (C) 3/11 (D) 3/5
›Reveal solutionSolution
Bayes' theorem gives P(female∣>6ft)=0.0220.006=113.
Population split 3:2 in favour of females ⇒ P(F)=53=0.6, P(M)=52=0.4.
Tall fractions: P(T∣F)=0.01, P(T∣M)=0.04.
By Bayes' theorem: …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.Three bags contain a number of red and white balls are as follows. Bag I: 3 red balls Bag II: 2 red balls and 1 white ball Bag III: 3 White balls The probability that bag i will be chosen and a ball is selected from it is 6i,i=1,2,3. If a white ball is selected, what is the probablity that it came from Bag III (A) 119 (B) 112 (C) 0 (D) 111
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a classic Bayes’ theorem problem: we are given prior probabilities for choosing each bag and the conditional probabilities of drawing a white ball from each bag; after observing a white ball, we want the posterior probability that it came from Bag III. The answer is 119.
We start by noting that the problem gives us three bags with different compositions, and a rule for choosing a bag: the probability of picking bag i is 6i. Then, from that bag, we pick a ball uniformly at random. We are told that a white ball was selected, and we need the probability that it came from Bag III. This is a textbook case for Bayes’ theorem, which lets us “reverse” conditional probabilities: we know P(white∣bag i), and we want P(bag i∣white).
Let’s work through it step by step.
- Define events and write down given probabilities. Let Bi be the event that bag i is chosen (i=1,2,3). We are told:
P(B1)=61,P(B2)=62,P(B3)=63.
Let W be the event that a white ball is drawn.
From the bag compositions:
- Bag I: 3 red, 0 white → P(W∣B1)=0.
- Bag II: 2 red, 1 white → P(W∣B2)=31.
- Bag III: 0 red, 3 white → P(W∣B3)=1.
- Compute the total probability of drawing a white ball. By the law of total probability:
P(W)=P(B1)P(W∣B1)+P(B2)P(W∣B2)+P(B3)P(W∣B3).
Substitute:
P(W)=61⋅0+62⋅31+63⋅1=0+182+63=91+21.
Get a common denominator (18):
P(W)=182+189=1811.
- Apply Bayes’ theorem to find P(B3∣W). Bayes’ theorem says:
P(B3∣W)=P(W)P(B3)P(W∣B3).
Plug in the numbers:
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-M1 markMCQQ.In an entrance test, there are multiple choice questions. There are four possible answers to each question of which only one is correct. The probability that a student knows the answer to a question is 90%. If he gets the correct answer to a question, then the probability that he was guessing is (A) 3736 (B) 91 (C) 371 (D) 4037
›Reveal solutionSolution
We use Bayes’ theorem to reverse the conditional probability: given that the student answered correctly, we want the probability that he was guessing. The answer is 371, so the correct option is (C).
Concept and intuition
This is a classic Bayes’ theorem problem. We have two ways a student can get a correct answer: either he knows the answer (and thus answers correctly for sure), or he guesses (and has a 1 in 4 chance of being correct). We are told the prior probability that he knows the answer is 90%. The question asks: given that he got it right, what’s the chance he was actually guessing? Bayes’ theorem lets us “flip” the conditional probability, using the known likelihoods.
Step-by-step reasoning
- Define events clearly Let K = “student knows the answer”, and G = “student guesses” (so G is the complement of K). Let C = “student gives the correct answer”. We are given:
P(K)=0.9,P(G)=0.1.
-
Conditional probabilities for answering correctly
- If the student knows the answer, he is certain to be correct: P(C∣K)=1.
- If he guesses, he picks randomly among 4 options, so P(C∣G)=41.
-
Find the total probability of a correct answer
By the law of total probability:
P(C)=P(C∣K)P(K)+P(C∣G)P(G)=(1)(0.9)+(41)(0.1)=0.9+0.025=0.925.
- Apply Bayes’ theorem We want P(G∣C), the probability that he was guessing given that he answered correctly:
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-M1 markMCQQ.Advika chooses one of three scarves every morning: Red, Blue, or Green. The probability she chooses Red is 20%. The probability she chooses Blue is twice the probability of choosing Red. On the remaining days she wears a Green scarf. Once a scarf is chosen, she decides whether to wear a Hat (H) and Sunglasses (S). These choices are independent of each other but depend on the scarf colour: Scarf colour Red Blue Green P(H)0.50.40.1P(S)0.80.50.5 Advika is spotted outdoors wearing both a Hat and Sunglasses. What is the probability that she is wearing the Red scarf? (A) 31313 (B) 218 (C) 94 (D) 138
›Reveal solutionSolution
Bayes' theorem on scarf colour given that both a hat and sunglasses are worn. Priors P(R)=0.2, P(B)=0.4, P(G)=0.4; likelihoods P(H∩S∣colour)=P(H)P(S). The posterior P(R∣H∩S)=94 — option (C).
Concept. Hat and sunglasses are independent given the scarf, so P(H∩S∣colour)=P(H∣colour)⋅P(S∣colour). Bayes' theorem then reverses the conditioning to give the probability of the scarf colour from the observed accessories.
Step 1 — Priors.
P(R)=20%=0.2,P(B)=2P(R)=0.4,P(G)=1−0.2−0.4=0.4.
Step 2 — Likelihood of wearing both accessories for each colour.
P(H∩S∣R)=0.5×0.8=0.40,
P(H∩S∣B)=0.4×0.5=0.20,
P(H∩S∣G)=0.1×0.5=0.05. …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-E1 markMCQQ.Suppose we have three cards identical in form except that both sides of the first card are coloured red, both sides of the second are coloured black, and one side of the third card is coloured red and the other side is coloured black. The three cards are mixed and a card is picked randomly. If the upper side of the chosen card is coloured red, what is the probability that the other side is coloured black. (A) 61 (B) 21 (C) 0 (D) 31
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a classic conditional probability problem (often called the "three cards" or "Bertrand's box" variant). The key is that seeing a red side updates the probability space to only the red sides, and among those, only one belongs to the mixed card. The answer is 1/3.
We are asked: given that the visible side is red, what is the probability that the other side is black? This is not simply "one of the two remaining cards has a black other side" because the cards are not equally likely once we condition on the observation.
Concept and Intuition
The pitfall is to think: "We see red, so the card is either the all-red or the mixed card. That's two possibilities, so the chance is 1/2." But this ignores that the all-red card has two red sides, while the mixed card has only one red side. When we pick a card at random and then look at a random side, each of the six sides is equally likely to be the one we see. Seeing red eliminates the three black sides, leaving only the three red sides. Among those three red sides, two belong to the all-red card and only one belongs to the mixed card. So the probability that the other side is black is 1/3.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Label the sides.
Let the cards be:
- Card A: both sides red (sides R1,R2)
- Card B: both sides black (sides B1,B2)
- Card C: one red, one black (sides R3,B3)
-
Count equally likely outcomes.
When we pick a card uniformly at random and then look at a random side, there are 3×2=6 equally likely side-views. Each of the six sides has probability 1/6 of being the one we see.
-
Condition on seeing a red side.
The red sides are: R1,R2 (from card A) and R3 (from card C). That's 3 red sides. So the conditional space has 3 equally likely possibilities. …
-
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-E1 markMCQQ.Bag A contains 3 white and 2 red balls. Bag B contains only 1 white ball. A fair coin is tossed. If head appears then 1 ball is drawn at random from bag A and put into bag B. However if tail appears then 2 balls are drawn at random from bag A and put into bag B. Now one ball is drawn at random from bag B. Given that the drawn ball from B is white, the probability that head appeared on the coin is (A) 3023 (B) 2312 (C) 2311 (D) 3019
›Reveal solutionSolution
Computing P(white drawn∣H)=54 and P(white∣T)=1511, Bayes' theorem gives P(H∣white)=2312.
Head (transfer 1 ball from A(3W,2R) to B(1W), then draw from B's 2 balls):
P(white)=53(1)+52(21)=53+51=54.
Tail (transfer 2 balls from A to B(1W), then draw from B's 3 balls):
P(WW)=103⇒P(white)=1,P(WR)=106⇒32,P(RR)=101⇒31. …
- KCET 2020Set A-11 markMCQQ.If A and B are two events such that P(A)=31, P(B)=21 and P(A∩B)=61, then P(A′/B) is (A) 32 (B) 31 (C) 21 (D) 121
›Reveal solutionSolution
Use P(A′∣B)=1−P(A∣B) (equivalently P(B)P(B)−P(A∩B)), which gives 32.
Step 1 — The definition of conditional probability.
For P(B)>0,
P(A′∣B)=P(B)P(A′∩B)
Conditioning on B means we restrict the sample space to B and ask what fraction of B lies outside A.
Step 2 — Split B into the part inside A and the part outside A.
The events A∩B and A′∩B are disjoint and their union is exactly B:
P(B)=P(A∩B)+P(A′∩B)
⇒P(A′∩B)=P(B)−P(A∩B)=21−61=63−1=62=31
Step 3 — Divide by P(B).
P(A′∣B)=P(B)P(A′∩B)=2131=31×12=32
Step 4 — Cross-check with the complement rule. …
- KCET 2021Set A-11 markMCQQ.Given that A and B are two events such that P(B)=53, P(A/B)=21 and P(A∪B)=54, then P(A)= (A) 103 (B) 21 (C) 51 (D) 53
›Reveal solutionSolution
Turn the conditional probability into P(A∩B), then substitute into the addition theorem and solve for P(A).
Step 1 — Extract P(A∩B) from the conditional probability.
By definition,
P(A/B)=P(B)P(A∩B)(P(B)=0).
Rearranging (the multiplication theorem):
P(A∩B)=P(A/B)⋅P(B)=21×53=103.
This is the key move — the conditional probability is not directly usable in the union formula, but P(A∩B) is.
Step 2 — Apply the addition theorem.
P(A∪B)=P(A)+P(B)−P(A∩B).
The intersection is subtracted because the elements common to A and B would otherwise be counted twice.
Step 3 — Substitute the known values.
54=P(A)+53−103.
Step 4 — Solve for P(A). …
- KCET 2025Set A-11 markMCQQ.Meera visits only one of the two temples A and B in her locality. Probability that she visits temple A is 52. If she visits temple A, 31 is the probability that she meets her friend, whereas it is 72 if she visits temple B. Meera met her friend at one of the two temples. The probability that she met her at temple B is (A) 167 (B) 165 (C) 163 (D) 169
›Reveal solutionSolution
The friend has already been met (the effect); we want the probability of the cause (temple B) — that reversal of conditioning is exactly Bayes' theorem.
Step 1 — Name the events.
Let A = "Meera visits temple A", B = "Meera visits temple B", F = "she meets her friend".
She visits only one of the two temples, so A and B are mutually exclusive and exhaustive:
P(A)=52⟹P(B)=1−52=53.
Given: P(F∣A)=31, P(F∣B)=72.
Step 2 — Why Bayes.
We are told the outcome (F happened) and asked for the probability of a cause (B). Bayes' theorem inverts the conditioning:
P(B∣F)=P(A)P(F∣A)+P(B)P(F∣B)P(B)P(F∣B).
The denominator is P(F) by the law of total probability — the friend can be met on either branch.
Step 3 — Compute the two branch probabilities.
P(A∩F)=52×31=152,P(B∩F)=53×72=356.
Step 4 — Total probability of meeting the friend. …
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-A1 markMCQQ.Vishnu has two jars of marbles, Jar A and Jar B. Jar A contains 3 yellow marbles and 2 green marbles. Jar B contains 4 yellow marbles and 3 green marbles. Vishnu flips a fair coin. If it lands heads, he picks two marbles at random without replacement from Jar A. If it lands tails, he picks two marbles at random with replacement from Jar B. Given that Vishnu picked one yellow and one green marble, what is the probability that they came from Jar B? (A) 4121 (B) 8949 (C) 8940 (D) 4120
›Reveal solutionSolution
P(E∣A)=53 (without replacement), P(E∣B)=4924 (with replacement); Bayes gives P(B∣E)=8940 — option (C).
Likelihoods of drawing one yellow and one green (E).
Jar A (3 yellow, 2 green; two draws without replacement):
P(E∣A)=(25)(13)(12)=106=53.
Jar B (4 yellow, 3 green; two draws with replacement):
P(E∣B)=2⋅74⋅73=4924.
Bayes' theorem with P(A)=P(B)=21 (the 21 cancels): …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-A1 markMCQQ.P and Q are considering to apply for a job. The probability that P applies for the job is 41. The probability that P applies for the job given that Q applies for the job is 21, and the probability that Q applies for the job given that P applies for the job is 31. Then the probability that P does not apply for the job given that Q does not apply for the job is (A) 54 (B) 87 (C) 65 (D) 1211
›Reveal solutionSolution
We are given conditional probabilities and need to find P(P∣Q). Using the definitions of conditional probability and the law of total probability, we compute P(Q) and P(Q), then apply Bayes' theorem to get 54, which corresponds to option (A).
Concept and intuition:
This is a classic problem of working backwards from conditional probabilities to find a joint probability table. We know P(P), P(P∣Q), and P(Q∣P). From these, we can find P(P∩Q) in two ways, which lets us solve for P(Q). Then we can compute the desired conditional probability P(P∣Q) using the complement rule and the definition of conditional probability.
Step-by-step solution:
- Write down what is given. Let P = event that P applies, Q = event that Q applies. We have:
P(P)=41,P(P∣Q)=21,P(Q∣P)=31.
- Use the definition of conditional probability to express P(P∩Q) in two ways. From P(P∣Q)=P(Q)P(P∩Q), we get
P(P∩Q)=P(P∣Q)⋅P(Q)=21P(Q).
From P(Q∣P)=P(P)P(P∩Q), we get
P(P∩Q)=P(Q∣P)⋅P(P)=31⋅41=121.
- Equate the two expressions for P(P∩Q) to find P(Q).
21P(Q)=121⇒P(Q)=61.
- Find P(Q) and P(P∩Q).
P(Q)=1−P(Q)=1−61=65.
Also, P(P∩Q)=P(P)−P(P∩Q)=41−121=123−121=122=61.
- Find P(P∩Q). Since P∩Q is the complement of P∪Q, we can use:
P(P∩Q)=1−P(P∪Q).
First, P(P∪Q)=P(P)+P(Q)−P(P∩Q)=41+61−121. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.