Q.A fair coin and an unbiased die are tossed. Let A be the event 'head appears on the coin' and B be the event '3 on the die'. Check whether A and B are independent events or not.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Event Independence
Event Independence
Two events are independent when the occurrence of one does not change the probability of the other. Toss a coin and roll a die: the coin landing heads tells you nothing about whether the die shows a six. Contrast this with drawing cards without replacement, where the first draw does change the odds for the second — those events are dependent.
From Conditional Probability to a Clean Test
"Knowing B doesn't change A" means P(A∣B)=P(A). Substituting the definition P(A∣B)=P(B)P(A∩B) and clearing the fraction gives the symmetric form used in practice:
P(A∩B)=P(A)P(B).
Events A and B are independent exactly when the probability of both occurring equals the product of their individual probabilities. This version is preferred because it needs no non-zero condition and treats A and B alike.
A Quick Check
Roll a fair die. Let A={2,4,6} (even) and B={4,5,6} (greater than 3). Then P(A)=P(B)=21, and A∩B={4,6} so P(A∩B)=31. Since 31=21⋅21=41, these events are not independent.
Three or More Events
Events A,B,C are mutually independent only if all four conditions hold: the three pairwise products and
P(A∩B∩C)=P(A)P(B)P(C).
Pairwise independence alone is not enough to guarantee mutual independence. …
Concept: Conditional Probability / Independence
Two events are independent if P(A∩B)=P(A)⋅P(B).
Step 1 – Individual probabilities
For a fair coin: P(A)=21.
For an unbiased die: P(B)=61.
Step 2 – Joint probability
Since the coin and die are tossed together, the sample space has 2×6=12 equally likely outcomes. Only one outcome gives both a head and a 3: (H,3).
So P(A∩B)=121.
Step 3 – Check the product …
For two events to be independent, P(A∩B)=P(A)⋅P(B) must hold. Here, P(A)=21, P(B)=61, and P(A∩B)=121. Since 121=21⋅61, the events are independent.
Why this works — the idea of independence
Independence means that knowing whether one event happened gives you no information about whether the other happened. For coin and die tosses, that's intuitively true: the coin doesn't care what the die shows, and vice versa. But we need to check it formally.
The mathematical test is simple: two events A and B are independent if and only if
P(A∩B)=P(A)⋅P(B).
If this equality holds, they're independent. If it doesn't, they're dependent.
Step-by-step verification
1. Find P(A) — the probability of heads on the coin.
A fair coin has two equally likely outcomes: heads or tails.
P(A)=21.
2. Find P(B) — the probability of a 3 on the die.
An unbiased die has six equally likely faces: 1 through 6. Only one face shows 3.
P(B)=61.
3. Find P(A∩B) — the probability that both happen together.
The coin and die are tossed simultaneously. The sample space has 2×6=12 equally likely outcomes:
{(H,1),(H,2),(H,3),(H,4),(H,5),(H,6),(T,1),(T,2),(T,3),(T,4),(T,5),(T,6)}.
Only one outcome — (H,3) — satisfies both "heads on coin" and "3 on die".
P(A∩B)=121. …
Method: Testing Whether Two Events Are Independent
Use this whenever an experiment defines two events and you must decide, by calculation, whether they are independent.
Steps
Step 1: Find the two marginal probabilities
Work out P(A) and P(B) separately from the experiment.
Step 2: Find the joint probability directly
Compute P(A∩B) from the actual outcomes — list or count the sample-space points that satisfy both events (for a coin-and-die type experiment the joint sample space has ∣S1∣×∣S2∣ equally likely outcomes). Do not assume the product yet; find P(A∩B) independently. …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Assuming the events must be dependent because the coin and die are tossed together.
Being part of one experiment does not link the outcomes. Why it's wrong: a coin result carries no information about the die. Correct approach: test P(A∩B)=P(A)P(B); here 121=21⋅61, so they are independent.
Mistake 2: Mis-sizing the joint sample space. …
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-M1 markMCQQ.The odds against Arjun solving a problem are 5:2 and the odds in favour of Bhavana solving the same problem are 3:4. What is the probability that the problem is NOT solved by either of them? (A) 4910 (B) 4929 (C) 4920 (D) 4915
›Reveal solutionSolution
Convert odds to probabilities, then use the multiplication rule for independent events: the probability neither solves is the product of their individual failure probabilities, giving 4920.
Concept & Intuition
Odds are a different way of expressing probability. "Odds against Arjun" means the ratio of failure to success; "odds in favour of Bhavana" means the ratio of success to failure. To find the probability that neither solves the problem, we first convert each person's odds into a probability of failure, then multiply them — assuming their attempts are independent.
-
Convert Arjun's odds to probability
Odds against Arjun = 5:2 means for every 5 failures, there are 2 successes.
Total outcomes = 5+2=7.
Probability Arjun fails = 75.
Probability Arjun succeeds = 72.
-
Convert Bhavana's odds to probability
Odds in favour of Bhavana = 3:4 means for every 3 successes, there are 4 failures.
Total outcomes = 3+4=7.
Probability Bhavana fails = 74.
Probability Bhavana succeeds = 73.
-
Probability neither solves
The problem is not solved by either only if both fail. Assuming independence:
-
- KCET 2025Set A-11 markMCQQ.Consider the following statements. Statement (I): If E and F are two independent events, then E' and F' are also independent. Statement (II): Two mutually exclusive events with non-zero probabilities of occurrence cannot be independent. Which of the following is correct? (A) Statement (I) is true and statement (II) is false (B) Statement (I) is false and statement (II) is true (C) Both the statements are true (D) Both the statements are false
›Reveal solutionSolution
Prove Statement (I) with De Morgan + the addition rule, and Statement (II) by showing P(E∩F)=0 contradicts P(E)P(F)>0 — both come out true.
Step 1 — Verify Statement (I): if E and F are independent, so are E′ and F′.
Given independence: P(E∩F)=P(E)P(F).
Use De Morgan's law, E′∩F′=(E∪F)′:
P(E′∩F′)=1−P(E∪F)
Apply the addition theorem, then the independence hypothesis:
=1−[P(E)+P(F)−P(E∩F)]
=1−P(E)−P(F)+P(E)P(F)
Now factor by grouping:
=[1−P(E)]−P(F)[1−P(E)]=[1−P(E)][1−P(F)]
=P(E′)P(F′)
Since P(E′∩F′)=P(E′)P(F′), the complements E′ and F′ are independent.
⇒ Statement (I) is TRUE.
(Intuition: independence means knowing whether E happened tells you nothing about F. Knowing whether E didn't happen is the same information, so it still tells you nothing about F — or about F not happening.)
Step 2 — Verify Statement (II): two mutually exclusive events with non-zero probabilities cannot be independent.
Suppose E and F are mutually exclusive with P(E)>0 and P(F)>0.
Mutually exclusive means they cannot occur together:
E∩F=ϕ⟹P(E∩F)=0
But independence would require …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.In a kabaddi league, two matches are being played between Jaipur and Delhi. It is assumed that the outcomes of the two games are independent. The probability of Jaipur winning, drawing and losing the game against Delhi are 21,103 and 51 respectively. Each team gets 5 points for win, 3 points for draw and 0 points for loss in a game. After two games, find the probability that Jaipur has more points than Delhi. (A) 41 (B) 203 (C) 2011 (D) 52
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to list all possible outcomes of the two independent matches, compute the total points for Jaipur and Delhi in each case, and sum the probabilities where Jaipur’s total exceeds Delhi’s. The result is 2011, which corresponds to option (C).
We are told the outcomes of the two matches are independent. For each match, the probabilities are:
- Jaipur wins: 21
- Draw: 103
- Jaipur loses: 51
Points per match: win = 5, draw = 3, loss = 0.
We need the probability that after two matches, Jaipur’s total points are strictly greater than Delhi’s.
Concept and intuition:
Since each match gives points to both teams simultaneously, we can think of the difference in points per match.
- If Jaipur wins: Jaipur +5, Delhi +0 → difference = +5 for Jaipur.
- If draw: both get +3 → difference = 0.
- If Jaipur loses: Jaipur +0, Delhi +5 → difference = –5 for Jaipur.
After two matches, the total difference is the sum of the two per-match differences. Jaipur has more points if and only if this total difference is positive.
Because the matches are independent, we can list all 3×3 = 9 possible pairs of outcomes, compute the total difference, and sum probabilities where it is > 0.
Step-by-step solution:
-
List all possible outcomes for the two matches.
Let the outcomes be (result of match 1, result of match 2). Each result can be W (Jaipur win), D (draw), or L (Jaipur loss).
The probability of each pair is the product of the individual probabilities (independence).
-
Compute the point difference for each match:
- W: difference = +5
- D: difference = 0
- L: difference = –5
After two matches, total difference = sum of the two differences.
-
Enumerate all 9 cases and find where total difference > 0:
Match 1 Match 2 Diff 1 Diff 2 Total diff Jaipur > Delhi? W W +5 +5 +10 Yes W D +5 0 +5 Yes W L +5 –5 0 No D W 0 +5 +5 Yes D D 0 0 0 No D L 0 –5 –5 No L W –5 +5 0 No
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-E1 markMCQQ.An unbiased die is tossed twice. What is the probability of getting a 4,5 or 6 on the first toss and a 1,2,3 or 4 on the second toss? (A) 65 (B) 43 (C) 32 (D) 31
›Reveal solutionSolution
The probability is the product of the probabilities of two independent events: first toss gives {4,5,6} (3 outcomes out of 6) and second toss gives {1,2,3,4} (4 outcomes out of 6). Multiplying gives 63×64=3612=31, so the answer is (D).
Concept and intuition
When two events are independent — meaning the outcome of the first doesn’t affect the second — the probability that both happen is simply the product of their individual probabilities. Here, each toss of a fair die is independent, so we can treat the two conditions separately and multiply.
- First toss condition We want a 4, 5, or 6. That’s 3 favorable outcomes out of 6 equally likely faces.
P(first in {4,5,6})=63=21.
- Second toss condition We want a 1, 2, 3, or 4. That’s 4 favorable outcomes out of 6.
P(second in {1,2,3,4})=64=32.
- Combine using independence Since the two tosses are independent, P(both conditions)=21×32=62=31. …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-A1 markMCQQ.A and B are two independent events. The probability of their simultaneous occurrence is 81 and the probability that neither of them occurs is 83. Then their individual probabilities are (A) 83 and 81 (B) 85 and 41 (C) 43 and 21 (D) 21 and 41
›Reveal solutionSolution
Using the independence condition P(A∩B)=P(A)P(B)=81 and the complement condition P(Ac∩Bc)=(1−P(A))(1−P(B))=83, we solve a quadratic to find P(A)=21 and P(B)=41 (or vice versa), matching option (D).
We are told that A and B are independent events. This is the key that unlocks the problem: for independent events, the probability of both occurring is simply the product of their individual probabilities. We are also given the probability that neither occurs — that is, the complement of their union. Let’s denote p=P(A) and q=P(B). Our goal is to find p and q.
1. Translate the given information into equations
- Simultaneous occurrence: P(A∩B)=81. Because A and B are independent,
P(A∩B)=P(A)⋅P(B)=pq=81.
- Neither occurs: P(neither A nor B)=P(Ac∩Bc)=83. For independent events, the complements are also independent, so
P(Ac∩Bc)=(1−p)(1−q)=83.
So we have the system:
{pq=81(1−p)(1−q)=83
2. Expand the second equation
(1−p)(1−q)=1−p−q+pq=83.
Substitute pq=81:
1−p−q+81=83.
Simplify:
1+81−83=p+q⇒1−82=p+q⇒1−41=p+q.
Thus:
p+q=43.
3. Solve for p and q
We now have:
p+q=43,pq=81.
These are the sum and product of the roots of a quadratic equation. The numbers p and q satisfy:
x2−(p+q)x+pq=0⇒x2−43x+81=0.
Multiply through by 8 to clear denominators:
8x2−6x+1=0. …
- KCET 2022Set C-41 markMCQQ.If A and B are two independent events such that P(A)=0.75, P(A∪B)=0.65, and P(B)=x, then find the value of x: (A) 8/15 (B) 9/14 (C) 7/15 (D) 5/14
›Reveal solutionSolution
Use P(A∪B)=P(A)+P(B)−P(A)P(B) for independent events and solve the resulting linear equation for x, giving x=8/15.
Step 1 — The concept: addition rule + independence
The general addition rule is
P(A∪B)=P(A)+P(B)−P(A∩B)
When A and B are independent, the occurrence of one does not change the chance of the other, so
P(A∩B)=P(A)P(B)
Combining the two:
P(A∪B)=P(A)+P(B)−P(A)P(B)
With P(B)=x this becomes a single linear equation in x:
P(A∪B)=P(A)+x(1−P(A))
Step 2 — A necessary consistency check on the data
Because A⊆A∪B, we must always have P(A∪B)≥P(A). The stem prints P(A)=0.75 and P(A∪B)=0.65, i.e. P(A∪B)<P(A) — impossible. Solving with those numbers confirms it:
0.65=0.75+x(1−0.75)⇒0.25x=−0.10⇒x=−0.4
a negative probability, which cannot be. So P(A) must read 0.25 (the value consistent with P(A∪B)=0.65) — and, as Step 3 shows, 0.25 is precisely the value that reproduces one of the printed options exactly.
Step 3 — Solve
With P(A)=0.25, P(A∪B)=0.65, P(B)=x: …
- COMEDK 2021Set 2021-B1 markMCQQ.If A and B be independent events with P(A)=41 and P(A∪B)=2P(B)−P(A) then P(B) = (A) 2/5 (B) 1/4 (C) 3/5 (D) 2/3
›Reveal solutionSolution
P(B)=52.
For independent A,B: P(A∪B)=P(A)+P(B)−P(A)P(B)=41+P(B)−41P(B).
Given P(A∪B)=2P(B)−P(A)=2P(B)−41. Equate:
41+P(B)−41P(B)=2P(B)−41. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.