Assertion: The IUPAC name of the ether CH3-CH(CH3)-O-CH2-CH2-CH3 (isopropyl n-propyl ether) is stated to be "2

NCERT Exemplar · Q67

Q. Assertion: The IUPAC name of the ether CH3-CH(CH3)-O-CH2-CH2-CH3 (isopropyl n-propyl ether) is stated to be "2-ethoxy-2-methylethane". Reason: In IUPAC nomenclature an ether is regarded as a hydrocarbon derivative in which a hydrogen atom is replaced by an -OR or -OAr group (where R = alkyl and Ar = aryl). Choose the correct option about the assertion and the reason.

(i) Assertion and reason both are correct statements and reason is the correct explanation for assertion.

(ii) Assertion and reason both are correct statements but reason is not the correct explanation for assertion.

(iii) Assertion is correct statement but reason is wrong statement.

(iv) Assertion is wrong statement but reason is correct statement.

Madhya Pradesh MpbseMCQ· 1mImportance★★★★★

88% · 119/135 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — IUPAC Nomenclature

IUPAC Nomenclature (Organic Compounds)

IUPAC nomenclature is a systematic way to name a compound so that its name alone tells you its exact structure, with no ambiguity. Every organic name follows the same underlying recipe, whatever the functional group.

The Recipe

Identify the principal characteristic group. If the molecule has a functional group senior enough to be named as a suffix (carboxylic acid > ester > amide > nitrile > aldehyde > ketone > alcohol > amine, and so on down the seniority order), that group decides the suffix and must be included in the parent chain. A halogen is never senior enough to be a suffix — it is always named as a prefix ("halo-"), whatever else is present.
Choose the parent chain. The parent is the longest continuous carbon chain that contains the principal characteristic group (if there is one). Among chains of the same length, the one with the most substituents wins.
Number the chain. Number from whichever end gives the LOWEST LOCANT to the principal characteristic group first. If there is no principal group (e.g. a simple haloalkane, or an alkene with a halogen substituent), lowest locant goes to the site of unsaturation (double/triple bond) first, then to substituents as a set.

Watch out

When two numbering directions give the SAME locant for the principal group/unsaturation (a genuine tie), the tie-break is the lowest locant SET for the substituents as a group — compare the two sets at their first point of difference. Only if the sets are themselves tied does the alphabetically-first substituent get the lower number.
Name and cite the substituents as prefixes, in alphabetical order (ignoring multiplying prefixes like di-/tri- but not ignoring structural prefixes like iso-/cyclo-), each with its own locant.
Assemble the name: locants + substituent prefixes (alphabetical) + parent chain name + suffix (if any).

Worked Example

$CH_3-CH(Cl)-CH(CH_3)-CH_2-CH_3$ : the longest chain is 5 carbons (pentane), no principal characteristic group (just a halogen substituent), so number for the lowest locant set. From the left: Cl at C2, methyl at C3 → set {2,3}. From the right: methyl at C3, Cl at C4 → set {3,4}. {2,3} is lower, so numbering from the left wins: 2-chloro-3-methylpentane. …

Why this formula?

IUPAC Nomenclature: Why the Rules Work the Way They Do

IUPAC nomenclature is not a single formula, but a system of rules designed to give every organic compound a unique, unambiguous name. The "why" behind these rules lies in clarity, consistency, and communication — ensuring that a chemist in Tokyo and one in Toronto draw the same structure from the same name.

1. The Core Principle: The Longest Carbon Chain

Rule: Identify the longest continuous chain of carbon atoms. This becomes the parent chain (e.g., pentane, hexane).

Why?

The longest chain represents the backbone of the molecule.
It gives the most stable, fundamental name — shorter chains would be branches, not the main structure.
Example: In a molecule with 5 carbons in a row and a 2-carbon branch, calling it "pentane" (not "ethane") tells you the core skeleton is 5 carbons long.

Key idea: The parent chain is the maximum continuous path — not necessarily the one that looks "straight" on paper.

2. Numbering: Lowest Locants (The "First Point of Difference" Rule)

Rule: Number the parent chain so that substituents get the smallest possible numbers. When there's a tie, compare the first point of difference.

Why?

This ensures reproducibility — two chemists will always number the same way.
It avoids ambiguity: "2-methylpentane" is unambiguous; "3-methylpentane" would be a different compound.
The first point of difference rule: If you have substituents at positions 2,4 and 3,5, choose 2,4 because 2 < 3 (the first number is smaller).

Example:

For a methyl group on carbon 2 vs. carbon 4 of a 5-carbon chain:
- 2-methylpentane (correct)
- 4-methylpentane (wrong — higher number)

3. Alphabetical Order of Substituents

Rule: List substituents in alphabetical order (ignoring prefixes like di-, tri-, sec-, tert- but not iso-).

Why?

Alphabetical order is a universal sorting convention — no need to remember priority based on size or complexity.
It makes names searchable and predictable.
Example: "3-ethyl-2-methylpentane" (e before m) — not "2-methyl-3-ethylpentane".

Exception: Prefixes like iso- and neo- are considered part of the name (e.g., isopropyl comes before methyl because "i" < "m").

4. Multiple Bonds: The "Lowest Locant" Rule for Alkenes/Alkynes

Rule: Number the chain so that the double or triple bond gets the lowest possible number, even if it means giving a substituent a higher number.

Why?

The functional group (alkene/alkyne) is more important than alkyl substituents.
The bond position defines the compound's reactivity and geometry.
Example: In pent-2-ene (not pent-3-ene), the double bond is between carbons 2 and 3 — the lower number (2) is used.

Priority order:

Principal functional group (e.g., -OH, -COOH, C=C)
Multiple bonds
Substituents (alkyl, halo, etc.)

5. The "Suffix" and "Prefix" System …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The assertion misnames the ether CH3-CH(CH3)-O-CH2-CH2-CH3: IUPAC nomenclature requires selecting the longest carbon chain as the parent, which here is propane (not ethane treated as bearing a methyl substituent), and the actual -O-CH2CH2CH3 group is propoxy, not ethoxy. So the assertion is false. The reason correctly states that ethers are named as hydrocarbon derivatives with an -OR/-OAr group replacing a hydrogen, so the reason is true.

Evaluating the assertion

The compound is isopropyl n-propyl ether, (CH3)2CH-O-CH2CH2CH3. IUPAC substitutive naming always selects the longest possible carbon chain as the parent hydride - here that is propane (three carbons), not a 2-carbon ethane chain artificially shortened by calling one carbon a methyl substituent. The given name also mislabels the oxygen substituent as ethoxy (2 carbons) when the actual group attached through oxygen is -CH2CH2CH3, i.e. propoxy (3 carbons). The assertion is therefore a WRONG statement. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

←Previous questionQ66 — Assertion: p-nitrophenol is more acidic than phenol. Reason: Nitro gro…→Next questionQ68 — Assertion: The C-O-C bond angle in ethers is slightly less than the te…

Concept understanding — IUPAC Nomenclature

IUPAC Nomenclature (Organic Compounds)

The Recipe

Worked Example

Why this formula?

IUPAC Nomenclature: Why the Rules Work the Way They Do

1. The Core Principle: The Longest Carbon Chain

2. Numbering: Lowest Locants (The "First Point of Difference" Rule)

3. Alphabetical Order of Substituents

4. Multiple Bonds: The "Lowest Locant" Rule for Alkenes/Alkynes

5. The "Suffix" and "Prefix" System …

Evaluating the assertion

Method: Independent Assertion-Reason Verification Method

Core Concept

Steps

Evaluating the assertion

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Unlock everything free for 14 days