Skip to content

Mathematics · Ch 12 — Permutations and Combination

Circular permutation

12.5.4

Circular permutation

This sub-section develops the formula for arranging objects around a CIRCLE, rather than in a straight row — a genuinely different counting problem, because a circular arrangement has no fixed starting point.

The core idea: a circular arrangement of nn distinct objects can be imagined as being 'cut open' at any one of the nn gaps between adjacent objects, and unrolled into a linear (row) arrangement. Crucially, this SAME single circular arrangement can be cut open at any of its nn different positions, and each different cut-point produces a DIFFERENT-looking linear arrangement — so one circular arrangement of nn objects corresponds to exactly nn different linear arrangements (Fig. 3.5 illustrates this for n=4n=4).

Let mm denote the (unknown, to be found) number of distinct circular arrangements of nn objects. Since the total number of LINEAR arrangements of nn distinct objects is the familiar n!n!, and each ONE circular arrangement accounts for exactly nn of these linear arrangements (one per cut-point), it follows that m×n=n!m\times n = n!, so m=n!n=(n−1)!.m = \dfrac{n!}{n} = (n-1)!. This is confirmed directly for n=4n=4: m=4!4=3!m=\dfrac{4!}{4}=3!. Generalising, the number of circular arrangements of nn distinct objects is (n−1)!(n-1)!.

Two important Notes refine this basic result. Note 1: a circular arrangement has no fixed starting point, and any ROTATION of a given seating is considered to be the SAME circular arrangement — since every object retains exactly the same left- and right-neighbour after a rotation (Fig. 3.5(a) illustrates several rotated copies of one seating, all counted as a single arrangement). However, CLOCKWISE and ANTICLOCKWISE arrangements ARE still considered different from each other under this basic count (a person's left- and right-hand neighbours genuinely swap if the whole seating is mirror-reversed). A contrasting situation is also noted: if the nn positions are themselves FIXED and individually labelled — for example, the four compass directions E, N, W, S, with 4 differently-coloured stickers to be placed on them — then rotating the assignment of stickers to directions produces a genuinely DIFFERENT arrangement (since 'sticker on E' is a fixed, distinguishable position, unlike an unlabelled circular seat). Such a fixed-position arrangement behaves exactly like an ordinary LINEAR arrangement, giving the full n!n! (not (n−1)!(n-1)!) — this is described as an arrangement 'with respect to a round table' (where the individual seats are effectively numbered) as opposed to an arrangement 'with respect to each other' (where only relative neighbour-relationships matter).

Note 2: if clockwise and anticlockwise arrangements are ALSO to be considered the same as each other (as happens physically whenever a circular object like a garland or necklace can be flipped over, e.g. Fig. 3.5(b)) — then each TRUE circular arrangement corresponds to 2n2n different linear arrangements (accounting for both the nn cut-points AND the 2 possible reading-directions). So the number of such arrangements is n!2n=(n−1)!2\dfrac{n!}{2n} = \dfrac{(n-1)!}{2}.

The sub-section then addresses the case where SOME of the nn objects are identical. Theorem: the number of circular arrangements of nn objects, of which mm objects are identical (indistinguishable from each other), is (n−1)!m!\dfrac{(n-1)!}{m!}. Proof: as argued for the basic case, the (n−1)!(n-1)! circular arrangements would apply if all nn objects were distinct; but the mm identical objects can be internally rearranged among themselves in m!m! ways WITHOUT changing the overall circular arrangement (since they are indistinguishable), so the true count must be reduced by this factor: (n−1)!m!\dfrac{(n-1)!}{m!}. (The text notes this argument closely parallels a similar argument encountered earlier — the identical-objects LINEAR permutation formula of §3.5.3.)

A closing Remark covers CIRCULAR permutations of only rr objects taken from a larger set of nn distinct objects, under two conditions: (a) when clockwise and anticlockwise arrangements are considered different, the count is nPrr\dfrac{{}^nP_r}{r}; (b) when clockwise and anticlockwise are NOT considered different, the count is nPr2r\dfrac{{}^nP_r}{2r}. (The text invites the reader to verify these two formulas directly for the case n=6, r=3n=6,\ r=3.)

Solved Example 1. In how many ways can 8 students be arranged at a round table so that 2 particular students are always together, (i) with respect to each other (unnumbered seats), (ii) with respect to the table (numbered seats)? Treating the 2 particular students as a single combined unit leaves 7 'students' to seat. (i) Circular arrangement of these 7 units: (7−1)!=6!(7-1)!=6! ways; the 2 particular students within their combined unit can be arranged in 2P2=2!{}^2P_2=2! ways. Total =6!×2!=720×2=1440=6!\times2!=720\times2=1440. (ii) With numbered seats, the arrangement behaves like a linear one: the 7 units are arranged in 7!7! ways, times 2!2! for the internal pair: 7!×2!=5040×2=100807!\times2!=5040\times2=10080.

Solved Example 2. In how many ways can 6 men and 3 women be seated at a round table so that every man has a woman beside him (Fig. 3.6)? First seat the 3 women in a circle: (3−1)!=2!=2(3-1)!=2!=2 ways. Once seated, each of the 3 women creates one adjacent position on each side available for a man — giving 6 distinct 'between-women' seat positions in total for the 6 men, who can fill these 6 positions in 6!6! ways. Total =6!×2!=720×2=1440=6!\times2!=720\times2=1440.

Solved Example 3. Find the number of ways in which 12 different flowers can be arranged in a GARLAND so that 4 particular flowers are always together. Treating the 4 particular flowers as one combined flower leaves 9 flowers to arrange in a garland: (9−1)!=8!(9-1)!=8! ways; the 4 particular flowers within their combined unit can be arranged among themselves in 4!4! ways. Since a garland (unlike an ordinary round-table seating of people) can be turned over, so clockwise and anticlockwise arrangements are considered the same, the raw product 8!×4!8!\times4! must be halved: 12(8!×4!)=12(40320×24)=483840\dfrac{1}{2}(8!\times4!) = \dfrac{1}{2}(40320\times24) = 483840.

Solved Example 4. How many necklaces of 12 beads each can be made from 18 beads of different colours? Here again, clockwise and anticlockwise arrangements of a necklace are the same (it can be flipped over), so — using the Remark's formula (b) for rr objects chosen from nn — the total number of circular permutations is 18P122×12=18P1224\dfrac{{}^{18}P_{12}}{2\times12} = \dfrac{{}^{18}P_{12}}{24}.

Solved Example 5. Three boys and three girls sit around a table (Fig. 3.7). Boy X does not want any girl as a neighbour, and girl Y does not want any boy as a neighbour. How many distinct arrangements are possible? Under these constraints, X's two neighbours must both be the OTHER two boys (B2,B3B_2, B_3), and Y's two neighbours must both be the OTHER two girls (G2,G3G_2, G_3) — this fixes the overall seating PATTERN, leaving only the freedom to order B2,B3B_2, B_3 on either side of X (2 ways) and to order G2,G3G_2, G_3 on either side of Y (2 ways). Total distinct arrangements =2×2=4=2\times2=4.

Solved Example 6. In how many ways can 6 gentlemen and 6 ladies (12 people total) sit around a table, (i) with no restriction, (ii) with no two ladies sitting side by side? (i) Unrestricted circular arrangement of 12 distinct people: (12−1)!=11!(12-1)!=11!. (ii) First seat the 6 gentlemen in a circle: (6−1)!=5!(6-1)!=5! ways — this creates exactly 6 gaps (one between each pair of adjacent gentlemen) where a lady could sit so that no two ladies end up adjacent. The 6 ladies then fill these 6 gaps in 6!6! ways. Total =5!×6!=120×720=86400=5!\times6!=120\times720=86400. …

Figure 3.5Cutting a circular arrangement of 4 objects into a linear one

What this figure shows. A schematic figure for n=4 objects arranged in a circle, illustrating how the circle can be conceptually 'cut open' at any one of its 4 gaps between adjacent objects to unroll it into a row (a linear arrangement). The figure underlies the derivation right after it: since the SAME single circular arrangement can be cut open at any of its n=4 positions to yield 4 DIFFERENT-looking linear arrangements, and the total number of linear arrangements of 4 distinct objects is known to be 4!, the number of genuinely distinct circular arrangements must be 4!/4=3!=(4-1)!, which is the pattern immed …

Figure 3.5(a)Rotations counted as the same circular arrangement

What this figure shows. A follow-up figure to Fig 3.5 illustrating the 'Note 1' point that in a genuine circular arrangement (seating 'with respect to each other', with no numbered/fixed seats), rotating every object around by one or more positions produces an arrangement that is considered IDENTICAL to the original, since every object still has exactly the same left-neighbour and right-neighbour as before — the figure shows several rotated copies of the same circular seating side by side to make visually clear that, despite looking shifted, they all count as just one single circular arrangement, distinguishing this from a arrangement 'with respect to a fixed table' (like the compass-direction example given right after) where rotations DO count as di …

Figure 3.5(b)Clockwise vs anticlockwise arrangements treated as the same

What this figure shows. A companion figure to Fig 3.5(a), illustrating 'Note 2' — the situation where a circular seating and its exact mirror-image (the same relative order but read going anticlockwise instead of clockwise, as happens physically when a garland or necklace can be flipped over) are considered the SAME arrangement rather than two different ones. The figure shows a circular arrangement alongside its clockwise-reversed counterpart to make the halving visually intuitive, which is the geometric justification given immediately afterward for why the formula in this case becomes (n-1)!/2 instead of the plain (n-1)! used when clockwise and anticlockwise are kept distinct (as in an ordinary round- …

Figure 3.66 men and 3 women seated so every man has a woman beside him

What this figure shows. A schematic round-table diagram accompanying Solved Example 2 of this section, depicting one valid seating of 6 men and 3 women around a circular table arranged so that every man sits directly beside a woman on at least one side — visually, the 3 women are shown spaced apart around the circle, each with men filling the seats between consecutive women. The figure grounds the worked solution's reasoning that the 3 women first fix (3-1)!=2 circular seatings among themselves, after which each of the 6 remaining seats between and around the women is available for the 6 men to fill in 6! wa …

Figure 3.73 boys and 3 girls with X and Y neighbour restrictions

What this figure shows. A schematic round-table diagram for Solved Example 5, showing 3 boys (including a specifically named boy X) and 3 girls (including a specifically named girl Y) seated in a circle, where X is drawn with two other boys (labelled B2, B3) as his immediate neighbours instead of any girl, and Y is drawn with two other girls (G2, G3) as her immediate neighbours instead of any boy. The figure makes the seating pattern concrete before the accompanying solution reasons that B2 and B3 can be arranged in 2 ways on either side of X, and G2, G3 can be arranged in 2 ways on either side of Y, giving 2×2=4 total distinct arrang …

Figure 3.84 married couples with spouse-related seating restrictions

What this figure shows. A schematic round circular-table diagram for Solved Example 7, depicting 4 married couples (8 people total) seated around a table, used to illustrate two different seating conditions solved side by side: (i) every spouse pair seated diametrically opposite each other around the table, and (ii) men and women seated in alternating positions all the way around. The figure shows the circular seat layout with couples' positions marked to make the geometric constraint of 'sitting exactly opposite' visually clear before the solution works through fixing one woman's seat (since there is no fixed starting point on a circle) and then placing each subsequent spouse pair's remaining seat options in turn, arriving at …