Mathematics · Ch 12 — Permutations and Combination
Combinations
Combinations
This section introduces the COMBINATION — a fundamentally different counting question from the permutation, since a combination is a SELECTION of objects where the ORDER of selection is irrelevant, in contrast to a permutation's ordered arrangement.
The motivating example revisits an earlier permutation scenario (from §3.5): 2 chairs filled from a group of 4 persons, A, B, C, D. But now the question changes — instead of asking for ordered SEATINGS, we ask for unordered GROUPS of 2 people, with no regard to which chair each person occupies. Under this new question, AB and BA now represent the SAME group of two people (just described in a different order), so do BC and CB, CA and AC, AD and DA, BD and DB, and CD and DC. Listing the 12 ordered arrangements from before — AB, BA, BC, CB, CA, AC, AD, DA, BD, DB, CD, DC — and collapsing each such matching pair down to a single group, only 6 genuinely distinct GROUPS remain: . This count of 6 is called the combination number of selecting a group of 2 from 4 persons, and is denoted — since (the ordered count) and each unordered group corresponds to exactly ordered versions of itself, is exactly the value.
This motivates the formal Definition: a combination of a set of distinct objects, taken at a time without repetition, is an -element SUBSET of those objects — with the accompanying Note that, unlike a permutation, the order of the elements WITHIN the selected subset is entirely immaterial.
This is generalised immediately: to choose a team of 3 players from a set of 8 different players, first count the ORDERED selections, — every distinct ordered arrangement of 3 chosen players. But since any FIXED set of 3 players corresponds to different ordered arrangements of THAT same set (the 3 players can be listed in any of orders), dividing by removes this over-counting and gives the true number of unordered TEAMS: .
The general notation is then fixed: from distinct objects, the number of ways of selecting a group (or set) of objects, without considering order, is denoted (also written or ) — it is 'the number of combinations of objects from distinct objects'.
Theorem. …
Worked out. To motivate the combination formula before it is formally derived, the text revisits the earlier 4-persons-2-chairs permutation example, but now asks for GROUPS of 2 people rather than ordered seatings, listing the resulting pairs AB, BA, BC, CB, CA, AC, AD, DA, BD, DB, CD, DC (the same 12 ordered arrangements as before) and pointing out that AB and BA now represent the SAME group (since order no longer matters for a mere selection), as do BC/CB, CA/AC, AD/DA, BD/DB, and CD/DC — collapsing the 12 ordered pairs down to just 6 genuinely distinct unordered groups, which the text denotes 4C2, directly motivating the general division-by-r! reasoning in the combination fo …