Q.Show that and justify why the other value is ignored.
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →The key idea is to let , then use the half-angle formula for tangent in terms of sine and cosine. The positive root is chosen because the angle lies in the first quadrant, making the tangent positive. The final result is .
Concept and Intuition
When you see an expression like , the natural instinct is to work from the inside out. Let the inverse sine produce an angle — call it — so that . Then the problem reduces to finding .
The half-angle formula for tangent is your best friend here. There are several forms, but the one that avoids square roots in the denominator is:
This formula is derived from and its conjugate, and it's particularly clean when you already know .
The twist: when you solve, you'll get two possible numeric values because the algebra involves a square root. But only one of them corresponds to the actual angle. The angle is half of an acute angle (since is acute), so it must also be acute — hence its tangent is positive. That's why we discard the larger, positive-but-invalid value.
Step-by-Step Solution
-
Set up the substitution.
Let . Then , and by definition . Since , is in the first quadrant: .
-
Find .
Using :
Since is acute, , so:
- Apply the half-angle formula for tangent. Use the form . Substitute the known values:
This gives the required result directly.
- Why is the other value ignored? The alternative half-angle formula would give:
Rationalising: , same result.
But where does come from? If you had used the formula , the square root would produce both signs:
Rationalising the inside: . So the positive root gives , and the negative root gives , not . …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.