Q.A current carrying circular loop of radius R is placed in the x-y plane with centre at the origin. Half of the loop with x>0 is now bent so that it now lies in the y-z plane.
(a) The magnitude of magnetic moment now diminishes.
(b) The magnetic moment does not change.
(c) The magnitude of B at (0.0.z), z >>R increases.
(d) The magnitude of B at (0.0.z), z >>R is unchanged.
Manipur CohsemMCQ· 1mImportance★★★★★est
51% · 28/55 Questions
✓ Free question
Concept understanding — Magnetic Force Balance
Magnetic Force Balance
When a current-carrying wire or coil sits in a magnetic field, it feels a force F=BILsinθ (or, for a point charge, F=qvBsinθ). On its own that force just pushes the conductor - but in many real situations the push is deliberately set up to CANCEL another force, so the whole system sits in equilibrium. That equilibrium condition - magnetic force balanced against weight, against another wire's magnetic force, or against a mechanical counterweight - is what "magnetic force balance" means, and it is also historically how the ampere itself was defined.
The balance condition
Whenever a conductor is in equilibrium under a magnetic force and one other force, the two must be equal and opposite:
BILsinθ=Fother
Solving this equation for whichever quantity is unknown (B, I, L, or the other force) is the entire skill in this class of problem - the only new step, beyond the force law itself, is correctly identifying what the magnetic force is opposing.
Case 1: a wire suspended against gravity
A straight horizontal wire of mass m and length l, carrying current I, can be held up ("floated") in mid-air by a horizontal magnetic field perpendicular to it. The upward magnetic force must equal the downward weight:
BIl=mg⟹B=Ilmg
For example, a 200g, 1.5m wire carrying 2A needs B=(2)(1.5)(0.2)(9.8)≈0.65T to stay suspended.
Case 2: two wires balancing each other
Two long parallel wires carrying currents I1,I2 exert a force per unit length on each other of 2πdμ0I1I2 (attractive if the currents run the same way, repulsive if opposite). If one wire is free to move, this magnetic force can itself balance that wire's weight:
2πhμ0I2L=mg⟹h=2πmgμ0I2L
This is exactly how a "current balance" apparatus works, and historically it is how the ampere was defined: the current that, flowing in two infinite parallel wires one metre apart, produces a force of exactly 2×10−7N per metre of length.
Case 3: balancing on a beam
A current-carrying coil arm hanging from one pan of a beam balance feels an extra force F=NBIl when only that arm sits in an external field. Re-balancing the beam means adding a mass m so that mg=NBIl.
Watch out
Always check which length enters the formula - for a coil of N turns the force multiplies by N; for a single suspended straight wire it doesn't.
Tip
The direction of the magnetic force (via the right-hand rule on IL×B) has to already point the right way to oppose the other force - check direction FIRST, before solving the magnitude equation, or you may set up a balance condition that is physically backwards.
Why this differs from the general force law
The formula F=BILsinθ is common to every problem here - but "magnetic force balance" problems are specifically the ones where the magnetic force is set exactly equal to something else (gravity, another wire's force, a beam's counterweight) so the system sits still. It is this equilibrium framing, not the force law by itself, that defines the concept, and what distinguishes it from the general force-on-a-current topic.
Balancing the magnetic force on a current-carrying conductor against gravity or another wire's force is a classic numerical application from the NCERT Class 12 Physics chapter on moving charges and magnetism, tested in CBSE boards and JEE Main. Students searching "force on a current carrying conductor in magnetic field numericals class 12" will find this equilibrium-condition approach, including the historical current-balance definition of the ampere, matches the NCERT treatment.
Why this formula?
Magnetic Force Balance: Why the Key Formulas Hold
The Magnetic Force Balance describes when the magnetic force on a charged particle or current-carrying conductor is exactly balanced by another force (gravity, electric force, or tension). Let's build the reasoning step-by-step.
1. The Core Idea: What Does "Balance" Mean?
A force balance means the net force on an object is zero:
Fnet=0
For magnetic forces we use the Lorentz force law:
On a moving charge: Fm=q(v×B)
On a current-carrying wire: Fm=I(L×B)
When this is balanced by another force (say gravity Fg=mg):
Fm+Fother=0
2. Case 1: Charged Particle in Crossed Fields (Velocity Selector)
A charged particle moves perpendicular to both electric field E and magnetic field B.
Electric force:Fe=qE (along E)
Magnetic force:Fm=q(v×B) (perpendicular to both v and B)
For straight-line motion (no deflection), the two forces must cancel:
qE=qvB⇒v=BE
Key insight: Only particles with this exact speed pass undeflected — this is how velocity selectors work in mass spectrometers.
3. Case 2: Current-Carrying Wire Balanced by Gravity
A horizontal wire carrying current I sits in a perpendicular magnetic field B, suspended by strings.
The magnetic force on a straight wire is Fm=ILBsinθ; for a wire perpendicular to the field (θ=90∘), Fm=ILB. Setting this equal to the weight Fg=mg for equilibrium:
ILB=mg
Key insight: This balance lets you measure B if I, L, and m are known — the principle behind a current balance experiment.
4. Case 3: Circular Motion of a Charged Particle
A charged particle moving perpendicular to a uniform magnetic field has the magnetic force supply the centripetal force:
qvB=rmv2⇒r=qBmv
Key insight: The radius depends on momentum (mv) and charge-to-mass ratio — this is why cyclotrons and mass spectrometers work.
5. Quick Summary
Situation
Balanced Forces
Key Formula
Velocity selector
qE vs qvB
v=E/B
Current balance
ILB vs mg
ILB=mg
Circular motion
qvB vs mv2/r
r=mv/(qB)
Every formula follows the same recipe: identify all forces, set the vector sum to zero (or to ma), and solve along the direction of interest. Because the magnetic force is always perpendicular to both velocity/current and field, getting the direction right matters as much as the magnitude.
Bending the x>0 half into the y-z plane turns the loop into two perpendicular semicircular arcs, each of moment m0=IπR2/2 - one along k^, one along i^.
Net moment:∣M∣=m02=2IπR2≈0.71IπR2 - smaller than the original IπR2, so the magnitude diminishes (option a true, b false).
Far-axial field at (0,0,z), using the dipole formula with M⋅z^=m0, gives ∣B∣=4πz3μ0m05, while the original field was πz3μ0m0 - a ratio of 5/4≈0.56, so the field also decreases (options c, d both false).
✓Final answer
Only option (a) is correct - the magnetic moment (and the far-axial field) diminishes after bending.
Bending the x>0 half of the loop into the y-z plane turns one planar loop into two perpendicular semicircular arcs. The magnetic moment shrinks to 21 of its original value, and the far-axial field at (0,0,z), z≫R, also decreases - matching only option (a).
Before bending
A full circular loop of radius R carrying current I has magnetic moment
M0=IπR2,direction k^.
After bending
The loop now consists of two semicircular arcs of radius R, joined along the diameter on the y-axis:
the x<0 half stays in the x-y plane, contributing a (half-loop) magnetic moment m0=2IπR2 along k^;
the x>0 half is bent into the y-z plane, contributing m0=2IπR2 along i^ (its own normal direction, once it lies in the y-z plane).
(Each semicircular arc encloses half the area of the full circle, πR2/2, so its moment is half of M0.)
Net magnetic moment - the two contributions are perpendicular, so they add as vectors:
M=m0k^+m0i^,∣M∣=m02=2IπR2≈0.71IπR2.
Since 0.71M0<M0, the magnitude of the magnetic moment diminishes - option (a) is true, and option (b) ("does not change") is false.
Far-axial field at (0,0,z), z≫R
For a point far from a magnetic dipole M, at position vector r (r^=z^ here, r=z):
Compare with the original far-axial field (dipole M0=2m0 along k^, on-axis):
B0=4πz3μ02M0=4πz3μ04m0=πz3μ0m0.
The ratio is
B0Bnew=45≈0.56,
so the field decreases - options (c) ("increases") and (d) ("unchanged") are both false.
✓Final answer
Only option (a) is correct: bending the loop diminishes the magnitude of the magnetic moment (to IπR2/2≈0.71IπR2), and it also diminishes the far-axial field at (0,0,z), z≫R (to 5/4≈0.56 of its original value).
Method: Vector Superposition of Magnetic Dipole Moments for Bent/Split Loops
When a loop is cut, bent out of its original plane, or split into pieces carrying the same current, treat each piece as its own magnetic dipole and add the dipole moment vectors -- never just rescale the original scalar moment.
Steps
Step 1: Find the dipole moment of each piece separately
Each planar piece of wire, carrying current I and enclosing area Ai, has its own magnetic moment of magnitude IAi, directed along that piece's own normal (right-hand rule applied to that piece alone):
mi=IAin^i
A semicircular half of a full loop of radius R encloses half the area, so ∣mi∣=I(πR2/2).
Step 2: Add the pieces as vectors, not as scalars
If the pieces now lie in different planes (as after bending part of a loop out of its original plane), their normals n^i point in different directions, so the net moment is a genuine vector sum:
M=∑imi,∣M∣=∣∑imi∣
This magnitude is generally less than the simple scalar sum ∑i∣mi∣ whenever the pieces are not all parallel -- this is the source of "the moment diminishes" answers in this class of problem.
Step 3: Use the far-axial dipole field with the new M
Once M is known, the field far from the dipole along a given axis (here the z-axis) follows the standard axial dipole formula:
B=4πz3μ0[3(M⋅z^)z^−M]
Compare ∣B∣ before and after bending by taking the ratio -- the geometry (perpendicular vs. parallel components of M) usually matters more than the raw magnitude of M.
Applying to this problem: the two perpendicular semicircular moments (m0k^ and m0i^) combine to ∣M∣=m02≈0.71IπR2 (Step 2), smaller than the original IπR2, and the resulting far-axial field is correspondingly smaller too (Step 3).