Q., where is a non-singular matrix.
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →The statement is false for any non-singular matrix . The correct relationship is , because the determinant of an inverse equals the reciprocal of the determinant.
The claim in the question is a common trap. Let’s see why it’s wrong — and why the correct equality holds.
1. The core idea: determinant of a product
For any two square matrices and of the same order, we have the fundamental property:
This is not a coincidence — it reflects how determinants measure scaling of volume under linear transformations. When you apply then , the total volume scaling factor is the product of the individual scaling factors.
2. Apply this to and
Since is non-singular, its inverse exists and satisfies:
Take determinants on both sides:
Using the product property on the left:
3. What is ?
The identity matrix has 1’s on the diagonal and 0’s elsewhere. Its determinant is (the product of the diagonal entries). So:
4. Solve for
Since (that’s what non-singular means), we can divide:
This is an exact equality, not an inequality.
The notation means , i.e., the reciprocal of the determinant. It does not mean the determinant of — but as we just proved, those two numbers are equal. The trap in the question is that it asserts they are unequal, which is false. …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.