The chain rule differentiates composite functions: the derivative of sin(x2) is cos(x2)⋅2x — differentiate the outer function, then multiply by the derivative of the inside. Integration asks the reverse: given cos(x2)⋅2x, find the original function. That's what u substitution does — it reverses the chain rule.
The Core Intuition
When an integral looks like "a function times the derivative of its inside," substitute the inside with u and the derivative of the inside with du. Consider:
∫2xcos(x2)dx
Here 2x is the derivative of x2, and x2 is the inside of cos(x2). Let u=x2, so du=2xdx:
∫cos(u)du=sin(u)+C=sin(x2)+C
Check: the derivative of sin(x2) is cos(x2)⋅2x.
The Precise Statement
∫f(g(x))⋅g′(x)dx=∫f(u)duwhere u=g(x),du=g′(x)dx
Valid provided g is differentiable and the resulting integral in u is simpler.
The Step-by-Step Method
Identify a function g(x) whose derivative g′(x) also appears (possibly up to a constant factor).
Setu=g(x), compute du=g′(x)dx.
Rewrite the entire integral in u and du — every x and dx must be replaced.
Integrate with respect to u.
Substitute backu=g(x).
Watch out
You cannot mix variables. If any x remains after substitution, you chose the wrong u (or must solve for x in terms of u — rare).
A Second Example (with a constant factor)
Evaluate ∫xx2+1dx. Let u=x2+1, so xdx=21du:
∫u⋅21du=21⋅32u3/2+C=31(x2+1)3/2+C
When Does It Work?
When the integrand is something times the derivative of something inside. Common patterns:
Split into x2−1x−x2−11; the first is a u-substitution, the second a standard form. Result: x2−1−logx+x2−1+C.
The idea
The numerator x−1 is two pieces bundled together. The x piece is (up to a factor of 2) exactly the derivative of x2−1 sitting under the root — a textbook cue for u-substitution. The −1 piece leaves x2−11, a standard integral. So split first, then handle each part.
Method: Split a fraction into a "derivative-of-radical" part plus a standard form
For x2−1x−1, separate the numerator so one piece matches the derivative of the radical (integrates to the radical itself) and the other is a standard reciprocal-radical form.
Steps
Step 1: Split the numerator.
x2−1x−1=x2−1x−x2−11
Step 2: Integrate the first piece by substitution.
For x2−1x, let u=x2−1, du=2xdx, giving ∫x2−1xdx=x2−1.
Step 3: Integrate the second piece with a standard form. …
Mistake 1: Trying a single substitution for the whole x2−1x−1.
Why it's wrong: the numerator mixes an x (whose derivative-of-radical structure fits) with a constant −1 (which does not), so one substitution cannot handle both. Correct approach: split into x2−1x−x2−11 and integrate each part.
Mistake 2: Using the wrong standard form for x2−11. …