Skip to content
NCERT Exemplar · Q16

Q.Can there be a potential difference between two adjacent conductors carrying the same charge?

Odisha ChseShort· 2mImportance★★★★★
66% · 37/56 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The key idea is that potential depends on both charge and geometry (capacitance). Two adjacent conductors carrying the same charge can absolutely have a potential difference if their shapes, sizes, or surroundings differ — the answer is yes.

Why This Isn’t Obvious

A common first instinct is: “Same charge means same potential.” That would be true if both conductors were identical in every way — same size, same shape, same environment. But potential is not a function of charge alone. It’s a function of charge and capacitance: V=Q/CV = Q/C. And capacitance depends entirely on geometry.

Think of it this way: a small metal sphere and a large metal sphere, both carrying 1 μC1\,\mu\text{C} of charge. The small sphere has a smaller capacitance, so its potential is higher. The large sphere has a larger capacitance, so its potential is lower. Connect them with a wire, and charge flows until potentials equalise — proving they were not equal before.

So the question is really: can two conductors with the same charge have different capacitances? Almost always, yes.


Step-by-Step Reasoning

  1. Recall the definition of potential for an isolated conductor

    For an isolated conductor, the potential VV (relative to infinity) is given by V=QCV = \frac{Q}{C}, where CC is its self-capacitance. Self-capacitance depends only on the conductor’s size and shape — not on its charge. For a sphere of radius RR, C=4πε0RC = 4\pi\varepsilon_0 R. For a more complex shape, CC is some other constant.

  2. Same charge, different geometry → different potential

    If two adjacent conductors have the same charge QQ but different capacitances C1C_1 and C2C_2, then:

V1=QC1,V2=QC2V_1 = \frac{Q}{C_1}, \quad V_2 = \frac{Q}{C_2}

Unless C1=C2C_1 = C_2, the potentials differ. So a potential difference V1−V2V_1 - V_2 exists.

  1. “Adjacent” doesn’t change the physics

    The word “adjacent” might suggest they influence each other via electrostatic induction. That’s true — but it only reinforces the point. When two conductors are near each other, their capacitances are modified by mutual influence (the system has a capacitance matrix). Even if they carry the same net charge, the potential of each depends on both its own charge and the charge of the neighbour. The result is almost always a potential difference.

  2. A concrete example

    Take two concentric spherical shells — inner radius aa, outer radius bb, with b>ab > a. Suppose both carry the same charge +Q+Q.

    • The inner shell’s potential (relative to infinity) is Vinner=14πε0(Qa+Qb)V_{\text{inner}} = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\left(\frac{Q}{a} + \frac{Q}{b}\right).
    • The outer shell’s potential is Vouter=14πε0(Qb+Qb)=14πε0⋅2QbV_{\text{outer}} = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\left(\frac{Q}{b} + \frac{Q}{b}\right) = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \cdot \frac{2Q}{b}. …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.