What is crystal field splitting energy? How does the magnitude of $\Delta_o$ decide the actual configuration of d orbitals in a coordination entity?

What is crystal field splitting energy? How does the magnitude of Δo decide the actual configuration of d orbi

Exercises · 5.18

\Delta_o

Puducherry CbseNCERTSubjective· 3mImportance★★★★★

35% · 35/101 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Crystal Field Splitting

Crystal Field Splitting: From Intuition to Precision

Imagine you are a negatively charged electron sitting on a metal ion. All around you, the space is perfectly spherical — every direction feels the same. Your energy depends only on how far you are from the nucleus, not on which way you face.

Now imagine that six negative ions (or the negative ends of polar molecules) march in from the $x$ , $y$ , and $z$ axes and stop close to you. Suddenly, the space around you is no longer uniform. If you try to move straight toward one of these approaching ions, you feel a strong repulsion — that path costs extra energy. If you move between the axes (say, along a diagonal), you feel less repulsion because you are farther from the incoming charges.

This is the core intuition: when ligands approach a metal ion, they break the spherical symmetry of the space around the metal. Different directions in space are no longer equivalent. Electrons in orbitals that point directly at the ligands get pushed up in energy; electrons in orbitals that point between the ligands stay lower.

The Precise Statement

d

For the most common geometry — octahedral — here is what happens:

Six ligands sit at the corners of an octahedron, along the $+x$ , $-x$ , $+y$ , $-y$ , $+z$ , $-z$ axes.
The $d_{x^2-y^2}$ and $d_{z^2}$ orbitals point their lobes directly along these axes. These are the $e_g$ set. They feel maximum repulsion → higher energy.
The $d_{xy}$ , $d_{xz}$ , and $d_{yz}$ orbitals point their lobes between the axes (into the octahedral faces). These are the $t_{2g}$ set. They feel less repulsion → lower energy.

The energy gap between these two sets is denoted by $\Delta_o$ (or $10\,Dq$ ). The $t_{2g}$ set drops by $0.4\Delta_o$ and the $e_g$ set rises by $0.6\Delta_o$ , keeping the average energy unchanged (the "barycentre" rule).

Note

The labels $e_g$ and $t_{2g}$ come from group theory — they describe how the orbitals transform under the symmetry operations of an octahedron. You do not need to memorise the derivation, but the notation is standard in every exam.

Why This Matters

Crystal field splitting explains three things you will see repeatedly:

Colour — electrons can jump from $t_{2g}$ to $e_g$ by absorbing visible light. The gap $\Delta_o$ determines the colour you see.
Magnetism — if $\Delta_o$ is large, electrons pair up in the lower $t_{2g}$ set (low spin). If $\Delta_o$ is small, electrons spread out (high spin). This changes the number of unpaired electrons. …

Why this formula?

Crystal Field Splitting: Why the Energy Splitting Occurs

Crystal Field Theory (CFT) explains how the d-orbitals of a transition metal ion split in energy when placed in an electrostatic field created by surrounding ligands (anions or polar molecules). The key result is that five degenerate d-orbitals split into two or more sets with different energies. Let's understand why this happens.

1. The Starting Point: Degenerate d-Orbitals

In a free transition metal ion (no ligands), all five d-orbitals have the same energy (degenerate). Their shapes are:

$d_{xy}$ , $d_{xz}$ , $d_{yz}$ — lobes lie between the x, y, z axes (called $t_{2g}$ set in octahedral symmetry)
$d_{x^2-y^2}$ , $d_{z^2}$ — lobes point directly along the x, y, z axes (called $e_g$ set)

Key idea: The spatial orientation of each orbital determines how it interacts with approaching ligands.

2. The Octahedral Case: Why $e_g$ Orbitals Are Higher in Energy

Imagine six ligands approaching along the +x, –x, +y, –y, +z, –z axes (octahedral geometry).

What happens to $d_{x^2-y^2}$ and $d_{z^2}$ ?

Their lobes point directly at the ligands.
The negatively charged ligands repel the electron density in these orbitals.
This repulsion raises the energy of these orbitals — they become less stable (higher energy).

What happens to $d_{xy}$ , $d_{xz}$ , $d_{yz}$ ?

Their lobes point between the axes (e.g., $d_{xy}$ lobes lie in the xy-plane but at 45° to x and y).
They avoid the ligands — less repulsion.
Their energy is lower than the $e_g$ set.

The Splitting Pattern

\Delta_{\text{oct}} = E(e_g) - E(t_{2g})

Where:

$E(e_g)$ = energy of $d_{x^2-y^2}$ and $d_{z^2}$ (higher)
$E(t_{2g})$ = energy of $d_{xy}$ , $d_{xz}$ , $d_{yz}$ (lower)
$\Delta_{\text{oct}}$ is called the crystal field splitting energy (CFSE)

Why the name? The $e_g$ orbitals are "doubly degenerate" (2 orbitals), $t_{2g}$ are "triply degenerate" (3 orbitals). The letters come from group theory symmetry labels.

3. The Energy Conservation Rule

The total energy of all five d-orbitals must remain constant (no energy is created or destroyed). So:

The center of gravity (average energy) of the split set equals the original degenerate energy.
For octahedral splitting:
- 2 $e_g$ orbitals go up by $+0.6\Delta_{\text{oct}}$ each
- 3 $t_{2g}$ orbitals go down by $-0.4\Delta_{\text{oct}}$ each

Check:

2 \times (+0.6\Delta) + 3 \times (-0.4\Delta) = 1.2\Delta - 1.2\Delta = 0

This conservation of energy is a fundamental constraint — the splitting is not arbitrary.

4. The Tetrahedral Case: Why It's Opposite and Smaller

In a tetrahedral complex, four ligands approach from alternate corners of a cube. The axes are different:

The $d_{xy}$ , $d_{xz}$ , $d_{yz}$ orbitals now point closer to the ligands (more repulsion).
The $d_{x^2-y^2}$ and $d_{z^2}$ orbitals point away from ligands (less repulsion).

Result:

$e$ set ( $d_{x^2-y^2}$ , $d_{z^2}$ ) — lower energy
$t_2$ set ( $d_{xy}$ , $d_{xz}$ , $d_{yz}$ ) — higher energy

The splitting is inverted compared to octahedral.

Magnitude:

\Delta_{\text{tet}} \approx \frac{4}{9} \Delta_{\text{oct}}

Why smaller?

Only 4 ligands (vs. 6) → less total repulsion.
Ligands are not directly along axes → weaker interaction. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Crystal field splitting energy ( $\Delta_o$ ) is the energy gap between the split $t_{2g}$ and $e_g$ sets of d-orbitals in an octahedral field. Its magnitude relative to the pairing energy ( $P$ ) determines whether electrons fill the $t_{2g}$ orbitals singly (high-spin) or pair up (low-spin), thereby deciding the actual d-electron configuration.

The Core Idea: Why d-Orbitals Split

In a free metal ion, all five d-orbitals have the same energy. But place that ion inside an octahedral field of ligands (say, six water molecules or cyanide ions), and the symmetry breaks. The ligands approach along the x, y, and z axes. Two of the d-orbitals — $d_{x^2-y^2}$ and $d_{z^2}$ (together called the $e_g$ set) — point directly at the ligands. The other three — $d_{xy}$ , $d_{xz}$ , $d_{yz}$ (the $t_{2g}$ set) — point between the axes, away from the ligands.

Electrons in the $e_g$ orbitals feel strong repulsion from the ligand lone pairs, raising their energy. Electrons in the $t_{2g}$ orbitals feel less repulsion, so their energy drops. The result: the five degenerate d-orbitals split into two groups separated by an energy gap called $\Delta_o$ (the subscript "o" for octahedral).

\Delta_o = \text{Energy}(e_g) - \text{Energy}(t_{2g})

The Decisive Battle: $\Delta_o$ vs. Pairing Energy $P$

Now we have a split. But how do electrons actually occupy these orbitals? That depends on a tug-of-war between two opposing tendencies:

Hund's rule says: electrons prefer to occupy different orbitals with parallel spins to minimize repulsion. This favours spreading electrons out.
The energy cost of pairing says: if you must put two electrons in the same orbital, you pay a penalty called the pairing energy ( $P$ ) — the extra energy needed to overcome electron-electron repulsion and spin-pairing.

The key question: Is it cheaper to promote an electron to the higher $e_g$ level, or to pair up in the lower $t_{2g}$ level?

The answer depends entirely on the size of $\Delta_o$ relative to $P$ .

Step-by-Step: How the Configuration Emerges

Let's walk through the filling for a $d^4$ to $d^7$ metal ion in an octahedral field. (For $d^1$ , $d^2$ , $d^3$ , there's no choice — electrons simply fill the $t_{2g}$ orbitals singly.)

1. The $d^4$ Case

The first three electrons go into the three $t_{2g}$ orbitals, one each, all spins parallel. Where does the fourth electron go?

Option A (High-spin): Place it in the $e_g$ orbital. Cost: $\Delta_o$ (the energy to jump the gap). Benefit: no pairing penalty.
Option B (Low-spin): Pair it in a $t_{2g}$ orbital. Cost: $P$ (the pairing energy). Benefit: no promotion energy.

The system chooses whichever costs less. So:

If $\Delta_o < P$ : the fourth electron goes to $e_g$ → high-spin configuration: $t_{2g}^3 e_g^1$
If $\Delta_o > P$ : the fourth electron pairs in $t_{2g}$ → low-spin configuration: $t_{2g}^4 e_g^0$

Watch out

A common mistake: thinking that "high-spin" means more unpaired electrons always. It does — but only because the alternative (low-spin) pairs electrons up. For $d^4$ , high-spin has 4 unpaired electrons; low-spin has 2.

2. The $d^5$ to $d^7$ Cases — Same Logic

The pattern repeats. For each additional electron, compare $\Delta_o$ and $P$ :

d-electrons	High-spin (if $\Delta_o < P$ )	Low-spin (if $\Delta_o > P$ )
$d^4$	$t_{2g}^3 e_g^1$ (4 unpaired)	$t_{2g}^4 e_g^0$ (2 unpaired)
$d^5$	$t_{2g}^3 e_g^2$ (5 unpaired)	$t_{2g}^5 e_g^0$ (1 unpaired)
$d^6$	$t_{2g}^4 e_g^2$ (4 unpaired)	$t_{2g}^6 e_g^0$ (0 unpaired)

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Crystal Field Splitting — Concept & Method

Method: Crystal Field Theory (CFT) Analysis

Core idea: In a coordination complex, the five degenerate d-orbitals split into different energy levels due to electrostatic repulsion from ligands. The pattern and magnitude of splitting depend on the geometry and the ligand field strength.

Step 1 — Define Crystal Field Splitting Energy ( $\Delta$ )

Crystal field splitting energy is the energy difference between the split sets of d-orbitals in a coordination entity.

For an octahedral complex, the splitting is denoted as $\Delta_o$ (or $10 \, Dq$ ).
The upper set ( $e_g$ ) has two orbitals ( $d_{x^2-y^2}$ , $d_{z^2}$ ) — higher energy.
The lower set ( $t_{2g}$ ) has three orbitals ( $d_{xy}$ , $d_{yz}$ , $d_{zx}$ ) — lower energy.

Key formula:

$\Delta_o = E(e_g) - E(t_{2g})$

Step 2 — Understand How $\Delta_o$ Decides the d-orbital Configuration

The actual electron configuration depends on the relative magnitude of $\Delta_o$ versus the pairing energy ( $P$ ).

Condition	Configuration type	Rule followed
$\Delta_o < P$	High-spin	Hund's rule — electrons fill all orbitals singly before pairing
$\Delta_o > P$	Low-spin	Pairing occurs in lower $t_{2g}$ before occupying $e_g$

Step 3 — Apply to an Example: $d^4$ ion in octahedral field

If $\Delta_o$ is small (weak field ligands like $\ce{H2O}$ , $\ce{F-}$ ):

Configuration = $t_{2g}^3 \, e_g^1$ → High-spin (4 unpaired electrons)
If $\Delta_o$ is large (strong field ligands like $\ce{CN-}$ , $\ce{CO}$ ):

Configuration = $t_{2g}^4 \, e_g^0$ → Low-spin (2 unpaired electrons) …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Here are the most common mistakes students make with Crystal Field Splitting Energy ( $\Delta_o$ ) and how to avoid each.

1. Confusing $\Delta_o$ with $\Delta_t$

The Mistake:

Using the same value or formula for $\Delta_o$ (octahedral) when solving for tetrahedral complexes. Students often forget that $\Delta_t = \frac{4}{9} \Delta_o$ .

How to Avoid:

Always check the geometry first.
Remember: Tetrahedral splitting is always smaller than octahedral.
Write the formula explicitly:

\Delta_t = \frac{4}{9} \Delta_o

2. Forgetting the Pairing Energy ( $P$ ) When Deciding Configuration

The Mistake:

Assuming that if $\Delta_o$ is large, electrons always pair up — without comparing $\Delta_o$ to the pairing energy ( $P$ ).

How to Avoid:

Use the rule:
- If $\Delta_o > P$ → low spin (electrons pair first)
- If $\Delta_o < P$ → high spin (electrons occupy all orbitals singly first)
Always write the comparison:

\text{If } \Delta_o > P \implies \text{low spin}

\text{If } \Delta_o < P \implies \text{high spin}

3. Misidentifying Which Orbitals Are Raised/Lowered

The Mistake:

Thinking that in an octahedral field, the $t_{2g}$ set is higher in energy than the $e_g$ set.

How to Avoid:

Memorise the energy ordering for octahedral:
- $e_g$ (higher energy) — $d_{x^2-y^2}$ and $d_{z^2}$
- $t_{2g}$ (lower energy) — $d_{xy}, d_{xz}, d_{yz}$
Draw the diagram every time you solve a problem.

4. Forgetting That $\Delta_o$ Depends on the Ligand

The Mistake:

Assuming $\Delta_o$ is constant for all ligands. Students often forget the spectrochemical series.

How to Avoid:

Memorise the spectrochemical series (strong to weak):

\text{CN}^- > \text{NO}_2^- > \text{en} > \text{NH}_3 > \text{H}_2\text{O} > \text{F}^- > \text{Cl}^- > \text{Br}^- > \text{I}^-

Strong field ligands → large $\Delta_o$ → low spin
Weak field ligands → small $\Delta_o$ → high spin

5. Confusing $\Delta_o$ with the Actual Electron Configuration

The Mistake:

Thinking that $\Delta_o$ alone determines the configuration — ignoring the number of d electrons and Hund’s rule.

How to Avoid:

For $d^4$ to $d^7$ configurations, both $\Delta_o$ and $P$ matter.
For $d^1, d^2, d^3, d^8, d^9, d^{10}$ , the spin state is fixed regardless of $\Delta_o$ .
Always count electrons first, then apply the $\Delta_o$ vs $P$ rule.

--- …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

←Previous question5.17 — What is spectrochemical series? Explain the difference between a weak …→Next question5.19 — [Cr(NH₃)₆]³⁺ is paramagnetic while [Ni(CN)₄]²⁻ is diamagnetic. Explain…

Q.What is crystal field splitting energy? How does the magnitude of Δo\Delta_oΔo​ decide the actual configuration of d orbitals in a coordination entity?

The Core Idea: Why d-Orbitals Split

The Decisive Battle: Δo\Delta_oΔo​ vs. Pairing Energy PPP

Step-by-Step: How the Configuration Emerges

1. The d4d^4d4 Case

2. The d5d^5d5 to d7d^7d7 Cases — Same Logic

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Q.What is crystal field splitting energy? How does the magnitude of $\Delta_o$ decide the actual configuration of d orbitals in a coordination entity?

The Decisive Battle: $\Delta_o$ vs. Pairing Energy $P$

1. The $d^4$ Case

2. The $d^5$ to $d^7$ Cases — Same Logic

Unlock everything free for 14 days