Q.Let and consider the relation . Then is
(A) reflexive but not symmetric
(B) reflexive but not transitive
(C) symmetric and transitive
(D) neither symmetric, nor transitive
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →The relation contains all three reflexive pairs, so it is reflexive. It is not symmetric because is present but is missing. It is transitive because whenever and are in , the pair is also present. Hence is reflexive but not symmetric — option (A).
We need to check three properties: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. The set is , and is given explicitly. Let’s go through each property one by one.
-
Reflexivity — A relation on is reflexive if every element of is related to itself. That means , , and must all be in .
Looking at , we see all three are present: , , . So is reflexive.
-
Symmetry — A relation is symmetric if whenever is in , then must also be in .
Check the non-diagonal pairs:
- is in , but is not in . That single violation is enough to break symmetry. So is not symmetric.
Watch outA common mistake is to check only a few pairs and miss the missing reverse. Here, is present but is absent — that’s a clear counterexample. No need to check further.
-
Transitivity — A relation is transitive if whenever and are in , then must also be in .
List all pairs that could serve as the “middle” step:
- and are both in . Their “composite” is , which is indeed in .
- and give — present.
- and give — present.
- and give — present.
- and give — present. …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.