For a system of 3 linear equations in 3 unknowns ai1x1+ai2x2+ai3x3=bi (i=1,2,3) whose coefficient determinant Δ=a11a21a31a12a22a32a13a23a33 is non-zero, Cramer's rule gives each unknown directly as a ratio of two determinants:
x1=ΔΔ1,x2=ΔΔ2,x3=ΔΔ3,
where Δk is Δ with its kth column replaced by the constants column (b1,b2,b3)T, everything else unchanged. (The same pattern extends to 2 equations in 2 unknowns: Δ=a11a21a12a22, x=Δ1/Δ, y=Δ2/Δ.)
Why it works. Multiplying Δ by x1 and using the linearity-in-a-column property of determinants (splitting the first column ai1x1 into the sum ai1x1+ai2x2+ai3x3 using the original equations, then subtracting off the x2,x3 multiples of the identical columns 2 and 3, which vanish) collapses the first column to exactly the constants bi -- giving x1Δ=Δ1, and dividing by Δ=0 gives the rule.
Worked illustration. For x+y=3,2x−y=0: Δ=121−1=−3, Δ1=301−1=−3, Δ2=1230=−6. So x=Δ1/Δ=1, y=Δ2/Δ=2 -- check: 1+2=3 and 2(1)−2=0, correct.
Word problems that produce equations like y=ax2+bx+c through three given points, or rate/mixture/scoring problems, translate to a 3×3 system in the unknown constants exactly as for matrix inversion, then Cramer's rule reads off each unknown independently -- convenient when only one or two of the unknowns are actually needed. A system with fractional unknowns like xa+by=c is first turned linear by the substitution u=x1 (or y1, z1), solved for u,v,(w) by Cramer's rule, and only inverted back to x,y,(z) at the very last step. …
(a) The coefficient determinant 311\1−32\7−14=0, so Cramer's rule (which needs Δeq0) cannot be applied; consistency must instead be checked by the rank method. (b) Since f′(x)=24x3(x−1)(x+1) vanishes at x=0,±1 and f′′(±1)=48>0, both x=−1 and x=1 are points of local minimum, each with minimum va …
(a) computes the 3x3 coefficient determinant of the given system and shows it is zero, which is exactly why Cramer's rule fails; (b) uses the first- and second-derivative tests on f(x)=4x6−6x4 to prove local minima at x=±1.
(a) Why Cramer's rule fails
System: 3x+y+z=2, x−3y+2z=1, 7x−y+4z=5, with coefficient matrix A=3171−3−1124.
Cramer's rule requires Δ=detA=0 so that x=Δ1/Δ,y=Δ2/Δ,z=Δ3/Δ are defined.
Expand Δ along row 1: Δ=3[(−3)(4)−(2)(−1)]−1[(1)(4)−(2)(7)]+1[(1)(−1)−(−3)(7)].
Since Δ=0, the formulas x=Δ1/Δ etc. involve division by zero, so Cramer's rule is not applicable; the system's consistency and solution set must instead be found by the rank (matrix) method.
(b) Local minima of f(x) = 4x^6 - 6x^4 at x = -1 and x = 1
f(x)=4x6−6x4, so f′(x)=24x5−24x3=24x3(x2−1)=24x3(x−1)(x+1).