Explain the Maxwell's modification of Ampere's circuital law.

III. Long Answer Questions · Q4

Q. Explain the Maxwell's modification of Ampere's circuital law.

Puducherry TnboardTextbookSubjectiveImportance★★★★★

29% · 15/52 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Displacement Current

Displacement Current

The Problem Maxwell Spotted

Ampere's circuital law, in its original form, links the magnetic field around a closed loop to the conduction current (moving charges) threading that loop:

\oint \vec{B} \cdot d\vec{l} = \mu_0 I_c

Maxwell realised this law is incomplete. The classic illustration is a charging capacitor. Consider an Amperian loop encircling the wire that feeds one plate.

If you cap that loop with a flat surface cut by the wire, a real conduction current $I_c$ passes through it.
If you instead cap the SAME loop with a bulging surface that passes between the two capacitor plates, no charge crosses the gap — the space between the plates is an insulator. So $I_c = 0$ through this surface.

Ampere's law now gives two different answers for $\oint \vec{B}\cdot d\vec{l}$ for the same loop, depending on which surface you choose. That is a contradiction — the law cannot be right as it stands.

Maxwell's Fix: A Current Made of Changing Field

Between the plates there is no moving charge, but there is a growing electric field, because charge is piling up on the plates. Maxwell proposed that a changing electric flux acts like a current for the purpose of producing a magnetic field. He called it the displacement current, $I_d$ .

I_d = \varepsilon_0 \frac{d\Phi_E}{dt}

where $\Phi_E = \int \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{A}$ is the electric flux through the surface, and $\varepsilon_0 = 8.85\times10^{-12}\ \text{C}^2\,\text{N}^{-1}\text{m}^{-2}$ is the permittivity of free space.

Check with the capacitor. For a parallel-plate capacitor of area $A$ and plate charge $q$ , the field between the plates is $E = \dfrac{q}{\varepsilon_0 A}$ , so the flux is $\Phi_E = EA = \dfrac{q}{\varepsilon_0}$ . Then

I_d = \varepsilon_0 \frac{d\Phi_E}{dt} = \varepsilon_0 \cdot \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\frac{dq}{dt} = \frac{dq}{dt} = I_c

So the displacement current in the gap is exactly equal to the conduction current in the wire. The two surfaces now give the same answer — the contradiction is gone.

The Complete (Ampere–Maxwell) Law

Maxwell rewrote Ampere's law so that the total current is conduction plus displacement current:

\oint \vec{B} \cdot d\vec{l} = \mu_0\left(I_c + I_d\right) = \mu_0 I_c + \mu_0\varepsilon_0 \frac{d\Phi_E}{dt}

Important

The deep meaning: a changing electric field produces a magnetic field, just as (by Faraday's law) a changing magnetic field produces an electric field. This symmetry is what makes self-sustaining electromagnetic waves possible — the changing E-field of the wave generates the B-field and vice versa.

Key Points to Remember …

Why this formula?

Displacement Current: Why the Formula Holds

The displacement current is one of the most elegant corrections in physics — it fixed a logical flaw in Maxwell's equations and predicted electromagnetic waves. Let's understand why its formula emerges.

1. The Problem That Demanded a Fix

Consider a capacitor being charged in a circuit. Ampère's law (in its original form) states:

\oint \vec{B} \cdot d\vec{l} = \mu_0 I_{\text{enc}}

where $I_{\text{enc}}$ is the current passing through any surface bounded by the loop.

Now take two different surfaces bounded by the same loop:

Surface S₁: Cuts the wire — current $I$ passes through.
Surface S₂: Passes between the capacitor plates — no current passes through.

Surface	Current through it
S₁ (cuts wire)	$I$
S₂ (between plates)	$0$

This is a contradiction: the same loop gives two different values for $\oint \vec{B} \cdot d\vec{l}$ . Ampère's law is inconsistent for time-varying fields.

2. The Insight: Changing Electric Field

Between the capacitor plates, there is no conduction current, but there is a changing electric field as charge builds up.

The electric field between plates: $E = \frac{\sigma}{\varepsilon_0} = \frac{Q}{\varepsilon_0 A}$
As $Q$ changes, $E$ changes: $\frac{dE}{dt} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0 A} \frac{dQ}{dt}$

Maxwell realized: a changing electric field should produce a magnetic field, just like a current does.

3. Deriving the Displacement Current Formula

Step 1: Relate charge to electric flux

The electric flux through the capacitor plates is:

\Phi_E = \int \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{A} = E \cdot A = \frac{Q}{\varepsilon_0}

Step 2: Differentiate with respect to time

\frac{d\Phi_E}{dt} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0} \frac{dQ}{dt} = \frac{I}{\varepsilon_0}

Step 3: Define displacement current

Maxwell defined the displacement current $I_d$ as:

I_d = \varepsilon_0 \frac{d\Phi_E}{dt}

From Step 2, this equals $I$ — the same conduction current in the wire. The displacement current "bridges" the gap.

4. The Corrected Ampère-Maxwell Law

The full law becomes:

\oint \vec{B} \cdot d\vec{l} = \mu_0 (I_{\text{enc}} + I_d)

Or equivalently:

\oint \vec{B} \cdot d\vec{l} = \mu_0 I_{\text{enc}} + \mu_0 \varepsilon_0 \frac{d\Phi_E}{dt}

Why this works:

For surface S₁: $I_{\text{enc}} = I$ , $\frac{d\Phi_E}{dt} = 0$ → result = $\mu_0 I$
For surface S₂: $I_{\text{enc}} = 0$ , $\frac{d\Phi_E}{dt} = \frac{I}{\varepsilon_0}$ → result = $\mu_0 \varepsilon_0 \cdot \frac{I}{\varepsilon_0} = \mu_0 I$

Both surfaces give the same answer. The contradiction is resolved.

5. The Key Formula(e) — Summarized

Quantity	Formula	Meaning
Displacement current	$I_d = \varepsilon_0 \frac{d\Phi_E}{dt}$	Equivalent "current" from changing E-field

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Step 1. For a charging parallel-plate capacitor, applying the original Ampere's circuital law $\oint\vec B\cdot d\vec l=\mu_0 i_{enclosed}$ to a fixed Amperian loop around the connecting wire gives different answers depending on which surface is chosen to bound the loop.

Step 2. Choosing a flat surface $S_1$ pierced by the wire gives enclosed current $i_C$ , so $\oint\vec B\cdot d\vec l=\mu_0 i_C$ (non-zero); choosing a balloon-shaped surface $S_2$ that instead bulges through the empty gap between the plates gives zero enclosed conduction current, so $\oint\vec B\cdot d\vec l=0$ .

Step 3. Since Ampere's law must give the same answer for a fixed loop no matter which surface is used, this is an inconsistency. Maxwell resolved it by noting the electric flux $\Phi_E=EA=q/\epsilon_0$ between the plates is changing with time as the capacitor charges, and its rate of change has the units of a current: he defined the displacement current $i_d=\epsilon_0\,d\Phi_E/dt=dq/dt$ . …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

←Previous question · 5.4Q3 — Discuss the Hertz experiment.→Next question · 5.4Q5 — Explain the importance of Maxwell's correction.

Q.Explain the Maxwell's modification of Ampere's circuital law.

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Unlock everything free for 14 days